Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Methodology and zoning of A.O.C. natural soils. Example of “Pic Saint-Loup”

Methodology and zoning of A.O.C. natural soils. Example of “Pic Saint-Loup”

Abstract

[English version below]

Les travaux menés, dans le cadre du programme départemental pour la connaissance et la valorisation des terroirs viticoles, sur l’aire A.O.C. Coteaux du Languedoc / Pic Saint-Loup ont permis d’appliquer à l’échelle d’une Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée (13 communes), une méthodologie d’étude axée sur les aspects sol/climat/topographie qui concourent à l’identification des terroirs naturels, facteurs de typicité des vins. Dans un premier temps, un «diagnostic» de l’ensemble des critères du milieu naturel a été réalisé. Après avoir défini le cadre géologique, une prospection agro-pédologique au 1/10.000ème a permis de cartographier les différentes unités de sol ainsi que leurs positions topographiques. Les conditions climatiques sont également précisées d’un point de vue statistique (stations météo au sein de l’aire et stations limitrophes).

Dans un second temps, il était intéressant d’associer plus étroitement ces caractéristiques agro­environnementales à la culture de la vigne et à l’élaboration d’un vin typique. On approche ainsi au plus près de la notion de «terroir». Dans ce cadre, une singularité bioclimatique du Pic Saint-Loup a été identifiée sur la base de 3 indices viticoles corrélés à des caractéristiques intrinsèques et spécifiques des vins du Pic Saint-Loup. Les différentes unités de terroir naturel ont été cartographiées (typologie du sol, avec une estimation de la disponibilité en eau, associée au bilan radiatif) et décrites sous les différents aspects qui font leurs identités.

The works led, within the local program for the knowledge and the valorization of the wine soils, on the area A.O.C. Coteaux du Languedoc / Pic Saint-Loup allowed to apply on the scale of a registrated appellation origin (13 municipalities), a methodology of study centered on aspects ground/climate/topography which contribute to the identification of natural soils, factors of typical wines. At first, a «diagnosis » of ail the criteria of the natural environment was realized. Having definite the geologic frame, an agro-pedological prospecting to the 1/10.000th allowed mapping the various unities of ground as well as their topographic positions. The climatic conditions are also clarified by a statistical point of view (meteorological stations within the area and bordering stations).

In a second time, it was interesting to associate more strictly these agro-environmental characteristics to the culture of the vineyard and to the elaboration of a typical wine. One approaches so in closer the notion of “soil”. In this frame, a bioclimatic peculiarity of the Pic Saint Loup was identified on the basis of 3 wine indicators correlated in intrinsic and specific characteristics of wines of Pic Saint Loup. The various units of natural soil were mapped (typology of ground, with an estimation of the availability in water, associated to the radiative assessment) and described under the various aspects which make their identities.

DOI:

Publication date: February 15, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2002

Type: Article

Authors

Jean-Paul STORAÏ (1), Jean-Luc TONDUT (2)

(1) Conseil général de l’Hérault – 1000 rue d’Alco – F. 34087 Montpellier cedex 4
(2) Association Climatologique de l’Hérault – 85 avenue d’Assas – F 34000 Montpellier

Keywords

méthodologie, terroir naturel, sol, climat, viticulture
methodology, natural soil, ground, climate, vine growing(2) Association Climatologique de l’Hérault – 85 avenue d’Assas – F 34000 Montpellier

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2002

Citation

Related articles…

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include: • New user interface • User authentication • Batch analysis of multiple images • Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features • Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard. Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.

Teasing apart terroir: the influence of management style on native yeast communities within Oregon wineries and vineyards

Newer sequencing technologies have allowed for the addition of microbes to the story of terroir. The same environmental factors that influence the phenotypic expression of a crop also shape the composition of the microbial communities found on that crop. For fermented goods, such as wine, that microbial community ultimately influences the organoleptic properties of the final product that is delivered to customers. Recent studies have begun to study the biogeography of wine-associated microbes within different growing regions, finding that communities are distinct across landscapes. Despite this new knowledge, there are still many questions about what factors drive these differences. Our goal was to quantify differences in yeast communities due to management style between seven pairs of conventional and biodynamic vineyards (14 in total) throughout Oregon, USA. We wanted to answer the following questions: 1) are yeast communities distinct between biodynamic vineyards and conventional vineyards? 2) are these differences consistent across a large geographic region? 3) can differences in yeast communities be tied to differences in metabolite profiles of the bottled wine? To collect our data we took soil, bark, leaf, and grape samples from within each vineyard from five different vines of pinot noir. We also collected must and a 10º brix sample from each winery. Using these samples, we performed 18S amplicon sequencing to identify the yeast present. We then used metabolomics to characterize the organoleptic compounds present in the bottled wine from the blocks the year that we sampled. We are actively in the process of analysing our data from this study.

Updating the Winkler index: An analysis of Cabernet sauvignon in Napa Valley’s varied and changing climate

This study aims to create an updated, agile viticultural climate index (similar to the Winkler Index) by performing in-depth analyses of current and historical data from industry partners in several major winegrowing regions. The Winkler Index was developed in the early twentieth century based on analysis of various grape-growing regions in California. The index uses heat accumulation (i.e. Growing Degree Days) throughout the growing season to determine which grape varieties are best suited to each region. As viticultural regions are increasingly subject to the complexity and uncertainty of a changing climate, a more rigorous, agile model is needed to aid grape growers in determining which cultivars to plant where. For the first phase of this study, 21 industry partners throughout Napa Valley shared historical phenology, harvest, viticultural practice, and weather data related to their Cabernet sauvignon vineyard blocks. To complement this data, berry samples were collected throughout the 2021 growing season from 50 vineyard blocks located throughout 16 American Viticultural Areas that were then analyzed for basic berry chemistry and phenolics. These blocks have been mapped using a Geographic Information System (GIS), enabling analysis of altitude, vineyard row orientation, slope, and remotely sensed climate data. Sampling sites were also chosen based on their proximity to a weather station. By analyzing historical data from industry partners and data specifically collected for this study, it is possible to identify key parameters for further analysis. Initial results indicate extreme variability at a high spatial resolution not currently accounted for in modern viticultural climate indices and suggest that viticultural practices play a major role. Using the structure of data collection and analyses developed for the first phase, this project will soon be expanded to other wine regions globally, while continuing data collection in Napa Valley.

Postveraison shoot trimming in Tannat and Merlot: preliminary results on yield components, plant balance and berry composition

There is currently a trend towards the production of wines with low alcohol content. To achieve this, grapes with low sugar content must be used. There are techniques at the vineyard level that can delay ripening and avoid excessive sugar accumulation without, a priori, affecting the final polyphenol content. Postveraison shoot trimming (PVST) is experimentally evaluated for these purposes, but its impact under Uruguayan climatic conditions with high interannual variability is not known. The aim of this work is to assess the PVST in Tannat and Merlot cultivars and their impact on yield components, plant balance and berry primary composition. In this study, two commercial vineyards of 10 years old Tannat and Merlot (grafted on SO4) at Canelones Department were selected. During the 2020-201 growing season, grapevines were submitted to PVST when grapes reached 15º Brix. In a randomized block, trimmed (T) and control (C) plants were evaluated with three repetitions each cultivar. Evaluation of the evolution of primary berry composition during ripening, measurement of yield components and plant balance were performed. For both cultivars, PVST did not affect yield components. Merlot reached 5.4 kg per plant and Tannat 7.1 kg, with not statistical significance between treatments. However, statistical differences were observed in terms of plant balance. In Merlot Ravaz Index reached a difference of 5.3 (12.0 in T and 6.7 in C) meanwhile Tannat reached 3.5 of statistical difference (13.7 in T and 10.2 in C). The tendency to imbalance for the treated plants had an impact on the final grape composition. Merlot grapes showed statistical difference in final total acidity (0.3 g of difference between treatments) while treatments impact final sugar content on Tannat grapes (10.0 g of difference between treatments). Further studies are needed to assess the impact of different canopy management techniques in our conditions.

Modulation of berry composition by different vineyard management practices

High concentration of sugars in grapes and alcohol in wines is one of the consequences of climate change on viticulture production in several wine-growing regions. In order to investigate the possibilities of adaptation of vineyard management practices aimed to reduce the accumulation of sugar during the maturation phase without reducing the accumulation of anthocyanins in grapes, a study with severe shoot trimming, shoot thinning, cluster thinning and date of harvest was conducted on Merlot variety in Istria region (Croatia), under the Mediterranean climate. Four factors which may affect grape maturation and its composition at harvest were investigated in a two-years experiment; severe shoot trimming applied at veraison when >80% of berries changed colour (in comparison to untreated control), shoot thinning (0 and 30%), cluster thinning (0 and 30%), and the date of harvest (early and standard harvest dates). Shoot thinning had no significant impact on berry composition, despite the obtained reduction in yield per vine. Lower Brix in grapes were obtained with earlier harvest date and if no cluster thinning was applied, although at the same time a reduction in the concentration of anthocyanins in berries was observed in these treatments. On the other hand, if severe shoot trimming was applied when >80% of berries changed colour, a reduction of Brix was obtained without a negative impact on berry anthocyanins concentration. We conclude that in cases when undesirably high sugar concentrations at harvest are expected, severe shoot trimming at 80% veraison may effectively be used in order to obtain moderate sugar concentration in berries together with the adequate phenolic composition.