IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 From vineyard to bottle. Rationalizing grape compositional drivers of the expression of “Amarone della Valpolicella” terroir

From vineyard to bottle. Rationalizing grape compositional drivers of the expression of “Amarone della Valpolicella” terroir

Abstract

Valpolicella is a famous Italian wine-producing region. One of its main characteristic is the intensive use of grapes that are submitted to post-harvest withering.  This is rather unique in the context of red wine, especially for the production of a dry red wine such as Amarone. Amarone wines produced in Valpolicella different geographic origin are anecdotally believed to be aromatically different, although there is no systematic study addressing the chemical bases of such diversity. Aroma is the product of a biochemical and technological series of steps, resulting from the contribution of different volatile molecules deriving from grapes, fermentations, and reactions linked to aging, as well as one of the most important features in the expression of the geographic identity and sensory uniqueness of a wine. The aim of this study was to investigate the volatile chemical composition of dry red passito wines obtained from withered grapes from different origins and vintages, and assess the existence of recurring patterns that could represent unique aroma chemical signatures. Comparison between wine volatile profiles and grape compositional data allowed to identify some key grape compositional features underling such aroma. Corvina and Corvinone withered grapes were harvested from five different vineyards located in two sub-regions within Valpolicella during three consecutive vintages (2017-2019). Winemaking was performed under standardized conditions Free volatile compounds and glycosidic precursors were analysed with GC-MS analysis.

Sensory characteristics of the wines have been investigated through sorting tasks performed with semi-trained panel. PCA analysis techniques allowed to identify volatile chemical patterns representing the aroma chemical signature of the geographical origin of each wine. Terpenes and norisoprenoids were the main drivers of vineyards aroma chemical signatures, but many other compounds such as vanillates, branched chain ethyl esters and acetate ester contributed significantly. The contribution of certain fermentative compounds to chemical signatures, like isoamyl acetate was also important. Patterns of odor similarities were observed during sensory evaluation, even if they were not always associated with geographical. Variations in wine terpenes content were associated with the grape content of different forms, mainly free. Finally a good correlation between grape content of yeast assimilable nitrogen  and wine isoamyl acetate content was observed, further broadening the boundaries of vineyard factors able to influence wine aroma.This study provides evidence for the existence of volatile chemical signatures that are representative of geographical origin even in wines from withered grapes. Azienda Agricola F.lli Tedeschi is acknowledged for financial support

DOI:

Publication date: June 24, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Luzzini Giovanni1, Slaghenaufi Davide1, Ugliano Maurizio1

1University of Verona

Contact the author

Keywords

Chemical signature of geographical identity; Valpolicella; Tipicality; Red wine aroma, terroir

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

The evolution of wine tourism: trends, challenges and opportunities for the future

The wine tourism industry has experienced significant transformation over the past years, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Post-spring frost canopy development and fruit composition in cv. Barbera grapevines

One of the effects of warming trends is the advance of budburst, increasing the frequency of spring frost-related damage. In April 2021, a severe frost event affected central and northern italian viticulture. In a cv. Barbera vineyard located in the Colli Piacentini wine district, after such occurrence, vines were tracked and growth of primary bud shoots (PBS), secondary bud shoots (SBS), and suckers (SK) was monitored, as well as their fruitfulness and fruit composition. Vine performances were then compared to those of the previous year, when no post-budburst freezing temperatures occurred. The goal of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of SBS in restoring yield loss due to PBS injuries and analyze respective contribution to fruit composition.

Estimation of stomatal conductance and chlorophyll fluorescence in Croatian grapevine germplasm under water deficit    

Water deficit profoundly impacts the quality of grapes and results in considerable reductions in crop yield. First symptoms manifest with reduced stomatal conductance and transpiration, accompanied by the wilting of apical leaves and tendrils. So far, there is no available data on the water stress response in Croatian grapevine germplasm. Therefore, objective of this study was to determine influence of genotype and treatment on stomatal conductance (gsw), transpiration (E), electron transport rate (ETR), and quantum efficiency in light (PhiPS2).

The role of tomato juice serum in malolactic fermentation in wine

Introduction: Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a common process in winemaking to reduce wine acidity, maintain microbial stability and modify wine aroma. However, successful MLF is often hampered by their sluggish or stuck activity of malolactic bacteria (MLB) which may be caused by nutrient deficiency, especially when MLB are inoculated after alcoholic fermentation (Alexandre et al., 2004; Lerm et al., 2010). Identification and characterization of essential nutrients and growth factors for MLB allows for production of highly efficient nutrient supplements for MLF.

Vine environment interaction as a method for land viticultural evaluation. An experience in Friuli Venezia Giulia (N-E of Italy)

For a long time environment was known as one of the most important factors to characterize the quality of wines but at the same time it appears very difficult to distinguish inside the “terroir” the role of the single factor. These remarks partially explain why methods for viticultural evaluation are often quite different (Amerine et al., 1944; Antoniazzi et al., 1986; Asselin et al., 1987; Astruc et al., 1980; Bonfils, 1977; Boselli, 1991; Colugnati, 1990; Costantinescu, 1967; Costantini et al., 1987; Dutt et al., 1981; Falcetti et al., 1992; Fregoni et al., 1992; Hidalgo, 1980; Intrieri et al., 1988; Laville, 1990; Morlat et al., 1991; Scienza et al., 1990; Shubert et al., 1987; Turri et al., 1991).