Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Effect of two contrasting soils on grape and wine sensory characteristics in Shiraz

Effect of two contrasting soils on grape and wine sensory characteristics in Shiraz


Aims: Berry composition and wine sensory characteristics reflect the origin of grape production and seasonal climatic conditions. The aim of this study was to compare berry and wine sensory characteristics from two contrasting soil types where the vineyard climate, geography, topography, vine and management factors were not different.

Methods and Results: Two adjoining blocks of Shiraz with similar vine age (+/-1 year), identical clone (1654), row orientation (NW, SE) and cordon height were selected for this study. All irrigation, spray and midrow management treatments were identical. Both sites have soils that are texture contrast or duplex brown chromosols. The main distinguishing feature between the two sites being the presence of 10% to 50% ironstone gravel, mainly in the bleached topsoil “E” (or A2) horizon for the “Ironstone” block which is in contrast to the “Sand over clay” block. 

Berry sensory attributes were evaluated using the accepted method of berry sensory assessment (BSA). The method allows for the identification and quantification of berry sensory attributes against standard sensory references by a trained panel. The evaluation of wine sensory attributes was performed using a quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA). Both methods were performed to assess sensory differences in grapes and wine from the two soil types. Berries from the “Ironstone” soil had more intense green/grassy flavour, a higher perception of acidity and greater astringency. This was in contrast to berry samples from the sand over clay soil, which were described as having more intense dried fruit/jammy flavour, a higher perceived sweetness and an elevated toasted flavour. Wines made from fruit from the “Ironstone” soil were found to have more intense red fruit characters, tannin quality and astringency in contrast to the dark fruit, higher colour intensity and confectionary characteristics of the wines made from fruit from “Sand over clay” soils.  Fifty-six soil mineral elements were analysed from each soil horizon, leaf blades, must and wine samples. Results obtained from inductively couple plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis identified elements some of which were unique to each soil type and some which were in higher concentrations. The differences in the two soils elemental status was translated to leaves, berries and wine from those soils. 


Differences were observed in berry and wine sensory characteristics when comparing the fruit harvested from two contrasting soils in close proximity. Soils displayed very similar physical characteristics. Both soils were observed to be texture contrast or duplex brown chromosols. They shared common features of sandy or loamy topsoils (“A” horizons) over brown light clay (LC) to light medium (LMC) “B” horizons with or without highly weathered sandstone in the subsoil or “C” horizon. There was no soil carbonate present at any site and topsoil pH was neutral (pH 6.5-7.5) and decreased slightly to 6.0 in the “B” and “C” horizons.  Root zones, both predicted and observed were not significantly different.

Slight differences were observed between the soils with measures of readily available water (RAW), topsoil depth and a unique layer of gravel in the ironstone soil all of which have been associated in previous research with water movement and plant water availability in soils. Analysis of the chemical composition and concentration of soils, vines, grapes, musts and wines demonstrated distinct differences in the chemical characteristics between the two soil sites. This study was able to investigate soils with different soil chemistries and sensory characteristics for berries and wine in isolation from other known influences including viticultural, environmental, many other soil, and winemaking factors. 

The application of elements to vines in a controlled environment in future work may provide a link between soil chemistry and grape and wine sensory attributes. 

Significance and Impact of the Study: Soil elemental composition is a contentious aspect of terroir especially in relation to the relative importance afforded to climate and soil physical characteristics in previous research. This trial was able to isolate soil for analysis to observe unique elemental compositions in varying concentrations in relation to differences in berry and wine sensory outcomes. The mechanisms by which soil elements might influence sensory outcomes of wines is not widely understood and future research could lead to soils and wines being paired for desired sensory outcomes.


Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video


Anthony Hoare*, Michael McLaughlin, Cassandra Collins

School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, SA, Australia

Contact the author


Elemental composition, fruit quality, wine quality, soil chemistry


IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020


Related articles…

Physiological and growth reaction of Shiraz/101-14 Mgt to row orientation and soil water status

Advanced knowledge on grapevine row orientation is required to improve establishment, management and outcomes of vineyards on terroirs with different environmental conditions (climate, soil, topography) and in view of a future change to more extreme climatic conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the combined effect of row orientation, plant water status and ripeness level on the physiological and viticultural reaction of Shiraz/101-14 Mgt.

Effects of mechanical leafing and deficit irrigation on Cabernet Sauvignon grown in warm climate of California

San Joaquin Valley accounts for 40% of wine grape acreage and produces 70% of wine grape in California. Fruit quality is one of most important factors which impact the economical sustainability of farming wine grapes in this region. Due to the recent drought and expected labor cost increase, the wine industry is thrilled to understand how to improve fruit quality while maintaining the yield with less water and labor input. The present study aims to study the interactive effects of mechanical leafing and deficit irrigation on yield and berry compositions of Cabernet Sauvignon grown in warm climate of California.

The effects of cane girdling on berry texture properties and the concentration of some aroma compounds in three table grape cultivars

The marketability of the table grapes is highly influenced by the consumer demand; therefore the market value of the table grapes is mainly characterized by its berry size, colour, taste and texture. Girdling could cause accumulation of several components in plants above the ringing of the phloem including clusters and resulting improved maturity. The aim of the experiments was to examine the effect of girdling on berry texture characteristics and aroma concentration.

Application of a fluorescence-based method to evaluate the ripening process and quality of Pinot Blanc grape

The chemical composition of grape berries at harvest is one of the most important factors that should be considered to produce high quality wines. Among the different chemical classes which characterize the grape juice, the polyphenolic compound, such as flavonoids, contribute to the final taste and color of wines. Recently, an innovative non-destructive method, based on chlorophyll fluorescence, was developed to estimate the phenolic maturity of red grape varieties through the evaluation of anthocyanins accumulated in the berry skin. To date, only few data are available about the application of this method on white grape varieties.

Different yield regulation strategies in semi-minimal-pruned hedge (SMPH) and impact on bunch architecture

Yields in the novel viticulture training system Semi-Minimal-Pruned Hedge (SMPH) are generally higher compared to the traditional Vertical Shoot Positioning (VSP). Excessive yields have a negative impact on the vine and wine quality, which can result in substantial losses in yield in subsequent vintages (alternate bearing) or penalties in fruit quality. Therefore yield regulation is essential. The bunch architecture in SMPH differs from VSP. Generally there is a higher amount but smaller bunches with lower single berry weights in SMPH compared to VSP.