Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Are my bubbles shrinking? A deeper look at oxygen desorption in wine

Are my bubbles shrinking? A deeper look at oxygen desorption in wine

Abstract

In the past decade, there has been an increasing amount of work dedicated to understanding micro-oxygenation in wine. Oxygen desorption into nitrogen gas is a similar process, but there has been little work focusing on this process and no work explicitly examining the effect that changes in wine components have on the process. The removal of excess dissolved oxygen from wine prior to bottling is commonly done in winemaking. A widely used method involves sparging nitrogen through the wine, in a process known as desorption. An indicator of the rate of oxygen desorption is the oxygen volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kla), which can be determined experimentally. The aim of the study was to examine how temperature, superficial gas velocity, and ethanol and glycerol levels affected the kla of dissolved oxygen into nitrogen gas in an aqueous solution of ethanol and glycerol. For the experiment, ethanol and glycerol concentrations were varied between 9 and 15% v/v, and 5 and 25 g/L respectively. The temperature was varied between 10 and 20C. The superficial gas velocity was varied between 0.15 and 0.32 cm/s. The experiments were performed in a 15L bubble column with a stone sparger. Before each run, the column was sparged with air in order to saturate the solution. Nitrogen was sparged until the concentration of oxygen was below 0.1 mg/L. DO levels were measured with an oxygen probe. The mean bubble size was determined using a high speed camera. The results showed that in the ranges tested, ethanol and glycerol concentration had no effect on the kla. A strong correlation was shown between superficial gas velocity, temperature and the kla The kla varied between 0.0139 and 0.0236s^-1. It was expected that the varying ethanol and glycerol concentrations would have an effect as the physico-chemical properties changed. Consequently an experiment was done in which ethanol concentration was incrementally increased from 0 to 10% v/v. It was found that raising the ethanol concentration to 0.1% increased the kla significantly relative to water. Beyond this the kla did not increase significantly. It was found that at ethanol concentrations of 0 to 0.02% the mean bubble size was nearly 2 times greater than at 0.05%. This suggests that the rise in kla is as a result of smaller bubbles. Preliminary tests performed on white wine showed that the kla was lower than in the ethanol/glycerol solutions under the same conditions. The kla range was 0.0094 and 0.012 s^-1 at 10 and 20 C respectively. The use of an aqueous solution of ethanol and glycerol overestimates the oxygen desorption rate in wine. This indicates that other unexamined properties within wine have a significant effect on kla. Oxygen desorption is significantly improved with the introduction of 0.05 % ethanol. Examining how wine proteins, acids and phenols affect the oxygen kla may give a better estimate of the desorption process in wine.

DOI:

Publication date: September 7, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Steven Sutton

Stellenbosch University,Prof. Wessel Du Toit, Stellenbosch University Prof. Robbie Pott, Stellenbosch University

Contact the author

Keywords

oxygen desorption, wine processing, volumetric mass transfer coefficient, nitrogen sparging, wine sparging, micro-oxygenation keyword3)

Citation

Related articles…

Modelling vine water stress during a critical period and potential yield reduction rate in European wine regions: a retrospective analysis

Most European vineyards are managed under rainfed conditions, where seasonal water deficit has become increasingly important. The flowering-veraison phenophase represents an important period for vine response to water stress, which is seldomly thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, we aim to quantify the flowering-veraison water stress levels using Crop Water Stress Indicator (CWSI) over 1986–2015 for important European wine regions, and to assess the respective potential Yield Lose Rate (YLR). Additionally, we also investigate whether an advanced flowering-veraison phase may help alleviating the water stress with improved yield. A process-based grapevine model STICS is employed, which has been extensively calibrated for flowering and veraison stages using observed data at 38 locations with 10 different grapevine varieties. Subsequently, the model is being implemented at the regional level, considering site-specific calibration results and gridded climate and soil datasets. The findings suggest wine regions with stronger flowering-veraison CWSI tend to have higher potential YLR. However, contrasting patterns are found between wine regions in France-Germany-Luxembourg and Italy-Portugal-Spain. The former tends to have slight-to-moderate drought conditions (CWSI<0.5) and a negligible-to-moderate YLR (<30%), whereas the latter possesses severe-to-extreme CWSI (>0.5) and substantial YLR (>40%). Wine regions prone to a high drought risk (CWSI>0.75) are also identified, which are concentrated in southern Mediterranean Europe. An advanced flowering-veraison phase may have benefited from cooler temperatures and a higher fraction of spring precipitation in wine regions of Italy-Portugal-Spain, resulting in alleviated CWSI and moderate reductions of YLR. For those of France-Germany-Luxembourg, this can have reduced flowering-veraison precipitation, but prevalent alleviations of YLR are also found, possibly because of shifted phase towards a cooler growing season with reduced evaporative demands. Overall, such a retrospective analysis might provide new insights towards better management of seasonal water deficit for conventionally vulnerable Mediterranean wine regions, but also for relatively cooler and wetter Central European regions.

Different soil types and relief influence the quality of Merlot grapes in a relatively small area in the Vipava Valley (Slovenia) in relation to the vine water status

Besides location and microclimatic conditions, soil plays an important role in the quality of grapes and wine. Soil properties influence…

Climate change projections to support the transition to climate-smart viticulture

The Earth’s system is undergoing major changes through a wide range of spatial and temporal scales as a response to growing anthropogenic radiative forcing, which is pushing the whole system far beyond its natural variability. Sources of greenhouse gases largely exceed their sinks, thus leading to a strengthened greenhouse effect. More energy is thereby being supplied to the system, with inevitable shifts in climatic patterns and weather regimes. Over the last decades, these modifications have been manifested in the full statistical distributions of the atmospheric variables, with dramatic changes in the frequency and intensity of extremes. Natural hazards, such as severe droughts, floods, forest fires, or heatwaves, are being triggered by extreme atmospheric events worldwide, thus threatening human activities. Viticultculture is not only exposed to changing climates but is also highly vulnerable, as grapevine phenology and physiological development are strongly controlled by atmospheric conditions. Therefore, the assessment of climate change projections for a given region is critical for climate change adaptation and risk reduction in viticulture. By adopting timely and suitable measures, the future sustainability and resiliency of the sector can be fostered. Climate-grapevine chain modelling is an essential tool for better planning and management. However, the accuracy of the resulting projections is limited by many uncertainties that must be duly taken into account when transferring knowledge to stakeholders and decision-makers. Climate-smart viticulture will comprise ensembles of locally tuned strategies, envisioning both adaptation and mitigation, assisted by emerging technologies and decision-support systems.

austrianvineyards.com: online viewer of all designations of Austrian wine

To digitally record and present all the origins of Austrian wines in the same perfect and clear way was the motivation for the Austrian Wine Marketing Board (Austrian Wine) to start with the project in 2018. In June 2021 the results were presented to the public in an online viewer showing all the designations of Austrian wine, available at https://austrianvineyards.com in a largely barrier-free manner. The online viewer provides tailored individual maps fitted to the respective zoom level. The smallest unit of wine-origins in Austria is called Ried and is displayed in a plot-specific manner highlighting areas under vine. Information on the Ried include administrative district, winegrowing municipality, cadastral municipality, large collective vineyard site, specific winegrowing region, generic winegrowing region, winegrowing area and, in many cases, an illustrative picture. Complementary data on the size, elevation (minimum-maximum), orientation (in 8 sectors plus flat) and gradient (minimum, maximum, average) are based on the area under vine according to the EU’s Integrated Administration and Control System. Additional information covers climate data. The diagrams are taken from the monthly breakdown of data in the annals of the Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Austria provide a display of values for air temperature, precipitation, and sunshine hours for the reference year and the long-term average. Seasonal aggregated data on temperature, precipitation, and sunshine hours complete the display. Short descriptions with emphasis on geology and soil, field name in historical maps, etymology of the denomination, and main planted variety complements the available information for the main designations in the online viewer. These descriptions are compiled by winegrowers, geologists, historians, and journalists. All the information and data can be extracted to a pdf-file. Printed vineyard maps are also available. Missing content regarding wine origins in Styria will be completed in winter 2021/22.

Grapevine yield-gap: identification of environmental limitations by soil and climate zoning in Languedoc-Roussillon region (south of France)

Grapevine yield has been historically overlooked, assuming a strong trade-off between grape yield and wine quality. At present, menaced by climate change, many vineyards in Southern France are far from the quality label threshold, becoming grapevine yield-gaps a major subject of concern. Although yield-gaps are well studied in arable crops, we know very little about grapevine yield-gaps. In the present study, we analysed the environmental component of grapevine yield-gaps linked to climate and soil resources in the Languedoc Roussillon. We used SAFRAN data and IGP Pays d’Oc wine yields from 2010 to 2018. We selected climate and soil indicators proving to have a significant effect on average wine yield-gaps at the municipality scale. The most significant factors of grapevine yield were the Soil Available Water Capacity; followed by the Huglin Index and the Climatic Dryness Index. The Days of Frost; the Soil pH; and the Very Hot Days were also significant. Then, we clustered geographical zones presenting similar indicators, facilitating the identification of resources yield-gaps. We discussed the number of zones with the experts of IGP Pays d’Oc label, obtaining 7 zones with similar limitations for grapevine yield. Finally, we analysed the main resources causing yield-gaps and the grapevine varieties planted on each zone. Mapping grapevine resource yield-gaps are the first stage for understanding grapevine yield-gaps at the regional scale.