IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Specificities of red wines without sulfites: which role for acetaldehyde and diacetyl? A compositional and sensory approach.

Specificities of red wines without sulfites: which role for acetaldehyde and diacetyl? A compositional and sensory approach.

Abstract

Sulfur dioxide is the most commonly used additive in oenology to protect wine from oxidation and microorganisms. Once added to wine SO2 is able to react with carbonyl compounds to form carbonyl bisulfites what affects their reactivity. All together these carbonyl bisulfites correspond to bound SO2. The affinity of each carbonyl for sulfur dioxide is defined by the dissociation constant Kd of its carbonyl bisulfite. Among wine compounds, acetaldehyde which carbonyl bisulfite Kd is 2.4×10-3 mM is considered as the one with the highest affinity for SO2. Acetaldehyde origins is both an intermediary in alcoholic fermentation pathway but could also be produced from ethanol oxidation. Diacetyl (2,3 butanedione), has also a microbiological origin and an appreciable affinity for sulfur dioxide (carbonyl bisulfite Kd is 0.1 mM). Moreover, diacetyl is able to be produced but also reduced by yeasts and their potential sensory impact on red wines has already been established.
To evaluate if acetaldehyde and diacetyl could be at the origin of sensory specificities in wines without SO2, sensory profiles were classically determined, using sensory descriptors generation and panel training, on different modalities illustrating average levels of diacetyl, acetaldehyde and free SO2 in wines with or without sulfites and prepared from the same commercial without sulfites wine. Such an approach allowed to reveal that acetaldehyde and free SO2 were involved in the perception of “Coolness” depending of their concentrations in wines with and without added SO2. Diacetyl, meanwhile, impacted fruity aroma perception in wines with added SO2 and was responsible for sensory differences between wine with and without added SO2. Thus, the addition of diacetyl and SO2, at average concentrations found in wines with SO2, in a wine without added SO2 led to a decrease of “Fresh Black Fruits”, “Fresh Raspberry” and “Coolness” perception and an increase of “Jammy Black Fruits” perception.  These results are in line with sensory differences already highlighted in studies dealing with global olfactive characterization of reds wines with and without sulfites and help to explain red wines without sulfites sensory specificities

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Article 

Authors

Pelonnier-Magimel Edouard¹, Cameleyre Margaux¹, Riquier Laurent¹and Barbe Jean-Christophe ¹

¹Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, ISVV, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, OENO, UMR 1366, ISVV

Contact the author

Keywords

Wine without sulfites, acetaldehyde, diacetyl, carbonyl bisulfite, sensory analysis

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

In search of the taste of terroir – a challenge for sensory science

The definition of terroir has evolved throughout history, from something clearly negative in the XVIth-XVIIIth century to a complex multi-parametric construct with positive connotations but also with many scientific unknowns. Terroir has always been linked more or less explicitly to the sensory properties of the resulting products.

Assessing the effect of oak derived aromas on mouthfeel perception in Chardonnay wine

Mouthfeel is an important quality parameter for Chardonnay wines, particularly those aged in oak. While research on mouthfeel has traditionally focused on the impact of non-aromatic compounds, the role of aroma compounds has largely been over looked. However, in wine as well as other food interactions between retronasal aroma and mouthfeel have been noted. The goal of this research was to investigate the impact of wine aroma on the perception of mouthfeel. Because of the importance of oak aging in the development of Chardonnay mouthfeel, the impact of oak aromas on perceived mouthfeel was explored. Aroma compounds associated with oak (ethyl palmitate, eugenol, furfural, isoeugenol, syringaldehyde, vanillin and whiskey lactone) were added to two different Chardonnay wines; one with no oak influence and one fermented in neutral oak. Low and high concentrations of the compounds were added based on concentrations typically found in barrel aged Chardonnay wine.

ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

Grape pomace is one of the main by-products generated after pressing in winemaking.Emerging methods, such as ultrasound-assisted extraction with eutectic mixtures, have great potential due to their low toxicity, and high biodegradability. Choline chloride (ChCl) was used as a hydrogen bond acceptor and its corresponding hydrogen bond donor (malic acid, citric acid, and glycerol: urea). Components were heated at 80 °C and stirred until a clear liquid was obtained. Distilled water was added (30 % v/v). A solid-liquid ratio of 1 g pomace per 10 ml of eutectic solvent was used.

FACTORS AFFECTING QUERCETIN SOLUBILITY IN SANGIOVESE RED WINE: FIRST RESULTS

Quercetin (Q) is present in grape in form of glycosides and as aglycone. These compounds are extracted from grape skins during winemaking. In wines, following the hydrolysis reactions, the amount of quercetin aglycon can exceed its solubility value. Unfortunately, a threshold solubility concentration for quercetin in wine is not easy to determine because it depends on wine matrix (Gambuti et al., 2020).

Volatilome in grapevine leaves is defined by the variety and modulated by mycorrhizal symbiosis

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) constitute a diverse group of secondary metabolites key for the communication of plants with other organisms and for their adaptation to environmental and biotic stresses. The emission of these compounds through leaves is also affected by the interaction of plants with symbiotic microorganisms, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) among them [1]. Our objective was to know the concentration and profile of VOCs emitted by the leaves of two grapevine varieties (Tempranillo, T, and Cabernet Sauvignon, CS, grafted onto R110 rootstocks), inoculated or not with a consortium of five AMF (Rhizophagus irregularis, Funneliformis mosseae, Septoglomus deserticola, Claroideoglomus claroideum and C. etunicatum).