Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Analysis of peptide fraction from white wines

Analysis of peptide fraction from white wines

Abstract

Among nitrogen compounds included in white wines, the peptide fraction is certainly the least studied, however this fraction is quantitatively the most important (Feuillat, 1974). Existing studies concern the fraction below 1 kDa and only for white and sparkling wines (Bartolomé et al, 1997, Desportes et al 2000). In this report, we have developed methods to isolate peptides from reference white wines. Then, we have applied this methodology with bitter wine to answer a research question: is there a relation between peptides and the bitterness of white wine as for some cheese for example (Furtado, 1984)? First, after splitting reference wines by means of tangential ultrafiltration we got 3 different fractions: proteins above 10 kDa, peptides between 3 and 10 kDa and small peptides and free amino acids below 3 kDa. The amount of total nitrogen for each fraction was quantified by method of Kjedhal. We confirm that peptides represent the largest fraction of the nitrogen compounds in white wine. We expanded the range of molecular weight and studied the peptide fraction between 1 kDa and 10 kDa. This fraction of interest obtained by tangential ultrafiltration was diafiltrated against water and was concentrated by lyophilization. After, extracts from this fraction was separated by gel exclusion chromatography with the superdex 30 specific for peptides. Each fraction was read by absorbance at the 275 nm and then specifically detected by fluorescence with o-phtalaldehyde (OPA) to differentiate peptides from other molecules like polyphenols which are also detected at this wavelength. This isolation strategy was subsequently applied to white wines more or less bitter to investigate a potential relation between the peptides and the bitter taste. We obtained different peptide profiles between the most and least bitter wine for peptides corresponding to a high molecular weight. Every white wines studied here have similar peptide profiles made of two pools of different peptides. For the bitterest wine, the first pool corresponding to the higher molecular weight is greater. Thus, we may have revealed a relation between a class of peptides and the bitterness of these white wines.

REFERENCE LIST • Bartolomé, B., Moreno-Arribas, V., Pueyo, E., Polo, M.C. (1997) – On-line HPLCL photodiode array detection and derivatization for partial identification of small peptides from white wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45, 3374-3381. • Desportes, C., Charpentier, M.,Duteurtre, B. Maujean, A., Duchiron, F. (2000) – Liquid chromatographic fractionation of small peptides from wine. Journal of chromatography A. 893, pages 281-291. • Feuillat, M. (1974) – Contribution à l’étude des composés azotés dans les moûts de raisin et dans les vins. Thèse de Doctorat, université de Dijon. • Furtado, M.M. (1984) – Prevention of bitter taste in cheeses. Bulletin de la fédération Internationale de Laiterie. 177, 113-122.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Francois-Xavier Sauvage*, Caty Chabalier

*INRA

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Tannin, anthocyanins and their reaction products play a major role in the quality of red wines. They contribute to their sensory characteristics, particularly colour and astringency. Grape tannins and anthocyanins are extracted during red wine fermentation. However, their concentration and composition change over time, due to their strong chemical reactivity1. It is also well known that yeasts influence the wine phenolic content, either through the release of metabolites involved in the formation of derived pigments1, or through polyphenol adsorption2,3.

Use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant in juices and wines

Chitosan is a polysaccharide produced from the deacetylation of chitin extracted from crustaceous and fungi. In winemaking chitosan is mainly used in the clarification of grape juice and wine, stabilization of white wines, removal of metals and to prevent wine spoilage by undesired microorganisms. The addition of chitosan to model wine systems was able to retard browning, reduce levels of metallic ions (Fe and Cu) and to protect varietal thiols due to its antiradical activity1. The present experiment was planned in order to evaluate the use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant at three different stages of Sauvignon blanc fermentation and winemaking. Sauvignon blanc juices from three different locations were obtained at a commercial winery in Marlborough, New Zealand. One lots of grapes was collected from a receival bin and pressed into juice with a water-bag press, and a further juice sample was collected from a commercial pressing operation. Chitosan (1 g/L, low molecular weight, 75 – 85% deacetylated) was added to the juice after pressing, after cold settling, after fermentation, or at all these stages. Controls without any chitosan additions were also prepared.

Microbial life in the grapevine: what can we expect from the leaf microbiome?

The above-ground parts of plants, which constitute the phyllosphere, have long been considered devoid of bacteria and fungi, at least in their internal tissues and microbial presence there was long considered a sign of disease. However, recent studies have shown that plants harbour complex bacterial communities, the so-called “microbiome”[1]. We are only beginning to unravel the origin of these bacterial plant inhabitants, their community structure and their roles, which in analogy to the gut microbiome, are likely to be of essential nature. Among their multifaceted metabolic possibilities, bacteria have been recently demonstrated to emit a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which can greatly impact the growth and development of both the plant and its disease-causing agents.

New molecular evidence of wine yeast-bacteria interaction unraveled by untargeted metabolomic profiling

Bacterial malolactic fermentation (MLF) has a considerable impact on wine quality. The yeast strain used for primary fermentation can consistently stimulate (MLF+ phenotype) or inhibit (MLF- phenotype) malolactic bacteria and the MLF process as a function of numerous winemaking practices, but the molecular evidence behind still remains a mystery. In this study, such evidence was elucidated by the direct comparison of extracellular metabolic profiles of MLF+ and MLF- yeast phenotypes. Untargeted metabolomics combining ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR-MS analysis, powerful machine learning methods and a comprehensive wine metabolite database, discovered around 800 putative biomarkers and 2500 unknown masses involved in phenotypic distinction.

Screening sensory-directed methodology for the selection of non-saccharomyces wine yeasts based on perceived aroma quality

The present work contributes by developing a rapid sensory-directed methodology for the screening and selection of high quality wines with different sensory profiles Therefore, Verdejo and Tempranillo musts were fermented with 50 different yeasts each under controlled laboratory conditions. Resulting samples were firstly categorized according to five levels of quality by a panel of wine professionals (Sáenz-Navajas, Ballester et al. 2013). Higher quality samples were described by flash profiling by a semi-trained panel
(Valentin, Chollet et al. 2012) and most distinctive samples were screened by gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) (López, Aznar et al. 2002).