Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Abstract

Oligosaccharides have only recently been characterized in wine, and the information on composition and content is still limited. In wine, these molecules are mainly natural byproducts of the degradation of grape berry cell wall polysaccharides. Wine oligosaccharides present several physicochemical properties, being one relevant factor linked to the astringency perception of wines (1,2). A terroir can be defined as a grouping of homogeneous environmental units based on the typicality of the products obtained. This notion is particularly associated with wine, being the climate and the soil two of the major elements of terroir concept. Monastrell red wines, predominant varietal wines from the Southern of Spain, were elaborated with grapes from four different terroirs: Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre. Climate and soil data from different terroirs were gathered to properly distinguish them. Oligosaccharide fractions from wines were isolated, after removal of phenolic compounds, by high resolution size-exclusion chromatography. The glycosyl–linkages composition was determined by GC–MS of the partially methylated alditol acetates. Results show differences in the glycosyl–linkages composition of oligosaccharides from wines, according to their terroir. The molar percentage of glucose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose and mannose residues exhibit marked differences depending on the terroir. The ratio of the terminal to the branched residues for Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre oligosaccharides is, respectively, 0.75, 0.85, 0.99 and 0.89. Proportions of oligosaccharides families have been calculated from glycosyl-linkage data (3,4,5). Montealegre wine clearly presents the lowest relative molar percentage for the oligosaccharides from yeasts (the sum of OligoGlucans and OligoMannans) and also for OligoXyloGlucans, whereas Bullas wine exhibits by far the lowest release of OligoRhamnogalacturonans. OligoArabinans and OligoArabiGalactans type II also show differences according to the terroir. All these data were treated by PCA to permit a best understanding. The projections on the first axis show obvious separation of Montealegre, whereas a clear separation of Albatana is observed in the projections on the second axis. The first and second principal components represent, respectively, 69% and 19% of the variability for samples. In summary, our results suggest the impact of “terroir” on the structure and the composition of wine oligosaccharide fraction, which could affect their physicochemical and sensory properties.

1.Quijada-Morín et al. (2014). Food Chem. 154, 44–51. 2.Boulet et al. (2016). Food Chem. 190, 357–363 3.Ducasse et al. (2011). J Agric Food Chem. 59, 6558–6567. 4.Ballou (1982). In Strathern, Jones & Broach (Eds.), Metabolism and gene expression (335–360), NY. 5.Fry et al. (1983). Plant Physiol. 89, 1–3.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Rafael Apolinar-Valiente*, Encarna Gómez-Plaza, José María Ros-García, Pascale Williams, Thierry Doco

*INRA Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

How pressing techniques affect must composition and wine quality of Pinot blanc

This study investigates how the sensory profile of Pinot Blanc is affected from different maceration and pressing techniques. Grapes were sourced from four vineyards in the village Tramin in South Tyrol. For the experiment 200 kg of grapes from each vineyard site were hand picked the day before harvest for the commercial winery took place. Grapes were stored over night at 4°C, homogenized and processed in the experimental winery at Laimburg research centre the day after harvest. Four different pressing techniques were applied in duplicates of 100kg each.

Pesticide removal in wine with a physical treatment by molecular sieving

All along the winemaking process, conditioning and aging, wine is susceptible to be contaminated by different molecules. Contaminations can have various origins, related to wine microorganisms or as a result of an exogenous contamination. The aforementioned contamination of the wine can be caused by the migration of molecules from the materials in contact with the wine or by a contamination from exogenous molecules present in the air. Regardless of the source of the contamination, mainly two types of consequences can be observed.

Efficiency of alternative chemical and physical treatments in reducing Brettanomyces Bruxellensis from oak wood

Oak barrels form an integral part of wine production, especially that of high quality wines. However, due to its porosity, wood presents an ecological niche for microbial proliferation and is highly susceptible to microbial spoilage which could cause considerable economic losses. Brettanomyces bruxellensis, the most commonly encountered microorganism responsible for spoilage during barrel ageing, can remain in barrels after barrel sanitation to contaminate new batches of wine after refilling. Therefore, effective sanitation treatments are of utmost importance to prevent recurring wine spoilage.

Modulating role of SO2 in white wine protein haze formation

Despite the extensive research performed during the last decades, the multifactorial mechanism responsible for the white wine protein haze formation is not fully characterized. Herein, a new model is proposed, which is based on the experimental identification of sulfur dioxide as a major modulating factor inducing wine protein haze upon heating. As opposed to other reducing agents, such as 2-mercaptoethanol, dithiothreitol and tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), the addition of SO2 to must/wine upon heating cleaves intraprotein disulfide bonds, hinders thiol-disulfide exchange during protein interactions and can lead to the formation of novel inter/intraprotein disulfide bonds. Those are eventually responsible for wine protein aggregation which follows a nucleation-growth kinetic model as shown by dynamic light scattering [1].

Accumulation of polyphenols in Barbera and Nebbiolo leaves during the vegetative season

Grapevine berries produce thousands of secondary metabolites of diverse chemical nature that have been largely detailed in the past due to their importance for defining wine quality. The wide Vitis vinifera diversity, resulting in thousands of different varieties well detailed in many studies regarding berries, is still not investigated in vegetative organs, leaves in particular. Deepening knowledge related to this aspect could be of great interest for many reasons (for example the possibility of using leaf extract for pharmaceutical, cosmetic and nutrition purposes) but, above all, for understanding the susceptibility of different grapevine varieties to pathogens.