Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Revisión de estudios sobre suelos vitícolas de las tierras del Jerez

Revisión de estudios sobre suelos vitícolas de las tierras del Jerez

Abstract

Dada la importancia de los suelos y de los substratos geológicos en la zonificación vitivinícola, los autores realizan una revisión de estudios sobre las formaciones más importantes en la D.O. Jerez-Xérès-Sherry y Manzanilla-Sanlúcar de Barrameda.
En el concepto de Pago vitícola (PEMARTÍN, 1965; Paneque et al., 1996 a, b, c; González GordOn, 1990; García de LujÁn, 1997) se destaca la singularidad del tipo o clase de suelo, subsuelo y substrato geológico que, conjuntamente con otras circunstancias ambientales, participan e intervienen en su delimitación (Suter y Palacios, 1857), caracterización y funcionamiento (Carbonel y BRAVO, 1820; EchegarAy, 1852; BARBADILLO, 1996).
El marco o región del Jerez y de la Manzanilla representa una de las regiones vitinícolas más antiguas de la Península Ibérica (Sáez fernández, 1995; Hidalgo, 1999). Los suelos citados por Columela como más importantes para el cultivo de la vid (cretosi, sabulosi y palustres) tienen distinta importancia en la calidad del viñedo y del vino, como se manifiesta por algunos autores citados, y especialmente por Boutelou (1807), Fernández Bobadilla (1949), García del Barrio (1972, 1979, 1988) y García de LujÁn (1997). Suelos calizos, silíceos y otros se citan en el Estudio Agrobiológico de la Provincia de Cádiz (CEBAC, 1963) y en el Mapa del INIA (1971), con la descripción morfológica de sus horizontes, la situación en el terreno y la caracterización analítica de los mismos, etc. Sin duda alguna, distintos Calcisols (CL), Cambisols (CB), Vertisols (VR), Leptosols (LP) y otros Grupos de suelos (ISRIC, ISSS, FAO, 1998); y lustrillos, polvillejos y barros rojos sobre albarizas (García del Barrio, 1979) y otros tipos de rocas (GAVALA laborde, 1959; IGME, 1977, 1988), muestran la diversidad de formaciones edafogeológicas en el viñedo del Jerez.

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

PANEQUE, G. (1), ROCA, M. (2), PANEQUE, P. (1), PARDO, C. (2), ALDECOA, J. (2)

(1) Departamento de Cristalografía, Mineralogía y Química Agrícola. Facultad de Química. Universidad de Sevilla
(2) Laboratorio de Edafología y Climatología. Escuela Universitaria de Ingeniería Técnica Agrícola. Cortijo de Cuarto. Diputación de Sevilla

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Long term influence of a cover crop in the agronomic and oenological performance of CV. Chardonnay

Cover crops are acknowledged to be an interesting tool to produce
higher quality grapes in red varieties, as they generally reduce vine vigour and yield. However, their incidence in white wine quality is not clear, since higher nitrogen availability can play an important positive
role, and cover crops may compete for this nutrient. The possible reduction in available nitrogen can also modify the fermentation processes, as well as the synthesis of aromas in the wine. The aim of this work was to evaluate the long-term effect of a grass cover crop on grape and wine quality.

Replay of the Wine Vision 2040 event

A webinar organised by the UBC Wine Research Centre, on June 25th 2020. About Wine Vision 2040 Wine Vision 2040 is delivered by wine-passionate, high-profile individuals keen to share ideas and views that will spark conversations within wine communities.  No...

IMPACT OF MANNOPROTEIN N-GLYCOSYL PHOSPHORYLATION AND BRANCHING ON WINE POLYPHENOL INTERACTIONS WITH YEAST CELL WALLS

Yeast cell walls (CWs) may adsorb wine components with a significant impact on wine quality. When dealing with red wines, this adsorption is mainly related to physicochemical interactions between wine polyphenols and cell wall mannoproteins. However, mannoproteins are a heterogeneous family of complex peptidoglycans including long and highly branched N-linked oligosaccharides and short linear O-linked oligosaccharides, resulting in a huge structural diversity.

Leaf elemental composition in a replicated hybrid grape progeny grown in distinct climates

The elemental composition (the ionome) of grape leaves is an important indicator of nutritional
health, but its genetic architecture has received limited scientific attention. In this study, we
analyzed the leaf ionome of 131 interspecific F1 hybrid progeny from a Vitis rupestris (♀) X Vitis
riparia (♂) cross. The progeny were replicated in New York, South Dakota, Southwest Missouri ad Central Missouri, and the concentration of 20 elements were measured in their leaves at
three different phenological stages during the growing season. In leaves collected at the apical node at anthesis, elemental concentrations correlated in a consistent manner (p < 0.05) across all four geographic locations. In subsequent phenological stages, elemental ratios in the apical-node leaves remained consistent across the South Dakota and New York sites, but not across the Missouri sites. In leaves collected at the basal and middle nodes, correlations varied greatly across all locations.

The regulation of ABA-induced anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry

Color is a key quality trait for grape berry and the producing wines. Berry color of red genotypes is mainly determined by the quantity and composition of anthocyanins accumulated in the skin and/or pulp. Both genetic and environmental factors could influence the quantity and composition of anthocyanins, while the underlying mechanisms are not fully clear. To explore the mechanisms underlying the diversity of anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry, we compared two grapevine genotypes showing distinct sensitivities to ABA-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis, where one genotype showed minor responses to exogenous ABA application while the other showed significant increase in anthocyanins after exogenous ABA application.