terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2013 9 GiESCO 2013 – Session 9: Territory management, sustainable viticulture 9 Grape composition changes during conversion to organic and biodynamic cultivation

Grape composition changes during conversion to organic and biodynamic cultivation

Abstract

This study deals with the changes observed in the first year of conversion to organic and biodynamic cultivation in a vineyard growing Rhine Riesling and Pinot blanc grafted onto SO4 and trained using the simple pergola system in a hilly area in Trentino (Italy). Three farming methods were compared: conventional (CONV; chemical weeding under the rows, grass mowing between rows, mechanical topping and air-operated leaf removal, cluster thinning with gibberellic acid), organic (ORG; soil working under the rows, grass mowing between rows, rolling up the canopy along the furthest wire, air-operated leaf removal and hand fining) and biodynamic (BIOD; soil working under the rows, deep ripping between rows, side-shoot removal by hand, green manure in alternate rows, 2 soil treatments with horn manure 500, 3 leaf treatments with horn silicate 501).

The cluster weight, real fertility, yield/vine and Ravaz index were measured. Sugars, total acidity, pH, tartaric and malic acids, K and the assimilable nitrogen of grapes harvested from 10 parcels for each variety at ripeness were measured. In both varieties, BIOD farming showed a higher cluster weight, yield/vine and Ravaz index, while the differences between ORG and CONV were significant in terms of cluster compactness in both varieties and cluster weight and botrytis attack only in the case of Riesling. As regards grape composition, technologically speaking the main differences observed were in pH – slightly lower in the ORG and BIOD plots – and above all in yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN), while no statistically significant differences were found for °Brix. ORG and BIOD grapes had half the YAN content of the CONV grapes.

Publication date: 07/09/2026

Issue: GiESCO 2013

Type: Poster

Authors

Enzo Mescalchin1,*, Roberto Zanzotti1, Matteo Secchi1, Daniela Bertoldi1, Roberto Larcher1, Mario Malacarne1, Tomás Román1, Giorgio Nicolini1

1 Centro Trasferimento Tecnologico, Fondazione E. Mach,v. E. Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all’Adige (TN), Italia

Contact the author*

Keywords

organic, biodynamic, vineyard management, grape composition, yeast assimilable nitrogen

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2013 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Risk of late frost events in viticulture – temperature trends, phenological observations and spatial analysis based on digital terrain models in Franconia/Germany

In the course of global warming a general decrease of frost days per year and in spring can be stated. However, in viticulture this matter of fact doesn´t lead to a reduction of the risk of damages to grapevines by late spring frost events.

Impact of leaf to fruit ratio on grape composition in Merlot grapevines

Adjustments of viticultural practices are required to adapt to climate change. In particular, vineyard management that vary the fruit to leaf area ratio is an important option to maintain and enhance fruit quality.

Modelling water and sugar flux to developing berries suggests early cessation of sugar accumulation and substantial xylem backflow

A model of the developing berry was constructed with data from published studies as well as 13 varieties grown in Davis, CA (USA).

Estimating leaf area and leaf area index in VSP trained grapevines under different management systems (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling)

The aim of this study was to validate and implement different non-destructive methods of leaf area and leaf area index (LAI) determination in VSP trained grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling) in a field trial comparing different management systems (i.e. integrated (GAP) and two different organic (European Union Regulation 834/07) management systems).

Classification for timing of flowering and veraison of a wide range of Vitis vinifera cultivars with the “GFV” model

In viticulture, the timing of phenology is critical to optimize grape quality potential particularly so in cool climates. Flowering and veraison are key phenological stages for grapevines.