Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

Abstract

Dans les Charentes, en réponse à une crise de production du vignoble destiné à la production de Cognac, un plan de diversification viticole pour des vins de pays de qualité est mis en place. Il nécessite une connaissance des sols et de leurs caractéristiques viticoles pour orienter le choix des types de vins et adapter l’itinéraire technique de production.
Afin de permettre une caractérisation rapide de l’ensemble du vignoble avec des coûts d’investigations limités, des secteurs de références (aires-échantillon d’extension limitée mais représentatives) ont été choisis à l’aide des cartes pédologiques à l’échelle du 1/250 000, et précisés par des visites de terrain. Ces secteurs de référence ont fait l’objet d’une cartographie pédologique fine qui a permis de définir les différents types de sol et leur mode d’organisation spatiale. A partir d’observations détaillées et d’analyses effectuées sur des profils représentatifs de chaque type de sol, les potentialités et les contraintes agro-viticoles sont analysées selon une démarche collective associant chargés d’études pédologiques, techniciens locaux viticulteurs et experts viti-vinicoles. Cette analyse débouche sur des recommandations relatives au choix des cépages, porte-greffes et pratiques viticoles susceptibles d’exploiter au mieux la potentialité de chaque type de sol, considéré ici comme unité de terroir. L’extension des résultats à l’ensemble du vignoble est réalisée au moyen de cartes d’extrapolation associées à des clefs de détermination qui permettent en priorité au technicien viticole mais aussi au viticulteur d’identifier l’unité de sol de chaque parcelle et d’utiliser les recommandations relatives à celle-ci. L’ensemble des résultats obtenus est par ailleurs largement diffusé auprès de tous les acteurs de la filière selon des médias adaptés.
Après trois ans de travail sur cinq secteurs de référence, les résultats sont positifs et la méthode a fait les preuves de son efficacité. Cette approche de la notion de terroir est un élément fédérateur de tous les acteurs viticoles et un élément structurant permettant d’organiser l’acquisition progressive de références propres au vignoble concerné. Dans cette perspective, des réseaux de suivi s’installent. Par ailleurs, la caractérisation des terroirs sera complétée par des études climatiques.

The “Charentes” region wants to diversify its Cognac vineyard by growing quality wines. This inquires precise soil knowledges to advise the right rootstock, grape variety and vineyard management.
To study soils on a so wide area with a limited budget, several “secteurs de référence” (smallest sample-areas representing the major regional soil types) are located thanks to different soil maps on scale 1/250 000 and a technical field visit. Those “secteurs de référence” are surveyed in details to identify the different soil types and understand their spatial relationship. Each soil type is then characterized by soil profile observations and analysis which lead to lighten the main vine growing factors. A panel of experts in soil science, viticulture and enology, and local wine growers is then constituted to select the most suitable rootstock, grape-variety and vineyard management in each soil (fig.1). To generalize the results to a wider area, extrapolation maps of soil are established, and a key to identify each kind of soil is built (fig.2). That key is to be used by anyone to be able to recognize precisely a soil type thanks to several easy-to-use discriminating observations, and then to advise for planting. The results are published towards people involved in quality wine production on different adapted mass media and through meetings.
After three years of studies on five “secteurs de référence” in the Cognac region (tab.1), the results are very encouraging. This method is perfectly well adapted to characterize soils on wide areas. It involves people of different demains, and generates a human and technical dynamic. It is also very evolutive and allow, by structurating a general soil programm, to’ go step by step in a “terroir” approach. It is really the first stone of a wider zoning, including also bio-climatic studies, and has to be followed by experimental plots to give the most suitable advices for the future.

DOI:

Publication date: February 16, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2002 

Type: Article

Authors

Catherine CAM*, Pierre VITAL**, Jean-Luc FORT*, Philippe LAGACHERIE***, René Morlat****

* Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Poitou-Charentes
** Coopérative Agricole Syntéane, Saintes
*** UMR ENSAM-INRA Sols et Environnement, Montpellier
****Unité expérimentale Vigne et Vin, Centre INRA Angers

Keywords

vigne, Cognac, sol, secteur de référence, experts
vine, Cognac, soil, zoning, experts

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2002

Citation

Related articles…

Current climate change in the Oplenac wine-growing district (Serbia)

Serbian autochthonous vine varieties Smederevka (for white wines) and Prokupac (for rosé and red wines) are the primary representatives of typical characteristics of wines and terroir of numerous wine-growing areas in Serbia. In the past, these varieties were the leading vine varieties, however, as the result of globalization of winemaking and the trend of consumption of wines from widely prevalent vine varieties, they were replaced by introduced international varieties. Smederevka and Prokupac vine varieties are characterized by later time of grape ripening, and relative sensitivity to low temperatures. Climate conditions can be a restrictive factor for production of high-quality grapes and wine and for the spatial spreading of these varieties in hilly continental wine-growing areas.
This paper focuses on the spatial analysis of changes of main climate parameters, in particular, analysis of viticultural bioclimatic indices that were determined for the purposes of viticulture zoning of wine-growing areas in the period 1961-2010, and those same parameters determined for the current, that is, referential climate period (1988-2017). Results of the research, that is, analysis of climate changes indicate that the majority of examined climate parameters in the Oplenac wine-growing district improved from the perspective of Smederevka and Prokupac vine varieties. These studies of climate conditions indicate that changes of analyzed climate parameters, that is, bioclimatic indices will be favorable for cultivation of varieties with later grape ripening times and those more sensitive to low temperatures, such as the autochthonous vine varieties Smederevka and Prokupac, therefore, it is recommended to producers to more actively plant vineyards with these varieties in the territory of the Oplenac wine-growing district.

Grapevine yield estimation in a context of climate change: the GraY model

Grapevine yield is a key indicator to assess the impacts of climate change and the relevance of adaptation strategies in a vineyard landscape. At this scale, a yield model should use a number of parameters and input data in relation to the information available and be able to reproduce vineyard management decisions (e.g. soil and canopy management, irrigation). In this study, we used data from six experimental sites in Southern France (cv. Syrah) to calibrate a model of grapevine yield limited by water constraint (GraY). Each yield component (bud fertility, number of berries per bunch, berry weight) was calculated as a function of the soil water availability simulated by the WaLIS water balance model at critical phenological phases. The model was then evaluated in 10 grapegrowers’ plots, covering a diversity of biophysical and technical contexts (soil type, canopy size, irrigation, cover crop). We identified three critical periods for yield formation: after flowering on the previous year for the number of bunches and berries, around pre-veraison and post-veraison of the same year for mean berry weight. Yields were simulated with a model efficiency (EF) of 0.62 (NRMSE = 0.28). Bud fertility and number of berries per bunch were more accurately simulated (EF = 0.90 and 0.77, NRMSE = 0.06 and 0.10, respectively) than berry weight (EF = -0.31, NRMSE = 0.17). Model efficiency on the on-farm plots reached 0.71 (NRMSE = 0.37) simulating yields from 1 to 8 kg/plant. The GraY model is an original model estimating grapevine yield evolution on the basis of water availability under future climatic conditions.  It allows to evaluate the effects of various adaptation levers such as planting density, cover crop management, fruit/leaf ratio, shading and irrigation, in various production contexts.

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)

Evolution of the amino acids content through grape ripening: Effect of foliar application of methyl jasmonate with or without urea

The parameters that determine the grape quality, and therefore the optimal harvest time, suffer variations during berry ripening, related to climate change, with the widely known problem of the gap between technological and phenolic maturities. However, there are few studies about its incidence on grape nitrogen composition. For this reason, the use of an elicitor, methyl jasmonate (MeJ), alone or with urea, is proposed as a tool to reduce climatic decoupling, allowing to establish the harvest time in order to achieve the optimum grape quality. The aim was to study the effect of MeJ and MeJ+Urea foliar applications on the evolution of Tempranillo amino acids content throughout the grape maturation. Three treatments were foliarly applied, at veraison and 7 days later: control (water), MeJ (10 mM) and MeJ+Urea (10 mM+6 kg N/ha). Grape samples were taken at five stages of maturation: day before the first and second applications, 15 days after the second application (pre-harvest), harvest day, and 15 days after harvest (post-harvest). The amino acids analysis of the samples was carried out by HPLC. Results showed that the evolution of amino acids was similar regardless of the treatment; however, foliar applications influenced the nitrogen compounds content, i.e., there was no qualitative effect but quantitative one. Most of the amino acids reached their maximum concentration in pre-harvest, being higher in grapes from the treatments than in the control. In general, no differences in grape amino acids content were observed between MeJ and MeJ+Urea treatments. Foliar applications with MeJ and MeJ+Urea enhanced the grape amino acids content, without affecting their profile, helping to optimize their quality and allowing to establish a more complete grape ripening standard. Therefore, MeJ and MeJ+Urea foliar applications can be a simple agronomic practice, which has shown promising results in order to enhance the grape quality.