Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

Abstract

3-Isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) is one of the key molecules in wine aroma with a bell pepper aroma and a very low threshold in wine, 1-6 ng/L for white wine and 10-16 ng/L in red wine1. The differences in these thresholds are likely due to IBMP-non volatile matrix interactions. It has indeed been shown that polyphenols may influence the volatility of flavor compounds2. In the present study, we focus on IBMP-polyphenols interactions in relation to volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution. Methods: 1. GC-MS Static Headspace Analysis: Samples were analyzed by Static headspace analysis with an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to HP 5975C mass spectrometry detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analyses of polyphenols and IBMP in model wine were all performed in 10ml vial flasks with volumes of 1ml of model wine volume. IBMP was quantified in Single Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode. The ions used for SIM mode were m/z 94, 121, 154. All the solutions were at fixed pH and ethanol concentration (pH 3.5, 12% Ethanol). For each experiment a control of IBMP, polyphenol, a blank and a mix between IBMP and polyphenol were prepared. 2. Sensory Analysis: Triangular tests were performed by trained panelists (n=26) to orthonasally differentiate between IBMP on its own and IBMP in the presence of a polyphenol. 3. NMR Spectroscopy : Spectra were performed on an Agilent 500 MHz DD2 NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).Titrations of polyphenols were obtained by addition of IBMP solubilized in CD3OD (~200mM) to quercetin or polydatin (~20mM) CD3OD solution. Absolute concentrations of both aroma and polyphenols were accurately determined from the surface integration of well-separated 1D 1H signal using qNMR method. Results: 1. The headspace analysis showed that polydatin and quercetin decreased the volatility of IBMP. 2. Compared to the control (IBMP without polyphenol), significant results were found in sensory analysis (triangular tests) for polytadin (P < 0030) and quercetin (P < 0000) in presence of IBMP at 8 ng/L in model wine solution 3. Variations in NMR 1H chemical shifts were observed in titration experiments which suggest different possible sites for the interactions of IBMP with the polyphenols

[1] D. Sidhu, J.Lund, Y. Kotseridis, C.Saucier (2015). Methoxypyrazine Analysis and influence of Viticultural and Enological Procedures on their Levels in Grapes, Musts, and Wines, Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55:4, 485-502, [2]. Aronson, J., & Ebeler, S. E. (2004). Effect of polyphenol compounds on the headspace volatility of flavors. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55 :1, 13-21.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Cédric Saucier*, Audrey Bloem, Christine Le Guernevé, Damien Lorenzi, Elizabeth Johansson Filote, Nicolas Bouvier, Peggy Rigou, Veronique Cheynier

*Université de Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

New molecular evidence of wine yeast-bacteria interaction unraveled by untargeted metabolomic profiling

Bacterial malolactic fermentation (MLF) has a considerable impact on wine quality. The yeast strain used for primary fermentation can consistently stimulate (MLF+ phenotype) or inhibit (MLF- phenotype) malolactic bacteria and the MLF process as a function of numerous winemaking practices, but the molecular evidence behind still remains a mystery. In this study, such evidence was elucidated by the direct comparison of extracellular metabolic profiles of MLF+ and MLF- yeast phenotypes. Untargeted metabolomics combining ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR-MS analysis, powerful machine learning methods and a comprehensive wine metabolite database, discovered around 800 putative biomarkers and 2500 unknown masses involved in phenotypic distinction.

Removal of Fumonisin B1 and B2 from red wine using polymeric substances

The Ability of PVPP (Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone), PVP-DEGMA-TAIC (copolimerization of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and triallyl isocyanurate) and PAEGDMA
(poly(acrylamide-co-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate)) polymers was tested as removal agents for Fumonisin B1 (FB1) and Fumonisin B2 (FB2) from model solutions and red wine. The polymers removal capacity was checked at three different resident times (2, 8 and 24 hours of contact time between the polymer and the sample), showing no differences in the percentage of FB1 and FB2 removal. Then, different polymer concentrations (1, 5 and 10 mg mL-1) were tested in model solution with and without phenolics (i.e. gallic acid and 4-methylcatechol).

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

Tyrosol (TYR) and hydroxytyrosol (HYT) are bioactive phenols present in olive oil and wine, basic elements of the Mediterranean diet. TYR is reported in the literature for its interesting antioxidant, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In wine, its concentration can reach values as high as about 40 mg/L
[Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007] but, more frequently, this phenol – derived from yeast metabolism of tyrosine during fermentation – is present at lower levels, generally higher in red wines compared to whites. HYT was measured for the first time by Di Tommaso et al. [1998] in Italian wines – with maximum values of 4.20 mg/L and 1.92 mg/L for red and white wines, respectively – while definitely lower concentrations have been found later in Greek samples.

Metabolomic profile of red non-V. vinifera genotypes

Vitis vinifera L. is the most widely cultivated Vitis species which includes numerous cultivars. Owing to their superior quality of grapes, these cultivars were long considered the only suitable for the production of fine wines. However, the lack of resistance genes in V. vinifera against major grapevine pathogens, requires for its cultivation frequent spraying with large amount of fungicides. Thus, the search for alternative and more sustainable methods to control the grapevine pathogens have brought the breeders to focus their attention on other Vitis species. In fact, wild Vitis genotypes present multiple resistance traits against pathogens, such as powdery mildew, downy mildew and phylloxera.