terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2025 9 Poster communication - Physiological responses to abiotic and biotic stress 9 The drought, the temperature, and the time: drivers of osmotic adjustment?

The drought, the temperature, and the time: drivers of osmotic adjustment?

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study. Leaf osmotic adjustment (i.e., active accumulation of osmolytes in the cells) has been reported in grapevines in response to drought and as a natural process throughout the growing season (seasonal osmotic adjustment). However, the seasonal progression and associated temperature changes were not separately considered in previous studies. Therefore, we investigated the capacity of Pinot noir leaves to modulate their osmotic potential in response to (i) time (seasonal osmoregulation), (ii) growing temperatures, and (iii) drought events. Additionally, we analyzed the contribution of key compounds acting as osmolytes (e.g., sugars and cations).

Material and methods. Trials were conducted under semi-controlled field conditions and in greenhouse chambers set to three distinct temperature regimes: cool (20/15 °C), warm (25/20 °C), and hot (30/25 °C) day/night conditions. Potted Vitis vinifera plants, cultivar Pinot Noir grafted onto SO4, were subjected to two water treatments for at least 30 days: well-watered (WW) and water deficit (WD). Leaf osmotic adjustment was assessed using an osmometer, while sugars and cations were quantified through ion chromatography (HPIC).

Results. Seasonal osmoregulation was observed throughout the growing season, with osmotic potential at full turgor decreasing by an average of -0.30 MPa in 70 days. Temperatures affected the intensity of osmotic potential at full turgor but not its seasonal trend.  Surprisingly, osmoregulation wasn’t triggered by the lower water potentials in WD vines. The absence of osmotic adjustment in response to drought observed in this cultivar suggests Vitis genotypes exhibit a wide range of drought responses, with drought-coping strategies varying significantly by cultivar. The total contributions of sugars and cations covered up to 60% of the measured osmotic potential. Glucose and fructose were the predominant sugars, while cations were the main contributors to the seasonal osmotic adjustment.

Publication date: September 8, 2025

Issue: GiESCO 2025

Type: Poster

Authors

Elena Farolfi1, Adéla Kulhánková2, Federica De Berardinis1, Astrid Forneck1, Jose Carlos Herrera1

1 Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

2 University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Crop Sciences, Institute of Viticulture and Pomology, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria

Contact the author*

Keywords

grapevine, Pinot noir, drought, osmotic adjustment, osmoregulation

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2025 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Seasonal dynamics of water and sugar compartmentalization in grape clusters under deficit irrigation

Water stress triggers functional compartmentalization in grapevines, influencing how resources are allocated to different plant organs.

Soil humidity and early leaf water potential affected by water recharge before budbreak in cv. Tempranillo deficitary irrigated during the summer in the D. O. Ribera del Duero

The availability of water for irrigation is usually greater at the beginning of spring than in the following months, until the end of summer, in most regions of Spain.

Irrigation frequency: variation and agronomic and qualitative effects on cv. Tempranillo in the D. O. Ribera del Duero

The application of irrigation in vineyard cultivation continues to be a highly debated aspect in terms of the quantity and distribution of water throughout the vegetative growth period.

Permanent vs temporary cover crops in a Sangiovese vineyard: preliminary results on vine physiology and productive traits

Cover crops in vineyards have been extensively studied, as the choice of grass species and their management significantly influence soil properties and vine performance.

Grapevine abiotic stress induce tolerance to bunch rot

Context. Botrytis bunch rot occurrence is the most important limitation for the wine industry in humid climate viticulture.