Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Cultures des vignobles en forte pente: possibilités de mécanisation. Effet de l’exposition et de l’orientation des rangs

Cultures des vignobles en forte pente: possibilités de mécanisation. Effet de l’exposition et de l’orientation des rangs

Abstract

Plus de la moitié du vignoble suisse (14’000 ha) est situé sur des coteaux en forte pente (> 30%). Dans certains vignobles, la pente naturelle du terrain a été réduite par la construction de terrasses soutenues par des murs. Ces murs, établis depuis des générations, constituent souvent une valeur paysagère de haut niveau. Dans ces situations, la culture de la vigne s’est généralement faite dans le sens de la pente, où une multitude de ceps (> 10’000 ceps/ha) conduits en gobelet sur échalas tirent le meilleur profit du rayonnement lumineux. Ce système de conduite limite fortement les possibilités de mécanisation et exige de ce fait un nombre élevé d’heures de main-d’œuvre par an. Pendant de nombreuses années, les façons culturales ont été faites au moyen d’outils tirés par un câble, entraîné par un treuil. Cette mécanisation est pratiquement abandonnée aujourd’hui, l’entretien des sols se faisant essentiellement par désherbage chimique. Cette pratique, liée à la diminution des apports de matière organique, a contribué à augmenter la sensibilité des sols à l’érosion, en particulier dans les terrains peu perméables.
La réduction des risques d’érosion et la nécessité de diminuer fortement les coûts de production ont exigé une transformation complète de la culture des vignobles en pente. Dans les situations où l’utilisation du tracteur interligne était possible (pente inférieure à 35%, grandeur des parcelles et possibilités d’accès suffisantes), le système de conduite mi-large (150 à 200 cm d’interligne), avec des rangs à un seul plan de palissage orienté dans le sens de la pente, s’est fortement développé. Les possibilités de mécanisation sont proches de celles des vignobles de plaine. Une gestion du sol, adaptée à la nature du terrain, doit y être appliquée pour réduire au maximum les dégâts d’érosion. L’enherbement des sols constitue une technique idéale lorsque les disponibilités en eau sont suffisantes.
Dans les situations où l’emploi du tracteur, dans le sens de la pente, n’était pas possible (déclivité supérieure à 35%, forme des parcelles inadaptée), la rationalisation s’est faite en orientant les rangs en travers de la pente et en cultivant la vigne en banquettes, selon les courbes de niveau. Cette technique, traditionnellement utilisée dans le vignoble du Tessin pour réduire les risques d’érosion et d’éboulement dus à la forte pluviométrie, inégalement répartie avec souvent des orages violents, s’est largement répandue dans les vignobles de suisse alémanique et française. La culture en banquettes garantit une bonne protection du sol contre l’érosion, augmente sensiblement les possibilités de mécanisation des vignobles en forte pente et diminue la pénibilité du travail manuel (Murisier, 1981; Murisier et al., 1984; Murisier et Ferretti, 1999).

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

F. MURISIER, M. FERRETTI, V. ZUFFEREY

Station fédérale de recherches en production végétale
de Changins, Centre viticole du Caudoz, CH-1009 PULLY

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Impact of climate change on the viticultural climate of the Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (SE Spain)

Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (PDO Jumilla) is located in the Spanish provinces of Albacete and Murcia, in the South-eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula, where most of the models predict a severe impact of climate change in next decades. PDO Jumilla covers an area of 247,054 hectares, of which more than 22,000 hectares

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

Using δ13C and hydroscapes as a tool for discriminating cultivar specific drought response

Measurement of carbon isotope discrimination in berry juice sugars at maturity (δ13C) provides an integrated assessment of water use efficiency (WUE) during the period of berry ripening, and when collected over multiple seasons can be used as an indication of drought stress response. Berry juice δ13C measurements were carried out on 48 different varieties planted in a common garden experiment in Bordeaux, France from 2014 through 2021 and were paired with midday and predawn leaf water potential measurements on the same vines in a subset of six varieties. The aim was to discriminate a large panel of varieties based on their stomatal behaviour and potentially identify hydraulic traits characterizing drought tolerance by comparing δ13C and hydroscapes (the visualisation of plant stomatal behaviour as a response to predawn water potential). Cluster analysis found that δ13C values are likely affected by the differing phenology of each variety, resulting in berry ripening of different varieties taking place under different stress conditions within the same year. We accounted for these phenological differences and found that cluster analysis based on specific δ13C metrics created a classification of varieties that corresponds well to our current empirical understanding of their relative drought tolerances. In addition, we analysed the water potential regulation of the subset of six varieties (using the hydroscape approach) and found that it was well correlated with some δ13C metrics. Surprisingly, a variety’s water potential regulation (specifically its minimum critical leaf water potential under water deficit) was strongly correlated to δ13C values under well-watered conditions, suggesting that base WUE may have a stronger impact on drought tolerance than WUE under water deficit. These results give strong insights on the innate WUE of a very large panel of varieties and suggest that studies of drought tolerance should include traits expressed under non-limiting conditions.

The concept of terroir: what place for microbiota?

Microbes play key roles on crop nutrient availability via biogeochemical cycles, rhizosphere interactions with roots as well as on plant growth and health. Recent advances in technologies, such as High Throughput Sequencing Techniques, allowed to gain deeper insight on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with soil, rhizosphere and plant phyllosphere. Over the past 10 years, numerous scientific studies have been carried out on the microbial component of the vineyard. Whether the soil or grape compartments have been taken into account, many studies agree on the evidence of regional delineations of microbial communities, that may contribute to regional wine characteristics and typicity. Some authors proposed the term “microbial terroir” including “yeast terroir” for grapes to describe the connection between microbial biogeography and regional wine characteristics. Many factors are involved in terroir including climate, soil, cultivar and human practices as well as their interactions. Studies considering “microbial terroir” greatly contributed to improve our knowledge on factors that shape the vineyard microbial structure and diversity. However, the potential impact of “microbial terroir” on wine composition has yet not received strong scientific evidence and many questions remain to be addressed, related to the functional characterization of the microbial community and its impact on plant physiology and grape composition, the origins and interannual stability of vineyard microbiota, as well as their impact on wine sensorial attributes. The presentation will give an overview on the role of microbiota as a terroir component and will highlight future perspectives and challenges on this key subject for the wine industry.

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...