Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Contribution of soil and atmospheric conditions to leaf water potential in grapevines

Contribution of soil and atmospheric conditions to leaf water potential in grapevines

Abstract

[English version below]

Etant lié au sol et aux conditions atmosphériques, le statut hydrique influence la physiologie de la vigne d’une part, mais joue aussi un role important en ce qui concerne la qualité du raisin et donc du vin d’autre part. Nous avons mesuré, dans la région de Stellenbosch, le statut hydrique sur des pieds de Sauvignon Blanc non irrigués, implantés sur 2 terroirs différents, l’un froid, l’autre plus chaud. D’après ces mesures, il semble que le potentiel hydrique foliaire (Ψl ) soit lié par une fonction logarithmique au potentiel hydrique du sol (Ψm). De plus, l’augmentation du stress hydrique du cep semble être plus lente lorsque Ψm descend en dessous de -0.3 MPa. Sous certaines conditions, le déficit en pression de vapeur ne semble pas influencer le Ψl (mesuré à l’aube), cependant lorsque les valeurs obtenues pour ce dernier sont combinées avec celles obtenues pour Ψm, alors 85% de la variabilité de Ψl mesuré à 14:00 peut être expliqué. A partir de ces résultats, nous pouvons donc conclure sur l’existence d’une fonction entre le statut hydrique de la vigne et les conditions atmosphériques ainsi qu’entre le statut hydrique et la teneur en eau du sol. Les résultats non linéaires du potentiel foliaire, caractérisés par des augmentations momentanées obtenus à différents moments de la journée peuvent être expliqués par une fermeture partielle des stomates. Les valeurs du flux de sève, observées pour des vignes cultivées sur les sols secs (Ψm = -0.75 MPa) du terroir plus froid, montrent de fortes diminutions pendant la journée, comparé à celles obtenues sur le terroir plus chaud où Ψm = -0.12 MPa. Ceci confirme bien que le statut hydrique de la vigne, situé sur le terroir plus froid, est régulé grâce à la fermeture partielle des stomates et ce, malgré le faible déficit en pression de vapeur enregistré sur cette même localité.
La linéarité de la relation entre Ψl et Ψm, sur vignes irriguées où Ψm était supérieur à -0.08 MPa, peut expliquer l’absence de contrôle stomatique significatif. Cependant, en mesurant Ψl toutes les 15 minutes, on peut observer la fermeture stomatique sur des vignes irriguées en climat semi-aride, où le déficit en pression de vapeur passe de 1.0 kPa à l’aube à 4.6 kPa dans l’après-midi, malgré une teneur en eau dans le sol proche de la capacité au champ (Ψm = ca -0.01 MPa). Le contrôle stomatique, une fois encore est à l’origine de la non- linéarité de la relation entre le déficit en pression de vapeur et Ψl. Ce dernier était, dans ces mêmes conditions, de –1.6 MPa. Ces résultats nous indiquent que là où la teneur en eau du sol n’est pas un facteur limitant, de difficiles conditions climatiques peuvent provoquer la fermeture des stomates, réduisant ainsi une chute trop sévère du potentiel hydrique foliaire. Le potentiel hydrique du sol, ainsi que le déficit en pression de vapeur, devraient donc permettre, par la suite, de quantifier l’effet du terroir sur le stress hydrique de la vigne.

Since grapevine water status, which is a function of soil and atmospheric conditions, affects grapevine physiology it will also play an important role in grape and wine quality. Water status in dry-land Sauvignon blanc was measured simultaneously both at a warm and a cool locality in the Stellenbosch region at different phenological stages during the growing season. Leaf water potential (Ψl) appeared to be a logarithmic function of soil matric potential (Ψm). Grapevine water stress tended to increase at a slower rate when Ψm dropped below ca -0.3 MPa. Under the given conditions, vapour pressure deficit (VPD) did not seem to have an effect on pre-dawn Ψl, but in combination with Ψm could explain 85% of the variation in Ψl measured at 14:00. These results indicated that grapevine water status was a function of atmospheric conditions as well as soil water content. The non-linear response of Ψl appeared to be the result of partial stomatal closure that increased Ψl at certain stages during the day. Sap flow rates in grapevines cultivated on the drier soil (i.e. Ψm = -0.75 MPa) showed pronounced reductions during the day at the cooler locality compared to those at the warmer one where Ψm was ca -0.12 MPa. This confirmed that grapevine water status was regulated via partial stomatal closure at the cooler locality, despite the lower VPD that was recorded at this particular locality.
In studies with irrigated grapevines, where Ψm was higher than -0.08 MPa, absence of significant stomatal control was probably the reason for the reported linear response between Ψl and Ψm. However, measuring Ψl at 15 minute intervals revealed that stomatal closure occurred in irrigated grapevines under semi-arid conditions where VPD increased from 1.0 kPa pre-dawn to 4.6 kPa in the afternoon despite soil water content being near field capacity (i.e. Ψm = ca -0.01 MPa). Due to stomatal control, the relationship between Ψl and VPD was also non-linear. Under these specific conditions, minimum Ψl was ca -1.6 MPa. These results showed that even where soil water content was not a limiting factor, harsh meteorological conditions were able to cause partial stomatal closure, thus preventing the evolution of extremely low Ψl values in grapevines. From the foregoing, it is suggested that Ψm as well as VPD should be considered for the quantification of terroir effects on grapevine water stress.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

P.A. Myburgh and M. Laker

ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine, leaf water potential, soil water, vapour pressure deficit, locality

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Phenolic composition of Tempranillo Blanco grapes changes after foliar application of urea

Our research aimed to determine the effect and efficiency of foliar application of urea on the phenolic composition of Tempranillo Blanco grapes. The field experiment was carried out in 2019 and 2020 seasons and the plot was located in D.O.Ca Rioja (North of Spain). The vineyard was Vitis vinifera L. Tempranillo Blanco and grafted on Richter-110 rootstock. The treatments were control (C), whose plants were sprayed with water and three doses of urea: plants were sprayed with urea 3 kg N/ha (U3), 6 kg N/ha (U6) and 9 kg N/ha (U9). The applications were performed in two phenological stages, pre-veraison (Pre) and veraison (Ver). Also, each of the treatments was repeated one week later. Control and treatments were performed in triplicate and arranged in a randomised block design. Grapes were harvested at optimum ripening stage. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to analyse the phenolic composition of the grapes. Finally, the results obtained from the analytical determinations – flavonols, flavanols and non-flavonoid (hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids and stilbenes) – were studied statistically by analysis of variance. The results showed that, in 2019, U6-Pre and U9-Pre treatments increased the hydroxybenzoic acid content in grapes, and also all foliar treatments applied at Pre enhanced the stilbene concentration. Moreover, U3-Ver was the only treatment that rose flavonol and stilbene contents in the Tempranillo Blanco grapes. In 2020, all treatments applied at Pre enhanced the flavonol concentration in grapes. Furthermore, U3-Pre and U9-Pre treatments increased stilbene content in grapes. Nevertheless, the hydroxybenzoic acid content was improved by U6-Ver and U9-Ver and besides, hydroxycinnamic acid concentration in grapes was increased by all treatments applied at Ver. In conclusion, the lower and highest dose of urea (U3 and U9), applied at pre-veraison, were the best treatments to improve the Tempranillo Blanco grape phenolic composition.

Late frost protection in Champagne

Probably one of the most counterintuitive impacts of climate change on vine is the increased frequency of late frost. Champagne, due to its septentrional position is historically and regularly affected by this meteorological hazard. Champagne has therefore developed a strong experience in frost protection with first experiments dating from the end of 19th century. Frost protection can be divided in two parts: passive and active. Passive protection includes all the methods that do not seek to modify the vine’s environment or resistance at the time of frost. The most iconic passive protection in Champagne is the establishment of the individual reserve. This reserve allows to stock a certain quantity of clear wine during a surplus year to compensate a meteorological hazard like frost during the following years. Other common passive methods are the control of planting area (walls, bushes, topography), the choice of grape variety, late pruning, or the impact of grass cover and tillage. Active frost protection is also divided in two parts. Most of the existing techniques tend to modify vine’s environment. Most of the time they provide warmth (candles, heaters, windmills, heating cables…), or stabilise bud’s temperature above a lethal threshold (water sprinkling). The other way to actively fight is to enhance the resistance of buds to frost (elicitors). The Comité Champagne evaluates frost protection methods following three main axes: the efficiency, the profitability, and the environmental impact through a lifecycle assessment. This study will present the results on both passive and active protection following these three axes.

Impact on leaf morphology of Vitis vinifera L. cvs Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon under Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FACE)

Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has continuously increased since pre-industrial times from 280 ppm in 1750, and is predicted to exceed 700 ppm by the end of 21st century. For most of C3 plant species elevated CO2 (eCO2) improve photosynthetic apparatus results in an increased plant biomass production. To investigate the effects of eCO2 on morphological leaf characteristics the two Vitis vinifera L. cultivars, Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon, grown in the Geisenheim VineyardFACE (Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment) system were used. The FACE site is located at Geisenheim University (49° 59′ N, 7° 57′ E, 94 m above sea level), Germany and was implemented in 2014 comparing future atmospheric CO2-concentrations (eCO2, predicted for the mid-21st century) with current ambient CO2-conditions (aCO2). Experiments were conducted under rain-fed conditions for two consecutive years (2015 and 2016). Six leaves per repetition of the CO2 treatment were sampled in the field and immediately fixed in a FAA solution (ethanol, H2O, formaldehyde and glacial acetic acid). After 24 h leaf samples were transferred and stored in an ethanol solution. Subsequently, leaf tissue was dehydrated using ethanol series and embedded in paraffin. By using a rotary microtomesections of 5 µm were prepared and fixed on microscopic slides. Subsequent the samples were stained using consecutive staining and washing solutions. Afterwards pictures of the leaf cross-sections were taken using a light microscope and consecutive measurements were conducted with an open source image software. Differences found in leaf cross-sections of the two CO2 treatments were detected for the palisade parenchyma. Leaf thickness, upper and lower epidermis and spongy parenchyma remained less affected under eCO2 conditions. The observed results within grapevine leaf tissues can provide first insights to seasonal adaptation strategies of grapevines under future elevated CO2 concentrations.

VineyardFACE: Investigation of a moderate (+20%) increase of ambient CO2 level on berry ripening dynamics and fruit composition

Climate change and rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is a concern for agriculture, including viticulture. Studies on elevated carbon dioxide have already been on grapevines, mainly taking place in greenhouses using potted plants or using field grown vines under higher CO2 enrichment, i.e. >650 ppm. The VineyardFACE, located at Hochschule Geisenheim University, is an open field Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experimental set-up designed to study the effects of elevated carbon dioxide using field grown vines (Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon). As the carbon dioxide fumigation started in 2014, the long term effects of elevated carbon dioxide treatment can be investigated on berry ripening parameters and fruit metabolic composition.
The present study aims to investigate the effect on fruit composition under a moderate increase (+20%; eCO2) of carbon dioxide concentration, as predicted for 2050 on both Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon. Berry composition was determined for primary (sugars, organic acids, amino acids) and secondary metabolites (anthocyanins). Special focus was given on monitoring of berry diameter and ripening rates throughout three growing seasons. Compared to previous results of the early adaptative phase of the vines [1], our results show little effect of eCO2 treatment on primary metabolites composition in berries. However, total anthocyanins concentration in berry skin was lower for eCO2 treatment in 2020, although the ratio between anthocyanins derivatives did not differ.
[1] Wohlfahrt Y., Tittmann S., Schmidt D., Rauhut D., Honermeier B., Stoll M. (2020) The effect of elevated CO2 on berry development and bunch structure of Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon. Applied Science Basel 10: 2486

Projected changes in vine phenology of two varieties with different thermal requirements cultivated in La Mancha DO (Spain) under climate change scenarios

The aim of this work was to analyze the phenology variability of Tempranillo and Chardonnay cultivars, related to the climatic characteristics in La Mancha Designation of Origin, and their potential changes under climate change scenarios. Phenological dates referred to budbreak, flowering, veraison and harvest were analyzed for the period 2000-2019. The weather conditions at daily time scale, recorded during the same period, were also evaluated. The thermal requirements to reach each of these phenological stages were calculated and expressed as the GDD accumulated from DOY=60. Changes in phenology were projected by 2050 and 2070 taking into account those values and the projected temperatures and precipitation, simulated under two Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios –RCP4.5 and RCP8.5– using an ensemble of models. The average phenological dates during the period under study were, April 16th ± 6.6 days and April 5th ± 6.0 days for budbreak, May 31st ± 6.0 days and May 27th ± 5.3 days for flowering, July 26th ± 5.6 days and July 25th ± 5.8 days for veraison, and Ago 23rd ± 10.8 days and Ago 17th ± 9.0 days for harvest, respectively, for Tempranillo and Chardonnay. The projected changes in temperature imply an average change in the maximum growing season (April-August) temperatures of 1.2 and 1.9°C by 2050, and 1.6 and 2.6°C by 2070, under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively. A reduction in precipitation is predicted, which vary between 15% for 2050 under RCP4.5 scenario and up to 30% by 2070 under RCP8.5. The advance of the phenological dates for 2050, could be of 6, 7, 7, and 8 days for Tempranillo and 4, 6, 6 and 9 days for Chardonnay, respectively for budbreak, flowering, veraison and harvest under the RCP4.5 scenario. Under the RCP8.5 emission scenario, the advance could be up to 30% higher.