GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Impact of changing climatic factors on physiological and vegetative growth

Impact of changing climatic factors on physiological and vegetative growth

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – scientific information on grapevine response to predicted levels of climate parameters is scarce and not sufficient to properly position the Wine Industry for the future. It is critical that the combined effects of increased temperature and CO2 on grapevines should be examined, without omitting the important link to soil water conditions. The purpose of this study is to quantify the effects of envisioned changes in climatic parameters on the functioning and growth of young grafted grapevines under controlled conditions, simulating expected future climate changes. Scientific knowledge of precisely how the newly-planted grapevine will react morphologically, anatomically and physiologically (at leaf, root and whole plant level) to the expected changes in important climatic parameters will enable producers to make better-informed decisions regarding terroir, cultivar and rootstock choices as well as the adaptation of current cultivation practices.

Material and methods – four glass house compartments were set up with combinations of the two main environmental factors, namely ambient temperature and CO2. Within each compartment, another treatment factor, water supply, was introduced. Young, grafted grapevines were established in pots in a randomized block design. Five growth cycles of 12 weeks each were monitored, with Shiraz as scion cultivar in three of them and Merlot in the other two. The rootstock used throughout was 101-14 Mgt. Vegetative and physiological growth parameters were measured throughout the growth cycles with critical sampling times at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after planting.

Results – a change in environmental growth conditions significantly affected physiological activity of the grapevine. Both increased CO2 levels and adequate water supply increased photosynthetic activity for all treatment combinations. Newly planted vines were photosynthetically more active and reacted more strongly to treatments than slightly older vines. The higher temperature treatment seemed to impair photosynthesis under comparable CO2 and H2O conditions, especially with regards to very young vines. The effect of temperature on vegetative growth was insignificant compared to the CO2 and H2O effects and only seemed to affect initial growth directly after planting. The availability of water was critical to root, shoot and leaf growth – higher CO2 levels further enhanced vegetative growth.
The results indicate that the importance and impact of the climatic variables and the vine reaction change during the growth season. The strong interactions found between weeks after planting, available water, ambient temperature and CO2 levels necessitate multi-variable research on the effect of changing climatic factors on the grapevine.

DOI:

Publication date: March 11, 2024

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

H. THERON 1,2*, C.G. VOLSCHENK 3, J.J. HUNTER 3

1 Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT), Wellington, South Africa
2 University of Stellenbosch (US), Stellenbosch, South Africa
3 ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Contact the author

Keywords

Climate change, Grapevine, CO2, Temperature; Water deficit, Growth, Physiology

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Exploring the mechanisms underpinning grapevine susceptibility to esca in a range of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars

Grapevine susceptibility to fungal diseases, including the vascular disease esca, is a major threat for wine productivity and vineyard perennity worldwide.

Mechanization of pre-flowering leaf removal under the temperate-climate conditions of Switzerland

Grapevine leaf removal (LR) in the cluster area is typically done between fruit set and cluster closure to create an unfavorable microclimate for fungal diseases, such as Botrytis cinerea and powdery mildew. Grape growers are now turning their attention to pre-flowering LR, which has additional benefits under certain conditions. When applied before flowering, LR strongly affects fruit set and thus the number of berries per cluster. It is therefore a good yield control tool, replacing time-consuming manual cluster thinning (Poni et al. 2006). It also improves berry structure, that is, skin thickness, skin-to-pulp ratio, and berry composition (total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and polyphenols) (Palliotti et al. 2012; Komm and Moyer 2015). By exacerbating competition for assimilates between reproductive and vegetative organs, pre-flowering LR also poses some risks. Excessive yield loss at the same year’s harvest due to a too low fruit set rate is the main concern: intensive pre-flowering LR (100% of the cluster area) can induce up to 50% yield loss in potted vines (Poni et al. 2005). Other parameters, such as cool climatic conditions during flowering, also affect fruit set rate and make it difficult to predict potential yield at harvest. Repeated and overly intensive preflowering LR can have repercussions over time and induce a decline in bud fruiting and plant vigor (Risco et al. 2014).

Exploring the impact of NPR3 gene silencing on the interaction between grapevine and mycorrhizal fungi through genome editing

One of the main plant defence mechanisms is the Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) mediated by Salicylic Acid (SA). This is a heightened and broad-spectrum immune response initiated by the exposure to pathogens, inducing resistance not only in the infected site, but also throughout the entire plant. It was demonstrated that plant immune system can be regulated by two classes of SA receptors: NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES 1 (NPR1) and NPR1-LIKE PROTEIN 3 and 4 (NPR3/NPR4). While NPR1 is required for SA-induction followed by the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) protein and resistance against pathogens, NPR3/NPR4 serve as transcriptional co-repressors of SA-responsive genes.

Survey of pesticide residues in vineyard soils from the Denomination of Origin Ribeiro

Vineyards from mild temperature, high humidity locations receive often treatments with fungicides to prevent damages produced by fungi responsible for mildium, oidium and botrytis infections. In addition, insecticides are also applied to vineyards to fight again pests, which affect directly, or indirectly (as vectors of different diseases), their productivity. A fraction of the above compounds reaches the soil of vineyards, either during application, or when released from the canopy of vines due to rain-wash-off. Thereafter, depending on soil conditions (pH, organic matter) and environmental variables (regimen of rain, slope of vineyards), they might persist in this compartment, be degraded and/or transferred to water masses, modifying the biodiversity of soils and/or affecting the quality of water reservoirs.

IMPACT OF FINING WITH K-CARRAGEENAN, BENTONITE, AND CHITOSAN ON PROTEIN STABILITY AND MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OF ALBARIÑO WHITE WINE PRODUCED WITH AND WITHOUT PRE-FERMENTATIVE SKIN MACERATION

Pre-fermentative skin maceration is a technique used in white wine production to enhance varietal aroma, but it can increase protein concentration, leading to protein instability and haze formation [1]. To prevent protein instability, wine producers typically use fining agents such as bentonite, before wine bottling, which can negatively impact sensory characteristics and produce waste [2,3]. The aim of this study was to understand the impact of alternative techniques such as the application of polysaccharides (k-carrageenan and chitosan) on protein stability and on the wine macromolecular composition.