terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Impact of soil-applied and foliar-applied nitrogen on grape and wine composition

Impact of soil-applied and foliar-applied nitrogen on grape and wine composition

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Foliar application of urea may be an efficient way to alter grape and wine composition without increasing vine vigor. However, we know little about the impact of this practice on phenolic compounds and yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN). Adequate YAN is required for an efficient and complete fermentation, while phenolics are particularly important for the sensory profile of red wines. The goal of this study is to test the impact of foliar urea application at veraison, compared to the traditional soil-applied nitrogen fertilization early in the season, on Syrah berry and wine composition in field conditions.

Material and methods – A trial was conducted in a commercial, drip-irrigated, own-rooted Syrah vineyard in arid eastern Washington in 2021 and 2022. We compared 4 treatments of soil-applied liquid urea ammonium nitrate (0, 22.5, 45, 90 kg N/ha), split in 3 applications (5-6 leaf stage, bloom, fruit set) with a 15 kg N/ha foliar urea treatment, split in 3 applications starting at the end of the lag phase of berry development. Wine was produced from all treatments.

Results – Berry weight, cluster number, yield, juice total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity and malic acid were similar among nitrogen treatments in 2021 and 2022. Must YAN increased with increasing soil applied N, but the foliar N treatment was much more effective at increasing YAN than was soil-applied N. The phenolics concentration in the juice at the beginning of fermentation was similar between treatments. For 2021 and 2022 wines at pressing, tannins were low and decreased as N application increased. Fruit and wine anthocyanins and wine total phenolics were unaffected in both vintages by the field treatments.

DOI:

Publication date: July 5, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Pierre Davadant1*, Nataliya Shcherbatyuk1, Ryan Doyle2, James Harbertson2 and Markus Keller1

1Washington State University, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350, USA
2Washington State University, Wine Science Center, Richland, WA 99354, USA

Contact the author*

Keywords

foliar urea, grape composition, nitrogen, YAN, phenolics

Tags

GiESCO | GIESCO 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Les préparations biodynamiques 500 et 501 ont elles un effet sur la vigne ?

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Markus Rienth a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8396

Bilan de l’impact des pratiques viticoles sur la qualité biologique des sols

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Laure Gontier a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8481

Vers des systèmes viticoles économes en pesticide. Étude du réseau DEPHY-Vigne

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Esther Fouillet a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8318

Influence du porte-greffe sur le statut minéral du greffon

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Elisa Marguerit a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8387

La balance hydrique explique davantage la diversité intravariétale du titre alcoométrique du Merlot que l’accumulation des sucres

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Charles Romieu a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8506