Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 New biological tools to control and secure malolactic fermentation in high pH wines

New biological tools to control and secure malolactic fermentation in high pH wines

Abstract

Originally, the role of the malolactic fermentation (MLF) was simply to improve the microbial stability of wine via biological deacidification. However, there is an accumulation of evidence to support the fact that lactic acid bacteria (LAB) also contribute positively to the taste and aroma of wine. Many different LAB enter into grape juice and wine from the surface of grape berries, cluster stems, vine leaves, soil and winery equipment. Due to the highly selective environment of juices and wine, only a few types of LAB are able to grow. Wine pH is most selective, and at pH below 3.5 generally only strains of Oenococcus oeni can survive and express malolactic activity, while wines with pH above 3.5 can contain various species of Pediococcus, as well as strains of Lactobacillus. The trend toward harvesting higher maturity grapes has resulted in the processing of higher pH musts and the production of wines containing increased levels of alcohol. These conditions favor the growth of indigenous bacteria and often O. oeni does not prevail at the end of alcoholic fermentation. More Lactobacillus sp. predominate and are often responsible for spontaneous MLF (du Toit et al. 2011). Some L. plantarum strains can tolerate the high alcohol concentrations and SO2 levels normally encountered in wine. Due to their very complex and diverse metabolism a range of compositional changes can be induced, which may affect the quality of the final product positively or negatively. A recent isolate have shown most interesting results, not only for its capacity to induce MLF after direct inoculation in freeze-dried form, but also for their positive contribution to the wine aroma. Co-inoculation (inoculation of selected wine LAB 24 hours after the yeast) can ensure the early implantation and dominance of the selected strain, the early onset and completion of MLF, and can possibly prevent the appearance of the spoilage yeast and bacteria. Applying an important L. plantarum inoculum with high malolactic activity assures an immediate dominance, as well as predictable and complete MLF in short time and allows an early stabilization of the wine. Since it degrades hexose sugars by the homo-fermentative pathway, which poses no risk of acetic acid production from the residual sugars that may be present in high pH wines, it is an interesting alternative to control MLF in high pH wines.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Sibylle Dr. Krieger-Weber*, Anthony Silvano, Magali Deleris-Bou

*Lallemand SAS

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Analysis of peptide fraction from white wines

Among nitrogen compounds included in white wines, the peptide fraction is certainly the least studied, however this fraction is quantitatively the most important (Feuillat, 1974). Existing studies concern the fraction below 1 kDa and only for white and sparkling wines (Bartolomé et al, 1997, Desportes et al 2000). In this report, we have developed methods to isolate peptides from reference white wines. Then, we have applied this methodology with bitter wine to answer a research question: is there a relation between peptides and the bitterness of white wine as for some cheese for example (Furtado, 1984)?

A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

In red wines the post-MLF SO2 addition is an essential event. It is also the case for the “mutage” during the elaboration of the “liquoreux”. At these moments SO2 plays an antimicrobial action and an antioxidant effect. But at current pH of wines, ensuring a powerful molecular SO2 has become very difficult. Recent work on Brettanomyces strains have also shown that some strains are resistant up to 1.2 mg / L of molecular SO2. It’s also the case of the some Saccharomuces or Zygosaccharomyces strains suitable to re-ferment “liquoreux” wines after the “mutage”.

South Africa’s top 10 Sauvignon blanc wines. How do the chemical and sensory profiles compare?

FNB Top 10 Sauvignon Blanc competition, presented by the Sauvignon Blanc Interest Group of South Africa and sponsored by First National Bank, is the country’s foremost platform for producers of this cultivar to showcase and benchmark their wines. Wines entered in the competition originated from all over the winegrowing regions of the country and the winning wines showed good representation of quality South African Sauvignon blanc wines. The ten selected wines were subjected to various chemical analyses including volatile thiol and methoxypyrazine determination, while the sensory profile of each wine was determined using projective mapping.

Oenological features of Sangiovese wine from vinification of whole grape berries

The present study was performed in a traditional winery located in the viticultural area of Brunello di Montalcino, Siena, Italy, in the vintage 2015. Actually, in this winery Sangiovese grape musts are fermented in large oak barrels by a single strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae previously isolated in the same winery. Pumping over operations are carried out once or twice a day until the end of alcoholic fermentations. The aim of this work was to investigate on the oenological properties of Sangiovese wine produced with the traditional winemaking process adopted by the winery under study obtained from the fermentation of whole berries compared to that from crushed grape must. In particular, two lots of 65q of Sangiovese grapes from the same 3ha vineyard were vinified in 150hL oak barrels.

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.