Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Understanding provenance and terroir in Australian Pinot noir

Understanding provenance and terroir in Australian Pinot noir

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to (1) characterise colour and phenolic profiles of commercial Australian Pinot noir wines, (2) understand regional drivers of sensory and volatile profiles of commercial Australian Pinot noir wines, and (3) generate a deeper understanding of where Australian Pinot noir wines profiles sit in an international context.

Methods and Results: A broad set of commercial wines was sourced from 10 Australian Pinot noir producing wine regions (n=102) from two vintages (2015 and 2016). The modified Somers method was used for preliminary colour and phenolic analysis of the wines. Noticeable colour and phenolic profile differences were observed amongst the regions. For example, wines from Southern Tasmania were found to have consistently higher anthocyanin levels.

A sub-set of the broad group of Australian samples (n=80) was selected for grape-derived and fermentative volatile analysis (solid phase micro extraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) in addition to colour and phenolic analyses. Vintage was found to have a greater effect on aroma compounds than region.

A narrower set of commercial wines (n=15) was sourced from 5 Australian Pinot noir producing wine regions for in-depth sensory (Pivot© Profile) and grape-derived and fermentative volatile analysis (solid phase micro extraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry). The sensory assessment results showed that wines from the Mornington Peninsula, and to a lesser extent two from Northern Tasmania were associated with ‘red fruits’ aroma, while the majority of wines from Adelaide Hills, Southern Tasmania, and Yarra Valley, were associated with the attributes ‘floral’ and ‘oaky’ aroma.

Conclusions:

Wine colour and phenolic analyses revealed demonstrable differences between Australian regions, and between the 2015 and 2016 vintages. Further investigation of volatile composition and sensory attributes of 2018 vintage wines showed regional sensory trends when it comes to Australia’s Pinot noir producing regions, with the Yarra Valley, Adelaide Hills and Mornington Peninsula showing similarities in their sensory profiles. However, from a sensory perspective Tasmanian Pinot noir tends to incorporate elements of all those regions into its sensory profiles, potentially reflecting the larger geographical size of the Tasmanian regions and greater terroir diversity in a single region.

Significance and Impact of the Study: The growing popularity of Pinot noir with Australian wine consumers underpins a need for better understanding the variety and its performance across varied terroirs. Many viticulturists and winemakers base agronomical and oenological practices on the colour and palate attributes of final wines. It is therefore important for the Australian wine industry to better understand the effect of regional compositional characteristics which potentially impact sensory attributes. These findings have the potential to support decision making for winemakers and viticulturists to achieve desired quality and stylistic outcomes and require further in-depth analysis of characteristics of the terroir. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study attempting to compare sensory and volatile profiles of Australian Pinot noir wines. Further studies including a greater number of samples and wine regions would provide more conclusive results, as would a comparative study using standardised winemaking protocols for fruit from a range of regions

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type : Video

Authors

Fiona Kerslake1*, Rocco Longo1, Wes Pearson2,3, Samantha Sawyer1, Angela Merry,1 Mark Solomon3, Luca Nicolotti3,5, Hanna Westmore1, Jacqui McRae3,6, Amanda Ylia3,5, Robert Dambergs,1,2,4

1 Horticulture Centre, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, Tasmania, 7249, Australia
2 National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, 2650, Australia
3 The Australian Wine Research Institute, Urrbrae, South Australia, 5064, Australia
4 WineTQ, Ganmain, NSW, 2702, Australia 
5 Metabolomics South Australia, Urrbrae, South Australia, 5064, Australia
6School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, The University of Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

Contact the author

Keywords

Australian Pinot noir, regionality, aroma, Pivot© Profile

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

The impact of sustainable management regimes on amino acid profiles in grape juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids

One of the biggest challenges of agriculture today is maintaining food safety and food quality while providing ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation, pest and disease control, ensuring water quality and supply, and climate regulation. Organic farming was shown to promote biodiversity and carbon sequestration, and is therefore seen as one possibility of environmentally friendly production. Consumers expect organically grown crops to be free from chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers and often presume that the quality of organically grown crops is different or higher compared to conventionally grown crops. Integrated, organic, and biodynamic viticulture were compared in a replicated field trial in Geisenheim, Germany (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling). Amino acid profiles in juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids were monitored over three consecutive seasons beginning 7 years after conversion to organic and biodynamic viticulture, respectively. In addition, parameters such as soil nutrient status, yield, vigor, canopy temperature, and water stress were monitored to draw conclusions on reasons for the observed changes. Results revealed that the different sustainable management regimes highly differed in their amino acid profiles in juice and also in their skin flavonol content, whereas differences in the flavanol and hydroxycinnamic acid content were less pronounced. It is very likely that differences in nutrient status and yield determined amino acid profiles in juice, although all three systems showed similar amounts of mineralized nitrogen in the soil. Canopy structure and temperature in the bunch zone did not differ among treatments and therefore cannot account for the observed differences in favonols. A different light exposure of the bunches in the respective systems due to differences in vigor together with differences in berry size and a different water status of the vines might rather be responsible for the increase in flavonol content under organic and biodynamic viticulture.

Analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon and Aglianico winegrape (V. vinifera L.) responses to different pedo-climatic environments in southern Italy

Water deficit is one of the most important effects of climate change able to affect agricultural sectors. In general, it determines a reduction in biomass production, and for some plants, as in the case of grapevine, it can endorse fruit quality. The monitoring and management of plant water stress in the vineyard

Is wine terroir a valid concept under a changing climate?

The OIV[i] defines terroir as a concept referring to an area in which collective knowledge of the interactions between the physical and biological environment (soil, topography, climate, landscape characteristics and biodiversity features) and vitivinicultural practices develops, providing distinctive wine characteristics. Those are perceptible in the taste of wine, which drives consumer preference and, therefore, wine’s value in the marketplace. Geographical indications (GI) are recognized regulatory constructs formalizing and protecting the nexus between wine taste and the terroir generating it. Despite considering updates, GIs do not consider the nexus as a dynamic one and do not anticipate change, namely of climate. Being climate a fundamental feature of terroir, it strongly impacts wine characteristics, such as taste. According to IPCC[ii], many widespread, rapid and unprecedented changes of climate occurred, some being irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Climatic shifts and atmospheric-driven extreme events have been widely reported worldwide. Recent climatic trends are projected to strengthen in upcoming decades, whereas extremes are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, forcing wines away from GI definitions. Geographical shifts of viticultural suitability are projected, often moving into regions and countries different from current ones. Some authors propose adaptation in viticulture, winemaking and product innovation. We show evidence of climate changing wine characteristics in the Douro valley, home of 270-year-old Port GI. We discuss herein resist or adapt stances for when climate changes the nexus between terroir and wine characteristics. Using the MED-GOLD[iii] dashboard, a tool allowing for easy visual navigation of past and future climates, we demonstrate how policymakers can identify future moments, throughout the 21st century under different emission scenarios, when GI specifications will likely need updates (e.g., boundaries, varieties) to reduce climate-change impacts.

Geospatial trends of bioclimatic indexes in the topographically complex region of Barolo DOCG

Barolo DOCG is an economically important wine producing region in Northwest Italy. It is a small region of approximately 70 km2 gross area. The topography is very complex with steep sloped hills ranging in elevation from below 200 m to 550 m. Barolo DOCG wine is made exclusively from the Nebbiolo grape. Bioclimatic indexes are often used in viticulture to gain a better understanding of broader climate trends which can be compared temporally and geographically. These indexes are also used for identifying potential phenological timing, growing region suitability, and potential risks associated with expected climatic changes. Understanding how topography influences bioclimatic indexes can help with understanding of mesoscale climate behaviour leading to improved decision making and risk management strategies. The average monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, the Cool Night Index, the Huglin Index, and the monthly diurnal range (from July to October) were calculated using data from 45 weather stations within a 40 km radius of the Barolo DOCG growing area between the years 1996 and 2019. Linear and multiple regression models were developed using independent variables (elevation, aspect, slope) extracted from a digital elevation model to identify significant relationships. Bioclimatic indexes were then kriged with external drift using independent variables that showed significant relationships with the bioclimatic index using a 100 m resolution grid. The maximum monthly temperatures and the Huglin Index showed consistent significant negative relationships with elevation in all years. The minimum monthly temperatures showed no relationship with elevation but in some months a small but significant relationship was observed with aspect. Due to the lack of a relationship between minimum monthly temperatures and elevation compared to the significant relationship between maximum monthly temperatures and elevation, monthly diurnal range had a negative relationship with elevation.

Underpinning terroir with data: rethinking the zoning paradigm

Agriculture, natural resource management and the production and sale of products such as wine are increasingly data-driven activities. Thus, the use of remote and proximal crop and soil sensors to aid management decisions is becoming commonplace and ‘Agtech’ is proliferating commercially; mapping, underpinned by geographical information systems and complex methods of spatial analysis, is widely used. Likewise, the chemical and sensory analysis of wines draws on multivariate statistics; the efficient winery intake of grapes, subsequent production of wines and their delivery to markets relies on logistics; whilst the sales and marketing of wines is increasingly driven by artificial intelligence linked to the recorded purchasing behaviour of consumers. In brief, there is data everywhere!

Opinions will vary on whether these developments are a good thing. Those concerned with the ‘mystique’ of wine, or the historical aspects of terroir and its preservation, may find them confronting. In contrast, they offer an opportunity to those interested in the biophysical elements of terroir, and efforts aimed at better understanding how these impact on vineyard performance and the sensory attributes of resultant wines. At the previous Terroir Congress, we demonstrated the potential of analytical methods used at the within-vineyard scale in the development of Precision Viticulture, in contributing to a quantitative understanding of regional terroir. For this conference, we take this approach forward with examples from contrasting locations in both the northern and southern hemispheres. We show how, by focussing on the vineyards within winegrowing regions, as opposed to all of the land within those regions, we might move towards a more robust terroir zoning than one derived from a mixture of history, thematic mapping, heuristics and the whims of marketers. Aside from providing improved understanding by underpinning terroir with data, such methods should also promote improved management of the entire wine value chain.