 IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evaluation of the impact of different amelioration techniques on the chemical composition and sensory characteristics of smoke impacted wines

Evaluation of the impact of different amelioration techniques on the chemical composition and sensory characteristics of smoke impacted wines

Abstract

AIM: The increasing incidences of wildfires in wine grape growing regions pose a significant risk. Persistent exposure to smoke can compromise the quality and value of wine grapes and adversely affect wines made from smoke exposed grapes. A wine is seen as smoke impacted or tainted when there is an overpowering smoky, medicinal, chemical, burnt or ashy aroma on the nose and a distinctive retronasal ash tray-like character in the mouth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the different wine smoke taint treatments available.

METHODS: The different amelioration techniques were investigated using smoke impacted wines made from Cabernet-Sauvignon grapes from Napa and Lake Counties (UC Davis Teaching and Research Winery) in 2017 and 2018. Treatments included enzyme additions with varying pectolytic and glycosidase activities (Lafazym AROM, Lyvarome A5, Sumizyme BGA and Zimarom at 2 and 4 g/hL), allowing reaction time of up to 6 weeks. Additionally, wines were treated by fining (activated charcoal and molecular imprinted polymers), reverse osmosis (standard and differential filtration procedures) and spinning cone technology. The impact on wine composition, specifically smoke taint marker compounds (both free and bound volatile phenols as determined by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS) as well as other key volatile (GC-MS) and non-volatile (RP-HPLC) compounds important for wine quality were evaluated. Additionally, descriptive analysis of the wines were performed using 12 panelists. Multivariate statistics were used to relate wine composition to sensory attributes.

RESULTS: In this study enzyme treatment did not result in a significant increase in free volatile phenols, irrespective of enzyme, treatment time or addition concentration. Indicating that the selected enzymes were unsuccessful in hydrolyzing the bound volatile phenols. Fining, reverse osmosis and spinning cone technology were successful in decreasing smoke taint markers (both free and bound volatile phenols), however significantly more free then bound volatile phenols were removed. Treatments were also able to decrease smoke taint-related sensory attributes in the smoke impacted wines. However, efficacy depended on the individual wine matrixes. Additionally, treatments lacked specificity and removed more then just volatile phenols from the wines, impacting flavor attributes other then those related to smoke. In general, the overall impact depended on the level of treatment needed and the decrease in mouthfeel for instance can be countered through blending or addition of commercial wine products.

CONCLUSIONS

Amelioration techniques are not 100% fixes of smoke taint but can significantly decrease smoke taint perception. Further research is needed to determine the feasibility of treatment success based on the wine matrix so that winemakers can make informed decisions.

DOI:

Publication date: September 10, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Anita Oberholster

Anita, OBERHOLSTER, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis,Yan WEN, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Sam HAY, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Sandra DOMÍNGUEZ- SUÁREZ, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Bishnu NEUPANE WEN, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Charles BRENNEMAN, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Raul GIRARDELLO, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Arran RUMBAUGH, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Hildegarde HEYMANN, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis Scott LAFONTAINE, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis

Contact the author

Keywords

wildfires, smoke, volatile phenols, sensory, amelioration treatments

Citation

Severe infestations of Daktulosphaeria vitifoliae on the hybrid rootstock 1103 Paulsen in Apulia Region (Italy)

In the last four years, despite repeated fertilization and irrigation applications from the farmer, a progressive vegetative decline and yield decrease have been observed in a large (5 ha) 10-year-old table grapes vineyard of the cv. Autumn Pearl grafted on 1103 Paulsen and located nearby the Ionian Sea in Taranto province (Apulia, Italy).

Biological control of root phylloxera by Metarhizium brunneum–student projects at the Winecampus Neustadt

The potential use of Metarhizium brunneum to control root phylloxera was tested on potted vines in the green house in studentical projects at the Winecampus Neustadt. In 2023 Metarhizium was applied by inoculated barley and by suspension variant in single pot experiments on 5 BB rootstock vines artificially infested by root phylloxera.

Hot water treatment combined with Trichoderma inoculation protects planting material in the nursery against grapevine trunk disease

Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs), caused by a group of fungal pathogens including Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Phaeoacremonium minimum, and Diplodia seriata, pose a serious threat to grapevine cultivation worldwide.

Assessment of the first spring wandering of asexual grapevine phylloxera hibernating on rootstock roots in vineyards–pilot monitoring in Austria

Grapevine phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch), controlled by grafting, has re-emerged due to climate change, with shorter hibernation phases, earlier hatching and migrating of hibernales towards the leaves of the vines, and increased reproduction cycles within one season.

Update of the PHYLLI international database for grape phylloxera: aims and challenges

The International Phylloxera Genotype Database “PHYLLI” which is supported by the 2014 ISHS Phylloxera group describes Grape Phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) genotypes, which are genotyped by seven SSR markers (Dvit6, DVSSR4, DV4, DV8, Phy_III_36, Phy_III_55, Phy_III_30). The samples are standardised by single founder lineages, that are equally biotyped.