terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2013 9 GiESCO 2013 – Session 5: Vineyard management, yield, quality 9 Grapevine yield variability: contribution of grape load and effects of the previous season’s growing conditions

Grapevine yield variability: contribution of grape load and effects of the previous season’s growing conditions

Abstract

The grapevine yield may be highly variable over years, even in the same plot with the same cultural practices. The determinism of yield formation of grapevine is complex as it takes place over two consecutive years, starting around flowering at year n-1 with the initiation and differentiation of the inflorescences of year n in the latent buds. Therefore forecasting grapevine yield is still a challenge for grape growers. In this study the following hypotheses, based on a review of literature, were tested: (i) the number of bunches per vine (NBv) is the yield component that accounts for the main part of yield variability, and (ii) the potential NBv of current year (year n) is determined by water and nitrogen stresses experienced by grapevine around the previous year (year n-1) flowering period. These hypotheses were tested on two grape varieties, shiraz and aranel, over three and six years, respectively, in Languedoc-Roussillon, south of France. For each variety different treatments were applied each year, i.e. chemical or mechanical weeding, grass cover, irrigation and/or fertilization. The considered yield components were NBv, number of berries per bunch and berry weight. They were measured once at harvest. Hypothesis (i) was tested by performing a multiple linear regression analysis for each variety. NBv accounted for around 58 % of yield variability for cv. shiraz and 20% for cv. aranel. Hypothesis (ii) was tested by looking for correlations between the number of bunches per shoot (NBs), the predawn leaf water potential (ψpredawn), and the leaves nitrogen content (LNC) around flowering. Our results show that NBs of year n is well and better correlated with ψpredawn and LNC of year n-1 than those of year n. This study shows that the potential yield of year n is settled around flowering of year n-1 through bud fertility (NBs). This potential could be assessed by measuring or estimating water and nitrogen stresses. This early information could be used to adapt pruning practices depending on the target yield of the next year.

Publication date: 07/09/2026

Issue: GiESCO 2013

Type: Poster

Authors

Nicolas Guilpart1,3, Aurélie Metay2,*, Christian Gary3

1 I.F.V, Rodilhan, Pôle Rhône-Méditerranée, Domaine de Donadille, 30230 RODILHAN, France

2 Montpellier SupAgro, UMR System, 2 place Pierre Viala, 34060 MONTPELLIER Cedex 2, France

3 INRA, UMR System, 2 place Pierre Viala, 34060 MONTPELLIER Cedex 2, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

grapevine, yield variability, yield formation, water stress, nitrogen stress, bud fertility

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2013 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Risk of late frost events in viticulture – temperature trends, phenological observations and spatial analysis based on digital terrain models in Franconia/Germany

In the course of global warming a general decrease of frost days per year and in spring can be stated. However, in viticulture this matter of fact doesn´t lead to a reduction of the risk of damages to grapevines by late spring frost events.

Impact of leaf to fruit ratio on grape composition in Merlot grapevines

Adjustments of viticultural practices are required to adapt to climate change. In particular, vineyard management that vary the fruit to leaf area ratio is an important option to maintain and enhance fruit quality.

Modelling water and sugar flux to developing berries suggests early cessation of sugar accumulation and substantial xylem backflow

A model of the developing berry was constructed with data from published studies as well as 13 varieties grown in Davis, CA (USA).

Estimating leaf area and leaf area index in VSP trained grapevines under different management systems (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling)

The aim of this study was to validate and implement different non-destructive methods of leaf area and leaf area index (LAI) determination in VSP trained grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling) in a field trial comparing different management systems (i.e. integrated (GAP) and two different organic (European Union Regulation 834/07) management systems).

Classification for timing of flowering and veraison of a wide range of Vitis vinifera cultivars with the “GFV” model

In viticulture, the timing of phenology is critical to optimize grape quality potential particularly so in cool climates. Flowering and veraison are key phenological stages for grapevines.