Terroir 2006 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Characterization and modelling of water flow on vineyard soil. Effect of compaction and grass cover

Characterization and modelling of water flow on vineyard soil. Effect of compaction and grass cover

Abstract

In the Burgundy vineyard, frequent tractor traffic and management of inter-rows alternating grass cover and chemical weed-control lead to structural soil contrast between row and inter-row. The aim of this study was to characterize and model water flow in relation with topsoil structure modifications induced by these practices. Void ratio of the different soil volumes were determined using bulk density measurements. Water flow was measured with tensiometers under two simulated rainfalls. Hydraulics properties of soil volumes defined at the profile level was characterized by water retention curve and infiltrometer measurements. Hydrus 2D software was used for 2D modelling of water flow on a transect perpendicular to the rows. Compaction of the 25 first centimetres of inter-row topsoil was observed in the two types of interrows. It led to a void ratio reduction of 37% and a reduction of the saturated hydraulic conductivity generating less infiltration than in rows. Grass-covered inter-rows were characterized by a macroporous mat root at the soil surface (0-3 cm) in the upper part of the underlying compacted volume. More infiltration was measured in inter-rows with grass cover than in chemically weed-controlled inter-rows. Modelling fairly reproduced contrast of water flow contrast in relation with soil structure for the first 25 centimetres. However, modelling was unable to reproduce flow in volume likely to be affected by preferential flow. Between 25 and 70 centimetres depth, soils containing numerous vine roots would be the seat of preferential flow pathways distributing water laterally from rows to inter-rows. Effectiveness of preferential pathways would increase with soil moisture and rainfall intensity.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2006

Type: Article

Authors

Pierre CURMI (1), Marion CHATELIER (1,2) et Gérard TROUCHE (1)

(1) Établissement National d’Enseignement Supérieur Agronomique de Dijon, 26 bd du Dr Petitjean, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
(2) Université de Bourgogne, UMR INRA A 111 « Microbiologie et Géochimie des sols », Centre des Sciences de la Terre, 6 bd Gabriel, 21000 Dijon cedex, France

Contact the author

Keywords

hydraulics properties, tensiometer, resistivity, infiltration, preferential flow

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2006

Citation

Related articles…

La zonazione viticola e i compiti dell’amministrazione regionale

Solo attraverso un adeguato intervento di estirpazione e reimpianto dei vigneti è possibile preservare, adeguare e valorizzare il patrimonio viticolo e le produzioni che da esso derivano. Il reimpianto dei vigneti è pertanto da intendersi come una normale pratica agricola, alla pari della rimonta di stalla in campo zootecnico, ma può assumere toni problematici quando, come si verifica adesso in Toscana per una serie di circostanze legate alla profonda trasfor­mazione della viticoltura avvenuta negli ultimi 30 anni, troppi impianti giungono contem­poraneamente a fine ciclo produttivo e devono essere rinnovati.

New plant protein extracts as fining agents for red wines

AIM: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) is a non-allergenic pseudocereal with a high protein content

Taking advantages of innovative chemometric tools to unveil vineyard ecosystem dynamics: look across volatile secondary metabolites

Sustainable viticulture and winemaking continue to represent huge challenges, where a better knowledge about the functional role of biodiversity in the vineyard ecosystems is required.

Rootstocks and climate change: adding up means learning faster

In this video recording of the IVES science meeting 2025, Gonzaga Santesteban (Public University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain) speaks about rootstocks, climate change and meta-analysis. This presentation is based on an original article accessible for free on OENO One.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).