Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

A applied viticultural zoning, based on the “secteurs de la reference” methodology, in the Cognac vineyard (France)

Abstract

Dans les Charentes, en réponse à une crise de production du vignoble destiné à la production de Cognac, un plan de diversification viticole pour des vins de pays de qualité est mis en place. Il nécessite une connaissance des sols et de leurs caractéristiques viticoles pour orienter le choix des types de vins et adapter l’itinéraire technique de production.
Afin de permettre une caractérisation rapide de l’ensemble du vignoble avec des coûts d’investigations limités, des secteurs de références (aires-échantillon d’extension limitée mais représentatives) ont été choisis à l’aide des cartes pédologiques à l’échelle du 1/250 000, et précisés par des visites de terrain. Ces secteurs de référence ont fait l’objet d’une cartographie pédologique fine qui a permis de définir les différents types de sol et leur mode d’organisation spatiale. A partir d’observations détaillées et d’analyses effectuées sur des profils représentatifs de chaque type de sol, les potentialités et les contraintes agro-viticoles sont analysées selon une démarche collective associant chargés d’études pédologiques, techniciens locaux viticulteurs et experts viti-vinicoles. Cette analyse débouche sur des recommandations relatives au choix des cépages, porte-greffes et pratiques viticoles susceptibles d’exploiter au mieux la potentialité de chaque type de sol, considéré ici comme unité de terroir. L’extension des résultats à l’ensemble du vignoble est réalisée au moyen de cartes d’extrapolation associées à des clefs de détermination qui permettent en priorité au technicien viticole mais aussi au viticulteur d’identifier l’unité de sol de chaque parcelle et d’utiliser les recommandations relatives à celle-ci. L’ensemble des résultats obtenus est par ailleurs largement diffusé auprès de tous les acteurs de la filière selon des médias adaptés.
Après trois ans de travail sur cinq secteurs de référence, les résultats sont positifs et la méthode a fait les preuves de son efficacité. Cette approche de la notion de terroir est un élément fédérateur de tous les acteurs viticoles et un élément structurant permettant d’organiser l’acquisition progressive de références propres au vignoble concerné. Dans cette perspective, des réseaux de suivi s’installent. Par ailleurs, la caractérisation des terroirs sera complétée par des études climatiques.

The “Charentes” region wants to diversify its Cognac vineyard by growing quality wines. This inquires precise soil knowledges to advise the right rootstock, grape variety and vineyard management.
To study soils on a so wide area with a limited budget, several “secteurs de référence” (smallest sample-areas representing the major regional soil types) are located thanks to different soil maps on scale 1/250 000 and a technical field visit. Those “secteurs de référence” are surveyed in details to identify the different soil types and understand their spatial relationship. Each soil type is then characterized by soil profile observations and analysis which lead to lighten the main vine growing factors. A panel of experts in soil science, viticulture and enology, and local wine growers is then constituted to select the most suitable rootstock, grape-variety and vineyard management in each soil (fig.1). To generalize the results to a wider area, extrapolation maps of soil are established, and a key to identify each kind of soil is built (fig.2). That key is to be used by anyone to be able to recognize precisely a soil type thanks to several easy-to-use discriminating observations, and then to advise for planting. The results are published towards people involved in quality wine production on different adapted mass media and through meetings.
After three years of studies on five “secteurs de référence” in the Cognac region (tab.1), the results are very encouraging. This method is perfectly well adapted to characterize soils on wide areas. It involves people of different demains, and generates a human and technical dynamic. It is also very evolutive and allow, by structurating a general soil programm, to’ go step by step in a “terroir” approach. It is really the first stone of a wider zoning, including also bio-climatic studies, and has to be followed by experimental plots to give the most suitable advices for the future.

DOI:

Publication date: February 16, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2002 

Type: Article

Authors

Catherine CAM*, Pierre VITAL**, Jean-Luc FORT*, Philippe LAGACHERIE***, René Morlat****

* Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Poitou-Charentes
** Coopérative Agricole Syntéane, Saintes
*** UMR ENSAM-INRA Sols et Environnement, Montpellier
****Unité expérimentale Vigne et Vin, Centre INRA Angers

Keywords

vigne, Cognac, sol, secteur de référence, experts
vine, Cognac, soil, zoning, experts

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2002

Citation

Related articles…

Postveraison shoot trimming in Tannat and Merlot: preliminary results on yield components, plant balance and berry composition

There is currently a trend towards the production of wines with low alcohol content. To achieve this, grapes with low sugar content must be used. There are techniques at the vineyard level that can delay ripening and avoid excessive sugar accumulation without, a priori, affecting the final polyphenol content. Postveraison shoot trimming (PVST) is experimentally evaluated for these purposes, but its impact under Uruguayan climatic conditions with high interannual variability is not known. The aim of this work is to assess the PVST in Tannat and Merlot cultivars and their impact on yield components, plant balance and berry primary composition. In this study, two commercial vineyards of 10 years old Tannat and Merlot (grafted on SO4) at Canelones Department were selected. During the 2020-201 growing season, grapevines were submitted to PVST when grapes reached 15º Brix. In a randomized block, trimmed (T) and control (C) plants were evaluated with three repetitions each cultivar. Evaluation of the evolution of primary berry composition during ripening, measurement of yield components and plant balance were performed. For both cultivars, PVST did not affect yield components. Merlot reached 5.4 kg per plant and Tannat 7.1 kg, with not statistical significance between treatments. However, statistical differences were observed in terms of plant balance. In Merlot Ravaz Index reached a difference of 5.3 (12.0 in T and 6.7 in C) meanwhile Tannat reached 3.5 of statistical difference (13.7 in T and 10.2 in C). The tendency to imbalance for the treated plants had an impact on the final grape composition. Merlot grapes showed statistical difference in final total acidity (0.3 g of difference between treatments) while treatments impact final sugar content on Tannat grapes (10.0 g of difference between treatments). Further studies are needed to assess the impact of different canopy management techniques in our conditions.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.

Spatiotemporal patterns of chemical attributes in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon vineyards in Central California

Spatial variability of vine productivity in winegrapes is important to characterise as both yield and quality are relevant for the production of different wine styles and products. The objectives were to understand how patterns of variability of Cabernet Sauvignon fruit composition changed over time and space, how these patterns could be characterised with indirect measurements, and how spatial patterns of the variation in fruit compositional attributes can aid in improving management. Prior to the 2017 vintage, 125 data vines were distributed across each of four vineyards in the Lodi American Viticultural Area (AVA) of California. Each data vine was sampled at commercial harvest in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Yield components and fruit composition were measured at harvest for each data vine, and maps of yield and fruit composition were produced for eight ‘objective measures of fruit quality’: total anthocyanins, polymeric tannins, quercetin glycosides, malic acid, yeast assimilable nitrogen, β-damascenone, C6 alcohols and aldehydes, and 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine. Patterns of variation in anthocyanins and phenolic compounds were found to be most stable over time. Given this relative stability, management decisions focused on fruit quality could be based on zonal descriptions of anthocyanins or phenolics to increase profitability in some vineyards. In each vineyard, dormant season pruning weights and soil cores were collected at each location, elevation and soil apparent electrical conductivity surveys were completed, and remotely sensed imagery was captured by fixed wing aircraft and two satellite platforms at major phenological stages. The data collected were used to develop relationships among biophysical data, soil, imagery, and fruit composition. The standardised and aggregated samples from four vineyards over three seasons were included in the estimation of ‘common variograms’ to assess how this technique could aid growers in producing geostatistically rigorous maps of fruit composition variability without cumbersome, single season sampling efforts.

The use of rootstock as a lever in the face of climate change and dieback of vineyard

As viticulture faces challenges such as climate change or vineyard dieback, the choice of the variety and rootstock becomes more and more crucial. To study rootstock levers in the Bordeaux region, a parcel of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) was planted with four rootstocks in 2014. Twenty repetitions of each of the following four rootstocks were set up: 101-14 MGt, Nemadex AB, 420A MGt and Gravesac. The number of bunches, yields and pruning weights of the vine shoots were measured individually on 240 vines from 2017 to 2021. Since 2020, nitrogen status assessed by assimilable nitrogen level, hydric status assessed by δ13C and berry maturity were measured on 80 samples taken from 20 repetitions of the four rootstocks. A lower yield was measured for CS grafted onto Nemadex AB due to the lower number of bunches and the lower weight of berries. The differences between the other three rootstocks are small, but CS grafted onto 420A MGt was the most productive. The CS grafted onto Nemadex AB had the lowest pruning weight while 101-14 MGt had the highest. In 2020, δ13C showed a more moderate water stress with 101-14 MGt and 420A MGt than with Nemadex AB. Surprisingly, the Gravesac was under more stress than the 101-14 MGt. The nitrogen status in the berries was better for Nemadex AB but this was perhaps due to the significantly lower weight of the berries.Rootstock 101-14 MGt attained the highest accumulation of sugars in the berries while 420A MGt allows to preserve higher acidity. The parcel is still young which may explain some of the results. These measures must therefore be continued over the next several years to fully assess the effects of these rootstocks on the development of the vines and the quality of the production under new climatic conditions.

Frost risk projections in a changing climate are highly sensitive in time and space to frost modelling approaches

Late spring frost is a major challenge for various winegrowing regions across the world, its occurrence often leading to important yield losses and/or plant failure. Despite a significant increase in minimum temperatures worldwide, the spatial and temporal evolution of spring frost risk under a warmer climate remains largely uncertain. Recent projections of spring frost risk for viticulture in Europe throughout the 21st century show that its evolution strongly depends on the model approach used to simulate budburst. Furthermore, the frost damage modelling methods used in these projections are usually not assessed through comparison to field observations and/or frost damage reports.
The present study aims at comparing frost risk projections simulated using six spring frost models based on two approaches: a) models considering a fixed damage threshold after the predicted budburst date (e.g BRIN, Smoothed-Utah, Growing Degree Days, Fenovitis) and b) models considering a dynamic frost sensitivity threshold based on the predicted grapevine winter/spring dehardening process (e.g. Ferguson model). The capability of each model to simulate an actual frost event for the Vitis vinifera cv. Chadonnay B was previously assessed by comparing simulated cold thermal stress to reports of events with frost damage in Chablis, the northernmost winegrowing region of Burgundy. Models exhibited scores of κ > 0.65 when reproducing the frost/non-frost damage years and an accuracy ranging from 0.82 to 0.90.
Spring frost risk projections throughout the 21st century were performed for all winegrowing subregions of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté under two CMIP5 concentration pathways (4.5 and 8.5) using statistically downscaled 8×8 km daily air temperature and humidity of 13 climate models. Contrasting results with region-specific spring frost risk trends were observed. Three out of five models show a decrease in the frequency of frost years across the whole study area while the other two show an increase that is more or less pronounced depending on winegrowing subregion. Our findings indicate that the lack of accuracy in grapevine budburst and dehardening models makes climate projections of spring frost risk highly uncertain for grapevine cultivation regions.