GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 First company results and for the territory on the application of the “bio-Métaéthique 4.1c” in italy. Cultural, socio-economic, technical and productive aspects

First company results and for the territory on the application of the “bio-Métaéthique 4.1c” in italy. Cultural, socio-economic, technical and productive aspects

Abstract

In this work the first results obtained in the application of the “Charter of Sustainability Universal Holistic MetaEthic 4.1C” or “Sustainability BIO-MétaÉthique 4.1CC” of GiESCO (Carbonneau, Cargnello, 2017) will be exposed “Direct Certification and Direct Warranty of Sustainability 4.1C” applied in about twenty structures located in the hills and in the plain of the of Italy (North East).
The application of the ” Charter of the Sustainability Universal Holistic MetaEthics 4.1C” or “Sustainability BIO-MétaÉthique 4.1CC” of GiESCO was shared by more than 65% of compilers of the charter and this without any specific communication to the interviewees. This sharing rose more than 95% if the compilers of the form were titled or well-off and with a correct and appropriate communication and allowed us to overcome the imposition of sector limited protocols, unsustainable according to the “Viticulture Bio-MétaÉthique 4.1CC”, inconsistent with the main objective of the same certification, not applicable and/or difficult to apply anywhere.
We cite as an example the eco-friendly, organic and biodynamic viticulture we were able to eliminate the conflict of interests, unacceptable bureaucracy, unacceptable direct and indirect costs, the “confusion” in relation to “Sustainability”, “Certification”, “Guarantee” , to simplify the system and to identify and/or create peculiarities “Sustainable 4.1C”. We also contribute to the indexed harmonic growth “4.1C”: cultural, moral, civil, relational, “Policy” “MetaEthics 4.1C”, ethics, existential, social, occupational, environmental, economic, technical , as well as the growth of the self: choice, determination, responsibility, declaration, control, discipline, and the growth of process and product, rationalizing and containing costs “MetaEthically 4.1C”.
Important is also to make sure that everyone and everything are directly responsible for the role that is right and put their face directly. Hence the acronym of this certification: “CartaBIOSOSDIR4.1C of the Face” or “Let’s Put All the Face 4.1C” or “Certification by putting the Face” or “Certification of the Face 4.1C” or “Certification from the Face” or “Face Certification”, between a “Company BIO-MétaÉthique 4.1C” compared to a “Conventional Company”: the cost containment has fluctuated between 4% and 21% with peaks exceeding 25%.
The buyers willingness to pay more the wine has fluctuated between 6% and 21% with peaks of over 35%. The increase in total profit ranged from 9% to 21% with peaks that duplicated it.

DOI:

Publication date: September 21, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Giovanni CARGNELLO1*, Gianni TEO1,2, Ruggero LUNARDELLI1, Giuseppe COFFELE1, Giorgio CECCHETTO1, Cesare FERRETTI1, Sergio FORNO1, Valerio BORTOLIN1, Lionello DA RIOS1, Daniele GIGANTE1, Stefano LUNARDELLI1, Sasha RADICON1, Edi KANTE1, Andrej SKERLJ1, Andrej BOLE1, Alessio PICININ1, Antonio KININGER1, Davide DANAU1, Marco RUPEL1, Renzo BONA1, Franco GIACOMIN1, Ivan RONCHI1, Gianmaria RIVA1, Danilo FERRARO1, Francesco DONATI1, Luigino BARISAN1,2, Matteo MASIN1,2, Claudio BONGHI1,2, Cristian BOLZONELLA2, Stefano SCAGGIANTE2

1 Conegliano Campus 5.1C, Conegliano (Italy)
2 University of Padua – Seat of Conegliano, Treviso (Italy)

Contact the author

Keywords

first results BioMétaÉthique sustainability 4.1CC, company, territory, BIO – MétaÉthique 4.1C district

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include:
• New user interface
• User authentication
• Batch analysis of multiple images
• Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features
• Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard.
Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.

Adapting the vineyard to climate change in warm climate regions with cultural practices

Since the 1980s global regime shift, grape growers have been steadily adapting to a changing climate. These adaptations have preserved the region-climate-cultivar rapports that have established the global trade of wine with lucrative economic benefits since the middle of 17th century. The advent of using fractions of crop and actual evapotranspiration replacement in vineyards with the use of supplemental irrigation has furthered the adaptation of wine grape cultivation. The shift in trellis systems, as well as pruning methods from positioned shoot systems to sprawling canopies, as well as adapting the bearing surface from head-trained, cane-pruned to cordon-trained, spur-pruned systems have also aided in the adaptation of grapevine to warmer temperatures. In warm climates, the use of shade cloth or over-head shade films not only have aided in arresting the damage of heat waves, but also identified opportunities to reduce the evapotranspiration from vineyards, reducing environmental footprint of vineyard. Our increase in knowledge on how best to understand the response of grapevine to climate change was aided with the identification of solar radiation exposure biomarker that is now used for phenotyping cultivars in their adaptability to harsh environments. Using fruit-based metrics such as sugar-flavonoid relationships were shown to be better indicators of losses in berry integrity associated with a warming climate, rather than solely focusing on region-climate-cultivar rapports. The resilience of wine grape was further enhanced by exploitation of rootstock × scion combinations that can resist untoward droughts and warm temperatures by making more resilient grapevine combinations. Our understanding of soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in the vineyard has increased within the last 50 years in such a manner that growers are able to use no-till systems with the aid of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi inoculation with permanent cover cropping making the vineyard more resilient to droughts and heat waves. In premium wine grape regions viticulture has successfully adapted to a rapidly changing climate thus far, but berry based metrics are raising a concern that we may be approaching a tipping point.

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)