Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Bilan hydrique: une méthode proposée pour l’évaluation des réserves hydriques dans le zonage viticole

Bilan hydrique: une méthode proposée pour l’évaluation des réserves hydriques dans le zonage viticole

Abstract

Dans le zonage viticole mis en place dans la province de Taranto, on a introduit la méthode du bilan hydrique pour évaluer les réserves hydriques dans les 8 zones déterminées (Zones 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B).
Cette évaluation revêt une importance toute particulière car dans ce milieu l’eau constitue un facteur limitatif.
Une première phase de mise au point de la méthode a été prévue en 1998 et a été effectuée en comparant les données d’humidité évaluées et celles mesureés directement avec la méthode “gravimétrique”.
Les données recueillies jusqu’à présent et circonscrites à la variété Primitivo des zones 2, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B, mettent en évidence que la méthode proposée est en mesure de relever de façon satisfaisante les différences d’humidité.. Si nous observons ces premiers résultats, la réponse de cette méthode semble être donc positive et en ligne avec les expectatives prévues.

 

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

Giorgessi F., Calò A., Tomasi D. and Catalano V.

Istituto Sperimentale per la Viticoltura, XXVIII Aprile, 26 – 31015 Conegliano (TV) – Italie

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

How sensory quality of wines can be accessed as a trait in MAS grape vine breeding

In the context of the global crises of global warming, biodiversity and pollution, current agricultural practices need to be reconsidered.

Development of a new indicator of grape skin ripening in relation to Botrytis cinerea susceptibility

The bunch rot induced by Botrytis cinerea is an important disease of grapevine that causes a diminution of grape quality and a considerable yield loss leading to an economic loss

Genotypic differences in early-stage root architectural traits and consequences for water uptake in three grapevine rootstocks differing in drought tolerance

Root architecture (RSA), the spatial-temporal arrangement of a root system in soil, is essential for edaphic resources acquisition by the plant, and thus contributes largely to its productivity and adaptation to environmental stresses, particularly soil water deficit. In grafted grapevine, while the degree of drought tolerance induced by the rootstock has been well documented in the vineyard, information about the underlying physiological processes, particularly at the root level, is scarce, due to the inherent difficulties in observing large root systems in situ. The aims of this study were (i) to determine the phenotypic differences in traits related to root distribution and morphology along the substrate profile in different Vitis rootstocks during early growth, (ii) to assess the plasticity of these traits to soil water deficit and (iii) to quantify their relationships with plant water uptake.

Investigating water stress-related seasonal and spatial patterns and the possible links with juice and wine compositional parameters

The mapping of spatial variability in vineyards offers the potential to implement zonal management strategies with the aim to optimize economic benefits and increase sustainability by managing natural resources, such as water used for irrigation, more optimally. This study characterized the (natural) variability in plant water status in a commercial Cabernet Sauvignon block, using remote sensing techniques, and identified the impact of this variability on the yield, and juice and wine composition. From the field data collected over two growing seasons, we demonstrated that remote sensing techniques are a practical and powerful tool for mapping spatial variability within vineyard blocks.

Viticultural practices: past, present and future

Practices in viticulture have greatly evolved in the last five decades. There were three objectives: improvement in the quality of the products, reduction in the production costs through mechanization