Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Abstract

Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) According to the Chenin blanc Association of South Africa, there are three recognized dry wine styles, Fresh and Fruity (FF), Rich and Ripe Unwooded (RRU), and Rich and Ripe Wooded (RRW), classically attributed with the help of sensory evaluation. One of the “rapid methods” has drawn our attention for the purpose of simplifying and making style attribution for large sample sets, evaluated during different sessions, more robust. Polarized Projective Mapping (PPM) is a hybrid of Projective Mapping (PM) and Polarised Sensory Positioning (PSP). It is a reference-based method in which poles (references) are used for the evaluation of similarities and dissimilarities between samples. Panelists are presented with “free-moving” products to arrange around the poles, according to similarities and dissimilarities, to create a 2D product map. Additionally, the judges give a description of the samples, generating a short list of attributes. Our approach to testing this method was to first establish the poles using PM, then test the model using PPM with samples that were either known (used in the PM session and that contributed to the choice of poles) or unknown. The sample set consisted of 18 commercial Chenin blanc wines, vintages 2013 and 2014, from the three representative styles, chosen according to the tasting notes description. Four PPM experiments were performed. The poles were kept constant among the PPM experiments, while different combinations of “free-moving” wines were evaluated to test the consistency of product groupings. In all tasks sensory descriptors were generated. For each session 15 judges were recruited. Each judge repeated the exercise after a 15 minute break. For PM the sample set consisted of 12 samples (9 wines, 3 of them duplicates). For PPM, the sample sets also had 12 samples, with one of the poles and one other sample duplicated. The PPM sessions were organized as follows: PPM1 same samples as PM, PPM2 and PPM3 half known and half unknown samples, and PPM4 only unknown samples. The data generated was evaluated statistically by means of multiple factor analysis (MFA). Multiple factor analysis (MFA) on the individual tasks showed in the PM and all four PPM tasks, the RRW group separated most clearly from other wines and blind duplicates of this style grouped well together. The FF and RRU styles grouped less consistently from one task to another and blind duplicates were not grouped as closely to one another. MFA results comparing all four PPM experiments showed good repeatability in grouping of wines among the separate sessions, especially for wooded wines. New rapid methods provide significant cost benefits for the wine industry and researchers. PPM may be a useful tool for researchers to apply in the analysis of large sample sets of wines.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Astrid Buica*, Christine Wilson, Jeanne Brand

*Stellenbosch University

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Monitoring of Pesticide Residues from Vine to Wine

Those previous years, pesticides are often brought to the forefront by media. Questions arose about their toxicity for growers and consumers. Even if a downward trend is underway, the use of pesticides is required to ensure steady quality and quantity of harvests. A large number of active ingredients are authorized but regarding viticulture, mainly insecticides and fungicides are applied, to control pests and diseases and to increase crop yield. Some phytosanitary products, principally fungicides, applied close to the harvest date may frequently be detected in wines.

Supramolecular approaches to the study of the astringency elicited by wine phenolic compounds

The objective of this study is to review the scientific evidences and to advance into the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of astringency. Astringency has been described as the drying, roughing and puckering sensation perceived when some food and beverages are tasted (1). The main, but possibly not the only, mechanism for the astringency is the precipitation of salivary proteins (2,3). Between phenolic compounds found in red wines, flavan-3-ols are the group usually related to the development of this sensation. Other compounds, phenolic or not, like anthocyanins, polysaccharides and mannoproteins could act modifying or modulating astringency perception by hindering the interaction between flavanols and salivary proteins either because of their interaction with the flavanols or because of their interaction with the salivary proteins.

Moscatel vine-shoot extracts as grapevine biostimulant to increase the varietal aroma of Airén wines

There is a growing interest in the exploitation of vine-shoots waste, since they are often left or burned. Sánchez-Gómez et al. [1] have shown that vines-shoots aqueous extracts have significant contents of bioactive compounds, among which several polyphenols and volatiles are highlighted. Recent studied had demonstrated that the chemical composition of vine-shoots is enhanced when vine-shoots are toasted
[2,3]. The application of vegetable products in the vineyards has led to significant changes towards a more “Sustainable Viticulture”. An innovative foliar application for Airén vine-shoot extracts have been carried out to the vineyard. It has been shown that they act as grape biostimulants, improving certain wine quality characteristics [4].

Pesticide removal in wine with a physical treatment by molecular sieving

All along the winemaking process, conditioning and aging, wine is susceptible to be contaminated by different molecules. Contaminations can have various origins, related to wine microorganisms or as a result of an exogenous contamination. The aforementioned contamination of the wine can be caused by the migration of molecules from the materials in contact with the wine or by a contamination from exogenous molecules present in the air. Regardless of the source of the contamination, mainly two types of consequences can be observed.

Bentonite fining in cold wines: prediction tests, reduced efficiency and possibilities to avoid additional fining treatments

Bentonite fining is widely used to prevent protein haze in white wines. Most wineries use laboratory-scale fining trials to define the appropriate amount of bentonite to be used in the cellar. Those pre-tests need to mimic as much as possible the industrial scale fining procedure to determine the exact amount of bentonite necessary for protein stability. Nevertheless it is frequent that, after fining with the recommended amount of bentonite, wines appear still unstable and need an additional fining treatment. It remains a major challenge to understand why the same wine, fined with the same dosage of the same bentonite, achieves stability in the lab, but not in the cellar.