Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

Abstract

3-Isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) is one of the key molecules in wine aroma with a bell pepper aroma and a very low threshold in wine, 1-6 ng/L for white wine and 10-16 ng/L in red wine1. The differences in these thresholds are likely due to IBMP-non volatile matrix interactions. It has indeed been shown that polyphenols may influence the volatility of flavor compounds2. In the present study, we focus on IBMP-polyphenols interactions in relation to volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution. Methods: 1. GC-MS Static Headspace Analysis: Samples were analyzed by Static headspace analysis with an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to HP 5975C mass spectrometry detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analyses of polyphenols and IBMP in model wine were all performed in 10ml vial flasks with volumes of 1ml of model wine volume. IBMP was quantified in Single Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode. The ions used for SIM mode were m/z 94, 121, 154. All the solutions were at fixed pH and ethanol concentration (pH 3.5, 12% Ethanol). For each experiment a control of IBMP, polyphenol, a blank and a mix between IBMP and polyphenol were prepared. 2. Sensory Analysis: Triangular tests were performed by trained panelists (n=26) to orthonasally differentiate between IBMP on its own and IBMP in the presence of a polyphenol. 3. NMR Spectroscopy : Spectra were performed on an Agilent 500 MHz DD2 NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).Titrations of polyphenols were obtained by addition of IBMP solubilized in CD3OD (~200mM) to quercetin or polydatin (~20mM) CD3OD solution. Absolute concentrations of both aroma and polyphenols were accurately determined from the surface integration of well-separated 1D 1H signal using qNMR method. Results: 1. The headspace analysis showed that polydatin and quercetin decreased the volatility of IBMP. 2. Compared to the control (IBMP without polyphenol), significant results were found in sensory analysis (triangular tests) for polytadin (P < 0030) and quercetin (P < 0000) in presence of IBMP at 8 ng/L in model wine solution 3. Variations in NMR 1H chemical shifts were observed in titration experiments which suggest different possible sites for the interactions of IBMP with the polyphenols

[1] D. Sidhu, J.Lund, Y. Kotseridis, C.Saucier (2015). Methoxypyrazine Analysis and influence of Viticultural and Enological Procedures on their Levels in Grapes, Musts, and Wines, Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55:4, 485-502, [2]. Aronson, J., & Ebeler, S. E. (2004). Effect of polyphenol compounds on the headspace volatility of flavors. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55 :1, 13-21.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Cédric Saucier*, Audrey Bloem, Christine Le Guernevé, Damien Lorenzi, Elizabeth Johansson Filote, Nicolas Bouvier, Peggy Rigou, Veronique Cheynier

*Université de Montpellier

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Effect of the winemaking technology on the phenolic compounds, foam parameters in sparklig wines

Contribution Sparkling wines elaborated following the traditional method undergo a second fermentation in closed bottles of base wines, followed by aging of wines with lees for at least 9 months. Most of the sparkling wines elaborated are white and rosé ones, although the production of red ones is highly increasing. One of the initial problems in red sparkling wine processing is to obtain suitable base wines that should have moderate alcohol content and astringency and adequate color intensity; which is difficult to obtain when grapes must be harvested at low phenolic and industrial maturity stage. The low phenolic maturity degree in the red grapes makes essential to choose an adequate winemaking methodology to obtain the base wines because the extracted polyphenols will vary according the winemaking technique: carbonic maceration or destemmed-crushed grapes.

Molecular cloning and characterization of UDP-glucose: furaneol glucosyltransferase gene from Japanese

2,5-Dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone (furaneol) is an important aroma compound in fruits, such as pineapple and strawberry, and is reported to contribute to the strawberry-like note in some wines. Several grapevine species are used in winemaking, and furaneol is one of the characteristic aroma compounds in wines made from American grape (Vitis labrusca) and its hybrid grape, similar to methyl anthranilate. Muscat Bailey A is a hybrid grape variety [V. labrusca (Bailey) x V. vinifera (Muscat Hamburg)], and its wine is one of the most popular in Japan. The inclusion of Muscat Bailey A in the ‘International List of Vine and Varieties and their Synonyms’ managed by the ‘International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV)’ in 2013 has further fueled its popularity among winemakers and researchers worldwide.

The use of cation exchange resins for wine acidity adjustment: Optimization of the process and the effects on tartrate formation and oxidative stability

Acidity adjustments are key to microbial control, sensory quality and wine longevity. Acidification with cation exchange resins -in acid cycle- offers the possibility to reduce the pH by exchanging wine cations, such as potassium (K+), for hydrogen ions (H+). During the exchange process, the removal of potassium and calcium ions contributes to limiting the formation of tartrate salts, thus offering an alternative solution to conventional methods for tartrate stability. Moreover, the reduction of wine pH and the removal of metals catalyzers (e.g. iron) could positively impact the wine’s oxidative stability. Therefore, the aims of this work were (a) to optimize the ion exchange process by testing different volumes and concentrations of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) during the acid cycle, (b) evaluate the effects of the ion exchange process on the formation of tartrate salts, and (c) analyze the oxidative stability of the treated wines.

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine.

New molecular evidence of wine yeast-bacteria interaction unraveled by untargeted metabolomic profiling

Bacterial malolactic fermentation (MLF) has a considerable impact on wine quality. The yeast strain used for primary fermentation can consistently stimulate (MLF+ phenotype) or inhibit (MLF- phenotype) malolactic bacteria and the MLF process as a function of numerous winemaking practices, but the molecular evidence behind still remains a mystery. In this study, such evidence was elucidated by the direct comparison of extracellular metabolic profiles of MLF+ and MLF- yeast phenotypes. Untargeted metabolomics combining ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR-MS analysis, powerful machine learning methods and a comprehensive wine metabolite database, discovered around 800 putative biomarkers and 2500 unknown masses involved in phenotypic distinction.