Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Oligosaccharides in red wines: could their structure and composition be influenced by the grape-growing

Abstract

Oligosaccharides have only recently been characterized in wine, and the information on composition and content is still limited. In wine, these molecules are mainly natural byproducts of the degradation of grape berry cell wall polysaccharides. Wine oligosaccharides present several physicochemical properties, being one relevant factor linked to the astringency perception of wines (1,2). A terroir can be defined as a grouping of homogeneous environmental units based on the typicality of the products obtained. This notion is particularly associated with wine, being the climate and the soil two of the major elements of terroir concept. Monastrell red wines, predominant varietal wines from the Southern of Spain, were elaborated with grapes from four different terroirs: Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre. Climate and soil data from different terroirs were gathered to properly distinguish them. Oligosaccharide fractions from wines were isolated, after removal of phenolic compounds, by high resolution size-exclusion chromatography. The glycosyl–linkages composition was determined by GC–MS of the partially methylated alditol acetates. Results show differences in the glycosyl–linkages composition of oligosaccharides from wines, according to their terroir. The molar percentage of glucose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose and mannose residues exhibit marked differences depending on the terroir. The ratio of the terminal to the branched residues for Cañada Judío, Albatana, Bullas and Montealegre oligosaccharides is, respectively, 0.75, 0.85, 0.99 and 0.89. Proportions of oligosaccharides families have been calculated from glycosyl-linkage data (3,4,5). Montealegre wine clearly presents the lowest relative molar percentage for the oligosaccharides from yeasts (the sum of OligoGlucans and OligoMannans) and also for OligoXyloGlucans, whereas Bullas wine exhibits by far the lowest release of OligoRhamnogalacturonans. OligoArabinans and OligoArabiGalactans type II also show differences according to the terroir. All these data were treated by PCA to permit a best understanding. The projections on the first axis show obvious separation of Montealegre, whereas a clear separation of Albatana is observed in the projections on the second axis. The first and second principal components represent, respectively, 69% and 19% of the variability for samples. In summary, our results suggest the impact of “terroir” on the structure and the composition of wine oligosaccharide fraction, which could affect their physicochemical and sensory properties.

1.Quijada-Morín et al. (2014). Food Chem. 154, 44–51. 2.Boulet et al. (2016). Food Chem. 190, 357–363 3.Ducasse et al. (2011). J Agric Food Chem. 59, 6558–6567. 4.Ballou (1982). In Strathern, Jones & Broach (Eds.), Metabolism and gene expression (335–360), NY. 5.Fry et al. (1983). Plant Physiol. 89, 1–3.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Rafael Apolinar-Valiente*, Encarna Gómez-Plaza, José María Ros-García, Pascale Williams, Thierry Doco

*INRA Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Comprehensive exploration of wine aroma-related compounds as promoted by alternative vinification procedures in case of Zelen (Vitis vinifera L.) grapes processing

Not only vintner’s decisions in the vineyard, but also winemaker’s choices of technology approaches in the cellar play a significant role in the final wine style and quality. Whereas traditional technologies within chosen terroir are quite well explored and thus somehow predictable, there is no proper knowledge available on possible outcomes in case of implementing novel, alternative winemaking strategies. To reveal their effects on wine aroma compounds and sensory characteristics, two alternative strategies
(cryoextraction or addition of whole grape berries during last stages of fermentation) were compared to classical Vipava valley winemaking approach as normally used for an autochthonous variety Zelen. After separate vinification and bottling, all the experimental wines were subjected to semiquantitative metabolic profiling of volatile compounds (VOCs) by means of GC/MS and were then also sensorialy evaluated by pre-trained panel.

Innovations in the use of bentonite in enology: interactions with grape and wine proteins, colloids, polyphenols and aroma compounds.

The use of bentonite in oenology rounds around the limpidity and the stability that determine consumer acceptability. As a matter of fact, the haze formation in wine reduces its commercial value and makes it unacceptable for sale. Stabilization treatments are, therefore, essential to ensure a long-time limpidity and to forecast the formation of deposits in the bottle. Bentonite that is normally used in oenology for clarifying-fining purpose, shows a natural clay-based mineral structure allowing it to swell and to jelly in water and hence in must and wine.

Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) According to the Chenin blanc Association of South Africa, there are three recognized dry wine styles, Fresh and Fruity (FF), Rich and Ripe Unwooded (RRU), and Rich and Ripe Wooded (RRW), classically attributed with the help of sensory evaluation. One of the “rapid methods” has drawn our attention for the purpose of simplifying and making style attribution for large sample sets, evaluated during different sessions, more robust. Polarized Projective Mapping (PPM) is a hybrid of Projective Mapping (PM) and Polarised Sensory Positioning (PSP). It is a reference-based method in which poles
(references) are used for the evaluation of similarities and dissimilarities between samples.

The impact of different yeasts and harvest time on the wine quality of Beihong and Beimei (<I>V. vinifera x V. amurensis</I>)

Beihong and Beimei are two wine cultivars from ‘Muscat Hamberg’ (V. vinifera L.) and wild V. amurensis Rupr., which were released in China in 2008. Here,two enology practices were reported. Firstly, the impact of different yeasts including D254, GRE, K1, D21 and BDX on dry wine quality of Beihong and Beimei was investigated. For Beihong, among wines fermented by all yeasts, residual sugar content was the lowest, total anthocyanin and resveratrol contents were the highest in the wine by D254. However, the wine by D254 had lower titrable acid than those by the other yeasts except BDX.