IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Applications of FTIR microspectroscopy in oenology: shedding light on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall composition and autolytic capacity

Applications of FTIR microspectroscopy in oenology: shedding light on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall composition and autolytic capacity

Abstract

Many microbial starters for the alcoholic and malolactic fermentation processes are commercially available, indicated for diverse wine styles and quality goals. The screening protocols cover a wide range of oenologically relevant features, although some characteristics could also be studied using underexplored powerful techniques. In this study, we applied Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy [1,2] to compare the cell wall biochemical composition and monitor the autolytic process in several wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. After cell death, autolysis trigger the release of mannoproteins and β-glucans, major components of yeast cell walls, influencing color, aroma, body, foaming properties, and stability of wine. Moreover, they can stimulate the metabolism of malolactic bacteria, while some fatty acids, also released during autolysis, act as inhibitors. Analysis of the cell wall structure was carried out both on cells grown in liquid medium and on cell walls previously separated from the other components. The autolytic capacity was assayed by sampling the cells at different times during induced autolysis in clarified and pasteurized must. From five to ten infrared spectra were acquired on each sample in the 4,000-700 cm-1 range in Attenuated Total Reflection on a 50×50 μm2 area. Spectra were analyzed after pretreatment through Hierarchical Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis. Preliminary results were evaluated in relation to conventional spectrophotometric methods to quantify mannoproteins and β-glucans. The thickness of the cell walls was determined by means of scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). From the point of view of cell wall composition two groups of yeasts were distinguished by multivariate statistical analysis on the FTIR spectra since the strains EC1118, MY11 and PEDRO2000E showed higher absorption bands of mannoproteins and β-glucans. With conventional methods, the cell walls of the first two strains, alongside K1 and MY8, displayed a higher content of parietal polysaccharides, while the latter had the thickest wall among all the tested yeasts. The strains BM45 and D47 have a thinner surface structure. Regarding the autolytic process, again two different clusters were found distinguishing the behavior of the strains EC1118 and FRB with a similar timing of autolysis on one side from CH and Q20 on the other side. Furthermore, the latter strain presented a higher absorption in the spectral zone related to lipids, which can be correlated with a greater release of fatty acids in the medium. In conclusion, FTIR microspectroscopy proved to be an accurate and informative technique, suitable to highlight profound differences among S. cerevisiae strains as concerns both the content of parietal polysaccharides and the evolution of autolysis. Thus, this technique may become an option for the selection of starter cultures with properties fo great interest for the wine sector.

References

[1] Burattini, E., Cavagna, M., Dell’Anna, R., Malvezzi Campeggi, F., Monti, F., Rossi, F., & Torriani, S. (2008). A FTIR microspectroscopy study of autolysis in cells of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 47(2), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2008.04.007.
[2] Cavagna, M., Dell’Anna, R., Monti, F., Rossi, F., & Torriani, S. (2010). Use of ATR-FTIR microspectroscopy to monitor autolysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in a base wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902369s.

DOI:

Publication date: June 27, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Martelli Francesco1, Binati Renato Leal1, Monti Francesca2, Felis Giovanna1 and Torriani Sandra1

1Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona 
2Department of Computer Science, University of Verona

Contact the author

Keywords

FTIR microspectroscopy; starter cultures; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; autolysis; wine quality

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Spatiotemporal patterns of chemical attributes in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon vineyards in Central California

Spatial variability of vine productivity in winegrapes is important to characterise as both yield and quality are relevant for the production of different wine styles and products. The objectives were to understand how patterns of variability of Cabernet Sauvignon fruit composition changed over time and space, how these patterns could be characterised with indirect measurements, and how spatial patterns of the variation in fruit compositional attributes can aid in improving management. Prior to the 2017 vintage, 125 data vines were distributed across each of four vineyards in the Lodi American Viticultural Area (AVA) of California. Each data vine was sampled at commercial harvest in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Yield components and fruit composition were measured at harvest for each data vine, and maps of yield and fruit composition were produced for eight ‘objective measures of fruit quality’: total anthocyanins, polymeric tannins, quercetin glycosides, malic acid, yeast assimilable nitrogen, β-damascenone, C6 alcohols and aldehydes, and 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine. Patterns of variation in anthocyanins and phenolic compounds were found to be most stable over time. Given this relative stability, management decisions focused on fruit quality could be based on zonal descriptions of anthocyanins or phenolics to increase profitability in some vineyards. In each vineyard, dormant season pruning weights and soil cores were collected at each location, elevation and soil apparent electrical conductivity surveys were completed, and remotely sensed imagery was captured by fixed wing aircraft and two satellite platforms at major phenological stages. The data collected were used to develop relationships among biophysical data, soil, imagery, and fruit composition. The standardised and aggregated samples from four vineyards over three seasons were included in the estimation of ‘common variograms’ to assess how this technique could aid growers in producing geostatistically rigorous maps of fruit composition variability without cumbersome, single season sampling efforts.

Effects of graft quality on growth and grapevine-water relations

Climate change is challenging viticulture worldwide compromising its sustainability due to warmer temperatures and the increased frequency of extreme events. Grafting Vitis vinifera L.

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Protected Designation of Origin (D.P.O.) Valdepeñas: classification and map of soils

The objective of the work described here is the elaboration of a map of the different types of vineyard soils that to guide the famers in the choice of the most productive vine rootstocks and varieties. 90 vineyard soils profiles were analysed in the entire territory of the Origen Denominations of Valdepeñas. The sampling was carried out in 2018 (June to October) by making a sampling grid, followed by photointerpretation and control in the field. The studied soils can be grouped into 9 different soil types (according to FAO 2006 classification): Leptosols, Regosols, Fluvisols, Gleysols, Cambisols, Calcisols, Luvisols and Anthrosols. A map showing the soil distribution with different type of soils has been made with the ArcGIS program. Regarding to the choice of rootstock, Calcisoles are soils with a high active limestone content, so the rootstocks used in these soils must be resistant to this parameter; Luvisols are deep soils with high clay content, so they will support vigorous rootstocks. Because the cartographic units are composed of two or more subgroups, with are associated in variable proportions, 9 different soil associations have been established; Unit 1: Leptosols, Cambisols and Luvisols (80%, 15% and 5% respectively); Unit 2: Cambisols with Regosols and Luvisols (40%, 30% and 30% respectively); Unit 3: Cambisols and Gleysols with Regosols (40%, 40% and 20% respectively); Unit 4: Regosols with Cambisols, Leptosols and Calcisols (40%, 30%, 15% and 15% respectively); Unit 5: Cambisols, Leptosols, Calcisols and Regosols (25% each of them); Unit 6: Luvisols with Cambisol and Calcisols (80%, 10% and 10% respectively); Unit 7: Luvisols and Calcisols with Cambisols (40%, 40% and 20% respectively); Unit 8: Calcisols with, Cambisols and Luvisols (80%, 10% and 10% respectively); Unit 9: Anthrosols. These study allow to elaborate the first map of vineyard soils of this Protected Designation of Origin in Castilla-La Mancha.