Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Effects of soil and climate on wine style in Stellenbosch: Sauvignon blanc

Effects of soil and climate on wine style in Stellenbosch: Sauvignon blanc

Abstract

[English version below]

Une étude a été menée pendant neuf ans sur deux vignes non-irriguées de Sauvignon blanc commercialisés, plantées à différentes localités (A et B) dans le district de Stellenbosch. Deux parcelles expérimentales, situées sur deux formations géologiques différentes, ont été identifiées au sein de chaque vignoble. A chaque localité une des formations pédologiques montre des signes d’humidité en profondeur, tandis que l’autre est relativement sèche. Malgré leur proximité géographique (9 km), le méso-climat diffère entre les deux localités, principalement en raison de l’altitude, A étant situé à 413 m et B à 148 m d’altitude. La température maximale de février est 1.9ºC plus basse en A qu’en B, les températures nocturnes sont aussi les plus basses en A. Les raisins de la localité la plus fraîche (A) sont généralement récoltés deux semaines plus tard que ceux de la localité la plus chaude (B). A la localité la plus fraîche, la maturation est aussi affectée par la formation pédologique : les raisins issus du sol le plus sec ont été vendangés approximativement une semaine avant ceux ceux issus du sol plus humide. Cependant la maturation n’a pas été affectée par le sol à la localité la plus chaude. A la localité la plus fraîche, les vins issus du sol plus humide révèlent généralement un caractère végétatif frais prédominant (herbacé, poivre vert, eucalyptus, menthe) et ceux issus du sol plus sec des caractéristiques de légumes cuits (haricots verts, asperges, olive, artichaut) et de fruits. Le style de vin n’a pas été affecté par la formation pédologique à la localité la plus chaude oú les caractères de fruits tropicaux dominent. Les résultats suggèrent que le style du vin de Sauvignon blanc de Stellenbosch n’est pas seulement affecté par le climat, mais aussi par le sol.
A nine-year study was carried out in two non-irrigated, commercial Sauvignon blanc vineyards, grown at different localities (A and B) in the district of Stellenbosch. Two experimental plots, representing different soil forms, were identified within each vineyard. At both localities one of the soil forms showed signs of wetness with depth, while the other one was relatively dry. Despite their geographic proximity (9 km), meso-climate differed between the two localities, largely on account of A being situated at higher altitude (413 m) than B (148 m). Maximum temperature for February was 1.9ºC lower for A than for B, while night temperature was also lowest at A. Grapes at the cooler locality (A) were generally harvested two weeks later than those at the warmer one (B). At the cooler locality ripening was also affected by soil form, with grapevines on the drier soil being harvested approximately one week earlier than those on the wetter soil. Ripening was not affected by soil form at the warmer locality. At the cooler locality, wine from the wetter soil generally exhibited a prominent fresh vegetative character (grass, green pepper, eucalyptus, mint), in comparison to cooked vegetative (green beans, asparagus, olive, artichoke) and fruity characteristics for the one from the drier soil. Wine style was not affected by soil form at the warmer locality, with tropical fruit character being dominant. Results suggested that the style of Sauvignon blanc wines from Stellenbosch is not only affected by climate, but also by soil form.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

W.J. Conradie (1)* and M.P. Olivier (1)**

(1) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa

* Present address: Department of Soil Science, University of Stellenbosch, 7600 Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa
** Presenting author

Contact the author

Keywords

Soil, climate, wine style, Sauvignon blanc, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Traditional agroforestry vineyards, sources of inspiration for the agroecological transition of viticulture

A unique “terroir” can be found in southern Bolivia, which combines the specific features of climate, topography and altitude of high valleys, with the management of grapevines staked on trees. It is one of the rare remnants of agroforestry viticulture. A survey was carried out among 29 grapegrowers in three valleys, to characterize the structure and management of these vineyards, and identify the services they expect from trees. Farms were small (2.2 ha on average) and 85% of vineyards were less than 1 ha. Viticulture was associated with vegetable, fruit and fodder production, sometimes in the same fields. Molle trees were found in all plots, together with one or two other native tree species. Traditional grapevine varieties such as Negra Criolla, Moscatel de Alejandría and Vicchoqueña were grown with a large range of densities from 1550 to 9500 vines ha-1. From 18 to 30% of them were staked on trees, with 1.2 to 4.9 vines per tree. The management of these vineyards (irrigation, fertilization and grapevine protection) was described, the most particular technical operation being the coordinated pruning of trees and grapevines. Three types of management could be identified in the three valleys. Grapegrowers had a clear idea of the ecosystem services they expected from trees in their vineyards. The main one was protection against climate hazards (hail, frost, flood). Then they expected benefits in terms of pest and disease control, improvement of soil fertility and resulting yield. At last, some producers claimed that tree-staking was quicker and cheaper than conventional trellising. It can be hypothesized then that agroforestry is a promising technique for the agroecological transition of viticulture. Its contribution to the “terroir” of the high valleys of southern Bolivia and its link with the specificities of the wines and spirits produced there remain to be explored.

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.

Effects of graft quality on growth and grapevine-water relations

Climate change is challenging viticulture worldwide compromising its sustainability due to warmer temperatures and the increased frequency of extreme events. Grafting Vitis vinifera L.

Grapevine varietal diversity as mitigation tool for climate change: Agronomic and oenologic potential of 14 foreign varieties grown in Languedoc region (France)

Climate change effects in Languedoc include an expected rise in temperatures, increased evapotranspiration as well as more severe and frequent climatic hazards, such as frost, drought periods and heat waves. For winegrowers theses phenomena impact both yield and quality, resulting in more frequent unbalanced wines. Research on identified mitigation tools for vineyard management is necessary to improve resilience of grapevine agrosystems. Varietal assortment is one of them. This study focuses on agronomic and oenologic potential of 14 foreign varieties grown in Languedoc French region. Fourteen grapevine varieties were monitored during 2021 from June until harvest on eight different sites, some of which occurring on more than one site adding up to 21 different modalities: 7 white varieties Alvarinho B, Assyrtiko B (2), Malvasia Istriana B, Parellada B, Verdejo B, Verdelho B, Xarello B, and 7 black varieties Saperavi N (2), Touriga nacional N, Baga N, Aleatico N, Montepulciano N (2), Primitivo N (3), Calabrese N (3). Varietals were compared through the following parameters: phenology was assessed by using the information collected in the Database Network of French Vine Conservatories (INRAE-SupAgro-IFV, 2005-2015). The number of inflorescences for shoots from secondary buds and bourillons and suckers were observed to assess post-bud break frost tolerance potential. Grapevine water status was studied through stem water potential measurement, observation of foliage symptoms of drought, and 𝛿13C on must. Frequencies and intensities of downy mildew, powdery mildew, and black rot attacks were estimated before harvest on leaves and clusters and botrytis at harvest to assess disease susceptibilities. Berry composition was monitored from end of veraison until harvest. Yield and mean bunch weight were also calculated. Varieties were then ranked on a 1-4 scale for each parameter and compared through PCA. Forty two stations of the Mediterranean basin were compared by PCA with the Multicriteria Climatic Classification indicators in order to confront the collected information during 2021 campaign to the hypothesis that plants coming from dry and hot regions are genetically adapted to such climatic conditions.

The impact of sustainable management regimes on amino acid profiles in grape juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids

One of the biggest challenges of agriculture today is maintaining food safety and food quality while providing ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation, pest and disease control, ensuring water quality and supply, and climate regulation. Organic farming was shown to promote biodiversity and carbon sequestration, and is therefore seen as one possibility of environmentally friendly production. Consumers expect organically grown crops to be free from chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers and often presume that the quality of organically grown crops is different or higher compared to conventionally grown crops. Integrated, organic, and biodynamic viticulture were compared in a replicated field trial in Geisenheim, Germany (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling). Amino acid profiles in juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids were monitored over three consecutive seasons beginning 7 years after conversion to organic and biodynamic viticulture, respectively. In addition, parameters such as soil nutrient status, yield, vigor, canopy temperature, and water stress were monitored to draw conclusions on reasons for the observed changes. Results revealed that the different sustainable management regimes highly differed in their amino acid profiles in juice and also in their skin flavonol content, whereas differences in the flavanol and hydroxycinnamic acid content were less pronounced. It is very likely that differences in nutrient status and yield determined amino acid profiles in juice, although all three systems showed similar amounts of mineralized nitrogen in the soil. Canopy structure and temperature in the bunch zone did not differ among treatments and therefore cannot account for the observed differences in favonols. A different light exposure of the bunches in the respective systems due to differences in vigor together with differences in berry size and a different water status of the vines might rather be responsible for the increase in flavonol content under organic and biodynamic viticulture.