Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 How small amounts of oxygen introduced during bottling and storage can influence the metabolic fingerprint and SO2 content of white wines

How small amounts of oxygen introduced during bottling and storage can influence the metabolic fingerprint and SO2 content of white wines

Abstract

The impact of minute amounts of headspace oxygen on the post-bottling development of wine is generally considered to be very important, since oxygen, packaging and storage conditions can either damage or improve wine quality. This is reflected in the generalised use of inert bottling lines, where the headspace between the white wine and the stopper is filled with an inert gas. This experiment aimed to address some open questions about the chemistry of the interaction between wine and oxygen, crucial for decisions regarding optimal closure. While it is known that similar amounts of oxygen affect different wines to a variable extent, our knowledge of chemistry is not sufficient to construct a predictive method. The experimental design included 12 different wines from five different cultivars. The wines (n=12×20) were bottled at the same industrial bottling line, then stored for 60 days at room temperature. Half of the bottles were filled using the standard process with inert headspace, and sealed with a synthetic coextruded stopper allowing lower oxygen ingress, resulting in a total package oxygen (TPO) in the range 1.30 – 4.25 ppm O2. The other half of the bottles were filled without inert gas and with extra headspace, and sealed with a synthetic coextruded stopper allowing higher oxygen ingress, resulting in TPO 5.93 – 8.38 ppm O2. After storage, the wines were analysed using an untargeted LC-ESI-QTOF MS method, optimised for wine metabolomics, to obtain the widest coverage of the metabolic space of non-volatiles [1]. This experiment produced a dataset with over 20,000 features, and data analysis showed the presence of about 35 putative markers induced by different amounts of oxygen. These metabolite markers included ascorbic acid, tartaric acid and various sulfonated compounds. Thus, the antioxidant SO2 takes part in various reactions, modulated by the presence of oxygen, several of which were unknown in wine to date and would appear to be of practical significance. Specifically, the sulfonated derivatives of indole-3-lactic hexoside, tryptophol, glutathione, cysteine and pantetheine were detected in wine for the first time, thanks to the untargeted metabolomics approach chosen. These findings explains why glutathione disulfide is not detectable in wines, due to its preferential antagonistic reaction with SO2. Further studies of the mechanisms involved in such reactions and the inclusion of selected SO2-binding compounds in the routinely quality control of wines could help to decrease SO2 addition in wine, and make smarter use of the various oenological antioxidants in correlation with varietal information, the amount of total package oxygen and the choice of stopper. Acknowledgments The authors thank Nomacorc for its financial support and the MezzaCorona winery for the wines, bottling and storage.

Reference [1] Arapitsas, P. et al., Journal of Chromatography A, 2016, 1429, 155-165

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Fulvio Mattivi*, Andrea Angeli, Daniele Perenzoni, Maurizio Ugliano, Panagiotis Arapitsas, Paolo Pangrazzi

*Fondazione Edmund Mach

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Non-invasive headspace sorptive extraction for monitoring volatile compounds production by saccharomyces and non-saccharomyces strains throughout alcoholic fermentation

Wine is a solution containing abundant volatile compounds which contribute to their aroma. Many of them are produced by yeast as metabolism by-products. Different yeast strains produce different volatile profiles. The possibility of studying the evolution of volatile compounds during fermentation, using sampling methods that not alter the volume of fermentation media, is of great interest. In spite of this, non-invasive methods to monitoring the evolution of volatile profile during fermentation have been seldom used. The goals of this work were to use by first time the headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) as non-invasive method to monitor the evolution of volatile profiles throughout alcoholic fermentation and to study the changes on volatile profiles produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans during fermentation of a must with high sugar content.

Ageing of sweet wines: oxygen evolution according to bung and barrel type

Barrel ageing is a crucial step in the wine process because it allows many changes to the wine as enrichment, colour stabilization, clarification and also a slow oxygenation. Effects of the oak barrel have to be known to prevent oxidation of the wine. The type of bung used during ageing is also a parameter to consider. Ageing sweet wines in barrel is a real challenge. These wines may need some oxygen at the beginning of ageing but they should be protected at the end of their maturation, to avoid oxidation.

The moment of preharvest elicitor application influence its final effect on winegrapes quality

Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites of grapes. Plants produce a wide variety of this type of metabolites through diverse biosynthesis pathways and their production is sometimes a response to external stimuli, either environmental or biotic stresses. Some of them may act as chemical defenses against pathogens or herbivores and their synthesis is increased when the attack exists. However, it is remarkable that the synthesis of these interesting compounds can be activated even when the stimulus is not present, with the use of elicitors. These are substances that when applied exogenously trigger the biosynthetic pathways conducting to the synthesis of these defense compounds.

South Africa’s top 10 Sauvignon blanc wines. How do the chemical and sensory profiles compare?

FNB Top 10 Sauvignon Blanc competition, presented by the Sauvignon Blanc Interest Group of South Africa and sponsored by First National Bank, is the country’s foremost platform for producers of this cultivar to showcase and benchmark their wines. Wines entered in the competition originated from all over the winegrowing regions of the country and the winning wines showed good representation of quality South African Sauvignon blanc wines. The ten selected wines were subjected to various chemical analyses including volatile thiol and methoxypyrazine determination, while the sensory profile of each wine was determined using projective mapping.