Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Abstract

Oligosaccharides have only recently been characterized in wine, and the information on composition and content is still limited. In wine, these molecules are mainly natural byproducts of the degradation of grape berry cell wall polysaccharides. Wine oligosaccharides present several physicochemical properties, being one relevant factor linked to the astringency perception of wines (1,2). A terroir can be defined as a grouping of homogeneous environmental units based on the typicality of the products obtained. This notion is particularly associated with wine, being the climate and the soil two of the major elements of terroir concept. Monastrell red wines, predominant varietal wines from the Southern of Spain, were elaborated with grapes from four different terroirs: Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre. Climate and soil data from different terroirs were gathered to properly distinguish them. Oligosaccharide fractions from wines were isolated, after removal of phenolic compounds, by high resolution size-exclusion chromatography. The glycosyl–linkages composition was determined by GC–MS of the partially methylated alditol acetates. Results show differences in the glycosyl–linkages composition of oligosaccharides from wines, according to their terroir. The molar percentage of glucose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose and mannose residues exhibit marked differences depending on the terroir. The ratio of the terminal to the branched residues for Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre oligosaccharides is, respectively, 0.75, 0.85, 0.99 and 0.89. Proportions of oligosaccharides families have been calculated from glycosyl-linkage data (3,4,5). Montealegre wine clearly presents the lowest relative molar percentage for the oligosaccharides from yeasts (the sum of OligoGlucans and OligoMannans) and also for OligoXyloGlucans, whereas Bullas wine exhibits by far the lowest release of OligoRhamnogalacturonans. OligoArabinans and OligoArabiGalactans type II also show differences according to the terroir. All these data were treated by PCA to permit a best understanding. The projections on the first axis show obvious separation of Montealegre, whereas a clear separation of Albatana is observed in the projections on the second axis. The first and second principal components represent, respectively, 69% and 19% of the variability for samples. In summary, our results suggest the impact of “terroir” on the structure and the composition of wine oligosaccharide fraction, which could affect their physicochemical and sensory properties.

1.Quijada-Morín et al. (2014). Food Chem. 154, 44–51. 2.Boulet et al. (2016). Food Chem. 190, 357–363 3.Ducasse et al. (2011). J Agric Food Chem. 59, 6558–6567. 4.Ballou (1982). In Strathern, Jones & Broach (Eds.), Metabolism and gene expression (335–360), NY. 5.Fry et al. (1983). Plant Physiol. 89, 1–3.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Rafael Apolinar-Valiente*, Encarna Gómez-Plaza, José María Ros-García, Pascale Williams, Thierry Doco

*INRA Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Mean polymerization degree of proanthocyanidins of grape seeds, skins and wines from Agiorgitiko (cv. Vitis vinifera): Differences among vintages

Grape phenolic compounds are very important constituents of red wine because, in addition to their antioxidant properties, they contribute to color, astringency and bitterness, oxidation reactions, interactions with proteins and ageing behavior of wines. The aim of our study was to assess the structural characteristics of grape and wine proanthocyanidins of Agiorgitiko variety and to evaluate the influence of the vintage year. Twelve vineyard locations were designated in the Nemea wine region. For three consecutive years (2012-2014), the grapes were harvested at technological maturity and the method of phloroglucinolysis was employed to determine the mean degree of polymerization (mDP) and subunit composition of the samples.

The effect of Nitrogen and Sulphur foliar applications in hot climates

ine nitrogen deficiency can negatively influence the aroma profile and ageing potential of white wines. Canopy management can alter vine microclimate, affect the nitrogen availability and influence the response of leaf senescence. Increasing the nitrogen availability to vines can increase the Yeast Assimilable Nitrogen (YAN) levels in harvested fruit and wine. Studies show that foliar nitrogen and sulphur applications at véraison, on low YAN Sauvignon blanc grapes have an effect on the level of amino acids (Jreij et al. 2009) and on S-containing compounds such as glutathione and thiols (Lacroux et al. 2008), which in turn can influence the formation of major volatiles and the aroma profile of the wine.

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Pesticide removal in wine with a physical treatment by molecular sieving

All along the winemaking process, conditioning and aging, wine is susceptible to be contaminated by different molecules. Contaminations can have various origins, related to wine microorganisms or as a result of an exogenous contamination. The aforementioned contamination of the wine can be caused by the migration of molecules from the materials in contact with the wine or by a contamination from exogenous molecules present in the air. Regardless of the source of the contamination, mainly two types of consequences can be observed.

Evaluation of colloidal stability in white and rosé wines investing Dynamic Light Scattering technology

Proteins constitute one of the three main components of grape juice and white wine, phenolic compounds and polysaccharides being the others. A specific group of the total grape-derived proteins resists degradation or adsorption during the winemaking process and remains in finished wine if not removed by the commonplace commercial practice of bentonite fining. While bentonite is effective in removing the problematic proteins, it is claimed to adversely affect the quality of the treated wine under certain conditions, through the removal of colour, flavor and texture compounds. A number of studies have indicated that different protein fractions require distinct bentonite concentrations for protein removal and consequent heat stabilization.