Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Zoning like base instrument for the agronomist’s work in vineyard

Zoning like base instrument for the agronomist’s work in vineyard

Abstract

Ad una prima analisi l’interesse dimostrato dal settore produttivo nei confronti della zonazione vitivinicola è da ricondursi al fatto che dopo i primi approcci puramente accademici, la zonazione è diventata un fondamentale strumento operativo. Questo è avvenuto allorquando, in tali progetti è entrato a far parte del gruppo di lavoro, assumendo altresì un ruolo strategico, anche il fruitore del lavoro stesso e cioè il tecnico, colui che trasferisce in campo le informazioni prodotte e le applica nell’attività giornaliera.
Ecco quindi che il gruppo di lavoro già articolato e complesso per sua natura si è arricchito di una nuova figura che ha portato due grandi benefici.
Il primo luogo è stata introdotta nella filosofia del progetto una logica puramente operativa ed applicativa delle informazioni prodotte dal progetto cercando di tradurre la grande massa di informazioni prodotte in elementi utili e pratici, prontamente travasabili alla realtà produttiva. Secondariamente vi è stato un avvicinamento fra due mondi distanti. L’uno, il viticoltore per sua natura scettico nei confronti della ricerca viticola e delle innovazioni, l’altro, la ricerca scientifica che spesso rischia di perdere il legame con la base produttiva e le sue esigenze.
Agli inizi degli anni Novanta, l’Unità Operativa di Pedoclimatologia dell’Istituto Agrario di San Michele all’Adige (Tn) ha proposto, un modello innovativo che ha previsto in primis il coinvolgimento diretto e fattivo del destinatario della zonazione, rendendolo partecipe non solo in qualità di co-finanziatore dell’opera, ma investendolo di responsabilità tecnica e strategica prima, durante e dopo la realizzazione del progetto. I
Esempio di questa filosofia di lavoro è la zonazione delle Valli di Cembra e dell’Adige la cui pubblicazione successiva (Falcetti et al.1998) ha dato un chiaro segno di quelle che sono le potenzialità di un siffatto progetto; ha dimostrato come la conoscenza del territorio di produzione diventi uno strumento decisionale indispensabile per chi si trova nella necessità di gestire la vigna in modo razionale e finalizzato ad un preciso obiettivo enologico.
Dopo questo primo progetto che ha indicato una nuova strada metodologica da percorrere, numerosi sono stati in Italia i lavori improntati secondo tale modus operandi con il chiaro intento di fornire delle semplici indicazioni tecniche ai viticoltori ed ai tecnici operanti in una data area viticola (Fiorini et Failla, 1998; Colugnati et al, 1998, De Biasi et al, 1999).
Testimonianza della positività dei risultati ottenuti e della crescita di consapevolezza del settore verso tali progetti è il fatto che, se inizialmente furono gli Istituti di Ricerca a promuovere le zonazioni, ora sono le aziende che le commissionano.
Scopo del presente contributo è non aggiungere nulla di nuovo sulle metodiche scientifiche che stanno alla base della zonazione, ma presentare la testimonianza concreta di chi si trova ad affrontare in vigna una serie di scelte importanti e che dalla zonazione riceve supporto tecnico importante al processo decisionale operativo di campo.
Si proporranno alcuni casi di processo decisionale di campo supportato dai dati della zonazione adeguatamente trattati, gestiti e proposti attraverso lo strumento informatico specifico, noto come Sistema Informativo Territoriale o G.I.S. (Geographic Information System).

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

De Biasi C.*, Campostrini F.** and Bersan A.***

*Zonin spa, Gambellara (VI)
**Agronomo Libero Professionista, Rovereto (TN)
***Abitat, Sistemi Informativi Territoriali s.r.l. — Pojana Maggiore (VI)

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Towards adaptation to climate change in Rioja: Quality evaluation of wines obtained from Grenache x Tempranillo selections

The wine sector is of great relevance and tradition in Mediterranean countries, however, it may be most susceptible to climate change. In recent years, wine production is facing changes worldwide, both at environmental as well as commercial levels, due to global warming and the shift in consumers’ preferences. Wine growers and wine makers are in search of solutions that allow to face these new challenges. One of the most promising initiatives in the long term is the introduction of new plant materials, specifically intraspecific hybridizations between premium varieties that may improve traditional germplasm in its adaptation to climate change. These inter-varietal crosses have the potential to generate quality wines, whilst maintaining the regional typicity, and constitute an attractive alternative for the consumer due to their sensory attributes. In this study, we have evaluated wines from 29 intraspecific Garnacha x Tempranillo hybrids in two different locations, with the aim to assess their oenological potential and sensory attributes. Thirteen of the selections were white and 16 were red. Microvinifications were conducted with two or three replications depending on grape availability. Conventional oenological parameters were determined for all wines. The sensory evaluation and hedonic scores were given by five experts. Red selections obtained higher quality scores than white ones. Among the white selections with higher quality scores, GT-41 Varea and GT-159 Varea outstand, due to their high total acidity and high malic acid content. Regarding red selections, GT-57 Varea and GT-57 UR were perceived as higher in quality, highlighted for their moderate alcoholic and high anthocyanin content. Our results indicate that intraspecific hybridization may be a powerful tool for adapting traditional cultivars to climate change in Rioja.

‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (Vitis vinifera L.) berry skin flavonol and anthocyanin composition is affected by trellis systems and applied water amounts

Trellis systems are selected in wine grape vineyards to mainly maximize vineyard yield and maintain berry quality. This study was conducted in 2020 and 2021 to evaluate six commonly utilized trellis systems including a vertical shoot positioning (VSP), two relaxed VSPs (VSP60 and VSP80), a single high wire (SH), a high quadrilateral (HQ), and a guyot (GY), combined with three levels of irrigation regimes based on different crop evapotranspiration (ETc) replacements, including a 25% ETc, 50% ETc, and 100% ETc. The results indicated SH yielded the most fruits and accumulated the most total soluble solids (TSS) at harvest in 2020, however, it showed the lowest TSS in the second season. In 2020, SH and HQ showed higher concentrations in most of the anthocyanin derivatives compared to the VSPs. Similar comparisons were noticed in 2021 as well. SH and HQ also accumulated more flavonols in both years compared to other trellis systems. Overall, this study provides information on the efficacy of trellis systems on grapevine yield and berry flavonoid accumulation in a currently warming climate.

Impact on leaf morphology of Vitis vinifera L. cvs Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon under Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FACE)

Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has continuously increased since pre-industrial times from 280 ppm in 1750, and is predicted to exceed 700 ppm by the end of 21st century. For most of C3 plant species elevated CO2 (eCO2) improve photosynthetic apparatus results in an increased plant biomass production. To investigate the effects of eCO2 on morphological leaf characteristics the two Vitis vinifera L. cultivars, Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon, grown in the Geisenheim VineyardFACE (Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment) system were used. The FACE site is located at Geisenheim University (49° 59′ N, 7° 57′ E, 94 m above sea level), Germany and was implemented in 2014 comparing future atmospheric CO2-concentrations (eCO2, predicted for the mid-21st century) with current ambient CO2-conditions (aCO2). Experiments were conducted under rain-fed conditions for two consecutive years (2015 and 2016). Six leaves per repetition of the CO2 treatment were sampled in the field and immediately fixed in a FAA solution (ethanol, H2O, formaldehyde and glacial acetic acid). After 24 h leaf samples were transferred and stored in an ethanol solution. Subsequently, leaf tissue was dehydrated using ethanol series and embedded in paraffin. By using a rotary microtomesections of 5 µm were prepared and fixed on microscopic slides. Subsequent the samples were stained using consecutive staining and washing solutions. Afterwards pictures of the leaf cross-sections were taken using a light microscope and consecutive measurements were conducted with an open source image software. Differences found in leaf cross-sections of the two CO2 treatments were detected for the palisade parenchyma. Leaf thickness, upper and lower epidermis and spongy parenchyma remained less affected under eCO2 conditions. The observed results within grapevine leaf tissues can provide first insights to seasonal adaptation strategies of grapevines under future elevated CO2 concentrations.

Phenolic composition of Tempranillo Blanco grapes changes after foliar application of urea

Our research aimed to determine the effect and efficiency of foliar application of urea on the phenolic composition of Tempranillo Blanco grapes. The field experiment was carried out in 2019 and 2020 seasons and the plot was located in D.O.Ca Rioja (North of Spain). The vineyard was Vitis vinifera L. Tempranillo Blanco and grafted on Richter-110 rootstock. The treatments were control (C), whose plants were sprayed with water and three doses of urea: plants were sprayed with urea 3 kg N/ha (U3), 6 kg N/ha (U6) and 9 kg N/ha (U9). The applications were performed in two phenological stages, pre-veraison (Pre) and veraison (Ver). Also, each of the treatments was repeated one week later. Control and treatments were performed in triplicate and arranged in a randomised block design. Grapes were harvested at optimum ripening stage. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to analyse the phenolic composition of the grapes. Finally, the results obtained from the analytical determinations – flavonols, flavanols and non-flavonoid (hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids and stilbenes) – were studied statistically by analysis of variance. The results showed that, in 2019, U6-Pre and U9-Pre treatments increased the hydroxybenzoic acid content in grapes, and also all foliar treatments applied at Pre enhanced the stilbene concentration. Moreover, U3-Ver was the only treatment that rose flavonol and stilbene contents in the Tempranillo Blanco grapes. In 2020, all treatments applied at Pre enhanced the flavonol concentration in grapes. Furthermore, U3-Pre and U9-Pre treatments increased stilbene content in grapes. Nevertheless, the hydroxybenzoic acid content was improved by U6-Ver and U9-Ver and besides, hydroxycinnamic acid concentration in grapes was increased by all treatments applied at Ver. In conclusion, the lower and highest dose of urea (U3 and U9), applied at pre-veraison, were the best treatments to improve the Tempranillo Blanco grape phenolic composition.

A blueprint for managing vine physiological balance at different spatial and temporal scales in Champagne

In Champagne, the vine adaptation to different climatic and technical changes during these last 20 years can be seen through physiological balance disruptions. These disruptions emphasize the general grapevine decline. Since the 2000s, among other nitrogen stress indicators, the must nitrogen has been decreasing. The combination of restricted mineral fertilizers and herbicide use, the growing variability of spring rainfall, the increasing thermal stress as well as the soil type heterogeneity are only a few underlying factors that trigger loss of physiological balance in the vineyards. It is important to weigh and quantify the impact of these factors on the vine. In order to do so, the Comité Champagne uses two key-tools: networking and modelization. The use of quantitative and harmonized ecophysiological indicators is necessary, especially in large spatial scales such as the Champagne appellation. A working group with different professional structures of Champagne has been launched by the Comité Champagne in order to create a common ecophysiology protocol and thus monitor the vine physiology, yearly, around 100 plots, with various cultural practices and types of soil. The use of crop modelling to follow the vine physiological balance within different pedoclimatic conditions enables to understand the present balance but also predict the possible disruptions to come in future climatic scenarios. The physiological references created each year through the working group, benefit the calibration of the STICS model used in Champagne. In return, the model delivers ecophysiology indicators, on a daily scale and can be used on very different types of soils. This study will present the bottom-up method used to give accurate information on the impacts of soil, climate and cultural practices on vine physiology.