Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

Abstract

Dans les Charentes, en réponse à une crise de production du vignoble destiné à la production de Cognac, un plan de diversification viticole pour des vins de pays de qualité est mis en place. Il nécessite une connaissance des sols et de leurs caractéristiques viticoles pour orienter le choix des types de vins et adapter l’itinéraire technique de production.
Afin de permettre une caractérisation rapide de l’ensemble du vignoble avec des coûts d’investigations limités, des secteurs de références (aires-échantillon d’extension limitée mais représentatives) ont été choisis à l’aide des cartes pédologiques à l’échelle du 1/250 000, et précisés par des visites de terrain. Ces secteurs de référence ont fait l’objet d’une cartographie pédologique fine qui a permis de définir les différents types de sol et leur mode d’organisation spatiale. A partir d’observations détaillées et d’analyses effectuées sur des profils représentatifs de chaque type de sol, les potentialités et les contraintes agro-viticoles sont analysées selon une démarche collective associant chargés d’études pédologiques, techniciens locaux viticulteurs et experts viti-vinicoles. Cette analyse débouche sur des recommandations relatives au choix des cépages, porte-greffes et pratiques viticoles susceptibles d’exploiter au mieux la potentialité de chaque type de sol, considéré ici comme unité de terroir. L’extension des résultats à l’ensemble du vignoble est réalisée au moyen de cartes d’extrapolation associées à des clefs de détermination qui permettent en priorité au technicien viticole mais aussi au viticulteur d’identifier l’unité de sol de chaque parcelle et d’utiliser les recommandations relatives à celle-ci. L’ensemble des résultats obtenus est par ailleurs largement diffusé auprès de tous les acteurs de la filière selon des médias adaptés.
Après trois ans de travail sur cinq secteurs de référence, les résultats sont positifs et la méthode a fait les preuves de son efficacité. Cette approche de la notion de terroir est un élément fédérateur de tous les acteurs viticoles et un élément structurant permettant d’organiser l’acquisition progressive de références propres au vignoble concerné. Dans cette perspective, des réseaux de suivi s’installent. Par ailleurs, la caractérisation des terroirs sera complétée par des études climatiques.

The “Charentes” region wants to diversify its Cognac vineyard by growing quality wines. This inquires precise soil knowledges to advise the right rootstock, grape variety and vineyard management.
To study soils on a so wide area with a limited budget, several “secteurs de référence” (smallest sample-areas representing the major regional soil types) are located thanks to different soil maps on scale 1/250 000 and a technical field visit. Those “secteurs de référence” are surveyed in details to identify the different soil types and understand their spatial relationship. Each soil type is then characterized by soil profile observations and analysis which lead to lighten the main vine growing factors. A panel of experts in soil science, viticulture and enology, and local wine growers is then constituted to select the most suitable rootstock, grape-variety and vineyard management in each soil (fig.1). To generalize the results to a wider area, extrapolation maps of soil are established, and a key to identify each kind of soil is built (fig.2). That key is to be used by anyone to be able to recognize precisely a soil type thanks to several easy-to-use discriminating observations, and then to advise for planting. The results are published towards people involved in quality wine production on different adapted mass media and through meetings.
After three years of studies on five “secteurs de référence” in the Cognac region (tab.1), the results are very encouraging. This method is perfectly well adapted to characterize soils on wide areas. It involves people of different demains, and generates a human and technical dynamic. It is also very evolutive and allow, by structurating a general soil programm, to’ go step by step in a “terroir” approach. It is really the first stone of a wider zoning, including also bio-climatic studies, and has to be followed by experimental plots to give the most suitable advices for the future.

DOI:

Publication date: February 16, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2002 

Type: Article

Authors

Catherine CAM*, Pierre VITAL**, Jean-Luc FORT*, Philippe LAGACHERIE***, René Morlat****

* Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Poitou-Charentes
** Coopérative Agricole Syntéane, Saintes
*** UMR ENSAM-INRA Sols et Environnement, Montpellier
****Unité expérimentale Vigne et Vin, Centre INRA Angers

Keywords

vigne, Cognac, sol, secteur de référence, experts
vine, Cognac, soil, zoning, experts

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2002

Citation

Related articles…

De novo Vitis champinii whole genome assembly allows rootstock-specific identification of potential candidate genes for drought and salt tolerance

Vitis champinii cultivars Ramsey and Dog-ridge are main choices for rootstocks to adapt viticulture in semi-arid and arid regions thanks to their distinctive tolerance to drought and salinity. However, genetic studies on non-vinifera rootstocks have heavily relied on the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) reference genome, which difficulted the assessment of the genetic variation between rootstock species and grapevines. In the present study, this limitation is addressed by introducing a novo phased genome assembly and annotation of Vitis champinii. This new Vitis champinii genome was employed as reference for mapping RNA-seq reads from the same species under drought and salt stresses, and for comparison the same reads were also mapped to the Vitis vinifera PN40024.V4 reference genome. A significant increase in alignment rate was gained when mapping Vitis champinii RNA-seq reads to its own genome, compared to the Vitis vinifera PN40024.V4 reference genome, thus revealing the expression levels of genes specific to Vitis champinii. Moreover, differences in coding sequences were observed in ortholog genes between Vitis champinii and Vitis vinifera, which therefore challenges previous differential expression analyses performed between contrasting Vitis genotypes on the same gene from the Vitis vinifera genome. Genes with possible implications in drought and salt tolerance have been identified across the genome of Vitis champinii, and the same genomic data can potentially guide the discovery of candidate genes specific from Vitis champinii for other traits of interest, therefore becoming a valuable resource for rootstock breeding designs, specially towards increased drought and salinity due to climate change.

Protected Designation of Origin (D.P.O.) Valdepeñas: classification and map of soils

The objective of the work described here is the elaboration of a map of the different types of vineyard soils that to guide the famers in the choice of the most productive vine rootstocks and varieties. 90 vineyard soils profiles were analysed in the entire territory of the Origen Denominations of Valdepeñas. The sampling was carried out in 2018 (June to October) by making a sampling grid, followed by photointerpretation and control in the field. The studied soils can be grouped into 9 different soil types (according to FAO 2006 classification): Leptosols, Regosols, Fluvisols, Gleysols, Cambisols, Calcisols, Luvisols and Anthrosols. A map showing the soil distribution with different type of soils has been made with the ArcGIS program. Regarding to the choice of rootstock, Calcisoles are soils with a high active limestone content, so the rootstocks used in these soils must be resistant to this parameter; Luvisols are deep soils with high clay content, so they will support vigorous rootstocks. Because the cartographic units are composed of two or more subgroups, with are associated in variable proportions, 9 different soil associations have been established; Unit 1: Leptosols, Cambisols and Luvisols (80%, 15% and 5% respectively); Unit 2: Cambisols with Regosols and Luvisols (40%, 30% and 30% respectively); Unit 3: Cambisols and Gleysols with Regosols (40%, 40% and 20% respectively); Unit 4: Regosols with Cambisols, Leptosols and Calcisols (40%, 30%, 15% and 15% respectively); Unit 5: Cambisols, Leptosols, Calcisols and Regosols (25% each of them); Unit 6: Luvisols with Cambisol and Calcisols (80%, 10% and 10% respectively); Unit 7: Luvisols and Calcisols with Cambisols (40%, 40% and 20% respectively); Unit 8: Calcisols with, Cambisols and Luvisols (80%, 10% and 10% respectively); Unit 9: Anthrosols. These study allow to elaborate the first map of vineyard soils of this Protected Designation of Origin in Castilla-La Mancha.

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

Frost risk projections in a changing climate are highly sensitive in time and space to frost modelling approaches

Late spring frost is a major challenge for various winegrowing regions across the world, its occurrence often leading to important yield losses and/or plant failure. Despite a significant increase in minimum temperatures worldwide, the spatial and temporal evolution of spring frost risk under a warmer climate remains largely uncertain. Recent projections of spring frost risk for viticulture in Europe throughout the 21st century show that its evolution strongly depends on the model approach used to simulate budburst. Furthermore, the frost damage modelling methods used in these projections are usually not assessed through comparison to field observations and/or frost damage reports.
The present study aims at comparing frost risk projections simulated using six spring frost models based on two approaches: a) models considering a fixed damage threshold after the predicted budburst date (e.g BRIN, Smoothed-Utah, Growing Degree Days, Fenovitis) and b) models considering a dynamic frost sensitivity threshold based on the predicted grapevine winter/spring dehardening process (e.g. Ferguson model). The capability of each model to simulate an actual frost event for the Vitis vinifera cv. Chadonnay B was previously assessed by comparing simulated cold thermal stress to reports of events with frost damage in Chablis, the northernmost winegrowing region of Burgundy. Models exhibited scores of κ > 0.65 when reproducing the frost/non-frost damage years and an accuracy ranging from 0.82 to 0.90.
Spring frost risk projections throughout the 21st century were performed for all winegrowing subregions of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté under two CMIP5 concentration pathways (4.5 and 8.5) using statistically downscaled 8×8 km daily air temperature and humidity of 13 climate models. Contrasting results with region-specific spring frost risk trends were observed. Three out of five models show a decrease in the frequency of frost years across the whole study area while the other two show an increase that is more or less pronounced depending on winegrowing subregion. Our findings indicate that the lack of accuracy in grapevine budburst and dehardening models makes climate projections of spring frost risk highly uncertain for grapevine cultivation regions.

Variations of soil attributes in vineyards influence their reflectance spectra

Knowledge on the reflectance spectrum of soil is potentially useful since it carries information on soil chemical composition that can be used to the planning of agricultural practices. If compared with analytical methods such as conventional chemical analysis, reflectance measurement provides non-destructive, economic, near real-time data. This paper reports results from reflectance measurements performed by spectroradiometry on soils from two vineyards in south Brazil. The vineyards are close to each other, are on different geological formations, but were subjected to the same management. The objective was to detect spectral differences between the two areas, correlating these differences to variations in their chemical composition, to assess the technique’s potential to predict soil attributes from reflectance data.To that end, soil samples were collected from ten selected vine parcels. Chemical analysis yield data on concentration of twenty-one soil attributes, and spectroradiometry was performed on samples. Chemical differences significant to a 95% confidence level between the two studied areas were found for six soil attributes, and the average reflectance spectra were separated by this same level along most of the observed spectral domain. Correlations between soil reflectance and concentrations of soil attributes were looked for, and for ten soil traits it was possible to define wavelength domains were reflectance and concentrations are correlated to confidence levels from 95% to 99%. Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) analyses were performed comparing measured and predicted concentrations, and for fifteen out of 21 soil traits we found Pearson correlation coefficients r > 0.8. These preliminary results, which have to be validated, suggest that variations of concentration in the investigated soil attributes induce differences in reflectance that can be detected by spectroradiometry. Applications of these observations include the assessment of the chemical content of soils by spectroradiometry as a fast, low-cost alternative to chemical analytical methods.