Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Zoning like base instrument for the agronomist’s work in vineyard

Zoning like base instrument for the agronomist’s work in vineyard

Abstract

Ad una prima analisi l’interesse dimostrato dal settore produttivo nei confronti della zonazione vitivinicola è da ricondursi al fatto che dopo i primi approcci puramente accademici, la zonazione è diventata un fondamentale strumento operativo. Questo è avvenuto allorquando, in tali progetti è entrato a far parte del gruppo di lavoro, assumendo altresì un ruolo strategico, anche il fruitore del lavoro stesso e cioè il tecnico, colui che trasferisce in campo le informazioni prodotte e le applica nell’attività giornaliera.
Ecco quindi che il gruppo di lavoro già articolato e complesso per sua natura si è arricchito di una nuova figura che ha portato due grandi benefici.
Il primo luogo è stata introdotta nella filosofia del progetto una logica puramente operativa ed applicativa delle informazioni prodotte dal progetto cercando di tradurre la grande massa di informazioni prodotte in elementi utili e pratici, prontamente travasabili alla realtà produttiva. Secondariamente vi è stato un avvicinamento fra due mondi distanti. L’uno, il viticoltore per sua natura scettico nei confronti della ricerca viticola e delle innovazioni, l’altro, la ricerca scientifica che spesso rischia di perdere il legame con la base produttiva e le sue esigenze.
Agli inizi degli anni Novanta, l’Unità Operativa di Pedoclimatologia dell’Istituto Agrario di San Michele all’Adige (Tn) ha proposto, un modello innovativo che ha previsto in primis il coinvolgimento diretto e fattivo del destinatario della zonazione, rendendolo partecipe non solo in qualità di co-finanziatore dell’opera, ma investendolo di responsabilità tecnica e strategica prima, durante e dopo la realizzazione del progetto. I
Esempio di questa filosofia di lavoro è la zonazione delle Valli di Cembra e dell’Adige la cui pubblicazione successiva (Falcetti et al.1998) ha dato un chiaro segno di quelle che sono le potenzialità di un siffatto progetto; ha dimostrato come la conoscenza del territorio di produzione diventi uno strumento decisionale indispensabile per chi si trova nella necessità di gestire la vigna in modo razionale e finalizzato ad un preciso obiettivo enologico.
Dopo questo primo progetto che ha indicato una nuova strada metodologica da percorrere, numerosi sono stati in Italia i lavori improntati secondo tale modus operandi con il chiaro intento di fornire delle semplici indicazioni tecniche ai viticoltori ed ai tecnici operanti in una data area viticola (Fiorini et Failla, 1998; Colugnati et al, 1998, De Biasi et al, 1999).
Testimonianza della positività dei risultati ottenuti e della crescita di consapevolezza del settore verso tali progetti è il fatto che, se inizialmente furono gli Istituti di Ricerca a promuovere le zonazioni, ora sono le aziende che le commissionano.
Scopo del presente contributo è non aggiungere nulla di nuovo sulle metodiche scientifiche che stanno alla base della zonazione, ma presentare la testimonianza concreta di chi si trova ad affrontare in vigna una serie di scelte importanti e che dalla zonazione riceve supporto tecnico importante al processo decisionale operativo di campo.
Si proporranno alcuni casi di processo decisionale di campo supportato dai dati della zonazione adeguatamente trattati, gestiti e proposti attraverso lo strumento informatico specifico, noto come Sistema Informativo Territoriale o G.I.S. (Geographic Information System).

Related articles…

VINIoT: Precision viticulture service for SMEs based on IoT sensors network

The main innovation in the VINIoT service is the joint use of two technologies that are currently used separately: vineyard monitoring using multispectral imaging and deployed terrain sensors. One part of the system is based on the development of artificial intelligence algorithms that are feed on the images of the multispectral camera and IoT sensors, high-level information on water stress, grape ripening status and the presence of diseases. In order to obtain algorithms to determine the state of ripening of the grapes and avoid losing information due to the diversity of the grape berries, it was decided to work along the first year 2020 at berry scale in the laboratory, during the second year at the cluster scale and on the last year at plot scale. Different varieties of white and red grapes were used; in the case of Galicia we worked with the white grape variety Treixadura and the red variety Mencía. During the 2020 and 2021 campaigns, multispectral images were taken in the visible and infrared range of: 1) sets of 100 grapes classifying them by means of densimetric baths, 2) individual bunches. The images taken with the laboratory analysis of the ripening stage were correlated. Technological maturity, pH, probable degree, malic acid content, tartaric acid content and parameters for assessing phenolic maturity, IPT, anthocyanin content were determined. It has been calculated for each single image the mean value of each spectral band (only taking into account the pixels of interest) and a correlation study of these values with laboratory data has been carried out. These studies are still provisional and it will be necessary to continue with them, jointly with the training of the machine learning algorithms. Processed data will allow to determine the sensitivity of the multispectral images and select bands of interest in maturation.

Projected changes in vine phenology of two varieties with different thermal requirements cultivated in La Mancha DO (Spain) under climate change scenarios

The aim of this work was to analyze the phenology variability of Tempranillo and Chardonnay cultivars, related to the climatic characteristics in La Mancha Designation of Origin, and their potential changes under climate change scenarios. Phenological dates referred to budbreak, flowering, veraison and harvest were analyzed for the period 2000-2019. The weather conditions at daily time scale, recorded during the same period, were also evaluated. The thermal requirements to reach each of these phenological stages were calculated and expressed as the GDD accumulated from DOY=60. Changes in phenology were projected by 2050 and 2070 taking into account those values and the projected temperatures and precipitation, simulated under two Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios –RCP4.5 and RCP8.5– using an ensemble of models. The average phenological dates during the period under study were, April 16th ± 6.6 days and April 5th ± 6.0 days for budbreak, May 31st ± 6.0 days and May 27th ± 5.3 days for flowering, July 26th ± 5.6 days and July 25th ± 5.8 days for veraison, and Ago 23rd ± 10.8 days and Ago 17th ± 9.0 days for harvest, respectively, for Tempranillo and Chardonnay. The projected changes in temperature imply an average change in the maximum growing season (April-August) temperatures of 1.2 and 1.9°C by 2050, and 1.6 and 2.6°C by 2070, under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively. A reduction in precipitation is predicted, which vary between 15% for 2050 under RCP4.5 scenario and up to 30% by 2070 under RCP8.5. The advance of the phenological dates for 2050, could be of 6, 7, 7, and 8 days for Tempranillo and 4, 6, 6 and 9 days for Chardonnay, respectively for budbreak, flowering, veraison and harvest under the RCP4.5 scenario. Under the RCP8.5 emission scenario, the advance could be up to 30% higher.

Under-vine management effects on grapevine production, soil properties and plant communities in South Australia

Under-vine (UV) management has traditionally consisted of synthetic herbicide use to limit competition between weeds and grapevines. With growing global interest towards non-synthetic chemical use, this study aimed to capture the effects of alternative UV management at two commercial Shiraz vineyards in South Australia, where the sole management variables were UV management since 2016. In adjacent treatment blocks, cultivation (CU) was compared to spontaneous vegetation (SV) in McLaren Vale (MV), and herbicide was compared to SV in Eden Valley (EV). Soil water infiltration rates were slower and grapevine stem water potential was lower in CU compared to SV in MV, with the latter having a plant community dominated by soursob (Oxalis pes-caprae) during winter; while in EV, there was little separation between the treatments. Yields were affected at both sites, with SV being higher in MV and HE being higher in EV. In MV, the only effect on grape must was a lower 13C:12C isotope ratio in CU, indicating greater grapevine water stress. In the grape must at EV, SV had higher total soluble solids, total phenolics, anthocyanins, and yeast available nitrogen; and lower pH and titratable acidity. Pruning weights were not affected by the treatments in MV, while they were higher in HE at EV. Assessments revealed that the differing soil types at the two sites were likely the main determinants of the opposing production outcomes associated with UV management. In the silty loam soil of MV, the higher yields in SV were likely due to more plant-available water, as a potential result of the continuous soil bio-pores formed by winter UV vegetation. Conversely, in the loamy sand soils of EV with a lower cation exchange capacity, the lower yields and pruning weights in SV suggest the UV vegetation competed significantly with the grapevines for available water and nutrients.

Frost risk projections in a changing climate are highly sensitive in time and space to frost modelling approaches

Late spring frost is a major challenge for various winegrowing regions across the world, its occurrence often leading to important yield losses and/or plant failure. Despite a significant increase in minimum temperatures worldwide, the spatial and temporal evolution of spring frost risk under a warmer climate remains largely uncertain. Recent projections of spring frost risk for viticulture in Europe throughout the 21st century show that its evolution strongly depends on the model approach used to simulate budburst. Furthermore, the frost damage modelling methods used in these projections are usually not assessed through comparison to field observations and/or frost damage reports.
The present study aims at comparing frost risk projections simulated using six spring frost models based on two approaches: a) models considering a fixed damage threshold after the predicted budburst date (e.g BRIN, Smoothed-Utah, Growing Degree Days, Fenovitis) and b) models considering a dynamic frost sensitivity threshold based on the predicted grapevine winter/spring dehardening process (e.g. Ferguson model). The capability of each model to simulate an actual frost event for the Vitis vinifera cv. Chadonnay B was previously assessed by comparing simulated cold thermal stress to reports of events with frost damage in Chablis, the northernmost winegrowing region of Burgundy. Models exhibited scores of κ > 0.65 when reproducing the frost/non-frost damage years and an accuracy ranging from 0.82 to 0.90.
Spring frost risk projections throughout the 21st century were performed for all winegrowing subregions of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté under two CMIP5 concentration pathways (4.5 and 8.5) using statistically downscaled 8×8 km daily air temperature and humidity of 13 climate models. Contrasting results with region-specific spring frost risk trends were observed. Three out of five models show a decrease in the frequency of frost years across the whole study area while the other two show an increase that is more or less pronounced depending on winegrowing subregion. Our findings indicate that the lack of accuracy in grapevine budburst and dehardening models makes climate projections of spring frost risk highly uncertain for grapevine cultivation regions.

Impact of climate change on the viticultural climate of the Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (SE Spain)

Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (PDO Jumilla) is located in the Spanish provinces of Albacete and Murcia, in the South-eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula, where most of the models predict a severe impact of climate change in next decades. PDO Jumilla covers an area of 247,054 hectares, of which more than 22,000 hectares