Terroir 2008 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Proposition of a simplified approach of the viticultural landscape

Proposition of a simplified approach of the viticultural landscape

Abstract

Une approche très simple de la lecture des paysages est proposée sur la base de l’expérience acquise par l’observation de divers terroirs du monde.
La manière selon laquelle est construit un paysage tourne autour de 2 éléments fondamentaux, des facteurs naturels et des facteurs humains.
Le premier élément est la morphologie du lieu qui est due principalement à la disposition et à la nature des couches géologiques, qui déterminent directement et fondamentalement l’ossature, le squelette du paysage et donc ses grandes lignes.
Le deuxième élément est la sculpture fine des détails du paysage qui est strictement du domaine du travail de l’homme qui, soit par contrainte, soit par aspect pratique, accompagne ces grandes lignes définies par la nature.
L’observation attentive de très nombreux paysages conduit invariablement à classer tous les éléments d’un paysage parmi ces deux seuls ensembles.
Elle permet de montrer comment, à travers quelques exemples pris dans différents vignobles du monde, la tectonique et la disposition actuelle des couches géologiques, ainsi que leur nature déterminent les lignes principales des paysages viticoles.
Un premier classement des grands types de paysages viticoles est proposé selon ces critères.
Par ailleurs, sont abordées, à travers différents exemples, les limites entre le rôle des facteurs naturels et des facteurs humains, c’est-à-dire dans la lecture de chaque paysage quels sont les éléments constitutifs qui peuvent être classés dans chacune des deux catégories.

DOI:

Publication date: December 8, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2008

Type : Article

Authors

Jacques FANET

Syndicat des Coteaux du Languedoc (Mas de Saporta)
CS 30030

Contact the author

Keywords

Paysages, géologie, travail de l’homme

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2008

Citation

Related articles…

Research on the origin and the side effects of chitosan stabilizing properties in wine

Fungal chitosan is a polysaccharide made up of glucosamine and N-acetyl-glucosamine and derived from chitin-glucan of Aspergillus niger or Agaricus bisporus. Fungal chitosan has been authorized as an antiseptic agent in wine since 2009 (OIV) and in organic wine in 2018. At the maximum dose of 10g/hl, it was shown to eliminate Brettanomyces bruxellensis, the main spoilage agent in red wines. Fungal chitosan is highly renewable, biocompatible (ADI equivalent to sucrose) and non-allergenic. However, winemakers often prefer to use sulfites (SO2), though sulfites are classified as priority food allergens, than chitosan. Indeed, many conflicting reports exist regarding its efficiency and its side effects towards beneficial wine microorganisms or wine taste. These contradictions could be explained by the heterogeneity of the fungal chitosan lots traded, the diversity of the wines (chemical composition, winemaking process), but also, by the recently highlighted huge genetic diversity prevailing in wine microbial species.

Berry maturity effects on physic and chemical characteristics of traditional sparkling wines produced from Chardonnay and Sauvignon blanc grapes.

One of the consequences of global warming is the quick berry development giving rise to a disconnection between sugar accumulation and the formation of important quality minor compounds such as phenolics and volatile compounds being a huge challenge for the oenologist [1]. Thus, this phenomenon is forcing the search on strategies for maintaining the quality of wines despite this situation. One possibility is to make an early harvest with a low sugar concentration (18ºbrix) and advanced harvest for sparkling wine (20-21ºbrix) and afterwards to combine base wines properly and carry out the second fermentation trying to compensate the lack of secondary metabolites due to the quick berry development and higher alcohol degree of the second one, not adequate itself for sparkling wine. The aim of this study was to assess the chemical and physical characteristics, mainly volatile profile, and foaming properties of sparkling wines from grapes of Chardonnay and Sauvignon blanc.

Composition of grape grown on different Homogenous Terroir Units (HTU)

One cultivar could produce distinct wines with typical properties and qualities different depending on its cultivated and its mesoclimatic conditions.

EFFECTS OF HYDROXYTYROSOL ON THE CHEMICAL PROFILE AND SENSORY ATTRIBUTES OF A RED TUSCAN WINE

The chemical profile and sensory attributes were studied in Borrigiano IGT Toscana wine (Italy), a blend of Sangiovese 85% and Cabernet Sauvignon 15% grapes harvested in September 2020, where 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)ethanol (hydroxytyrosol, HT, [1]) was added to a 750-ml wine bottle in 3 different amounts (30, 60, 120 mg) and compared with the control (no HT addition). The study aimed to evaluate whether Polyphenol-HT1®, a high purity HT (>99%) produced by Nova Mentis using biotechnology, could be used as a supplement to sulfites and how it would impact the sensory and chemical profile of this wine [2]. Each sample was prepared in triplicate.

INFLUENCE OF WINEMAKING VARIABLES AND VINEYARD LOCATIONS ON CHEMICAL AND SENSORY PROFILES OF SOUTH TYROLEAN PINOT BLANC

Pinot Blanc, an important grape variety grown in some mountain areas of Northern Italy such as South Tyrol over the last decades, with its cultivation covering 10.3% of the total vineyards, has compatible climatic conditions (e.g. heat requirements) which are normally found in the geographical areas of the mountain viticulture [1,2,3,4]. Climatic changes are hastening the growth of this variety at higher elevations, particularly for the production of high quality wine.