Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

Abstract

Dans les Charentes, en réponse à une crise de production du vignoble destiné à la production de Cognac, un plan de diversification viticole pour des vins de pays de qualité est mis en place. Il nécessite une connaissance des sols et de leurs caractéristiques viticoles pour orienter le choix des types de vins et adapter l’itinéraire technique de production.
Afin de permettre une caractérisation rapide de l’ensemble du vignoble avec des coûts d’investigations limités, des secteurs de références (aires-échantillon d’extension limitée mais représentatives) ont été choisis à l’aide des cartes pédologiques à l’échelle du 1/250 000, et précisés par des visites de terrain. Ces secteurs de référence ont fait l’objet d’une cartographie pédologique fine qui a permis de définir les différents types de sol et leur mode d’organisation spatiale. A partir d’observations détaillées et d’analyses effectuées sur des profils représentatifs de chaque type de sol, les potentialités et les contraintes agro-viticoles sont analysées selon une démarche collective associant chargés d’études pédologiques, techniciens locaux viticulteurs et experts viti-vinicoles. Cette analyse débouche sur des recommandations relatives au choix des cépages, porte-greffes et pratiques viticoles susceptibles d’exploiter au mieux la potentialité de chaque type de sol, considéré ici comme unité de terroir. L’extension des résultats à l’ensemble du vignoble est réalisée au moyen de cartes d’extrapolation associées à des clefs de détermination qui permettent en priorité au technicien viticole mais aussi au viticulteur d’identifier l’unité de sol de chaque parcelle et d’utiliser les recommandations relatives à celle-ci. L’ensemble des résultats obtenus est par ailleurs largement diffusé auprès de tous les acteurs de la filière selon des médias adaptés.
Après trois ans de travail sur cinq secteurs de référence, les résultats sont positifs et la méthode a fait les preuves de son efficacité. Cette approche de la notion de terroir est un élément fédérateur de tous les acteurs viticoles et un élément structurant permettant d’organiser l’acquisition progressive de références propres au vignoble concerné. Dans cette perspective, des réseaux de suivi s’installent. Par ailleurs, la caractérisation des terroirs sera complétée par des études climatiques.

The “Charentes” region wants to diversify its Cognac vineyard by growing quality wines. This inquires precise soil knowledges to advise the right rootstock, grape variety and vineyard management.
To study soils on a so wide area with a limited budget, several “secteurs de référence” (smallest sample-areas representing the major regional soil types) are located thanks to different soil maps on scale 1/250 000 and a technical field visit. Those “secteurs de référence” are surveyed in details to identify the different soil types and understand their spatial relationship. Each soil type is then characterized by soil profile observations and analysis which lead to lighten the main vine growing factors. A panel of experts in soil science, viticulture and enology, and local wine growers is then constituted to select the most suitable rootstock, grape-variety and vineyard management in each soil (fig.1). To generalize the results to a wider area, extrapolation maps of soil are established, and a key to identify each kind of soil is built (fig.2). That key is to be used by anyone to be able to recognize precisely a soil type thanks to several easy-to-use discriminating observations, and then to advise for planting. The results are published towards people involved in quality wine production on different adapted mass media and through meetings.
After three years of studies on five “secteurs de référence” in the Cognac region (tab.1), the results are very encouraging. This method is perfectly well adapted to characterize soils on wide areas. It involves people of different demains, and generates a human and technical dynamic. It is also very evolutive and allow, by structurating a general soil programm, to’ go step by step in a “terroir” approach. It is really the first stone of a wider zoning, including also bio-climatic studies, and has to be followed by experimental plots to give the most suitable advices for the future.

DOI:

Publication date: February 16, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2002 

Type: Article

Authors

Catherine CAM*, Pierre VITAL**, Jean-Luc FORT*, Philippe LAGACHERIE***, René Morlat****

* Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Poitou-Charentes
** Coopérative Agricole Syntéane, Saintes
*** UMR ENSAM-INRA Sols et Environnement, Montpellier
****Unité expérimentale Vigne et Vin, Centre INRA Angers

Keywords

vigne, Cognac, sol, secteur de référence, experts
vine, Cognac, soil, zoning, experts

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2002

Citation

Related articles…

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

The modification of cultural practices in grapevine cv. Syrah, does it modify the characteristics of the musts?

The work shows the results of a year of experimentation (2020) in a Syrah variety vineyard in La Roda (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). The trial approach was on a randomized block design with two factors: Irrigation (I) and Pruning (P).
Irrigation schedules were adjusted to apply amounts close to 1,500 m3/ha. With this provision, 2 different irrigation treatments were proposed: I1) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to post-harvest (providing at least 20 % of the total amount of irrigation water to be provided post-harvest); I2) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to harvest (usual irrigation practice in the study area). Pruning was proposed with two treatments, one at the end of January (P1), which is pruning on a conventional date; and P2) pruning carried out at the beginning of budding. In total, 4 repetitions were designed with 4 elementary plots, each one of them representing one of the proposed treatments (I1P1; I1P2; I2P1; I2P2). In total, 16 plots were worked on and each elementary plot consisted of 30 strains, distributed in 3 lines.
The productive response was evaluated with the yield results of the harvest harvested at 23 ºBrix. The qualitative response was measured in the musts through the indices of technological (acidity, pH and potassium) and phenolic maturity and aromatic compounds in free and glycosylated fractions. The treatments tested had, in general, an effect on the different variables analyzed.

Impact on leaf morphology of Vitis vinifera L. cvs Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon under Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FACE)

Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has continuously increased since pre-industrial times from 280 ppm in 1750, and is predicted to exceed 700 ppm by the end of 21st century. For most of C3 plant species elevated CO2 (eCO2) improve photosynthetic apparatus results in an increased plant biomass production. To investigate the effects of eCO2 on morphological leaf characteristics the two Vitis vinifera L. cultivars, Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon, grown in the Geisenheim VineyardFACE (Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment) system were used. The FACE site is located at Geisenheim University (49° 59′ N, 7° 57′ E, 94 m above sea level), Germany and was implemented in 2014 comparing future atmospheric CO2-concentrations (eCO2, predicted for the mid-21st century) with current ambient CO2-conditions (aCO2). Experiments were conducted under rain-fed conditions for two consecutive years (2015 and 2016). Six leaves per repetition of the CO2 treatment were sampled in the field and immediately fixed in a FAA solution (ethanol, H2O, formaldehyde and glacial acetic acid). After 24 h leaf samples were transferred and stored in an ethanol solution. Subsequently, leaf tissue was dehydrated using ethanol series and embedded in paraffin. By using a rotary microtomesections of 5 µm were prepared and fixed on microscopic slides. Subsequent the samples were stained using consecutive staining and washing solutions. Afterwards pictures of the leaf cross-sections were taken using a light microscope and consecutive measurements were conducted with an open source image software. Differences found in leaf cross-sections of the two CO2 treatments were detected for the palisade parenchyma. Leaf thickness, upper and lower epidermis and spongy parenchyma remained less affected under eCO2 conditions. The observed results within grapevine leaf tissues can provide first insights to seasonal adaptation strategies of grapevines under future elevated CO2 concentrations.

Soil quality in Beaujolais vineyard. Importance of pedology and cultural practices

A pedological study was carried out from 2009 to 2017 in Beaujolais vineyard, to improve physical and chemical knowledge of soils. It was completed in 2016 and 2017 by the current study, dealing with microbial aspects, in order to build a reference frame for improved advice in soil management. Microbial biomass was measured on representative plots of the six most common soil types identified in Beaujolais and, for each soil type, on plots with different levels of the main impacting parameters: total organic carbon, pH, cation exchange capacity, extractable copper. A total of 59 soil samples were collected. Confirming the results of various trials carried out in Beaujolais over the past 20 years, the results of the present study showed that the soils were still alive, but exhibited a large variability of biological parameters, which appeared dependant on both pedological and anthropic factors. Therefore, a good interpretation of biological parameters and advice for vine growers must rely on a pedologically-based referential with differentiated main driving factors. For example, the control of pH is of primary importance in granitic soils and in no way organic matter addition can improve soil quality if pH is too low. Conversely, in calcareous soils, biological parameters are more directly affected by direct or indirect (cover crops for example) inputs of organic matter. The use of biological parameters, such as microbial biomass, is of great potential value to improve advice on agro-viticultural practices (soil management, fertilization, liming, etc.), basis of a sustainable wine production on fragile soils.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.