Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Abstract

Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) According to the Chenin blanc Association of South Africa, there are three recognized dry wine styles, Fresh and Fruity (FF), Rich and Ripe Unwooded (RRU), and Rich and Ripe Wooded (RRW), classically attributed with the help of sensory evaluation. One of the “rapid methods” has drawn our attention for the purpose of simplifying and making style attribution for large sample sets, evaluated during different sessions, more robust. Polarized Projective Mapping (PPM) is a hybrid of Projective Mapping (PM) and Polarised Sensory Positioning (PSP). It is a reference-based method in which poles (references) are used for the evaluation of similarities and dissimilarities between samples. Panelists are presented with “free-moving” products to arrange around the poles, according to similarities and dissimilarities, to create a 2D product map. Additionally, the judges give a description of the samples, generating a short list of attributes. Our approach to testing this method was to first establish the poles using PM, then test the model using PPM with samples that were either known (used in the PM session and that contributed to the choice of poles) or unknown. The sample set consisted of 18 commercial Chenin blanc wines, vintages 2013 and 2014, from the three representative styles, chosen according to the tasting notes description. Four PPM experiments were performed. The poles were kept constant among the PPM experiments, while different combinations of “free-moving” wines were evaluated to test the consistency of product groupings. In all tasks sensory descriptors were generated. For each session 15 judges were recruited. Each judge repeated the exercise after a 15 minute break. For PM the sample set consisted of 12 samples (9 wines, 3 of them duplicates). For PPM, the sample sets also had 12 samples, with one of the poles and one other sample duplicated. The PPM sessions were organized as follows: PPM1 same samples as PM, PPM2 and PPM3 half known and half unknown samples, and PPM4 only unknown samples. The data generated was evaluated statistically by means of multiple factor analysis (MFA). Multiple factor analysis (MFA) on the individual tasks showed in the PM and all four PPM tasks, the RRW group separated most clearly from other wines and blind duplicates of this style grouped well together. The FF and RRU styles grouped less consistently from one task to another and blind duplicates were not grouped as closely to one another. MFA results comparing all four PPM experiments showed good repeatability in grouping of wines among the separate sessions, especially for wooded wines. New rapid methods provide significant cost benefits for the wine industry and researchers. PPM may be a useful tool for researchers to apply in the analysis of large sample sets of wines.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Astrid Buica*, Christine Wilson, Jeanne Brand

*Stellenbosch University

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Merging fast sensory profiling with non-targeted GC-MS analysis for multifactorial experimental wine making

Wine aroma is influenced by several viticultural and oenological factors. In this study we used experimental wine making in a full factorial design to determine the impact of grapevine age, must turbidity, and yeast strain on the aroma of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling wines. A recently developed, non-targeted SPME-GC-MS fingerprinting approach for wine volatiles was used. This approach includes the segmentation and mathematical transformation of chromatograms in combination with Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) and subsequent deconvolution of important chromatogram segments.

Flavanol glycosides in grapes and wines : the key missing molecular intermediates in condensed tannin biosynthesis ?

Polyphenols are present in a wide variety of plants and foods such as tea, cacao and grape1. An important sub-class of these compounds is the flavanols present in grapes and wines as monomers (e.g (+)-catechin or (-)-epicatechin), or polymers also called condensed tannins or proanthocyanidins. They have important antioxidant properties2 but their biosynthesis remains partly unknown. Some recent studies have focused on the role of glycosylated intermediates that are involved in the transport of the monomers and may serve as precursors in the polymerization mechanism3, 4. The global objective of this work is to identify flavanol glycosides in grapes or wines, describe their structure and determine their abundance during grape development and in wine.

Technological possibilities of grape marc cell walls as wine fining agent. Effect on wine phenolic composition

Fining is a technique that is used to remove unwanted wine components that affect clarification, astringency, color, bitterness, and aroma. Fining involves the addition of adsorptive or reactive material in order to reduce or eliminate the presence of certain less desirable wine components and to ensure that a wine remains in a particular stable state for a given period of time Recently concerns have been raised about the addition of animal proteins, such as gelatin, to wine due to the disease known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (Mad Cow disease). Although the origin of gelatins has been moved to porcine, winemakers are asking for substitute products with properties and application protocols similar to the traditional animal-derived ones, making the use of plant-derived proteins in fining a practically viable possibility. As a consequence, various fining agents derived from plants have been proposed, including proteins from cereals, legumes, and potato.

Bentonite fining in cold wines: prediction tests, reduced efficiency and possibilities to avoid additional fining treatments

Bentonite fining is widely used to prevent protein haze in white wines. Most wineries use laboratory-scale fining trials to define the appropriate amount of bentonite to be used in the cellar. Those pre-tests need to mimic as much as possible the industrial scale fining procedure to determine the exact amount of bentonite necessary for protein stability. Nevertheless it is frequent that, after fining with the recommended amount of bentonite, wines appear still unstable and need an additional fining treatment. It remains a major challenge to understand why the same wine, fined with the same dosage of the same bentonite, achieves stability in the lab, but not in the cellar.

The moment of preharvest elicitor application influence its final effect on winegrapes quality

Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites of grapes. Plants produce a wide variety of this type of metabolites through diverse biosynthesis pathways and their production is sometimes a response to external stimuli, either environmental or biotic stresses. Some of them may act as chemical defenses against pathogens or herbivores and their synthesis is increased when the attack exists. However, it is remarkable that the synthesis of these interesting compounds can be activated even when the stimulus is not present, with the use of elicitors. These are substances that when applied exogenously trigger the biosynthetic pathways conducting to the synthesis of these defense compounds.