Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The role of tomato juice serum in malolactic fermentation in wine

The role of tomato juice serum in malolactic fermentation in wine

Abstract

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a common process in winemaking to reduce wine acidity, maintain microbial stability and modify wine aroma. However, successful MLF is often hampered by their sluggish or stuck activity of malolactic bacteria (MLB) which may be caused by nutrient deficiency, especially when MLB are inoculated after alcoholic fermentation (Alexandre et al., 2004; Lerm et al., 2010). Identification and characterization of essential nutrients and growth factors for MLB allows for production of highly efficient nutrient supplements for MLF. While the growth-inducing effect of tomato juice, the so-called ‘tomato juice factor’ (glycosylated pantothenic acid) on lactic acid bacteria in the culture medium without ethanol has been described a long time ago (Imamoto et al. 1972; Eto and Nakagawa 1975; Okada et al, 2000), still, the effect in high alcohol wine matrix remains to be elucidated. Aim: The aim of the current work was to study the possible role of TJF in inducing the malolactic conversion in wine. Materials and Methods: The synthetic grape must was fermented with EC-1118 wine yeast (Lalvin®, Lallemand Inc.) to the final ethanol concentration of 10-11%, pH 3.5 and glucose/fructose concentration of less than 3 g/L. The model wine was transferred into 100 ml fermenters and the whole freeze-dried tomato juice serum (TJS) or its molecular fractions obtained with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) were added. The wines were then inoculated with a commercial Oenococcus oeni strain VP41 (Lalvin®, Lallemand Inc.). The MLF was followed for 22 days and the conversion of malic acid to lactic acid was measured with HPLC. Glycosylated pantothenic acid was determined with indirect enzymatic method after hydrolysis of β-Glucosidase and liberated pantothenic acid was quantified by LC-MS. Results and Discussion: Our experiments showed that the addition of lyophilized TJS to model wine enabled to complete malolactic conversion in 18 days, while in control fermentation only 10 % of malic acid was consumed in the same time. The TJS was then fractionated using SEC and the effect of the collected fractions on MLF performance was tested using the same experimental setup. We observed the significant variation of MLF activity between different SEC fractions. The treatment of TJS with β-glucosidase revealed that from all pantothenic acid ~58% is glycosylated. These results suggest that TJS is a vital supplement, containing essential nutrients like glycosylated pantothenic acid for MLB, which results in quicker and more reliable MLF in wine.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Mary-Liis Kütt*, Ildar Nisamedtinov, Kaspar Kevvai, Triinu Kapp

*Competence Center of Food and Fermentation Technology

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Impact of industrial-scale serial filtration on macromolecules in red wines

Filtration is a critical step in ensuring the clarity and microbial stability of wine prior to bottling. However the process of filtering potentially reduces red wine quality by removing some of the macromolecules that contribute to the texture of the wine. Commercial red wines, Cabernet Sauvignon (CAS) and Shiraz (SHZ), of two vintages and two grades (premium grade wines from the older vintage: CAS13 and SHZ13; and standard grade wines from a younger vintage: CAS14 and SHZ14) were filtered through industrial-scale commercial filtration units prior to bottling. Samples were taken before and after cross-flow filtration, lenticular filters, 0.65 µm and 0.45 µm pore size nylon membrane filters. The concentration and composition of macromolecules, including tannins and polysaccharides, were measured in all samples as well as particle size distribution and wine colour.

Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

The interactions among aromatic compounds and proteins is an important issue for the quality of foods and beverages. In wine, the loss of flavor after vinification is associated to bentonite treatment and this effect can be the result of the removal of aroma compounds which are bound wine proteins. This phenomenon was recently demonstrated for long chain fatty acids and their ethyl esters (1). Since these latter compounds are spectroscopically silent, their association with proteins is not easy to measure.

The impact of different yeasts and harvest time on the wine quality of Beihong and Beimei (<I>V. vinifera x V. amurensis</I>)

Beihong and Beimei are two wine cultivars from ‘Muscat Hamberg’ (V. vinifera L.) and wild V. amurensis Rupr., which were released in China in 2008. Here,two enology practices were reported. Firstly, the impact of different yeasts including D254, GRE, K1, D21 and BDX on dry wine quality of Beihong and Beimei was investigated. For Beihong, among wines fermented by all yeasts, residual sugar content was the lowest, total anthocyanin and resveratrol contents were the highest in the wine by D254. However, the wine by D254 had lower titrable acid than those by the other yeasts except BDX.

Multivariate strategies for red wines classification using stilbenes and flavonols content

Bioactive polyphenols from grapes and wines, like stilbenes and flavonols (SaF), are often determined to nutritional evaluation, but also for many other purposes. The objective of this study was to quantify SaF in red wines from “Campanha Gaúcha”, a large and young viticultural region from South Brazil. Moreover, through statistical analysis, evaluate the influence of these compounds according to varieties, production process, harvest years and micro-regions of cultivation. A total of 58 samples of red wines were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) for determination of trans-resveratrol (R), quercetin (Q), myricetin (M), kaempferol (K), trans-e-viniferin (V) and their precursor, cinnamic acid (C).

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain.