Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

Abstract

3-Isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) is one of the key molecules in wine aroma with a bell pepper aroma and a very low threshold in wine, 1-6 ng/L for white wine and 10-16 ng/L in red wine1. The differences in these thresholds are likely due to IBMP-non volatile matrix interactions. It has indeed been shown that polyphenols may influence the volatility of flavor compounds2. In the present study, we focus on IBMP-polyphenols interactions in relation to volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution. Methods: 1. GC-MS Static Headspace Analysis: Samples were analyzed by Static headspace analysis with an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to HP 5975C mass spectrometry detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analyses of polyphenols and IBMP in model wine were all performed in 10ml vial flasks with volumes of 1ml of model wine volume. IBMP was quantified in Single Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode. The ions used for SIM mode were m/z 94, 121, 154. All the solutions were at fixed pH and ethanol concentration (pH 3.5, 12% Ethanol). For each experiment a control of IBMP, polyphenol, a blank and a mix between IBMP and polyphenol were prepared. 2. Sensory Analysis: Triangular tests were performed by trained panelists (n=26) to orthonasally differentiate between IBMP on its own and IBMP in the presence of a polyphenol. 3. NMR Spectroscopy : Spectra were performed on an Agilent 500 MHz DD2 NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).Titrations of polyphenols were obtained by addition of IBMP solubilized in CD3OD (~200mM) to quercetin or polydatin (~20mM) CD3OD solution. Absolute concentrations of both aroma and polyphenols were accurately determined from the surface integration of well-separated 1D 1H signal using qNMR method. Results: 1. The headspace analysis showed that polydatin and quercetin decreased the volatility of IBMP. 2. Compared to the control (IBMP without polyphenol), significant results were found in sensory analysis (triangular tests) for polytadin (P < 0030) and quercetin (P < 0000) in presence of IBMP at 8 ng/L in model wine solution 3. Variations in NMR 1H chemical shifts were observed in titration experiments which suggest different possible sites for the interactions of IBMP with the polyphenols

[1] D. Sidhu, J.Lund, Y. Kotseridis, C.Saucier (2015). Methoxypyrazine Analysis and influence of Viticultural and Enological Procedures on their Levels in Grapes, Musts, and Wines, Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55:4, 485-502, [2]. Aronson, J., & Ebeler, S. E. (2004). Effect of polyphenol compounds on the headspace volatility of flavors. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55 :1, 13-21.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Cédric Saucier*, Audrey Bloem, Christine Le Guernevé, Damien Lorenzi, Elizabeth Johansson Filote, Nicolas Bouvier, Peggy Rigou, Veronique Cheynier

*Université de Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

The effect of cropload on the volatile aroma characteristics of ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ red wine

Beihong and Beimei were bred as winemaking cultivars released by Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2008. The cultivars are selected from the population of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ (Vitis vinifera) ×V. amurensis. They are extended to most provinces in North of China because they have strong resistance to cold and disease and need not be buried in soil in winter. To better understand the effect of cropload on volatile compounds during wine-making, we surveyed volatiles composition and content of different cropload level in 3-years-old ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ vines which planted in east foot of Helan mountain of Ningxia (EHN).

Effect of intra‐vineyard ripeness variation on the efficiency of commercial enzymes on berry cell wall deconstruction under winemaking conditions

Intra-vineyard variation grape berry ripening occurs within bunches, between bunches on the same vine and between vines. Although it is assumed that such variation also occurs at the grape berry cell wall level, no study to data has investigated in any depth. Here we have used a intra-vineyard panel design to investigate pooled bunches from six vines (per panel) in the context of a winemaking scenario. The dissected vineyard was harvested by separate panels, where each panel was then subjected to a standard winemaking procedure with or without the addition of three different enzyme preparations for maceration.

New molecular evidence of wine yeast-bacteria interaction unraveled by untargeted metabolomic profiling

Bacterial malolactic fermentation (MLF) has a considerable impact on wine quality. The yeast strain used for primary fermentation can consistently stimulate (MLF+ phenotype) or inhibit (MLF- phenotype) malolactic bacteria and the MLF process as a function of numerous winemaking practices, but the molecular evidence behind still remains a mystery. In this study, such evidence was elucidated by the direct comparison of extracellular metabolic profiles of MLF+ and MLF- yeast phenotypes. Untargeted metabolomics combining ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR-MS analysis, powerful machine learning methods and a comprehensive wine metabolite database, discovered around 800 putative biomarkers and 2500 unknown masses involved in phenotypic distinction.

Using elicitors in different grape varieties. Effect over their phenolic composition

Phenolic compounds are very important in crop plants and have been the subject of a large number of studies. Three main reasons can be cited for optimizing the level of phenolic compounds in crop plants: their physiological role in plants, their technological significance for food processing, and their nutritional characteristics1 Indeed, an enormous diversity of phenolic antioxidants is found in fruits and vegetables, and their presence and roles can be affected or modified by several pre- and postharvest cultural practices and/or food processing technologies (Ruiz-García et al. 2012, Goldman et al. 1999, Tudela et al. 2002). In winegrapes, the technological importance of phenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids, is well-known.