Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Abstract

Aim: The notion of “terroir” enables the attribution of distinctive characteristics to wines from the same region. Climate change raises issues about viticulture, especially the growth of the vines and even more importantly the economic situation of actual wine-growing regions (Schultz and Jones 2010; Quénol 2014). Several studies have addressed the impacts of climate change on viticulture in many wine-growing regions of the world, but only a few have focused on the potential of island and coastal vineyards. However, in the context of climate change, ultramarine and coastal vineyards could become increasingly coveted according to their specific climatic conditions. In regions subject to significant warming, thermal regulation and oceanic influence can limit extremes temperatures, which could be a major advantage for grapevine production. This contribution, first step of a spatial optimization approach to define suitable agro-climatic patterns, will present a typology of these vineyards, to understand their specificities and their adaptability.

Methods and Results: An in-depth bibliographical search has been conducted to provide a global inventory and to highlight relevant variables to describe and categorize the world’s island wine-growing regions. From this approach, three main themes have been defined as variables: climate characteristics, vineyards characteristics and cultivars and associated management systems.

Climate plays a very important role in terroir, and especially temperatures, which determine the regional characteristics of viticulture (van Leeuwen et al., 2004; Hall and Blackman, 2019). In this study we consider the following climatic data: seasonal[1] average temperatures, annual and seasonal1 mean daily amplitude, completed by the average annual sunshine duration, average annual precipitation, winds and sea sprays.

Concerning vineyard characteristics, topological aspects like altitude or distance to ocean can limit diurnal and extremes temperatures (Bonnardot et al., 2001; Koufos et al., 2013; Fourment et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). Vineyards soils and especially soils’ composition, depth and water holding capacity are also completed. Vineyards’ characteristics were supplemented by economic data like surface area (ha), production (hl), market target and appellations. 

Due to their specific climatic conditions and/or because their relative isolation from other continents, many islands harbour autochthonous and rare varieties (Scherrer et al., 2009). In connection with vine variety, rootstock and diseases variables are integrated in the typology. Moreover, several coastal and island vineyards integrate traditional practices to manage the hydric stress without irrigation (i.e. mitigate wind effects on plants) (Drumonde-Neves et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). These practices were highlighted with management systems variables (implementation and management system, space between vines and rows, vine density, mechanization and irrigation system).

When applied to vineyards of Lanzarote, this approach describes structural elements of ultramarine vineyards. In 2009, Canarian viticulture represented 36% of total cultivated area of the archipelago, and 2.9% of total Spanish viticulture. In Lanzarote’s island, the climate is defined as subtropical with low precipitation (average of 150 mm/year), warm temperatures throughout the year and a high average annual sunshine duration (3000 h/year). 

Lanzarote’s island has a low relief and vineyards are planted on volcanic soils. Poured thick layers of volcanic ashes called “picóns” are added at the base of the vine stock. These porous volcanic granules have a great thermal inertia. Indeed, during the day picóns store heat and give it back to the plant at night. Picóns also have good water retention capacity (Troll et al., 2017; González Morales et al., 2015). Lanzarote’s vineyards under the appellation “Denominación de Origen Protegida de Lanzarote” were about 1850 ha in 2016-2017, for a production above 4330 hl and 1800 winegrowers (DO Lanzarote, 2020). The target market is local in scope. Mainly due to the isolation of the archipelago from the mainland, phylloxera is not present in the vineyards of Lanzarote. Vines are not grafted and Malvasia represents ¾ of the vine stock of the island. Vine varieties such as Listàn blanco, Moscatel de Alejandria, Verdello and Gual are often planted to produce dry and sweet white wines. Listàn negro and Negramoll varieties are preferred to produce red wine (DO Lanzarote, 2020). Low-growing vines are planted in drilled holes, and low walls of volcanic rocks are built to protect them from drought and hot drying winds. Due to their specific implementation, vines are widely spaced (400-500 m between them), yields are low and mechanization is not possible. 

This information has been documented and summarised for each wine-growing region. Thanks to this approach, key elements of insular vineyards can be described with generic indicators.  The resulting typology enables comparisons between different wine-growing regions with a generic framework.

Conclusions:

This first step of characterization of vineyard variables highlights the specificities of insular and coastal vineyards. Then, discriminant characteristics will be exploited in a process of spatial optimization in order to identify suitable agroclimatic patterns for different climate change scenarios. The main objective is to implement an approach under multiple constraints (climatic, agronomic, spatial, etc.). The results expected will be compromises between these several constraints. 

DOI:

Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Jeanne Thibault1*, Hervé Quénol2, Cyril Tissot1

1UMR 6554 LETG Brest, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280 Plouzané, France
2UMR 6554 LETG Rennes, Université Rennes 2, Place Recteur H. Le Moal, 35043 Rennes, France

Contact the author

Keywords

Viticulture, insularity, coastal, climate change, adaptation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Optimizing stomatal traits for future climates

Stomatal traits determine grapevine water use, carbon supply, and water stress, which directly impact yield and berry chemistry. Breeding for stomatal traits has the strong potential to improve grapevine performance under future, drier conditions, but the trait values that breeders should target are unknown. We used a functional-structural plant model developed for grapevine (HydroShoot) to determine how stomatal traits impact canopy gas exchange, water potential, and temperature under historical and future conditions in high-quality and hot-climate California wine regions (Napa and the Central Valley). Historical climate (1990-2010) was collected from weather stations and future climate (2079-99) was projected from 4 representative climate models for California, assuming medium- and high-emissions (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). Five trait parameterizations, representing mean and extreme values for the maximum stomatal conductance (gmax) and leaf water potential threshold for stomatal closure (Ψsc), were defined from meta-analyses. Compared to mean trait values, the water-spending extremes (highest gmax or most negative Ysc) had negligible benefits for carbon gain and canopy cooling, but exacerbated vine water use and stress, for both sites and climate scenarios. These traits increased cumulative transpiration by 8 – 17%, changed cumulative carbon gain by -4 – 3%, and reduced minimum water potentials by 10 – 18%. Conversely, the water-saving extremes (lowest gmax or least negative Ψsc) strongly reduced water use and stress, but potentially compromised the carbon supply for ripening. Under RCP 8.5 conditions, these traits reduced transpiration by 22 – 35% and carbon gain by 9 – 16% and increased minimum water potentials by 20 – 28%, compared to mean values. Overall, selecting for more water-saving stomatal traits could improve water-use efficiency and avoid the detrimental effects of highly negative canopy water potentials on yield and quality, but more work is needed to evaluate whether these benefits outweigh the consequences of minor declines in carbon gain for fruit production.

Deconstructing the soil component of terroir: from controversy to consensus

Wine terroir describes the collectively recognized relation between a geographical area and the distinctive organoleptic characteristics of the wines produced in it. The overriding objective in terroir studies is therefore to provide scientific proof relating the properties of terroir components to wine quality and typicity. In scientific circles, the role of climate (macro-, meso- and micro-) on grape and wine characteristics is well documented and accepted as the most critical. Moreover, there has been increasing interest in recent years about new elements with possible importance in shaping wine terroir like berry/leaf/soil microbiology or even aromatic plants in proximity to the vineyard conferring flavors to the grapes. However, the actual effect of these factors is also dependent on complex interactions with plant material (variety/clone, rootstock, vine age) and with human factors.
The contribution of soil, although a fundamental component of terroir and extremely popular among wine enthusiasts, remains a much-debated issue among researchers. The role of geology is probably the one mostly associated by consumers with the notion of terroir with different parent rocks considered to give birth to different wine styles. However, the relationship between wine properties and the underlying parent material raises a lot of controversy especially regarding the actual existence of rock-derived flavors in the wine (e.g. minerality). As far as the actual soil properties are concerned, the effect of soil physical properties is generally regarded as the most significant (e.g sandy soils being associated with lighter wines while those on clay with colored and tannic ones) mostly through control of water availability which ultimately modifies berry ripening conditions either directly by triggering biosynthetic pathways, or indirectly by altering vigor and yield components. The role of soil chemistry seems to be weakly associated to wine sensory characteristic, although N, K, S and Ca, but also soil pH, are often considered important in the overall soil effect.
Recently, in the light of evidence provided by precision agriculture studies reporting a high variability of vineyard soils, the spatial scale should also be taken into consideration in the evaluation of the soil effects on wines. While it is accepted that soil effects become more significant than climate on a local level, it is not clear whether these micro-variations of vineyard soils are determining in the terroir effect. Moreover, as terroir is not a set of only natural factors, the magnitude of the contribution of human-related factors (irrigation, fertilization, soil management) to the soil effect still remains ambiguous. Lastly, a major shortcoming of the majority of works about soil effects on wine characteristics is the absence of connection with actual vine physiological processes since all soil effects on grape and wine chemistry and sensorial properties are ultimately mediated through vine responses.
This article attempts to breakdown the main soil attributes involved in the terroir effect to suggest an improved understanding about soil’s true contribution to wine sensory characteristics. It is proposed that soil parameters per se are not as significant determining factors in the terroir effect but rather their mutual interactions as well as with other natural and human factors included in the terroir concept. Consequently, similarly to bioclimatic indices, composite soil indices (i.e. soil depth, water holding capacity, fertility, temperature etc), incorporating multiple soil parameters, might provide a more accurate and quantifiable means to assess the relative weight of the soil component in the terroir effect.

Influence of weather and climatic conditions on the viticultural production in Croatia

The research includes an analysis of the impact of weather conditions on phenological development of the vine and grape quality, through monitoring of four experimental cultivars (Chardonnay, Graševina, Merlot and Plavac mali) over two production years. In each experimental vineyard, which were evenly distributed throughout the regions of Slavonia and The Croatian Danube, Croatian Uplands,

Terroir traceability in grapes, musts and wine: results of research on Gewürztraminer and Sauvignon Blanc grape varieties in northern Italy

In the study of terroir, a separate analysis of its many component factors can be of great help in accurately identifying a vineyard’s natural elements that impact wine quality and typicity. This research used a dedicated pluri-disciplinary approach to investigate the ecological characteristics, including geology and geographical features, of 14 vineyards that produce Gewürztraminer and Sauvignon Blanc cultivars in the alpine Alto Adige DOC wine region. Both the geopedological method using Vineyards Geological Identity (VGI) and the new Solar Radiaton Identity (SRI) topoclimatic classification method were used to provide analytical measurements and qualitative/quantitative characterisations. In addition, wide-ranging targeted and untargeted oenological and chemical analyses were carried out on grapes, musts and wines to correlate the soils’ geomineral and physical conditions with the biochemical properties of their fruits and wines. The research identified strong correlations between vineyard geo-identity and wine biofingerprint, confirming a mineral traceability of strontium rubidium ratio and some minerals distinctive to the local geology, such as K, Ca, Ag, Ba and Mn.  The study also discovered that particular geomineral and physical soil conditions of the studied vineyards are related to the different amount of amino acids, primary varietal aromas and polyphenols found in grapes, musts and wines. The research confirmed that winemaking technologies support oenological quality, although in some cases, human practices can overpower certain characteristic elements in wine, erasing the typical imprint left by the vineyards’ natural terroir, which becomes less traceable. Terroir abiotic ecological factors and vineyard identity can be classified in detail using the new VGI and SRI analysis methods to discover interrelationships between geo-pedological and topoclimatic conditions that impact wine quality. These methods are also helpful in identifying which ecological elements are exclusive to a particular vineyard or wine sub-region.

Green berries on Gewürztraminer (Vitis vinifera L.) in South Tyrol (Italy)

The grape variety Gewürztraminer is known to be affected by two physiological disorders namely berry shrivel and bunch stem necrosis. During the season 2014 we noticed a new symptomatology type of ripening disorder on the variety. The new symptom showed not all berries fallowing the normal maturation stages, but single berries remaining at a soft but green stage till harvest. The broad distribution of these so called “green berries” symptoms in different production sites of our region, caused huge damage due to the difficulty of eliminating single berries per bunch before harvesting. Therefore, the Research Centre Laimburg began to investigate the reasons and origins of this new symptom. This work shows the results of first attempts to find causes for the symptom as well as the resulting approach to mitigate symptoms. Applications of magnesium leaf fertilizer showed first promising results against this putative disorder. To study the causal effect of the green berries 30 symptomatic vineyards in 2014 have been selected for a monitoring during the season 2016. To evaluate the foliar nutrient treatment two vineyards have been selected for application of magnesium sulfate and magnesium chloride. Leaf and berry nutrient analysis, as well as the main quality parameters during ripening have been performed. As soon as “green berries” symptoms appeared, incidence and severity have been evaluated. Most of the symptomatic vineyards of the 2016 monitoring showed light to clear magnesium deficit symptoms on their foliage. Only during the seasons 2020 and 2021 “green berries” symptoms could be found in the leaf fertilizer treatment vineyards. Both seasons showed a significant effect of the magnesium treatments to reduce the incidence and severity of the symptom. It seems that the appearance of the “green berries” symptom on Gewürztraminer is correlated to a disturbed uptake of magnesium of the vines.