Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 How small amounts of oxygen introduced during bottling and storage can influence the metabolic fingerprint and SO2 content of white wines

How small amounts of oxygen introduced during bottling and storage can influence the metabolic fingerprint and SO2 content of white wines

Abstract

The impact of minute amounts of headspace oxygen on the post-bottling development of wine is generally considered to be very important, since oxygen, packaging and storage conditions can either damage or improve wine quality. This is reflected in the generalised use of inert bottling lines, where the headspace between the white wine and the stopper is filled with an inert gas. This experiment aimed to address some open questions about the chemistry of the interaction between wine and oxygen, crucial for decisions regarding optimal closure. While it is known that similar amounts of oxygen affect different wines to a variable extent, our knowledge of chemistry is not sufficient to construct a predictive method. The experimental design included 12 different wines from five different cultivars. The wines (n=12×20) were bottled at the same industrial bottling line, then stored for 60 days at room temperature. Half of the bottles were filled using the standard process with inert headspace, and sealed with a synthetic coextruded stopper allowing lower oxygen ingress, resulting in a total package oxygen (TPO) in the range 1.30 – 4.25 ppm O2. The other half of the bottles were filled without inert gas and with extra headspace, and sealed with a synthetic coextruded stopper allowing higher oxygen ingress, resulting in TPO 5.93 – 8.38 ppm O2. After storage, the wines were analysed using an untargeted LC-ESI-QTOF MS method, optimised for wine metabolomics, to obtain the widest coverage of the metabolic space of non-volatiles [1]. This experiment produced a dataset with over 20,000 features, and data analysis showed the presence of about 35 putative markers induced by different amounts of oxygen. These metabolite markers included ascorbic acid, tartaric acid and various sulfonated compounds. Thus, the antioxidant SO2 takes part in various reactions, modulated by the presence of oxygen, several of which were unknown in wine to date and would appear to be of practical significance. Specifically, the sulfonated derivatives of indole-3-lactic hexoside, tryptophol, glutathione, cysteine and pantetheine were detected in wine for the first time, thanks to the untargeted metabolomics approach chosen. These findings explains why glutathione disulfide is not detectable in wines, due to its preferential antagonistic reaction with SO2. Further studies of the mechanisms involved in such reactions and the inclusion of selected SO2-binding compounds in the routinely quality control of wines could help to decrease SO2 addition in wine, and make smarter use of the various oenological antioxidants in correlation with varietal information, the amount of total package oxygen and the choice of stopper. Acknowledgments The authors thank Nomacorc for its financial support and the MezzaCorona winery for the wines, bottling and storage.

Reference [1] Arapitsas, P. et al., Journal of Chromatography A, 2016, 1429, 155-165

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Fulvio Mattivi*, Andrea Angeli, Daniele Perenzoni, Maurizio Ugliano, Panagiotis Arapitsas, Paolo Pangrazzi

*Fondazione Edmund Mach

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain.

Use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant in juices and wines

Chitosan is a polysaccharide produced from the deacetylation of chitin extracted from crustaceous and fungi. In winemaking chitosan is mainly used in the clarification of grape juice and wine, stabilization of white wines, removal of metals and to prevent wine spoilage by undesired microorganisms. The addition of chitosan to model wine systems was able to retard browning, reduce levels of metallic ions (Fe and Cu) and to protect varietal thiols due to its antiradical activity1. The present experiment was planned in order to evaluate the use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant at three different stages of Sauvignon blanc fermentation and winemaking. Sauvignon blanc juices from three different locations were obtained at a commercial winery in Marlborough, New Zealand. One lots of grapes was collected from a receival bin and pressed into juice with a water-bag press, and a further juice sample was collected from a commercial pressing operation. Chitosan (1 g/L, low molecular weight, 75 – 85% deacetylated) was added to the juice after pressing, after cold settling, after fermentation, or at all these stages. Controls without any chitosan additions were also prepared.

Use of glutathione under different grape processing and winemaking conditions and its impact on the formation of sulfide off-flavors, colour, and sensory characteristics of Riesling, Sauvignon blanc, and Chardonnay

The use of glutathione (GSH) in winemaking has been legitimated recently, according to OIV resolutions OENO 445-2015 and OENO 446-2015 a maximum dose of 20 mg/L is now allowed to use in must and wine. Several studies have proven the benefits of GSH, predominantly in Sauvignon blanc. Thus, oxidative coloration of must and wine is limited, aroma compounds such as volatile thiols are preserved, and the development of ageing flavors such as sotolon and 2-aminoacetophenone is impeded. The protective effect may be explained by the high affinity of GSH to bind o-quinones which are formed during phenolic oxidation and which are known to initiate browning and other oxidative changes. Some researchers have proposed the hydroxycinnamic acid to GSH ratio (HGR) as an indicator of oxidation susceptibility of must and could show that lower ratios yielded lighter musts.

Impact of industrial-scale serial filtration on macromolecules in red wines

Filtration is a critical step in ensuring the clarity and microbial stability of wine prior to bottling. However the process of filtering potentially reduces red wine quality by removing some of the macromolecules that contribute to the texture of the wine. Commercial red wines, Cabernet Sauvignon (CAS) and Shiraz (SHZ), of two vintages and two grades (premium grade wines from the older vintage: CAS13 and SHZ13; and standard grade wines from a younger vintage: CAS14 and SHZ14) were filtered through industrial-scale commercial filtration units prior to bottling. Samples were taken before and after cross-flow filtration, lenticular filters, 0.65 µm and 0.45 µm pore size nylon membrane filters. The concentration and composition of macromolecules, including tannins and polysaccharides, were measured in all samples as well as particle size distribution and wine colour.