Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Abstract

Tannin, anthocyanins and their reaction products play a major role in the quality of red wines. They contribute to their sensory characteristics, particularly colour and astringency. Grape tannins and anthocyanins are extracted during red wine fermentation. However, their concentration and composition change over time, due to their strong chemical reactivity1. It is also well known that yeasts influence the wine phenolic content, either through the release of metabolites involved in the formation of derived pigments1, or through polyphenol adsorption2,3. Up to now, this adsorption has mainly been attributed to cell walls, though it has been supposed that small tannin dimers and trimers could enter the periplasmic space through the wall pores and interact with the plasma membrane4. Interactions between polyphenols and inactivated yeast cells or cell walls obtained from an enological commercial strain were studied first by means of adsorption isotherms in a model wine-like solution5. The framework of this study was the aging of red wines. Polyphenols were skin and seed tannins, and a pool of polyphenols purified from a red wine (Merlot). Results evidenced a high capacity of whole cells to irreversibly adsorb grape and wine tannins whereas only weak interactions were observed for cell walls. This point was quite unexpected considering literature and raised the question of the part played by cell walls in the yeast ability to fix wine polyphenols. In the present work, polyphenol location after their interactions with inactivated yeast cells or cell walls was studied by means of transmission electron microscopy, light epifluorescence and confocal microscopy. Microscopy observations evidenced that if tannins interact with cell walls, and especially cell wall mannoproteins, they mostly diffuse freely through the cell wall and plasma membrane of dead cells to interact with their cytoplasmic components. This raised the question of yeast interactions with polyphenols in the case of living cells. The study was thus extended and interactions studied during fermentation, at different stages. The impact of polyphenols on fermentation kinetic and yeast growth rate were determined. In our experimental conditions, the exponential phase of the fermentation and the yeast growth rate were affected by polyphenols. Confocal microscopy observations allowed evidencing the diffusion of polyphenols in living cells. These results demonstrate that interactions between yeast cells and polyphenols are not limited to cell walls. They also involve cytoplasmic components and may influence yeast metabolism.

Litterature cited: 1.Fulcrand et al. (2006), Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 57(3), 289. 2.Morata et al. (2003), J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 4084 3.Mazauric et al. (2006). J. Agric. Food Chem.,54, 3876 4.Marquez et al. (2009), J. Agric. Food Chem., 57, 8026 5.Mekoue et al. (2015), J. Agric. Food Chem, 63, 660. 6.Mekoue et al. (2015), J. Agric. Food Chem, 63, 7539

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Julie Mekoue Nguela*, Aude Vernhet, Jean-Marc Brillouet, Nathalie Sieczkowski

*INRA/SUPAGRO

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Using elicitors in different grape varieties. Effect over their phenolic composition

Phenolic compounds are very important in crop plants and have been the subject of a large number of studies. Three main reasons can be cited for optimizing the level of phenolic compounds in crop plants: their physiological role in plants, their technological significance for food processing, and their nutritional characteristics1 Indeed, an enormous diversity of phenolic antioxidants is found in fruits and vegetables, and their presence and roles can be affected or modified by several pre- and postharvest cultural practices and/or food processing technologies (Ruiz-García et al. 2012, Goldman et al. 1999, Tudela et al. 2002). In winegrapes, the technological importance of phenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids, is well-known.

Mean polymerization degree of proanthocyanidins of grape seeds, skins and wines from Agiorgitiko (cv. Vitis vinifera): Differences among vintages

Grape phenolic compounds are very important constituents of red wine because, in addition to their antioxidant properties, they contribute to color, astringency and bitterness, oxidation reactions, interactions with proteins and ageing behavior of wines. The aim of our study was to assess the structural characteristics of grape and wine proanthocyanidins of Agiorgitiko variety and to evaluate the influence of the vintage year. Twelve vineyard locations were designated in the Nemea wine region. For three consecutive years (2012-2014), the grapes were harvested at technological maturity and the method of phloroglucinolysis was employed to determine the mean degree of polymerization (mDP) and subunit composition of the samples.

Influence of methyl jasmonate foliar application to vineyard on grape volatile composition over three consecutive vintages

An alternative to improve grape quality is the application to the vineyard of elicitors. Although these compounds were first used to increase resistance of plants against pathogens, it has been found that they are also able to induce mechanisms involved in the synthesis of phenolic compounds and some amino acids. However, researches about the influence of elicitors on grape volatile composition are scarcely. Therefore, the aim of this work was to study the influence of methyl jasmonate (MeJ) foliar application on grape aroma composition over three consecutive vintages. MeJ was applied to Tempranillo grapevines at a concentration of 10 mM in 2013, 2014, and 2015 years. Control plants were sprayed with water.

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Molecular cloning and characterization of UDP-glucose: furaneol glucosyltransferase gene from Japanese

2,5-Dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone (furaneol) is an important aroma compound in fruits, such as pineapple and strawberry, and is reported to contribute to the strawberry-like note in some wines. Several grapevine species are used in winemaking, and furaneol is one of the characteristic aroma compounds in wines made from American grape (Vitis labrusca) and its hybrid grape, similar to methyl anthranilate. Muscat Bailey A is a hybrid grape variety [V. labrusca (Bailey) x V. vinifera (Muscat Hamburg)], and its wine is one of the most popular in Japan. The inclusion of Muscat Bailey A in the ‘International List of Vine and Varieties and their Synonyms’ managed by the ‘International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV)’ in 2013 has further fueled its popularity among winemakers and researchers worldwide.