Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Abstract

Aim: The notion of “terroir” enables the attribution of distinctive characteristics to wines from the same region. Climate change raises issues about viticulture, especially the growth of the vines and even more importantly the economic situation of actual wine-growing regions (Schultz and Jones 2010; Quénol 2014). Several studies have addressed the impacts of climate change on viticulture in many wine-growing regions of the world, but only a few have focused on the potential of island and coastal vineyards. However, in the context of climate change, ultramarine and coastal vineyards could become increasingly coveted according to their specific climatic conditions. In regions subject to significant warming, thermal regulation and oceanic influence can limit extremes temperatures, which could be a major advantage for grapevine production. This contribution, first step of a spatial optimization approach to define suitable agro-climatic patterns, will present a typology of these vineyards, to understand their specificities and their adaptability.

Methods and Results: An in-depth bibliographical search has been conducted to provide a global inventory and to highlight relevant variables to describe and categorize the world’s island wine-growing regions. From this approach, three main themes have been defined as variables: climate characteristics, vineyards characteristics and cultivars and associated management systems.

Climate plays a very important role in terroir, and especially temperatures, which determine the regional characteristics of viticulture (van Leeuwen et al., 2004; Hall and Blackman, 2019). In this study we consider the following climatic data: seasonal[1] average temperatures, annual and seasonal1 mean daily amplitude, completed by the average annual sunshine duration, average annual precipitation, winds and sea sprays.

Concerning vineyard characteristics, topological aspects like altitude or distance to ocean can limit diurnal and extremes temperatures (Bonnardot et al., 2001; Koufos et al., 2013; Fourment et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). Vineyards soils and especially soils’ composition, depth and water holding capacity are also completed. Vineyards’ characteristics were supplemented by economic data like surface area (ha), production (hl), market target and appellations. 

Due to their specific climatic conditions and/or because their relative isolation from other continents, many islands harbour autochthonous and rare varieties (Scherrer et al., 2009). In connection with vine variety, rootstock and diseases variables are integrated in the typology. Moreover, several coastal and island vineyards integrate traditional practices to manage the hydric stress without irrigation (i.e. mitigate wind effects on plants) (Drumonde-Neves et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). These practices were highlighted with management systems variables (implementation and management system, space between vines and rows, vine density, mechanization and irrigation system).

When applied to vineyards of Lanzarote, this approach describes structural elements of ultramarine vineyards. In 2009, Canarian viticulture represented 36% of total cultivated area of the archipelago, and 2.9% of total Spanish viticulture. In Lanzarote’s island, the climate is defined as subtropical with low precipitation (average of 150 mm/year), warm temperatures throughout the year and a high average annual sunshine duration (3000 h/year). 

Lanzarote’s island has a low relief and vineyards are planted on volcanic soils. Poured thick layers of volcanic ashes called “picóns” are added at the base of the vine stock. These porous volcanic granules have a great thermal inertia. Indeed, during the day picóns store heat and give it back to the plant at night. Picóns also have good water retention capacity (Troll et al., 2017; González Morales et al., 2015). Lanzarote’s vineyards under the appellation “Denominación de Origen Protegida de Lanzarote” were about 1850 ha in 2016-2017, for a production above 4330 hl and 1800 winegrowers (DO Lanzarote, 2020). The target market is local in scope. Mainly due to the isolation of the archipelago from the mainland, phylloxera is not present in the vineyards of Lanzarote. Vines are not grafted and Malvasia represents ¾ of the vine stock of the island. Vine varieties such as Listàn blanco, Moscatel de Alejandria, Verdello and Gual are often planted to produce dry and sweet white wines. Listàn negro and Negramoll varieties are preferred to produce red wine (DO Lanzarote, 2020). Low-growing vines are planted in drilled holes, and low walls of volcanic rocks are built to protect them from drought and hot drying winds. Due to their specific implementation, vines are widely spaced (400-500 m between them), yields are low and mechanization is not possible. 

This information has been documented and summarised for each wine-growing region. Thanks to this approach, key elements of insular vineyards can be described with generic indicators.  The resulting typology enables comparisons between different wine-growing regions with a generic framework.

Conclusions:

This first step of characterization of vineyard variables highlights the specificities of insular and coastal vineyards. Then, discriminant characteristics will be exploited in a process of spatial optimization in order to identify suitable agroclimatic patterns for different climate change scenarios. The main objective is to implement an approach under multiple constraints (climatic, agronomic, spatial, etc.). The results expected will be compromises between these several constraints. 

DOI:

Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Jeanne Thibault1*, Hervé Quénol2, Cyril Tissot1

1UMR 6554 LETG Brest, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280 Plouzané, France
2UMR 6554 LETG Rennes, Université Rennes 2, Place Recteur H. Le Moal, 35043 Rennes, France

Contact the author

Keywords

Viticulture, insularity, coastal, climate change, adaptation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Impact of long term agroecological and conventional practices on subsurface soil microbiota in Macabeu and Xarel·lo vineyards

There is a growing trend on the transition from conventional to agroecological management of vineyards. However, the impact of practices, such as reduced-tillage, organic fertilization and cover crops, is not well-understood regarding the soil microbial diversity, and its relationship with the soil physicochemical properties in the subsurface depth near the rooting zone. Soil bacterial diversity is an important contributor towards plant health, productivity and response to environmental stresses. A field experiment was conducted by sampling subsurface soil bacterial community (NGS and qPCR) near to the root zone of Macabeu and Xarel·lo vineyards, located at the Penedes. 3 organic (ECO) and 3 conventional (CON) vineyards, with more than 10 years of respective management were sampled (n=5 each plot). ECO practices did not affect bacterial and fungal abundance but increased significantly the ammonium oxidizing bacteria and alpha-diversity (Inv.Simpson). Interestingly beta-diversity was significantly affected by the management strategy. ANOSIM-tests revealed a significative effect of the management (ecological vs conventional) and plot, on the soil microbial structure (ASV abundance). Main phyla depicted were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria, whose relative abundances were not affected by the management. EdgeR assay revealed a significant increase of Cyanobacteria and decrease of Gemmatimonadetes and Firmicutes phyla in ECO. Interestingly, the grapevine variety was not correlated with the soil microbial community structure. Mantel-test revealed an important correlation (Spearman) of some physicochemical parameters with the soil microbiota structure, in order of importance: texture, EC, pH Ca/Mg, Mg/P, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, SO42-, and OM. N-NH4 and NTK, which were higher in the ECO managed soils, did not correlated significantly with the soil microbiome population. The results revealed the importance of combining a deep physicochemical characterization of each replicate with the microbial diversity assessment to gain better insights on the relationship between soil microbiome and vineyard management.

Late frost protection in Champagne

Probably one of the most counterintuitive impacts of climate change on vine is the increased frequency of late frost. Champagne, due to its septentrional position is historically and regularly affected by this meteorological hazard. Champagne has therefore developed a strong experience in frost protection with first experiments dating from the end of 19th century. Frost protection can be divided in two parts: passive and active. Passive protection includes all the methods that do not seek to modify the vine’s environment or resistance at the time of frost. The most iconic passive protection in Champagne is the establishment of the individual reserve. This reserve allows to stock a certain quantity of clear wine during a surplus year to compensate a meteorological hazard like frost during the following years. Other common passive methods are the control of planting area (walls, bushes, topography), the choice of grape variety, late pruning, or the impact of grass cover and tillage. Active frost protection is also divided in two parts. Most of the existing techniques tend to modify vine’s environment. Most of the time they provide warmth (candles, heaters, windmills, heating cables…), or stabilise bud’s temperature above a lethal threshold (water sprinkling). The other way to actively fight is to enhance the resistance of buds to frost (elicitors). The Comité Champagne evaluates frost protection methods following three main axes: the efficiency, the profitability, and the environmental impact through a lifecycle assessment. This study will present the results on both passive and active protection following these three axes.

Long-term drought resilience of traditional red grapevine varieties from a semi-arid region

In recent decades, the scarcity of water resources in agriculture in certain areas has been aggravated by climate change, which has caused an increase in temperatures, changes in rainfall patterns, as well as an increase in the frequency of extreme phenomena such as droughts and heat waves. Although the vine is considered a drought-tolerant specie, it has to satisfy important water requirements to complete its cycle, which coincides with the hottest and driest months. Achieving sustainable viticulture in this scenario requires high levels of efficiency in the use of water, a scarce resource whose use is expected to be severely restricted in the near future. In this regard, the use of drought-tolerant varieties that are able to maintain grape yield and quality could be an effective strategy to face this change. During three consecutive seasons (2018-2020) the behavior in rainfed regime of 13 traditional red grapevine varieties of the Spain central region was studied. These varieties were cultivated in a collection at Centro de Investigación de la Vid y el Vino de Castilla-La Mancha (IVICAM-IRIAF) located in Tomelloso (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). Yield components (yield, mean bunch and berry weight, pruning weight), physicochemical parameters of the musts (brix degree, total acidity, pH) and some physiological parameters related with water stress during ripening period (δ13C, δ18O) were analysed. The application of different statistical techniques to the results showed the existence of significant differences between varieties in their response to stressful conditions. A few varieties highlighted for their high ability to adapt to drought, being able to maintain high yields due to their efficiency in the use of water. In addition, it was possible quantify to what extent climate can be a determinant in the δ18O of musts under severe water stress conditions.

The impact of sustainable management regimes on amino acid profiles in grape juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids

One of the biggest challenges of agriculture today is maintaining food safety and food quality while providing ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation, pest and disease control, ensuring water quality and supply, and climate regulation. Organic farming was shown to promote biodiversity and carbon sequestration, and is therefore seen as one possibility of environmentally friendly production. Consumers expect organically grown crops to be free from chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers and often presume that the quality of organically grown crops is different or higher compared to conventionally grown crops. Integrated, organic, and biodynamic viticulture were compared in a replicated field trial in Geisenheim, Germany (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling). Amino acid profiles in juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids were monitored over three consecutive seasons beginning 7 years after conversion to organic and biodynamic viticulture, respectively. In addition, parameters such as soil nutrient status, yield, vigor, canopy temperature, and water stress were monitored to draw conclusions on reasons for the observed changes. Results revealed that the different sustainable management regimes highly differed in their amino acid profiles in juice and also in their skin flavonol content, whereas differences in the flavanol and hydroxycinnamic acid content were less pronounced. It is very likely that differences in nutrient status and yield determined amino acid profiles in juice, although all three systems showed similar amounts of mineralized nitrogen in the soil. Canopy structure and temperature in the bunch zone did not differ among treatments and therefore cannot account for the observed differences in favonols. A different light exposure of the bunches in the respective systems due to differences in vigor together with differences in berry size and a different water status of the vines might rather be responsible for the increase in flavonol content under organic and biodynamic viticulture.

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include:
• New user interface
• User authentication
• Batch analysis of multiple images
• Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features
• Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard.
Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.