Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Island and coastal vineyards in the context of climate change

Abstract

Aim: The notion of “terroir” enables the attribution of distinctive characteristics to wines from the same region. Climate change raises issues about viticulture, especially the growth of the vines and even more importantly the economic situation of actual wine-growing regions (Schultz and Jones 2010; Quénol 2014). Several studies have addressed the impacts of climate change on viticulture in many wine-growing regions of the world, but only a few have focused on the potential of island and coastal vineyards. However, in the context of climate change, ultramarine and coastal vineyards could become increasingly coveted according to their specific climatic conditions. In regions subject to significant warming, thermal regulation and oceanic influence can limit extremes temperatures, which could be a major advantage for grapevine production. This contribution, first step of a spatial optimization approach to define suitable agro-climatic patterns, will present a typology of these vineyards, to understand their specificities and their adaptability.

Methods and Results: An in-depth bibliographical search has been conducted to provide a global inventory and to highlight relevant variables to describe and categorize the world’s island wine-growing regions. From this approach, three main themes have been defined as variables: climate characteristics, vineyards characteristics and cultivars and associated management systems.

Climate plays a very important role in terroir, and especially temperatures, which determine the regional characteristics of viticulture (van Leeuwen et al., 2004; Hall and Blackman, 2019). In this study we consider the following climatic data: seasonal[1] average temperatures, annual and seasonal1 mean daily amplitude, completed by the average annual sunshine duration, average annual precipitation, winds and sea sprays.

Concerning vineyard characteristics, topological aspects like altitude or distance to ocean can limit diurnal and extremes temperatures (Bonnardot et al., 2001; Koufos et al., 2013; Fourment et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). Vineyards soils and especially soils’ composition, depth and water holding capacity are also completed. Vineyards’ characteristics were supplemented by economic data like surface area (ha), production (hl), market target and appellations. 

Due to their specific climatic conditions and/or because their relative isolation from other continents, many islands harbour autochthonous and rare varieties (Scherrer et al., 2009). In connection with vine variety, rootstock and diseases variables are integrated in the typology. Moreover, several coastal and island vineyards integrate traditional practices to manage the hydric stress without irrigation (i.e. mitigate wind effects on plants) (Drumonde-Neves et al., 2017; Heras-Roger et al., 2018). These practices were highlighted with management systems variables (implementation and management system, space between vines and rows, vine density, mechanization and irrigation system).

When applied to vineyards of Lanzarote, this approach describes structural elements of ultramarine vineyards. In 2009, Canarian viticulture represented 36% of total cultivated area of the archipelago, and 2.9% of total Spanish viticulture. In Lanzarote’s island, the climate is defined as subtropical with low precipitation (average of 150 mm/year), warm temperatures throughout the year and a high average annual sunshine duration (3000 h/year). 

Lanzarote’s island has a low relief and vineyards are planted on volcanic soils. Poured thick layers of volcanic ashes called “picóns” are added at the base of the vine stock. These porous volcanic granules have a great thermal inertia. Indeed, during the day picóns store heat and give it back to the plant at night. Picóns also have good water retention capacity (Troll et al., 2017; González Morales et al., 2015). Lanzarote’s vineyards under the appellation “Denominación de Origen Protegida de Lanzarote” were about 1850 ha in 2016-2017, for a production above 4330 hl and 1800 winegrowers (DO Lanzarote, 2020). The target market is local in scope. Mainly due to the isolation of the archipelago from the mainland, phylloxera is not present in the vineyards of Lanzarote. Vines are not grafted and Malvasia represents ¾ of the vine stock of the island. Vine varieties such as Listàn blanco, Moscatel de Alejandria, Verdello and Gual are often planted to produce dry and sweet white wines. Listàn negro and Negramoll varieties are preferred to produce red wine (DO Lanzarote, 2020). Low-growing vines are planted in drilled holes, and low walls of volcanic rocks are built to protect them from drought and hot drying winds. Due to their specific implementation, vines are widely spaced (400-500 m between them), yields are low and mechanization is not possible. 

This information has been documented and summarised for each wine-growing region. Thanks to this approach, key elements of insular vineyards can be described with generic indicators.  The resulting typology enables comparisons between different wine-growing regions with a generic framework.

Conclusions:

This first step of characterization of vineyard variables highlights the specificities of insular and coastal vineyards. Then, discriminant characteristics will be exploited in a process of spatial optimization in order to identify suitable agroclimatic patterns for different climate change scenarios. The main objective is to implement an approach under multiple constraints (climatic, agronomic, spatial, etc.). The results expected will be compromises between these several constraints. 

DOI:

Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Jeanne Thibault1*, Hervé Quénol2, Cyril Tissot1

1UMR 6554 LETG Brest, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280 Plouzané, France
2UMR 6554 LETG Rennes, Université Rennes 2, Place Recteur H. Le Moal, 35043 Rennes, France

Contact the author

Keywords

Viticulture, insularity, coastal, climate change, adaptation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Spatial variability of temperature is linked to grape composition variability in the Saint-Emilion winegrowing area

Elevated temperature during the grape maturation period is a major threat for grape quality and thus wine quality. Therefore, characterizing the grape composition response to temperature at a larger scale would represent a crucial step towards adaptation to climate change. In response to changes in temperature, various physiological mechanisms regulate grape composition. Primary and secondary metabolisms are both involved in this response, with well-known effects, for example on anthocyanins, and lesser known effects, for example on aromas or aroma precursors. At the field scale or at the regional scale, however, numerous environmental or plant-specific factors intervene to make the effects of temperature difficult to distinguish from overall variability. In this study, it was attempted to overcome this difficulty by selecting well-characterized situations with differing temperatures.
A long-term study of air temperature variability across several Merlot vineyards in the Saint-Emilion and Pomerol wine producing area found significant temperature differences and gradients at various time scales linked to environmental factors. From this study area, a few sites were selected with similar age, soil and training system conditions, and with repeated and contrasted temperature differences during the maturation period. The average temperature difference during the maturation period was about 2°C between cooler and warmer sites, a difference similar to that expected under future climate change scenarios. In close vicinity to the temperature sensors at each site, grape berries were sampled at different times until full maturity during 2019 and 2020. Also, berries from bunches on either side of the row were analyzed separately, allowing an investigation of bunch exposure effect associated with the coupling of berry temperature and solar radiation. Four replicates of pooled berries for each time – site – bunch exposure combination were obtained and analyzed for biochemical composition. Analyses of variance of the biochemical composition data collected at different sampling times reveal significant effects associated with temperature, site, and bunch azimuth. For instance, anthocyanins in grape skins are clearly influenced by temperature and solar radiation exposure, with up to 30% reduction in warmer conditions.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.

Simulating climate change impact on viticultural systems in historical and emergent vineyards

Global climate change affects regional climates and hold implications for wine growing regions worldwide. Although winegrowers are constantly adapting to internal and external factors, it seems relevant to develop tools, which will allow them to better define actual and future agro-climatic potentials. Within this context, we develop a modelling approach, able to simulate the impact of environmental conditions and constraints on vine behaviour and to highlight potential adaptation strategies according to different climate change scenarios. Our modeling approach, named SEVE (Simulating Environmental impacts on Viticultural Ecosystems), provides a generic modeling framework for simulating grapevine growth and berry ripening under different conditions and constraints (slope, aspect, soil type, climate variability…) as well as production strategies and adaptation rules according to climate change scenarios. Each activity is represented by an autonomous agent able to react and adapt its reaction to the variability of environmental constraints. Using this model, we have recently analyzed the evolution of vineyards’ exposure to climatic risks (frost, pathogen risk, heat wave) and the adaptation strategies potentially implemented by the winegrowers. This approach, implemented for two climate change scenarios, has been initiated in France on traditional (Loire Valley) and emerging (Brittany) vineyards. The objective is to identify the time horizons of adaptations and new opportunities in these two regions. Carried out in collaboration with wine growers, this approach aims to better understand the variability of climate change impacts at local scale in the medium and long term.

Different soil types and relief influence the quality of Merlot grapes in a relatively small area in the Vipava Valley (Slovenia) in relation to the vine water status

Besides location and microclimatic conditions, soil plays an important role in the quality of grapes and wine. Soil properties influence…

Teasing apart terroir: the influence of management style on native yeast communities within Oregon wineries and vineyards

Newer sequencing technologies have allowed for the addition of microbes to the story of terroir. The same environmental factors that influence the phenotypic expression of a crop also shape the composition of the microbial communities found on that crop. For fermented goods, such as wine, that microbial community ultimately influences the organoleptic properties of the final product that is delivered to customers. Recent studies have begun to study the biogeography of wine-associated microbes within different growing regions, finding that communities are distinct across landscapes. Despite this new knowledge, there are still many questions about what factors drive these differences. Our goal was to quantify differences in yeast communities due to management style between seven pairs of conventional and biodynamic vineyards (14 in total) throughout Oregon, USA. We wanted to answer the following questions: 1) are yeast communities distinct between biodynamic vineyards and conventional vineyards? 2) are these differences consistent across a large geographic region? 3) can differences in yeast communities be tied to differences in metabolite profiles of the bottled wine? To collect our data we took soil, bark, leaf, and grape samples from within each vineyard from five different vines of pinot noir. We also collected must and a 10º brix sample from each winery. Using these samples, we performed 18S amplicon sequencing to identify the yeast present. We then used metabolomics to characterize the organoleptic compounds present in the bottled wine from the blocks the year that we sampled. We are actively in the process of analysing our data from this study.