GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Decline of new vineyards in Southern Spain

Decline of new vineyards in Southern Spain

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – In-season vineyard pest management relies on proper timing, selection, and application of products. Most of the research on pest management tends to focus on the influence of regional conditions on these aspects, with an emphasis on product timing and efficacy evaluation. One aspect that is not fully vetted in various vineyard regions is application (sprayer) technology. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of regional conditions on sprayer performance in commercial wine grape vineyards in eastern Washington.

Material and methods – Three commercially available sprayer technologies were optimized and assessed in the 2016 and 2017 production seasons. The sprayer technologies evaluated were: multi-fan heads, pneumatic, and electrostatic. Data were collected in commercial Vitis vinifera wine grape vineyards at two growth stages, 50% bloom and pea sized berries using a fluorescent tracer (Pyranine) to track deposition within the vineyard. Aspects of the sprayers that were evaluated were spray deposition patterns in the canopy and in-field drift (aerial and vineyard floor). Sprayer deposition was collected on 5cm x 5cm plastic cards. These cards were placed in 5 canopy zones (upper sides, upper middle, and both sides of fruit zone), on the vineyard floor in the first 3 rows downwind from the sprayer, and on aerial poles collecting drift in 0.3-meter increments above the canopy for 0.9-meters in the first 3 rows downwind from the sprayer. Sprayer data collected in the vineyard was used to evaluate total spray deposition of each sprayer.

Results – All sprayer technologies showed consistent in-canopy deposition and drift patterns at both canopy growth stages. The greatest deposition found in the canopy; the Quantum Mist had 95.57% and 98.48%, the Gregorie had 97.35% and 97.08%, and the On Target had 91.79% and 80.12% of total spray deposited in the canopy at the 50% bloom and pea-sized berry growth stages, respectively. Aerial and floor drift was relatively minimal with these technologies. The Quantum Mist had aerial drift of 1.65% and 0.01%, and floor drift of 2.78% and 1.51% for the two growth stages, respectively. The Gregoire had aerial drift of 0.09% and 0.08%, and floor drift of 2.56% and 2.84% for the two growth stages, respectively. The On Target had aerial drift of 0.42% and 4.05%, and floor drift of 7.79% and 15.83% for the two growth stages, respectively. Aerial and floor drift were highest in the row closest to spray application, indicating that longer-distance drift is relatively low with modern spray technologies. Ultimately, the information generated from this project will be used to help optimize sprayer selection for different vineyard sites.

DOI:

Publication date: September 21, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Margaret MCCOY1, Gwen HOHEISEL2, Lav KHOT3, Michelle MOYER1

1 Dept. of Horticulture, WSU IAREC, 24106 N Bunn Road,Prosser, Washington, USA
2 Dept. of Extension, WSU IAREC, 24106 N Bunn Road,Prosser, Washington, USA
3 Dept. of Biological Systems, Engineering WSU IAREC, 24106 N Bunn Road,Prosser, Washington, USA

Keywords

Sprayer, drift, deposition, Pyranine, fluorescent, optimization

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Relation entre les caractéristiques des fromages d’Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée et les facteurs de production du lait

Les fromages d’Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée (AOC) représentent un enjeu économique important pour la filière laitière (11 % des fromages produits en France sont des fromages d’AOC, et dans certaines régions de montagne, cette proportion dépasse 50 %). Les spécificités de ces fromages et leurs liaisons avec les caractéristiques du terroir constituent un système complexe où interagissent en particulier la technologie fromagère et les caractéristiques des laits (composition chimique en particulier). Ces dernières dépendent elles-mêmes des caractéristiques des animaux (origine génétique, facteurs physiologiques, état sanitaire) et de leur mode de conduite (alimentation, hygiène, traite…) (fig. 1). L’influence de ces facteurs de production (alimentation et type d’animal en particulier) sur les caractéristiques des fromages est fréquemment mise en avant par les fromagers, sur la base d’observations empiriques. Il existe cependant très peu de travaux expérimentaux sur le sujet, en raison, entre autres, de la difficulté de séparer correctement les effets propres de ces facteurs d’amont de ceux liés à la technologie fromagère.

LC-MS based metabolomics discriminates premium from varietal chilean Cabernet Sauvignon cv. Wines

Aim of the study was to investigate the metabolomic differences between Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon wines, divided according to their quality in two main groups: “Varietal” and “Premium”, and to point out metabolites tentative markers of their chemical signature and sensorial quality. Initially, 150 (50 x 3 biological replicates) experimental wines were produced by the same semi-industrial process, which covered 8 different Chilean valleys. The wine classification made by experts, divided the wines into two major groups (“Varietal” and “Premium”) and four subgroups (two for each major group). All the samples were analyzed according to a robust LC-MS based untargeted work-flow (Arapitsas et al 2018), and the proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis of the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (Sumner et al 2007)

Vitivoltaics: overview of the impacts on grapevine performance, wine quality, design features and stakeholder perceptions

This multidisciplinary study investigates “”Vitivoltaics,”” where photovoltaic (PV) panels are integrated into vineyard systems to generate renewable energy while providing partial shade to grapevines.

Monitoring water deficit in vineyards by means of Red and Infrared measurements

Vineyard water availability is one of the most important variables both in plant’s production and wine quality, once it regulates several processes, among which the stomata activity. To avoid water deficit, wine producers introduced artificial irrigation in their vineyard, using a semi-empirical process to calculate water amount.

From grapevines to extreme environments … and back?

I performed my PhD in grapevine physiology under the supervision of Dr. H. Medrano, standing in the vineyards from pre-dawn to sunrise during many hot, wet and sunny days with my colleagues J.M.E. and J.B. I also spent many days and nights facing ticks year-round working in Mediterranean macchias with J.Gu. and M.M. Later I was able to supervise PhD students on grapevines – like A.P. and M.T. – and on Mediterranean vegetation – like J.Gal. With the incorporation to the group of M.R.-C. ‘the puzzle’ was completed and, combining the aforementioned studies, we could conclude (more than 20 years ago) things like: (1) stomatal conductance is the best proxy for ‘water stress’ in studies on photosynthesis; (2) steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence retrieves photosynthesis under saturating light; (3) photoinhibition is not a major photosynthetic limitation under water stress; (4) mesophyll conductance instead is; and (5) mesophyll conductance is a major driver of leaf water use efficiency.