Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Abstract

Oligosaccharides have only recently been characterized in wine, and the information on composition and content is still limited. In wine, these molecules are mainly natural byproducts of the degradation of grape berry cell wall polysaccharides. Wine oligosaccharides present several physicochemical properties, being one relevant factor linked to the astringency perception of wines (1,2). A terroir can be defined as a grouping of homogeneous environmental units based on the typicality of the products obtained. This notion is particularly associated with wine, being the climate and the soil two of the major elements of terroir concept. Monastrell red wines, predominant varietal wines from the Southern of Spain, were elaborated with grapes from four different terroirs: Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre. Climate and soil data from different terroirs were gathered to properly distinguish them. Oligosaccharide fractions from wines were isolated, after removal of phenolic compounds, by high resolution size-exclusion chromatography. The glycosyl–linkages composition was determined by GC–MS of the partially methylated alditol acetates. Results show differences in the glycosyl–linkages composition of oligosaccharides from wines, according to their terroir. The molar percentage of glucose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose and mannose residues exhibit marked differences depending on the terroir. The ratio of the terminal to the branched residues for Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre oligosaccharides is, respectively, 0.75, 0.85, 0.99 and 0.89. Proportions of oligosaccharides families have been calculated from glycosyl-linkage data (3,4,5). Montealegre wine clearly presents the lowest relative molar percentage for the oligosaccharides from yeasts (the sum of OligoGlucans and OligoMannans) and also for OligoXyloGlucans, whereas Bullas wine exhibits by far the lowest release of OligoRhamnogalacturonans. OligoArabinans and OligoArabiGalactans type II also show differences according to the terroir. All these data were treated by PCA to permit a best understanding. The projections on the first axis show obvious separation of Montealegre, whereas a clear separation of Albatana is observed in the projections on the second axis. The first and second principal components represent, respectively, 69% and 19% of the variability for samples. In summary, our results suggest the impact of “terroir” on the structure and the composition of wine oligosaccharide fraction, which could affect their physicochemical and sensory properties.

1.Quijada-Morín et al. (2014). Food Chem. 154, 44–51. 2.Boulet et al. (2016). Food Chem. 190, 357–363 3.Ducasse et al. (2011). J Agric Food Chem. 59, 6558–6567. 4.Ballou (1982). In Strathern, Jones & Broach (Eds.), Metabolism and gene expression (335–360), NY. 5.Fry et al. (1983). Plant Physiol. 89, 1–3.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Rafael Apolinar-Valiente*, Encarna Gómez-Plaza, José María Ros-García, Pascale Williams, Thierry Doco

*INRA Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Interest and impact of PVP/PVI (Polyvinylpyrrolidone/ Polyvinylimidazole) on winemaking and final quality of wines

Céline Sparrow a, Christophe Morge a, a SOFRALAB SAS, 79, av. A.A. Thévenet – CS 11031 – 51530 Magenta, France Consumers’ health and security force authorities to limit, in wine as in others food industry products, the concentration in « dangerous » molecules. Therefore the legal limit in heavy metals keeps on decreasing. As per proof EU regulation just decrease the stain concentration in wine from 0,2 to 0,15 mg/l. Certain changes , such as sodium arsenite treatment in vines, disappearance of brass in wineries to the benefit of stainless steel, limit even more the concentration of heavy metals in wines. But the use of copper derivates in vines treatments is difficult to replace. In the case of wine and its elaboration, the problem is even more complex. Indeed, regulation forces the wine producers to control the concentration of certain heavy metals in final wines.

How small amounts of oxygen introduced during bottling and storage can influence the metabolic fingerprint and SO2 content of white wines

The impact of minute amounts of headspace oxygen on the post-bottling development of wine is generally considered to be very important, since oxygen, packaging and storage conditions can either damage or improve wine quality. This is reflected in the generalised use of inert bottling lines, where the headspace between the white wine and the stopper is filled with an inert gas. This experiment aimed to address some open questions about the chemistry of the interaction between wine and oxygen, crucial for decisions regarding optimal closure. While it is known that similar amounts of oxygen affect different wines to a variable extent, our knowledge of chemistry is not sufficient to construct a predictive method.

Microbial life in the grapevine: what can we expect from the leaf microbiome?

The above-ground parts of plants, which constitute the phyllosphere, have long been considered devoid of bacteria and fungi, at least in their internal tissues and microbial presence there was long considered a sign of disease. However, recent studies have shown that plants harbour complex bacterial communities, the so-called “microbiome”[1]. We are only beginning to unravel the origin of these bacterial plant inhabitants, their community structure and their roles, which in analogy to the gut microbiome, are likely to be of essential nature. Among their multifaceted metabolic possibilities, bacteria have been recently demonstrated to emit a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which can greatly impact the growth and development of both the plant and its disease-causing agents.

On the losses of dissolved CO2 during champagne aging

A misconception lingers in the minds of some wine consumers that Champagne wines don’t age. It’s largely a myth, certainly as far as the best cuvees are concerned. Actually, during the so-called autolysis period of time (in the closed bottle, after the “prise de mousse”), complex chemical reactions take place when the wine remains in contact with the dead yeast cells, which progressively bring complex and very much sought-after aromas to champagne. Nevertheless, despite their remarkable impermeability to liquid and air, caps or natural cork stoppers used to cork the bottles are not 100% hermetic with regard to gas transfers. Gas species therefore very slowly diffuse through the cap or cork stopper, along their respective inverse partial pressure. After the “prise de mousse”, because the partial pressure of CO2 in the bottleneck reaches up to 6 bars (at 12 °C), gaseous CO2 progressively diffuse from the bottle to the ambient air
(where the partial pressure of gaseous CO2 is only of order of 0,0004 bar).

On the losses of dissolved CO2 from laser-etched champagne glasses under standard tasting conditions

Under standard champagne tasting conditions, the complex interplay between the level of dissolved CO2 found in champagne, its temperature, the glass shape, and the bubbling rate, definitely impacts champagne tasting by modifying the neuro-physico-chemical mechanisms responsible for aroma release and flavor perception. Based on theoretical principles combining heterogeneous bubble nucleation, ascending bubble dynamics and mass transfer equations, a global model is proposed (depending on various parameters of both the wine and the glass itself), which quantitatively provides the progressive losses of dissolved CO2 from laser-etched champagne glasses.