terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2023 9 Vineyard floor management intensity impacts soil health indicators and biodiversity across South Australian viticultural landscapes

Vineyard floor management intensity impacts soil health indicators and biodiversity across South Australian viticultural landscapes

Introduction

Vineyard floors in warm, dry landscapes including those in South Australia, have traditionally been managed using intensive practices such as tillage and herbicides to control weeds and vegetation, thereby limiting competition with grapevines for water and nutrients in order to not compromise yields (Celette et al., 2009). However, due to increasing awareness about the detrimental environmental impacts associated with chemical herbicides, tillage, and resulting bare earth on soil health and biodiversity (Winter et al., 2018; Guzmán et al., 2019), many recent investigations have been made as to the potential of increasing vineyard floor ground cover through the use of sown or spontaneous vegetation in addition to reducing the frequency and intensity of tillage and herbicides (Garcia et al., 2018).

Although there has been a noticeable shift in vineyard floor management towards more extensive and ecological practices in the last two decades, there are differences in the rates of adoption between winegrowing regions and between the mid-row and under-vine row areas in vineyards (Payen et al., 2022). While it has been demonstrated that in some vineyard sites, competition with grapevines for water and nutrients limiting grapevine yield is one of the main factors restraining the use of complete vineyard floor vegetation cover (Karl et al., 2016), this yield discrepancy is not always significant (Giese et al., 2014). Recent investigations of complete vineyard floor coverage systems have been predominantly focused in cool, wet winegrowing regions such as those in the Eastern United States, where many studies have indicated improved provisioning of ecosystem services in addition to more ideal vine balance as a result of these strategies (Vanden Heuvel and Centinari, 2021).

Thus, we propose to investigate how complete vineyard floor coverage is used by commercial vineyards in drier viticultural regions, such as those of Australia, and specifically, we aim to assess how these systems comparatively affect biodiversity and soil health indicators. Findings from another viticultural landscape study in a drier climate in Spain indicated that vineyards with cover crops compared to bare soil had higher soil organic carbon and greater plant biomass; however, this study focused solely on vineyard mid-row areas (Guzmán et al., 2019). Furthermore, a landscape study demonstrated that high mid-row management intensity at vineyards across Austria, France, Spain and Romania reduced plant species richness (Hall et al., 2020). Therefore, it is yet to be determined how plant biodiversity and soil health indicators compare at South Australian vineyard sites across a landscape with different floor management intensities, and in both the mid-row and under-vine row areas. In order to address these questions, a comprehensive investigation at the landscape level of varying intensity levels of vineyard floor management practices used in the Barossa and McLaren Vale regions was conducted to explore the effects on various environmental indicators of biodiversity and soil health.

DOI:

Publication date: June 21, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Merek M. KESSER1, Timothy R. CAVAGNARO 1, Roberta DE BEI1, Cassandra COLLINS1,2*

1The University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, PMB 1 Glen Osmond, 5064 South Australia, Australia
2ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production, Waite Research Institute, PMB 1 Glen Osmond, 5064 South Australia, Australia

Contact the author*

Keywords

vineyard floor management, soil health, biodiversity, management intensity, viticultural landscape

Tags

GiESCO | GIESCO 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Tomatoes and Grapes: berry fruits with a (bright) biotech future?

Tomatoes and Grapes are berries that are genetically related and therefore at least partially their developmental pathways leading to a fleshy fruit should share some of the components. In a sense knowledge obtained from the model plant tomato could be useful for grape and conversely the more amenable tomato can be used to test some hypothesis that would be difficult to obtain in grape. Research in my lab and other labs have led to a better understanding of the molecular genetics mechanisms underlying fruit development and ripening in tomato and more specifically those related to metabolite accumulation that may lead to changes in fruit nutritional and flavor composition. This research has involved the use of genetic variability in natural population, but also biparental population and genetically engineered lines that are easy to develop in tomato tomato but not in grape. NGTs also can be easily implemented in tomato to not only speed up the gene-to-trait but also develop new tomato varieties.

Methodological advances in relating deep root activity to whole vine physiology

Full understanding of grapevine responses to variable soil resources requires
assessing the grapevine root system. Grapevine root systems are expansive and examining deep roots (i.e., >40 cm)
is particularly important in conditions where grapevines increase reliance on deep soil resources, such as drought
or plant competition. Traditional methods of assessing roots rely on morphological traits associated specific
functions (e.g., root color, diameter, length), while recent methodological advances allow for estimating root
function more directly (e.g., omics). Yet, the potential of applying refined methods remains underexplored for roots
at deep depths.

NACs intra-family hierarchical transcriptional regulatory network orchestrating grape berry ripening

Considering that global warming is changing berry ripening timing and progression, uncovering the molecular mechanisms and identifying key regulators governing berry ripening could provide important tools in maintaining high quality grapes and wine. NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC) transcription factors represent an interesting family due to their key role in the developmental processes control, such as fruit-ripening-associated genes expression, and in the regulation of multiple stress responses. Between the 74 NAC family members, we selected 12 of them as putative regulators of berry ripening: NAC01, NAC03, NAC05, NAC11, NAC13, NAC17, NAC18, NAC26, NAC33, NAC37, NAC60 and NAC61.

Molecular characterization of a variegated grapevine mutant cv Bruce’s Sport

Variegation, a frequently observed trait in plants, is characterized by the occurrence of white or discoloured plant tissue. This phenomenon is attributed to genetic mosaicism or chimerism, potentially impacting the epidermal (L1) and subepidermal (L2) cell layers. In grapevine, variegation manifests as white or paler leaf, flower, or berry tissues, often leading to stunted growth and impeded development. Despite its prevalence, variegation in grapevines remains understudied.

Phenotypical impact of a floral somatic mutation in the cultivar Listán Prieto

The accession Criolla Chica Nº2 (CCN2) is catalogued as a floral mutation of cultivar Criolla Chica (synonym for cv. Listán Prieto). Contrary to what is observed in hermaphrodite-cultivated varieties like Criolla Chica, CCN2 exhibits a prevalence of masculinized flowers. Aiming to study the incidence and phenotypical implications of this mutation, CCN2 plants were deeply studied using Criolla Chica ‘Ballista’ (CCBA) as control plants. For each CCN2 plant, two inflorescences per shoot were sampled and segmented into proximal, mid and distal positions, relative to the pedicel. Flowers were observed through magnifying lens and classified according to OIV151 descriptor.