terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2023 9 Vineyard nutrient budget and sampling protocols

Vineyard nutrient budget and sampling protocols


Context and purpose of the study – Vineyard nutrient management is crucial for reaching production-specific quality standards, yet timely evaluation of nutrient status remains challenging. The existing sampling protocol of collecting vine tissue (leaves and/or petioles) at bloom or veraison is time-consuming. Additionally, this sampling practice is too late for in-season fertilizer applications (e.g. N is applied well before bloom). Therefore alternative early-season protocols are necessary to predict the vine nutrient demand for the upcoming season.  The main goals of this project are to 1) optimize existing tissue sampling protocols; 2) determine the amount of nutrients removed at the end of the growing season.

Material and methods – Field trials were initiated in late summer 2020, and conducted through 2022 in commercial, drip-irrigated ownrooted vineyard blocks in arid eastern Washington. Three rates of K were applied in Chardonnay, and three and two rates of N were applied in Syrah and Concord, respectively. Dormant canes; whole shoots at the 5-6-leaf stage; leaves (blades and petioles) at bloom and veraison; and whole clusters at harvest were collected from each block for macro- and micronutrient analysis. Yield components and fruit composition were determined at harvest, and pruning weights were collected in winter. Vines were covered with bird nets after harvest, and leaves were collected after the first freeze for nutrient analysis. 

Results – Blade and petiole nutrient concentrations were not well correlated with higher N concentrations and lower K concentrations in blades than petioles. The P and K concentrations in early-season shoots correlated with those in blades and petioles at bloom. There was no difference in yield components between the treatments in any vineyard block. Fruit harvest and leaf fall removed significant amounts of nutrients, depending on variety, crop yield, and vintage. On average across all varieties, 22 kg/ha of N, 5 kg/ha of P, 50kg/ha of K and 3 kg/ha of Mg were removed at harvest and 6.4 kg/ha of N, 0.5 kg/ha of P, 2.9 kg/ha of K and 2.6 kg/ha of Mg were removed with leaves at leaf fall. Leaf fall constitutes an important loss of nutrients in addition to the loss in the harvested fruit. If the dead leaves remain in the vineyard, those nutrients may be available for vine uptake in subsequent growing seasons. However, if the nutrients are lost, they must be replaced through fertilizer addition to prevent the gradual buildup of nutrient deficiency and sustain vineyard productivity.


Publication date: June 22, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2023

Type: Article



1Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, USA

Contact the author*


grapevine nutrition, vineyard nutrient management, nutrient sampling protocol


GiESCO | GIESCO 2023 | IVES Conference Series


Related articles…

Physiological and growth reaction of Shiraz/101-14 Mgt to row orientation and soil water status

Advanced knowledge on grapevine row orientation is required to improve establishment, management and outcomes of vineyards on terroirs with different environmental conditions (climate, soil, topography) and in view of a future change to more extreme climatic conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the combined effect of row orientation, plant water status and ripeness level on the physiological and viticultural reaction of Shiraz/101-14 Mgt.

Effects of mechanical leafing and deficit irrigation on Cabernet Sauvignon grown in warm climate of California

San Joaquin Valley accounts for 40% of wine grape acreage and produces 70% of wine grape in California. Fruit quality is one of most important factors which impact the economical sustainability of farming wine grapes in this region. Due to the recent drought and expected labor cost increase, the wine industry is thrilled to understand how to improve fruit quality while maintaining the yield with less water and labor input. The present study aims to study the interactive effects of mechanical leafing and deficit irrigation on yield and berry compositions of Cabernet Sauvignon grown in warm climate of California.

The effects of cane girdling on berry texture properties and the concentration of some aroma compounds in three table grape cultivars

The marketability of the table grapes is highly influenced by the consumer demand; therefore the market value of the table grapes is mainly characterized by its berry size, colour, taste and texture. Girdling could cause accumulation of several components in plants above the ringing of the phloem including clusters and resulting improved maturity. The aim of the experiments was to examine the effect of girdling on berry texture characteristics and aroma concentration.

Application of a fluorescence-based method to evaluate the ripening process and quality of Pinot Blanc grape

The chemical composition of grape berries at harvest is one of the most important factors that should be considered to produce high quality wines. Among the different chemical classes which characterize the grape juice, the polyphenolic compound, such as flavonoids, contribute to the final taste and color of wines. Recently, an innovative non-destructive method, based on chlorophyll fluorescence, was developed to estimate the phenolic maturity of red grape varieties through the evaluation of anthocyanins accumulated in the berry skin. To date, only few data are available about the application of this method on white grape varieties.

Different yield regulation strategies in semi-minimal-pruned hedge (SMPH) and impact on bunch architecture

Yields in the novel viticulture training system Semi-Minimal-Pruned Hedge (SMPH) are generally higher compared to the traditional Vertical Shoot Positioning (VSP). Excessive yields have a negative impact on the vine and wine quality, which can result in substantial losses in yield in subsequent vintages (alternate bearing) or penalties in fruit quality. Therefore yield regulation is essential. The bunch architecture in SMPH differs from VSP. Generally there is a higher amount but smaller bunches with lower single berry weights in SMPH compared to VSP.