Terroir 2010 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Il sistema vigneto del Lago di Bolsena: caratterizzazione della produzione di Cannaiola di Marta

Il sistema vigneto del Lago di Bolsena: caratterizzazione della produzione di Cannaiola di Marta

Abstract

[English version below]

Il comprensorio del Lago di Bolsena (VT) è un territorio ad elevata vocazione vitivinicola in cui il paesaggio della vite storicamente persiste e caratterizza la fisionomia dei luoghi. Qui gli agroecosistemi viticoli possiedono una valenza ecologico-ambientale, storico-culturale ed economica di rilievo. La ricerca condotta ha previsto la caratterizzazione della tipologia delle produzioni e degli ambienti di coltivazione di diversi vitigni locali, in particolare il vitigno autoctono Cannaiola di Marta, con l’obiettivo di salvaguardarne il valore biologico, valutarne la qualità in funzione dei microambienti di coltivazione e il ruolo nella definizione della fisionomia del paesaggio. Mediante indagine cartografica è stata condotta un’analisi diacronica a scala territoriale per evidenziare il ruolo dei vigneti nell’uso del suolo e nella definizione dell’ecomosaico ambientale. In vigneti rappresentativi dell’eterogeneità degli ambienti di coltivazione, il vitigno autoctono Cannaiola di Marta è stato caratterizzato con indagine ampelografia rispetto alla varietà certificata Canaiolo nero. La qualità della produzione è stata rapportata alla tipologia di suolo e alla variabilità fisiografica. Uno studio dell’architettura dei vigneti ha completato l’analisi dei modelli viticoli. I risultati ottenuti hanno evidenziato l’unicità della produzione della Cannaiola di Marta e la particolarità degli ambienti di coltivazione per una qualità superiore. E’ emerso il carattere di vulnerabilità di questa produzione dovuta alla frammentarietà dei vigneti, a fronte di un elevato valore storico-culturale degli impianti. Il sistema vigneto della Cannaiola di Marta si inserisce armonicamente in un ecosistema prezioso per la salvaguardia delle risorse ambientali e paesaggistiche di un territorio fra i più suggestivi del Lazio.

The northern part of the Lazio region, i.e. the area around the Lake of Bolsena, is highly vacated to grapevine production. Since the past, rural landscape has been characterized by vineyards, that represent still today a distinctive trait of this territory. Here vineyards exhibit economical, but also ecological, historical, biological and social functions. Nonetheless, vineyard surface is decreasing dramatically, with evident loss in biodiversity and landscape diversity. The study was carried out in order to characterized through a systemic approach the production of the local variety Cannaiola di Marta and its territorial contest. In order to preserve this production and the related landscape, the germplasm unicity was evaluated, the grape quality was tested in the highly differing physical environments, and the physionomy of the vineyards, as well as that of the rural landscape, was measured through cartographic elaboration. The research has proved that the investigated area is suitable for high quality and unique productions. It is also possible to attribute to these vulnerable vineyards a cultural significance, based on the employment of historic germplasm, on traditional vineyard traits and cultural practices. The viticulture of this territory is included in a equilibrated ecosystem, in which vineyards might preserve the environmental resources of one of the most agreeable territory of the Lazio region.

DOI:

Publication date: December 3, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2010

Type: Article

Authors

R. Biasi, E. Brunori, I. Ceccariglia, F. Botti

Dipartimento di Produzione Vegetale, Università degli Studi della Tuscia Via S. Camillo De Lellis, snc – 01100 Viterbo, Italia

Contact the author

Keywords

ecologia del paesaggio, multifunzionalità, paesaggio agrario tradizionale, vitigni autoctoni, zonazione
landscape ecology, local variety, multifunctionality, tradizional vineyards, zonation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2010

Citation

Related articles…

Biodiversity in the vineyard agroecosystem: exploring systemic approaches

Biodiversity conservation and restoration are essential for guarantee the provision of ecosystem services associated to vineyard agroecosystem such as climate regulation trough carbon sequestration and control of pests and diseases. Most of published research dealing with the complexity of the vineyard agroecosystems emphasizes the necessity of innovative approaches, including the integration of information at different temporal and spatial scales and development of systemic analysis based on modelling. A biodiversity survey was conducted in the Franciacorta wine-growing area (Lombardy, Italy), one of the most important Italian wine-growing regions for sparkling wine production, considering a portion of the territory of 112 ha. The area was divided into several Environmental Units (EUs), defined as a whole vineyard or portion of vineyard homogenous in terms of four agronomic characteristics: planting year, planting density, cultivar, and training system. In each EU a set of compartments was identified and characterised by specific variables. The compartments are meteorology, morphology (altitude, slope, aspect, row orientation, and solar irradiance), ecological infrastructures and management. The landscape surrounding EU was also characterised in terms of land-use in a buffer zone of 500 m. For each component a specific methodology was identified and applied. Different statistical approaches were used to evaluate the method to integrate the information related to different compartments within the EU and related to the buffer zone. These approaches were also preliminarily evaluated for their ability to describe the contribution of biodiversity and landscape components to ecosystem services. This methodological exploration provides useful indication for the development of a fully systemic approach to structural and functional biodiversity in vineyard agroecosystems, contributing to promote a multifunctional perspective for the all wine-growing sector.

Making sense of available information for climate change adaptation and building resilience into wine production systems across the world

Effects of climate change on viticulture systems and winemaking processes are being felt across the world. The IPCC 6thAssessment Report concluded widespread and rapid changes have occurred, the scale of recent changes being unprecedented over many centuries to many thousands of years. These changes will continue under all emission scenarios considered, including increases in frequency and intensity of hot extremes, heatwaves, heavy precipitation and droughts. Wine companies need tools and models allowing to peer into the future and identify the moment for intervention and measures for mitigation and/or avoidance. Previously, we presented conceptual guidelines for a 5-stage framework for defining adaptation strategies for wine businesses. That framework allows for direct comparison of different solutions to mitigate perceived climate change risks. Recent global climatic evolution and multiple reports of severe events since then (smoke taint, heatwave and droughts, frost, hail and floods, rising sea levels) imply urgency in providing effective tools to tackle the multiple perceived risks. A coordinated drive towards a higher level of resilience is therefore required. Recent publications such as the Australian Wine Future Climate Atlas and results from projects such as H2020 MED-GOLD inform on expected climate change impacts to the wine sector, foreseeing the climate to expect at regional and vineyard scale in coming decades. We present examples of practical application of the Climate Change Adaptation Framework (CCAF) to impacts affecting wine production in two wine regions: Barossa (Australia) and Douro (Portugal). We demonstrate feasibility of the framework for climate adaptation from available data and tools to estimate historical climate-induced profitability loss, to project it in the future and to identify critical moments when disruptions may occur if timely measures are not implemented. Finally, we discuss adaptation measures and respective timeframes for successful mitigation of disruptive risk while enhancing resilience of wine systems.

Impact of climate change on the viticultural climate of the Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (SE Spain)

Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (PDO Jumilla) is located in the Spanish provinces of Albacete and Murcia, in the South-eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula, where most of the models predict a severe impact of climate change in next decades. PDO Jumilla covers an area of 247,054 hectares, of which more than 22,000 hectares

The modification of cultural practices in grapevine cv. Syrah, does it modify the characteristics of the musts?

The work shows the results of a year of experimentation (2020) in a Syrah variety vineyard in La Roda (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). The trial approach was on a randomized block design with two factors: Irrigation (I) and Pruning (P).
Irrigation schedules were adjusted to apply amounts close to 1,500 m3/ha. With this provision, 2 different irrigation treatments were proposed: I1) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to post-harvest (providing at least 20 % of the total amount of irrigation water to be provided post-harvest); I2) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to harvest (usual irrigation practice in the study area). Pruning was proposed with two treatments, one at the end of January (P1), which is pruning on a conventional date; and P2) pruning carried out at the beginning of budding. In total, 4 repetitions were designed with 4 elementary plots, each one of them representing one of the proposed treatments (I1P1; I1P2; I2P1; I2P2). In total, 16 plots were worked on and each elementary plot consisted of 30 strains, distributed in 3 lines.
The productive response was evaluated with the yield results of the harvest harvested at 23 ºBrix. The qualitative response was measured in the musts through the indices of technological (acidity, pH and potassium) and phenolic maturity and aromatic compounds in free and glycosylated fractions. The treatments tested had, in general, an effect on the different variables analyzed.

Climate projections over France wine-growing region and its potential impact on phenology

Climate change represents a major challenge for the French wine industry. Climatic conditions in French vineyards have already changed and will continue to evolve. One of the notable effects on grapevine is the advancing growing season. The aim of this study is to characterise the evolution of agroclimatic indicators (Huglin index, number of hot days, mean temperature, cumulative rainfall and number of rainy days during the growing season) at French wine-growing regions scale between 1980 and 2019 using gridded data (8 km resolution, SAFRAN) and for the middle of the 21th century (2046-2065) with 21 GCMs statistically debiased and downscaled at 8 km. A set of three phenological models were used to simulate the budburst (BRIN, Smoothed-Utah), flowering, veraison and theoretical maturity (GFV and GSR) stages for two grape varieties (Chardonnay and Cabernet-Sauvignon) over the whole period studied. All the French wine-growing regions show an increase in both temperatures during the growing season and Huglin index. This increase is accompanied by an advance in the simulated flowering (+3 to +9 days), veraison (+6 to +13 days) and theoretical maturity (+6 to +16 days) stages, which are more noticeable in the north-eastern part of France. The climate projections unanimously show, for all the GCMs considered, a clear increase in the Huglin index (+662 to 771 °C.days compared to the 1980-1999 period) and in the number of hot days (+5.6 to 22.6 days) in all the wine regions studied. Regarding rainfall, the expected evolution remains very uncertain due to the heterogeneity of the climates simulated by the 21 models. Only 4 regions out of 21 have a significant decrease in the number of rainy days during the growing season. The two budburst models show a strong divergence in the evolution of this stage with an average difference of 18 days between the two models on all grapevine regions. The theoretical maturity is the most impacted stage with a potential advance between 40 and 23 days according to wine-growing regions.