Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Effects of soil and climate on wine style in Stellenbosch: Sauvignon blanc

Effects of soil and climate on wine style in Stellenbosch: Sauvignon blanc

Abstract

[English version below]

Une étude a été menée pendant neuf ans sur deux vignes non-irriguées de Sauvignon blanc commercialisés, plantées à différentes localités (A et B) dans le district de Stellenbosch. Deux parcelles expérimentales, situées sur deux formations géologiques différentes, ont été identifiées au sein de chaque vignoble. A chaque localité une des formations pédologiques montre des signes d’humidité en profondeur, tandis que l’autre est relativement sèche. Malgré leur proximité géographique (9 km), le méso-climat diffère entre les deux localités, principalement en raison de l’altitude, A étant situé à 413 m et B à 148 m d’altitude. La température maximale de février est 1.9ºC plus basse en A qu’en B, les températures nocturnes sont aussi les plus basses en A. Les raisins de la localité la plus fraîche (A) sont généralement récoltés deux semaines plus tard que ceux de la localité la plus chaude (B). A la localité la plus fraîche, la maturation est aussi affectée par la formation pédologique : les raisins issus du sol le plus sec ont été vendangés approximativement une semaine avant ceux ceux issus du sol plus humide. Cependant la maturation n’a pas été affectée par le sol à la localité la plus chaude. A la localité la plus fraîche, les vins issus du sol plus humide révèlent généralement un caractère végétatif frais prédominant (herbacé, poivre vert, eucalyptus, menthe) et ceux issus du sol plus sec des caractéristiques de légumes cuits (haricots verts, asperges, olive, artichaut) et de fruits. Le style de vin n’a pas été affecté par la formation pédologique à la localité la plus chaude oú les caractères de fruits tropicaux dominent. Les résultats suggèrent que le style du vin de Sauvignon blanc de Stellenbosch n’est pas seulement affecté par le climat, mais aussi par le sol.
A nine-year study was carried out in two non-irrigated, commercial Sauvignon blanc vineyards, grown at different localities (A and B) in the district of Stellenbosch. Two experimental plots, representing different soil forms, were identified within each vineyard. At both localities one of the soil forms showed signs of wetness with depth, while the other one was relatively dry. Despite their geographic proximity (9 km), meso-climate differed between the two localities, largely on account of A being situated at higher altitude (413 m) than B (148 m). Maximum temperature for February was 1.9ºC lower for A than for B, while night temperature was also lowest at A. Grapes at the cooler locality (A) were generally harvested two weeks later than those at the warmer one (B). At the cooler locality ripening was also affected by soil form, with grapevines on the drier soil being harvested approximately one week earlier than those on the wetter soil. Ripening was not affected by soil form at the warmer locality. At the cooler locality, wine from the wetter soil generally exhibited a prominent fresh vegetative character (grass, green pepper, eucalyptus, mint), in comparison to cooked vegetative (green beans, asparagus, olive, artichoke) and fruity characteristics for the one from the drier soil. Wine style was not affected by soil form at the warmer locality, with tropical fruit character being dominant. Results suggested that the style of Sauvignon blanc wines from Stellenbosch is not only affected by climate, but also by soil form.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

W.J. Conradie (1)* and M.P. Olivier (1)**

(1) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa

* Present address: Department of Soil Science, University of Stellenbosch, 7600 Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa
** Presenting author

Contact the author

Keywords

Soil, climate, wine style, Sauvignon blanc, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Teasing apart terroir: the influence of management style on native yeast communities within Oregon wineries and vineyards

Newer sequencing technologies have allowed for the addition of microbes to the story of terroir. The same environmental factors that influence the phenotypic expression of a crop also shape the composition of the microbial communities found on that crop. For fermented goods, such as wine, that microbial community ultimately influences the organoleptic properties of the final product that is delivered to customers. Recent studies have begun to study the biogeography of wine-associated microbes within different growing regions, finding that communities are distinct across landscapes. Despite this new knowledge, there are still many questions about what factors drive these differences. Our goal was to quantify differences in yeast communities due to management style between seven pairs of conventional and biodynamic vineyards (14 in total) throughout Oregon, USA. We wanted to answer the following questions: 1) are yeast communities distinct between biodynamic vineyards and conventional vineyards? 2) are these differences consistent across a large geographic region? 3) can differences in yeast communities be tied to differences in metabolite profiles of the bottled wine? To collect our data we took soil, bark, leaf, and grape samples from within each vineyard from five different vines of pinot noir. We also collected must and a 10º brix sample from each winery. Using these samples, we performed 18S amplicon sequencing to identify the yeast present. We then used metabolomics to characterize the organoleptic compounds present in the bottled wine from the blocks the year that we sampled. We are actively in the process of analysing our data from this study.

Grape must quality and mesoclimatic variability in Fruška Gora wine-growing region, Serbia

The Fruška Gora mountain is a traditional wine-growing region in Serbia situated in the Pannonian Basin. Due to such a position, the vicinity of the Danube River and the presence of concave configuration, it is suitable for grape production. This paper provides analyses of spatial variations in meteorological parameters and grape juice quality within Fruška Gora wine region over three consecutive vintages (2018-2020). The examined period can be defined as warm with cool nights during September (AVG 18,9°C; GDD 1918°C; CI 12°CF) and with the presence of mesoclimatic variability. The East part of the study area was somewhat drier and hotter compared to other parts of the region. The analyses of grape must samples (190 in total) of five cultivars (Cabernet-Sauvignon, Merlot, Chardonnay, Sauvignon blanc and Grašac (Welschriesling)) commonly grown across the region (19 sites), were performed using Fourier Transform Infrared Technology (FTIR). Among all cultivars, Sauvignon blanc was harvested first in the East area (DOY=246±5, GDD at harvest=1552±74, 22.2±0.7 °Brix), while the latest harvest was recorded for Cabernet-Sauvignon in the West (DOY=283±5, GDD at harvest=1936±187, 23.4±1.0 °Brix ). Both the red and white cultivars had higher acidity and YAN in the grape must if the vines were grown in the North and East compared to South and West areas. According to PCA analysis, Grašac showed the lowest variation in grape must chemical composition. Thus, the results confirm that Grašac is the most stable cultivar in Fruška Gora. All monitored cultivars reached technological fruit ripeness by the end of the growing season. However, it was difficult to reach full ripeness of red cultivars, mostly beacuse of uncoupling of technolocical and phenolic ripeness. Thus, Cabernet-Sauvignon had higher variations in GDD sums at harvest compared to other cultivars, which probably increased variations in grape must quality.

‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (Vitis vinifera L.) berry skin flavonol and anthocyanin composition is affected by trellis systems and applied water amounts

Trellis systems are selected in wine grape vineyards to mainly maximize vineyard yield and maintain berry quality. This study was conducted in 2020 and 2021 to evaluate six commonly utilized trellis systems including a vertical shoot positioning (VSP), two relaxed VSPs (VSP60 and VSP80), a single high wire (SH), a high quadrilateral (HQ), and a guyot (GY), combined with three levels of irrigation regimes based on different crop evapotranspiration (ETc) replacements, including a 25% ETc, 50% ETc, and 100% ETc. The results indicated SH yielded the most fruits and accumulated the most total soluble solids (TSS) at harvest in 2020, however, it showed the lowest TSS in the second season. In 2020, SH and HQ showed higher concentrations in most of the anthocyanin derivatives compared to the VSPs. Similar comparisons were noticed in 2021 as well. SH and HQ also accumulated more flavonols in both years compared to other trellis systems. Overall, this study provides information on the efficacy of trellis systems on grapevine yield and berry flavonoid accumulation in a currently warming climate.

Aromatic maturity is a cornerstone of terroir expression in red wine

Harvesting grapes at adequate maturity is key to the production of high-quality red wines. Enologists and wine makers define several types of maturity, including technical maturity, phenolic maturity and aromatic maturity. Technical maturity and phenolic maturity are relatively well documented in the scientific literature, while articles on aromatic maturity are scarcer. This is surprising, because aromatic maturity is, without a doubt, the most important of the three in determining wine quality and typicity (including terroir expression). Optimal terroir expression can be obtained when the different types of maturity are reached at the same time, or within a short time frame. This is more likely to occur when the ripening takes place under mild temperatures, neither too cool, nor too hot. Aromatic expression in wine can be driven, from low to high maturity, by green, herbal, fresh fruit, ripe fruit, jammy fruit, candied fruit or cooked fruit aromas. Green and cooked fruit aromas are not desirable in red wines, while the levels of other aromatic compounds contribute to the typicity of the wine in relation to its origin. Wines produced in cool climates, or on cool soils in temperate climates, are likely to express herbal or fresh fruit aromas; while wines produced under warm climates, or on warm soils in temperate climates, may express ripe fruit, jammy fruit or candied fruit aromas. Growers can optimize terroir expression through their choice of grapevine variety. Early ripening varieties perform better in cool climates and late ripening varieties in warm climates. Additionally, maturity can be advanced or delayed by different canopy management practices or training systems.

The concept of terroir: what place for microbiota?

Microbes play key roles on crop nutrient availability via biogeochemical cycles, rhizosphere interactions with roots as well as on plant growth and health. Recent advances in technologies, such as High Throughput Sequencing Techniques, allowed to gain deeper insight on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with soil, rhizosphere and plant phyllosphere. Over the past 10 years, numerous scientific studies have been carried out on the microbial component of the vineyard. Whether the soil or grape compartments have been taken into account, many studies agree on the evidence of regional delineations of microbial communities, that may contribute to regional wine characteristics and typicity. Some authors proposed the term “microbial terroir” including “yeast terroir” for grapes to describe the connection between microbial biogeography and regional wine characteristics. Many factors are involved in terroir including climate, soil, cultivar and human practices as well as their interactions. Studies considering “microbial terroir” greatly contributed to improve our knowledge on factors that shape the vineyard microbial structure and diversity. However, the potential impact of “microbial terroir” on wine composition has yet not received strong scientific evidence and many questions remain to be addressed, related to the functional characterization of the microbial community and its impact on plant physiology and grape composition, the origins and interannual stability of vineyard microbiota, as well as their impact on wine sensorial attributes. The presentation will give an overview on the role of microbiota as a terroir component and will highlight future perspectives and challenges on this key subject for the wine industry.