Terroir 2010 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Terroir Conferences 9 Terroir 2010 9 Geology and Soil: effects on wine quality (T2010) 9 On-the-go resistivity sensors employment to support soil survey for precision viticulture

On-the-go resistivity sensors employment to support soil survey for precision viticulture

Abstract

There is an increasing need in agriculture to adopt site-specific management (precision farming) because of economic and environmental pressures. Geophysical on-the-go sensors, such as the ARP (Automatic Resistivity Profiling) system, can effectively support soil survey by optimizing sampling density according to the spatial variability of apparent electrical resistivity (ER).
The aim of this work was to test the sensitivity of the ARP methodology in supporting soil survey for precision viticulture. In particular, an optimization procedure for coupled geoelectrical and soil surveys is illustrated.
The research was carried out in a vineyard located in Tuscany (central Italy) affected by low yield due to soil salinity; the investigation was simultaneously conducted by soil survey and resistivity measurements. The ARP method consists in the electric current injection into the ground and in the continuous measure of the resulting potential, simultaneously providing three georeferenced values of ER related to 50, 100 and 170 cm depths for each point.
Forty-nine soil samples were taken at 10-30 cm depth and analyzed for moisture, particle size distribution and electrical conductivity. The best correlation (R2 = 0.609; P <0.01) was obtained between clay content and ER referred to the 0-50 cm depth (ER50).
The evaluation of the density reduction effect for both ARP and soil survey was expressed in terms of ER50 and clay predictability. Doubling the ARP swaths width (12 m) the ER50 accuracy was substantially in agreement with that obtained for the highest ARP survey density (22 swaths 6 m spaced); the further width doubling (24 m) provided a moderate accuracy. With regard to clay content prediction k accuracy values ranged between 0.87 and 0.49 for the 22 swaths/25 soil samples and 10 swaths/12 soil samples combination, respectively.

DOI:

Publication date: December 3, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2010

Type: Article

Authors

M.C. Andrenelli, E.A.C. Costantini, S. Pellegrini, R. Perria, and N. Vignozzi

CRA-ABP- Centro per l’Agrobiologia e la Pedologia, Piazza M. D’Azeglio, 30 50121, Firenze, Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

ARP, ER, accuracy, precision viticulture, GIS, clay

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2010

Citation

Related articles…

Valorization of grape marc in a biorefinery loop for producing short- and medium-chain fatty acids, hydrogen, and methane, with polyphenol recovery

Global grape production amounts to approximately 70 million tons per year, with Europe contributing 61% of the world’s wine output, primarily from Italy, France, and Spain.

Outside and inside grapevine roots: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in a ‘nebbiolo’ vineyard 

In field conditions, grapevine roots are colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Little is known about the species composition of AMF communities associated to grapevine.

Do natural wines differ from conventionally-produced wines?

In recent years, consumer awareness for consuming healthy and environmental sustainability products has considerably increased [1]. In an ever-changing and highly competitive environment such as the wine sector, production of wines without sulfites, or biodynamic, organic or vegan wines, has experienced an important increase to meet the new needs of consumers [2,3]. Beyond these categories of regulated products, a new concept has emerged: natural wines (NW), for which there is not an established definition or legal regulation. Rather, producers have a personal idea of naturalness under the premise of applying minimal intervention from grape to wine production [4]. In this context, it is hypothesized that self-defined natural wines are different from conventional wines (CW) in their sensory and chemical profile. The predicament of natural wine is based on anecdotic declarations and assumes that minimal intervention guarantees the production of wines with organoleptic properties able to express the “terroir” and thus promote wine diversity, plurality and sensory typicity against the risk of standardization of CW.

Preliminary characterisation of mannoproteins from different wine yeast strains and impact on wine properties

Mannoproteins (MPs) are released from the yeast cell wall during alcoholic fermentation and aging on the lees, and influence aspects of wine quality such as haze formation and colour stability. Yet, as this is a slow process with microbiological and sensory risks, the exogenous addition of extracted MPs poses an efficient alternative. While Saccharomyces cerevisiae has long been studied as a prominent source for MPs extraction, their structure and composition greatly differ between yeast species. This may influence their behaviour in the wine matrix and subsequent impact on wine properties. However, although wine yeast species other than S. cerevisiae possibly present an untapped source of MPs, they are still ill-characterised in terms of chemical composition and influence on wine.

Use of artificial intelligence for the prediction of microbial diseases of grapevine and optimisation of fungicide application

Plasmopara viticola, the causal agent of downy mildew (DM), and Uncinula necator, the causal agent of powdery mildew (PM), are two of the main phytopathogenic microorganisms causing major economic losses in the primary sector, especially in the wine sector, by wilting bunches and leaves with a consequent decrease in the photosynthetic rate of the plant and in the annual yield. Currently, the most widespread methods for planning spraying are based on the 3-10 rule, which states that the first application should take place when: (i) the air temperature is greater than 10°C; (ii) shoots are equal or greater than 10 cm; and (iii) a minimum of 10 mm rainfall within 24–48 hours has occurred, or at the beginning of the bud break with periodic applications according to the manufacturer’s instructions.