GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 First company results and for the territory on the application of the “bio-Métaéthique 4.1c” in italy. Cultural, socio-economic, technical and productive aspects

First company results and for the territory on the application of the “bio-Métaéthique 4.1c” in italy. Cultural, socio-economic, technical and productive aspects

Abstract

In this work the first results obtained in the application of the “Charter of Sustainability Universal Holistic MetaEthic 4.1C” or “Sustainability BIO-MétaÉthique 4.1CC” of GiESCO (Carbonneau, Cargnello, 2017) will be exposed “Direct Certification and Direct Warranty of Sustainability 4.1C” applied in about twenty structures located in the hills and in the plain of the of Italy (North East).
The application of the ” Charter of the Sustainability Universal Holistic MetaEthics 4.1C” or “Sustainability BIO-MétaÉthique 4.1CC” of GiESCO was shared by more than 65% of compilers of the charter and this without any specific communication to the interviewees. This sharing rose more than 95% if the compilers of the form were titled or well-off and with a correct and appropriate communication and allowed us to overcome the imposition of sector limited protocols, unsustainable according to the “Viticulture Bio-MétaÉthique 4.1CC”, inconsistent with the main objective of the same certification, not applicable and/or difficult to apply anywhere.
We cite as an example the eco-friendly, organic and biodynamic viticulture we were able to eliminate the conflict of interests, unacceptable bureaucracy, unacceptable direct and indirect costs, the “confusion” in relation to “Sustainability”, “Certification”, “Guarantee” , to simplify the system and to identify and/or create peculiarities “Sustainable 4.1C”. We also contribute to the indexed harmonic growth “4.1C”: cultural, moral, civil, relational, “Policy” “MetaEthics 4.1C”, ethics, existential, social, occupational, environmental, economic, technical , as well as the growth of the self: choice, determination, responsibility, declaration, control, discipline, and the growth of process and product, rationalizing and containing costs “MetaEthically 4.1C”.
Important is also to make sure that everyone and everything are directly responsible for the role that is right and put their face directly. Hence the acronym of this certification: “CartaBIOSOSDIR4.1C of the Face” or “Let’s Put All the Face 4.1C” or “Certification by putting the Face” or “Certification of the Face 4.1C” or “Certification from the Face” or “Face Certification”, between a “Company BIO-MétaÉthique 4.1C” compared to a “Conventional Company”: the cost containment has fluctuated between 4% and 21% with peaks exceeding 25%.
The buyers willingness to pay more the wine has fluctuated between 6% and 21% with peaks of over 35%. The increase in total profit ranged from 9% to 21% with peaks that duplicated it.

DOI:

Publication date: September 21, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Giovanni CARGNELLO1*, Gianni TEO1,2, Ruggero LUNARDELLI1, Giuseppe COFFELE1, Giorgio CECCHETTO1, Cesare FERRETTI1, Sergio FORNO1, Valerio BORTOLIN1, Lionello DA RIOS1, Daniele GIGANTE1, Stefano LUNARDELLI1, Sasha RADICON1, Edi KANTE1, Andrej SKERLJ1, Andrej BOLE1, Alessio PICININ1, Antonio KININGER1, Davide DANAU1, Marco RUPEL1, Renzo BONA1, Franco GIACOMIN1, Ivan RONCHI1, Gianmaria RIVA1, Danilo FERRARO1, Francesco DONATI1, Luigino BARISAN1,2, Matteo MASIN1,2, Claudio BONGHI1,2, Cristian BOLZONELLA2, Stefano SCAGGIANTE2

1 Conegliano Campus 5.1C, Conegliano (Italy)
2 University of Padua – Seat of Conegliano, Treviso (Italy)

Contact the author

Keywords

first results BioMétaÉthique sustainability 4.1CC, company, territory, BIO – MétaÉthique 4.1C district

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Underpinning terroir with data: rethinking the zoning paradigm

Agriculture, natural resource management and the production and sale of products such as wine are increasingly data-driven activities. Thus, the use of remote and proximal crop and soil sensors to aid management decisions is becoming commonplace and ‘Agtech’ is proliferating commercially; mapping, underpinned by geographical information systems and complex methods of spatial analysis, is widely used. Likewise, the chemical and sensory analysis of wines draws on multivariate statistics; the efficient winery intake of grapes, subsequent production of wines and their delivery to markets relies on logistics; whilst the sales and marketing of wines is increasingly driven by artificial intelligence linked to the recorded purchasing behaviour of consumers. In brief, there is data everywhere!

Opinions will vary on whether these developments are a good thing. Those concerned with the ‘mystique’ of wine, or the historical aspects of terroir and its preservation, may find them confronting. In contrast, they offer an opportunity to those interested in the biophysical elements of terroir, and efforts aimed at better understanding how these impact on vineyard performance and the sensory attributes of resultant wines. At the previous Terroir Congress, we demonstrated the potential of analytical methods used at the within-vineyard scale in the development of Precision Viticulture, in contributing to a quantitative understanding of regional terroir. For this conference, we take this approach forward with examples from contrasting locations in both the northern and southern hemispheres. We show how, by focussing on the vineyards within winegrowing regions, as opposed to all of the land within those regions, we might move towards a more robust terroir zoning than one derived from a mixture of history, thematic mapping, heuristics and the whims of marketers. Aside from providing improved understanding by underpinning terroir with data, such methods should also promote improved management of the entire wine value chain.

The impact of sustainable management regimes on amino acid profiles in grape juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids

One of the biggest challenges of agriculture today is maintaining food safety and food quality while providing ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation, pest and disease control, ensuring water quality and supply, and climate regulation. Organic farming was shown to promote biodiversity and carbon sequestration, and is therefore seen as one possibility of environmentally friendly production. Consumers expect organically grown crops to be free from chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers and often presume that the quality of organically grown crops is different or higher compared to conventionally grown crops. Integrated, organic, and biodynamic viticulture were compared in a replicated field trial in Geisenheim, Germany (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling). Amino acid profiles in juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids were monitored over three consecutive seasons beginning 7 years after conversion to organic and biodynamic viticulture, respectively. In addition, parameters such as soil nutrient status, yield, vigor, canopy temperature, and water stress were monitored to draw conclusions on reasons for the observed changes. Results revealed that the different sustainable management regimes highly differed in their amino acid profiles in juice and also in their skin flavonol content, whereas differences in the flavanol and hydroxycinnamic acid content were less pronounced. It is very likely that differences in nutrient status and yield determined amino acid profiles in juice, although all three systems showed similar amounts of mineralized nitrogen in the soil. Canopy structure and temperature in the bunch zone did not differ among treatments and therefore cannot account for the observed differences in favonols. A different light exposure of the bunches in the respective systems due to differences in vigor together with differences in berry size and a different water status of the vines might rather be responsible for the increase in flavonol content under organic and biodynamic viticulture.

Use of a new, miniaturized, low-cost spectral sensor to estimate and map the vineyard water status from a mobile 

Optimizing the use of water and improving irrigation strategies has become increasingly important in most winegrowing countries due to the consequences of climate change, which are leading to more frequent droughts, heat waves, or alteration of precipitation patterns. Optimized irrigation scheduling can only be based on a reliable knowledge of the vineyard water status.

In this context, this work aims at the development of a novel methodology, using a contactless, miniaturized, low-cost NIR spectral tool to monitor (on-the-go) the vineyard water status variability. On-the-go spectral measurements were acquired in the vineyard using a NIR micro spectrometer, operating in the 900–1900 nm spectral range, from a ground vehicle moving at 3 km/h. Spectral measurements were collected on the northeast side of the canopy across four different dates (July 8th, 14th, 21st and August 12th) during 2021 season in a commercial vineyard (3 ha). Grapevines of Vitis vinifera L. Graciano planted on a VSP trellis were monitored at solar noon using stem water potential (Ψs) as reference indicators of plant water status. In total, 108 measurements of Ψs were taken (27 vines per date).

Calibration and prediction models were performed using Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression. The best prediction models for grapevine water status yielded a determination coefficient of cross-validation (r2cv) of 0.67 and a root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSEcv) of 0.131 MPa. This predictive model was employed to map the spatial variability of the vineyard water status and provided useful, practical information towards the implementation of appropriate irrigation strategies. The outcomes presented in this work show the great potential of this low-cost methodology to assess the vineyard stem water potential and its spatial variability in a commercial vineyard.

Climate modeling at local scale in the Waipara winegrowing region in the climate change context

In viticulture, a warming climate can have a very significant impact on grapevine development and therefore on the quality and characteristics of wines across different spatial scales, ranging from global to local. In order to adapt wine-growing to climate change, global climate models can be used to define future scenarios, but only at the scale of major wine regions. Despite the huge progress made over the last ten years in terms of the spatial resolution of climate models (now downscaled to a few square kilometres), they are not yet sufficiently precise to account for the local climate variability associated with such parameters as local topography, in spite of these parameters being decisive for vine and wine characteristics. This study describes a method to downscale future climate scenarios to vineyard scale. Networks of data loggers have been used to collect air temperature at canopy level in the Waipara winegrowing region (New Zealand) over five growing seasons. These measurements allow the creation of fine-scale geostatistical models and maps of temperature (at 100 m resolution) for the growing season. In order to model climate change at pilot site scale, these geostatistical models have been combined with regional climate change predictions for the periods 2031-2050 and 2081-2100 based on the RCP8.5 climate change scenario. The integration of local climate variability with regionalized climate change simulations allows assessment of the impacts of climate change at the vineyard scale. The improved knowledge gained using this methodology results from the increased horizontal resolution that better addresses the concerns of winegrowers. The results provide the local winegrowers with information necessary to understand current processes, as well as historical and future viticulture trends at the scale of their site, thereby facilitating decisions about future response strategies.