Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Abstract

Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) According to the Chenin blanc Association of South Africa, there are three recognized dry wine styles, Fresh and Fruity (FF), Rich and Ripe Unwooded (RRU), and Rich and Ripe Wooded (RRW), classically attributed with the help of sensory evaluation. One of the “rapid methods” has drawn our attention for the purpose of simplifying and making style attribution for large sample sets, evaluated during different sessions, more robust. Polarized Projective Mapping (PPM) is a hybrid of Projective Mapping (PM) and Polarised Sensory Positioning (PSP). It is a reference-based method in which poles (references) are used for the evaluation of similarities and dissimilarities between samples. Panelists are presented with “free-moving” products to arrange around the poles, according to similarities and dissimilarities, to create a 2D product map. Additionally, the judges give a description of the samples, generating a short list of attributes. Our approach to testing this method was to first establish the poles using PM, then test the model using PPM with samples that were either known (used in the PM session and that contributed to the choice of poles) or unknown. The sample set consisted of 18 commercial Chenin blanc wines, vintages 2013 and 2014, from the three representative styles, chosen according to the tasting notes description. Four PPM experiments were performed. The poles were kept constant among the PPM experiments, while different combinations of “free-moving” wines were evaluated to test the consistency of product groupings. In all tasks sensory descriptors were generated. For each session 15 judges were recruited. Each judge repeated the exercise after a 15 minute break. For PM the sample set consisted of 12 samples (9 wines, 3 of them duplicates). For PPM, the sample sets also had 12 samples, with one of the poles and one other sample duplicated. The PPM sessions were organized as follows: PPM1 same samples as PM, PPM2 and PPM3 half known and half unknown samples, and PPM4 only unknown samples. The data generated was evaluated statistically by means of multiple factor analysis (MFA). Multiple factor analysis (MFA) on the individual tasks showed in the PM and all four PPM tasks, the RRW group separated most clearly from other wines and blind duplicates of this style grouped well together. The FF and RRU styles grouped less consistently from one task to another and blind duplicates were not grouped as closely to one another. MFA results comparing all four PPM experiments showed good repeatability in grouping of wines among the separate sessions, especially for wooded wines. New rapid methods provide significant cost benefits for the wine industry and researchers. PPM may be a useful tool for researchers to apply in the analysis of large sample sets of wines.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Astrid Buica*, Christine Wilson, Jeanne Brand

*Stellenbosch University

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Reduction of herbaceous aromas by wine lactic acid bacteria mediated degradation of volatile aldehydes

Consumers typically prefer wines with floral and fruity aromas over those presenting green-pepper, vegetal or herbaceous notes. Pyrazines have been identified as causatives for herbaceous notes in wines, especially Bordeaux reds. However, pyrazines are not universally responsible for herbaceousness, and several other wine volatile compounds are known to produce distinct vegetal/herbaceous aromas in wines. Specifically, volatile aldehydes elicit sensations of herbaceousness or grassiness and have been described in wines well above their perception thresholds.

Correlations between N,S,O-heterocycle levels and age of Champagne base wines

Champagne regulation allows winegrowers to stock small amounts of still wines in order to compensate vintages’ quality shifts mainly due to climate variations. According to their technical requirements and house style some Champagne producers (commonly named “Champagne houses”) use these stored wines in the blend in order to introduce an element of complexity. These wines possess the particularity of being aged on fine lees in thermo-regulated stainless steel tanks. The Champagne house of Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin has several wines stored this way.

A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

In red wines the post-MLF SO2 addition is an essential event. It is also the case for the “mutage” during the elaboration of the “liquoreux”. At these moments SO2 plays an antimicrobial action and an antioxidant effect. But at current pH of wines, ensuring a powerful molecular SO2 has become very difficult. Recent work on Brettanomyces strains have also shown that some strains are resistant up to 1.2 mg / L of molecular SO2. It’s also the case of the some Saccharomuces or Zygosaccharomyces strains suitable to re-ferment “liquoreux” wines after the “mutage”.

Field-grown Sauvignon Blanc berries react to increased exposure by controlling antioxidant homeostasis and displaying UV acclimation responses that are influenced by the level of ambient light

Leaf removal in the bunch zone is a common viticultural practice with several objectives, yet it has been difficult to conclusively link the physiological mechanism(s) and metabolic berry impact to this widely practiced treatment. We used a field-omics approach1 in a Sauvignon blanc high altitude model vineyard, showing that the early leaf removal in the bunch zone caused quantifiable and stable responses (over years) in the microclimate where the main perturbation was increased exposure. We provide an explanation for how leaf removal leads to the shifts in grape metabolites typically linked to this treatment and confirm anecdotal evidence and previous reports that leaf removal treatment at an early stage of berry development affects “quality-associated” metabolites (monoterpenes and norisoprenoids).

Chemical markers in wine related to low levels of yeast available nitrogen in the grape

Nitrogen is an important nutrient of yeast and its low content in grape must is a major cause for sluggish fermentations. To prevent problems during fermentation, a supplementation of the must with ammonium salts or more complex nitrogen mixtures is practiced in the cellar. However this correction seems to improve only partially the quality of wine [1]. In fact, yeast is using nitrogen in many of its metabolic pathways and depending of the sort of the nitrogen source (ammonium or amino acids) it produces different flavor active compounds. A limitation in amino acids can lead to a change in the metabolic pathways of yeast and consequently alter wine quality.