Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Abstract

Aim: The notion of “terroir” enables the attribution of distinctive characteristics to wines from the same region. Climate change raises issues about viticulture, especially the growth of the vines and even more importantly the economic situation of actual wine-growing regions (Schultz and Jones 2010; Quénol 2014). Several studies have addressed the impacts of climate change on viticulture in many wine-growing regions of the world, but only a few have focused on the potential of island and coastal vineyards. However, in the context of climate change, ultramarine and coastal vineyards could become increasingly coveted according to their specific climatic conditions. In regions subject to significant warming, thermal regulation and oceanic influence can limit extremes temperatures, which could be a major advantage for grapevine production. This contribution, first step of a spatial optimization approach to define suitable agro-climatic patterns, will present a typology of these vineyards, to understand their specificities and their adaptability.

Methods and Results: An in-depth bibliographical search has been conducted to provide a global inventory and to highlight relevant variables to describe and categorize the world’s island wine-growing regions. From this approach, three main themes have been defined as variables: climate characteristics, vineyards characteristics and cultivars and associated management systems.

Climate plays a very important role in terroir, and especially temperatures, which determine the regional characteristics of viticulture (van Leeuwen et al., 2004; Hall and Blackman, 2019). In this study we consider the following climatic data: seasonal[1] average temperatures, annual and seasonal1 mean daily amplitude, completed by the average annual sunshine duration, average annual precipitation, winds and sea sprays.

Concerning vineyard characteristics, topological aspects like altitude or distance to ocean can limit diurnal and extremes temperatures (Bonnardot et al., 2001; Koufos et al., 2013; Fourment et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). Vineyards soils and especially soils’ composition, depth and water holding capacity are also completed. Vineyards’ characteristics were supplemented by economic data like surface area (ha), production (hl), market target and appellations. 

Due to their specific climatic conditions and/or because their relative isolation from other continents, many islands harbour autochthonous and rare varieties (Scherrer et al., 2009). In connection with vine variety, rootstock and diseases variables are integrated in the typology. Moreover, several coastal and island vineyards integrate traditional practices to manage the hydric stress without irrigation (i.e. mitigate wind effects on plants) (Drumonde-Neves et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). These practices were highlighted with management systems variables (implementation and management system, space between vines and rows, vine density, mechanization and irrigation system).

When applied to vineyards of Lanzarote, this approach describes structural elements of ultramarine vineyards. In 2009, Canarian viticulture represented 36% of total cultivated area of the archipelago, and 2.9% of total Spanish viticulture. In Lanzarote’s island, the climate is defined as subtropical with low precipitation (average of 150 mm/year), warm temperatures throughout the year and a high average annual sunshine duration (3000 h/year). 

Lanzarote’s island has a low relief and vineyards are planted on volcanic soils. Poured thick layers of volcanic ashes called “picóns” are added at the base of the vine stock. These porous volcanic granules have a great thermal inertia. Indeed, during the day picóns store heat and give it back to the plant at night. Picóns also have good water retention capacity (Troll et al., 2017; González Morales et al., 2015). Lanzarote’s vineyards under the appellation “Denominación de Origen Protegida de Lanzarote” were about 1850 ha in 2016-2017, for a production above 4330 hl and 1800 winegrowers (DO Lanzarote, 2020). The target market is local in scope. Mainly due to the isolation of the archipelago from the mainland, phylloxera is not present in the vineyards of Lanzarote. Vines are not grafted and Malvasia represents ¾ of the vine stock of the island. Vine varieties such as Listàn blanco, Moscatel de Alejandria, Verdello and Gual are often planted to produce dry and sweet white wines. Listàn negro and Negramoll varieties are preferred to produce red wine (DO Lanzarote, 2020). Low-growing vines are planted in drilled holes, and low walls of volcanic rocks are built to protect them from drought and hot drying winds. Due to their specific implementation, vines are widely spaced (400-500 m between them), yields are low and mechanization is not possible. 

This information has been documented and summarised for each wine-growing region. Thanks to this approach, key elements of insular vineyards can be described with generic indicators.  The resulting typology enables comparisons between different wine-growing regions with a generic framework.

Conclusions:

This first step of characterization of vineyard variables highlights the specificities of insular and coastal vineyards. Then, discriminant characteristics will be exploited in a process of spatial optimization in order to identify suitable agroclimatic patterns for different climate change scenarios. The main objective is to implement an approach under multiple constraints (climatic, agronomic, spatial, etc.). The results expected will be compromises between these several constraints. 

DOI:

Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Jeanne Thibault1*, Hervé Quénol2, Cyril Tissot1

1UMR 6554 LETG Brest, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280 Plouzané, France
2UMR 6554 LETG Rennes, Université Rennes 2, Place Recteur H. Le Moal, 35043 Rennes, France

Contact the author

Keywords

Viticulture, insularity, coastal, climate change, adaptation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

The impact of sustainable management regimes on amino acid profiles in grape juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids

One of the biggest challenges of agriculture today is maintaining food safety and food quality while providing ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation, pest and disease control, ensuring water quality and supply, and climate regulation. Organic farming was shown to promote biodiversity and carbon sequestration, and is therefore seen as one possibility of environmentally friendly production. Consumers expect organically grown crops to be free from chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers and often presume that the quality of organically grown crops is different or higher compared to conventionally grown crops. Integrated, organic, and biodynamic viticulture were compared in a replicated field trial in Geisenheim, Germany (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling). Amino acid profiles in juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids were monitored over three consecutive seasons beginning 7 years after conversion to organic and biodynamic viticulture, respectively. In addition, parameters such as soil nutrient status, yield, vigor, canopy temperature, and water stress were monitored to draw conclusions on reasons for the observed changes. Results revealed that the different sustainable management regimes highly differed in their amino acid profiles in juice and also in their skin flavonol content, whereas differences in the flavanol and hydroxycinnamic acid content were less pronounced. It is very likely that differences in nutrient status and yield determined amino acid profiles in juice, although all three systems showed similar amounts of mineralized nitrogen in the soil. Canopy structure and temperature in the bunch zone did not differ among treatments and therefore cannot account for the observed differences in favonols. A different light exposure of the bunches in the respective systems due to differences in vigor together with differences in berry size and a different water status of the vines might rather be responsible for the increase in flavonol content under organic and biodynamic viticulture.

Effect of one-year cover crop and arbuscular mycorrhiza inocululation in the microbial soil community of a vineyard

The microbial composition of the soil is an important factor to consider in viticulture, since its influence on the “terroir” and on the organoleptic properties of the wine have been demonstrated. Different agronomic techniques have the potential to modify the composition and functionality of the soil microbial community. Maintaining green covers is known to increase soil microbial diversity. The direct application of inoculum of beneficial microorganisms to the soil has also been used to increase their abundance. However, the environmental conditions of each site seem to have a determining weight in the result of these practices. In this study, we compared the effect on the microbial community of a cover crop with legumes in autumn and the inoculation of grapevines with commercial inoculum bases on Rhizophagus irregularis and Funeliformis mosseae in the previous spring. The study has been carried out in a vineyard in Binissalem, Mallorca, Spain. After applying the treatments, we will analyze the soil microbial communities using the data obtained from Illumina amplification of soil DNA from the 16S and ITS regions to analyze bacteria and fungi community, respectively. In addition, we will record the physicochemical characteristics of the soil at each sampling point. The result showed that agronomic management, in the short term, has less influence than soil characteristics on the composition of the soil microbiome. With these results, we can conclude that in a vineyard, agricultural techniques should focus on improving the characteristics of the soil to improve the biodiversity of the soil microbiota.

Sustaining wine identity through intra-varietal diversification

With contemporary climate change, cultivated Vitis vinifera L. is at risk as climate is a critical component in defining ecologically fitted plant materiel. While winegrowers can draw on the rich diversity among grapevine varieties to limit expected impacts (Morales-Castilla et al., 2020), replacing a signature variety that has created a sense of local distinctiveness may lead to several challenges. In order to sustain wine identity in uncertain climate outcomes, the study of intra-varietal diversity is important to reflect the adaptive and evolutionary potential of current cultivated varieties. The aim of this ongoing study is to understand to what extent can intra-varietal diversity be a climate change adaptation solution. With a focus on early (Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, Grolleau, Pinot noir) to moderate late (Chenin, Petit Verdot, Cabernet franc) ripening varieties, data was collected for flowering and veraison for the various studied accessions (from conservatory plots) and clones. For these phenological growing stages, heat requirements were established using nearby weather stations (adapted from the GFV model, Parker et al., 2013) and model performances were verified. Climate change projections were then integrated to predict the future behaviour of the intra-varietal diversity. Study findings highlight the strong phenotypic diversity of studied varieties and the importance of diversification to enhance climate change resilience. While model performances may require improvements, this study is the first step towards quantifying heat requirements of different clones and how they can provide adaptation solutions for winegrowers to sustain local wine identity in a global changing climate. As genetic diversity is an ongoing process through point mutations and epigenetic adaptations, perspective work is to explore clonal data from a wide variety of geographic locations.

Using δ13C and hydroscapes as a tool for discriminating cultivar specific drought response

Measurement of carbon isotope discrimination in berry juice sugars at maturity (δ13C) provides an integrated assessment of water use efficiency (WUE) during the period of berry ripening, and when collected over multiple seasons can be used as an indication of drought stress response. Berry juice δ13C measurements were carried out on 48 different varieties planted in a common garden experiment in Bordeaux, France from 2014 through 2021 and were paired with midday and predawn leaf water potential measurements on the same vines in a subset of six varieties. The aim was to discriminate a large panel of varieties based on their stomatal behaviour and potentially identify hydraulic traits characterizing drought tolerance by comparing δ13C and hydroscapes (the visualisation of plant stomatal behaviour as a response to predawn water potential). Cluster analysis found that δ13C values are likely affected by the differing phenology of each variety, resulting in berry ripening of different varieties taking place under different stress conditions within the same year. We accounted for these phenological differences and found that cluster analysis based on specific δ13C metrics created a classification of varieties that corresponds well to our current empirical understanding of their relative drought tolerances. In addition, we analysed the water potential regulation of the subset of six varieties (using the hydroscape approach) and found that it was well correlated with some δ13C metrics. Surprisingly, a variety’s water potential regulation (specifically its minimum critical leaf water potential under water deficit) was strongly correlated to δ13C values under well-watered conditions, suggesting that base WUE may have a stronger impact on drought tolerance than WUE under water deficit. These results give strong insights on the innate WUE of a very large panel of varieties and suggest that studies of drought tolerance should include traits expressed under non-limiting conditions.

Aromatic maturity is a cornerstone of terroir expression in red wine

Harvesting grapes at adequate maturity is key to the production of high-quality red wines. Enologists and wine makers define several types of maturity, including technical maturity, phenolic maturity and aromatic maturity. Technical maturity and phenolic maturity are relatively well documented in the scientific literature, while articles on aromatic maturity are scarcer. This is surprising, because aromatic maturity is, without a doubt, the most important of the three in determining wine quality and typicity (including terroir expression). Optimal terroir expression can be obtained when the different types of maturity are reached at the same time, or within a short time frame. This is more likely to occur when the ripening takes place under mild temperatures, neither too cool, nor too hot. Aromatic expression in wine can be driven, from low to high maturity, by green, herbal, fresh fruit, ripe fruit, jammy fruit, candied fruit or cooked fruit aromas. Green and cooked fruit aromas are not desirable in red wines, while the levels of other aromatic compounds contribute to the typicity of the wine in relation to its origin. Wines produced in cool climates, or on cool soils in temperate climates, are likely to express herbal or fresh fruit aromas; while wines produced under warm climates, or on warm soils in temperate climates, may express ripe fruit, jammy fruit or candied fruit aromas. Growers can optimize terroir expression through their choice of grapevine variety. Early ripening varieties perform better in cool climates and late ripening varieties in warm climates. Additionally, maturity can be advanced or delayed by different canopy management practices or training systems.