terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Can minimal pruning be a strategy to adapt grape ripening to global warming?

Can minimal pruning be a strategy to adapt grape ripening to global warming?


Context and purpose of the study – Berry maturation in warm areas takes place very early, when temperatures are still high and favorable for carbohydrate synthesis and accumulation in the berries, but not as favorable for maintaining high titratable acidity or low pH, or for increasing berry polyphenol content. Different canopy management techniques have been proven to delay berry maturation at the expense of yield (severe canopy trimming, late spring pruning to induce sprouting of dormant buds, etc.). Minimal pruning delays berry ripening by highly increasing yield and by reducing the leaf area to fruit ratio. If so, berry ripening will match later in summer with lower temperatures more favorable to reduce organic acids degradation, and for anthocyanin synthesis in the berry. We have compared the effect of minimal pruning on harvest date, yield, pruning weight and berry composition, respect to the traditional bud load with and without shoot load adjustment in spring. 

Material and methods – The study was carried out for 5 consecutive years – 2012 to 2016 – in a merlot/140Ru vineyard, planted in 2000 at El Socorro Experimental Center (Colmenar de Oreja, Madrid, Spain). Plant spacing was 2.2 x 1.5 m. Training system was a royat cordon with 2 bud spurs along the cordon, but the minimal pruning was hand pruned simulating a minimal pruning or box pruning. Three budload treatments were evaluated: a) traditional with 10-12 shoots per m of row and shoot adjustment in spring (Control, C) b) traditional without shoot adjustment along the cordon (NSA) and c) minimal pruning (MP). In all treatments, trunk suckers were removed in spring. Experimental design was a 3-block strip design. Each block consisted of 9 rows, 3 consecutives for each treatment, being the central row where the data were collected, and the two lateral rows acted as buffers. Each row had 100 vines which was divided into three subplots of 30 vines, so each treatment average resulted from 9 individual plots (3 blocks x 3 subplots). Total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, and polyphenol maturity was analyzed from veraison but only harvest data are presented herein. All treatments were irrigated to ensure that leaf water potential was -1.2 MPa during ripening, this turned into different irrigation doses for each treatment to optimize its performance.

Results – On average, yield increased 45% and 100% in the NSA treatment and the MP treatment, respectively, compared to the traditional one. Pruning weight was reduced only in MP by 30% respect to C. This fact delayed ripening in the minimal pruning system most of the seasons, 7 days on average. The longest delays were obtained in the warmest seasons, delaying ripening by up to 3 weeks. Although the overall statistical analysis including all years showed a significant treatment effect in most of the parameters, the statistical analysis performed by year showed significant differences only in specific parameters and seasons. MP showed the lowest TSS and pH values, and the highest titratable acidity values. Regarding polyphenol maturity, only tannins in 2016 and extractable anthocyanins in 2014 and 2016 were reduced as yield increased. This leads to the conclusion that in warm areas we can considerably increase yield and water use efficiency without significantly modifying must quality but delaying ripening up to 20 days.


Publication date: July 7, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2023

Type: Poster



1CEIGRAM- UPM. ETSI Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas. Avda. Puerta de Hierro 2-4, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Contact the author*


minimal pruning, yield partitioning, must composition, climate change adaptation, resource use efficiency


GiESCO | GIESCO 2023 | IVES Conference Series


Related articles…


Climate change has brought several impacts that are becoming increasingly intense during the last few years and put at risk the quality of the berries or even the plant’s sustainability. Such extreme climatic events impact the composition of the wine while modulating its quality and the consumer preferences (Tempère et al., 2019). The three most important changes that take place in the must are: 1) decrease acidity, 2) increase of the concentration of sugar, hence increase of alcohol in the wine, and 3) modification of the sensory balance and the development for example of cooked fruit aromas.


In Italy, in the past two decades, the rate of temperature increases (0.0369 °C per year) was slightly higher compared to the world average (0.0313 °C per year). It has also been indicated that the number and intensity of heat waves have increased considerably in the last decades. (IEA, 2022). Viticultural zones can be classified with climatic indexes. Huglin’s index (HI) considers the temperature in a definite area and has been considered as reliable to evaluate the thermal suitability for winegrape production (Zhang et al., 2023).

A synthesis approach on the impact of elevated CO2 on berry physiology and yield of Vitis vinifera

Besides the increase in global mean temperature the second main challenge of a changing climate is the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in relation to physiology and yield performance of grapevines. The benefits of increasing CO2 levels under greenhouse environment or open field studies have been well investigated for various annual crops. Research under free carbon dioxide enrichment on field-grown perennial plants such as grapevines is limited to a few studies. Further, chamber and greenhouse experiments have been conducted mostly on potted vines under eCO2 conditions.

Microbial ecosystems in wineries – molecular interactions between species and modelling of population dynamics

Microbial ecosystems are primary drivers of viticultural, oenological and other cellar-related processes
such as wastewater treatment. Metagenomic datasets have broadly mapped the vast microbial species
diversity of many of the relevant ecological niches within the broader wine environment, from vineyard
soils to plants and grapes to fermentation. The data highlight that species identities and diversity
significantly impact agronomic performance of vineyards as well as wine quality, but the complexity
of these systems and of microbial growth dynamics has defeated attempts to offer actionable
tools to guide or predict specific outcomes of ecosystem-based interventions.

Searching for the sweet spot: a focus on wine dealcoholization

It is well known that the vinification of grapes at full maturation can produce rich, full-bodied wines,
with intense and complex flavour profiles. However, the juice obtained from such grapes may have very
high sugar concentration, resulting in wines with an excessive concentration of ethanol. In addition, the decoupling between technological maturity and phenolic/aromatic one due to global warming, exacerbates this problem in some wine-growing regions. In parallel with the increase of the mean alcohol content of wines on the market, also the demand for reduced alcohol beverages has increased in recent years, mainly as a result of health and social concerns about the risks related to the consumption of alcohol.