Cabernet-Sauvignon grown on ten rootstocks and two different soils: edaphology, vine nutrition and fruit quality
Abstract
A total of 704 Cabernet Sauvignon (CS8) vines were grafted on 10 different rootstocks and compared to an own-rooted control as part of a new vineyard planting on the terraces above the Estrella River in the Paso Robles AVA. The planting was done on two different sites, each underlain by a different soil type, within the same vineyard block. We hypothesized that rootstock and soil type would independently influence vine growth, nutrient levels, fruit yield, and fruit quality. Soil type 1, an Inceptisol, was a sandy soil with reduced water holding capacity due to coarse texture and high gravel content. Soil type 2 was an Alfisol with a sandy loam surface texture over a heavier clay loam subsurface, with higher water and nutrient holding capacities. Three years after planting, the vines exhibited marked differences in growth rate and canopy development, as measured in two consecutive seasons. Tissue analyses performed in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 showed differences among rootstocks for all nutrients studied, which included N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn. In most cases, the rootstock rank order was similar for vines grown on both soil types, but there were some exceptions to this trend. Juice from the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons was analyzed for degrees Brix, pH, total acidity (TA), α-amino nitrogen, ammonia, yeast available nitrogen (YAN), malic acid, and potassium. Juice degrees Brix, TA, and malic acid content varied by both rootstock and soil type. Results of these analyses indicated differences in juice properties between vines grown on the two contrasting soil types. Notably, pairwise analyses revealed that grapes grown on the Inceptisol had significantly higher degrees Brix, higher TA, lower pH, and higher malic acid content than their counterparts grown on the Alfisol. Taken together, these results demonstrate that vine growth and fruit characteristics are influenced by both rootstock and soil type.
Issue: GiESCO 2013
Type: Poster
Authors
1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, 595 Hilgard Way, Davis, CA 95616 USA
2 J. Lohr Vineyards and Wines, 6169 Airport Road, Paso Robles, CA 93446
3 Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, UC Davis, 1, Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616