Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Flavanol glycosides in grapes and wines : the key missing molecular intermediates in condensed tannin biosynthesis ?

Flavanol glycosides in grapes and wines : the key missing molecular intermediates in condensed tannin biosynthesis ?

Abstract

Polyphenols are present in a wide variety of plants and foods such as tea, cacao and grape1. An important sub-class of these compounds is the flavanols present in grapes and wines as monomers (e.g (+)-catechin or (-)-epicatechin), or polymers also called condensed tannins or proanthocyanidins. They have important antioxidant properties2 but their biosynthesis remains partly unknown. Some recent studies have focused on the role of glycosylated intermediates that are involved in the transport of the monomers and may serve as precursors in the polymerization mechanism3, 4. The global objective of this work is to identify flavanol glycosides in grapes or wines, describe their structure and determine their abundance during grape development and in wine. Material and methods: Chardonnay and Syrah grapes and a Tannat red wine (Tannat, Languedoc, 2015) were used to make polyphenol extracts by using different preparative gel chromatography techniques (HW40S, LH20 and silica gels). The different fractions obtained were analyzed by UPLC-ESI-IT_MS (Waters Acquity, negative scan and targeted mode). Specific molecular ions corresponding to monomeric and dimeric flavanol glycosides were targeted with specific m/z values: 451 (epi) catechin glucoside, 467 epigallocatechin glucoside, 603 epicatechin gallate glucoside and 739 (epi) catechin glucoside dimer. Results: The existence of glycosylated flavan-3-ol monomers in wine and grape seeds have already been reported based on MS/MS experiments.5 Our results confirmed their presence in Tannat wines and grapes but new MS ions corresponding to glycosylated procyanidin dimers (m/z = 739) were also detected. MS/MS specific ions were also found for these dimers like an ion at m/z = 449 (quinone-methide cleavage (QM)) and at m/z = 587 Da (Retro Diels Alder reaction (RDA)). Further work is on the way to elucidate the exact structure of these compounds (hexose nature and position) by NMR. The complete structural elucidation of these glycosylated dimers will help to determine their exact role in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis.

1. Quideau, S., Deffieux, D., Douat-Casassus, C., and Pouysegu, L. (2011), Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50, 586-621. 2. Antoniolli, A., Fontana, A. R., Piccoli, P., and Rubén, B. (2015), 178, 172–178. 3. Pang Y, C. X., Huhman DV, Ma J, Peel GJ, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Saito K, Shen G, Sumner LW, Tang Y, Wen J, Yun J, Dixon RA. (2013)., Planta, 139-154. 4. Zhao, J., and Dixon, R. A. (2009), The Plant Cell 21, 2323-2340. 5. Delcambre, A., and Saucier, C. (2012), J Mass Spectrom 47, 727-736. 6. Gu, L., Kelm, M. A., Hammerstone, J. F., Beecher, G., Holden, J., Haytowitz, D., and Prior, R. L. (2003), J Agric Food Chem 51, 7513-7521.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Cédric Saucier*, Chloé Puech, Emmanuelle Meudec, Jean-Paul Mazauric, Marie Zerbib, Mauve Abelanet, Nancy Terrier, Veronique Cheynier

*Université de Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Some applications come from a method to concentrate proteins

All techniques usually used to assay proteins was not reliable in vegetable extract due to interferences with the components included in extracts like polyphenols, tanins, pectines, aromatics compounds. Absorbance at 280nm, Kjeldhal assay, Biuret and Lowry methods, Acid Bicinchonique technique and Bradford assay give the results depending on the composition of extract, on the presence or not of detergent and on the raw material (Marchal, 1995). Another difficulty in these extracts for the quantification of proteins comes from the large amount of water included in vegetable and the low concentration of proteins. Thus in red wines, proteins are usually not taken into account due to their low concentration (typically below 10 mgL-1) and to the presence of anthocyanis and polyphenols.

Chemical markers in wine related to low levels of yeast available nitrogen in the grape

Nitrogen is an important nutrient of yeast and its low content in grape must is a major cause for sluggish fermentations. To prevent problems during fermentation, a supplementation of the must with ammonium salts or more complex nitrogen mixtures is practiced in the cellar. However this correction seems to improve only partially the quality of wine [1]. In fact, yeast is using nitrogen in many of its metabolic pathways and depending of the sort of the nitrogen source (ammonium or amino acids) it produces different flavor active compounds. A limitation in amino acids can lead to a change in the metabolic pathways of yeast and consequently alter wine quality.

Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Tannin, anthocyanins and their reaction products play a major role in the quality of red wines. They contribute to their sensory characteristics, particularly colour and astringency. Grape tannins and anthocyanins are extracted during red wine fermentation. However, their concentration and composition change over time, due to their strong chemical reactivity1. It is also well known that yeasts influence the wine phenolic content, either through the release of metabolites involved in the formation of derived pigments1, or through polyphenol adsorption2,3.

Full automation of oenological fermentations and its application to the processing of must containing high sugar or acetic acid concentrations

Climate change and harvest date decisions have led to the evolution of must quality over the last decades. Increases in must sugar concentrations are among the most obvious consequences, quantitatively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a robust and acid tolerant organism. These properties, its sugar to ethanol conversion rate and ethanol tolerance make it the ideal production organism for wine fermentations. Unfortunately, high sugar concentrations may affect S. cerevisiae and lead to growth inhibition or yeast lysis, and cause sluggish or stuck fermentations. Even sublethal conditions cause a hyperosmotic stress response in S. cerevisiae which leads to increased formation of fermentation by-products, including acetic acid, which may exceed legal limits in some wines.