Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Zonage vitivinicole: recherches et considérations initiales sur une proposition de “nouvelle” méthodologie d'”évaluation de la qualité” du produit tel qu’élément base pour le zonage aussi

Zonage vitivinicole: recherches et considérations initiales sur une proposition de “nouvelle” méthodologie d'”évaluation de la qualité” du produit tel qu’élément base pour le zonage aussi

Abstract

Si on part de l’introduction que l’activité vitivinicole maintenant plus que jamais doit être une activité d’entreprenariat introduite de mieux en mieux sur le territoire et donc effectuée pour rendre maximal le Profit “d’entreprise” dans un contexte de centralité de l’homme et du milieu entendu dans le sens plus ample du terme (Profit “sociale” et “existentiel”) (Cargenllo G. 1997).
Faisant suite à ce que nous avons exposé sur les: “GRANDS ZONAGES” et “QUALITE ECONOMQUE, “ECONOMIE DE LA QUALITE e DE LA PREFERENCE” et sur la “QUALITE”, “PREFERENCE”, COUT, PRIX, PROFIT etc., ainsi que sur la nécessité d’évaluer un bien ou un service et donc aussi un vin en allant au-delà de l’aspect organoleptique.
Dans ce travail, on expose les premières considérations initiales sur une proposition de “nouvelle méthodologie” d’évaluation d’un produit ou d’un service, dénommeé CIMEC (Cima IMprenditoriale Conegliano), basé sur le fait d’évaluer, ( dans ce cas spécifique), le vin non seulement au niveau organoleptique (qualité) et/ou de la part du consommateur (qualité-prix), mais aussi de la part du producteur considérant dans l’équation mise au point pour évaluer le produit, pour le moment: qualité organoleptique, préférence, prix, coût et profit, par le biais le méthode dénommeé CIMEC.

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

Giovanni Cargnello

Sezione di Tecniche colturali Istituto Sperimentale per la Viticoltura Conegliano (Treviso)
Via 28 Aprile 26, 31015 Conegliano (Treviso) – Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

CIMEC, nouvelle évaluation qualité, qualité économique, qualité sociale, qualité existentielle

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Rootstock effect on Cabernet Sauvignon aromatic and chemical composition

Grape quality potential for wine production is strongly influenced by environmental parameters and agronomic factors. Several studies underline the rootstock effect on scions vegetative growth and berry composition [1] with an impact on wine quality. Rootstocks are promising agronomic tools for climate change adaptation and in most grape-growing regions the potential diversity of rootstocks is not fully used and only a few genotypes are planted. Moreover, little is known about the effect of rootstock genetic variability on the aromatic composition in wines.

Characterization of variety-specific changes in bulk stomatal conductance in response to changes in atmospheric demand and drought stress

In wine growing regions around the world, climate change has the potential to affect vine transpiration and overall vineyard water use due to related changes in atmospheric demand and soil water deficits. Grapevines control their transpiration in response to a changing environment by regulating conductance of water through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Most vineyard water use models currently estimate vine transpiration by applying generic crop coefficients to estimates of reference evapotranspiration, but this does not account for changes in vine conductance associated with water stress, nor differences thought to exist between varieties. The response of bulk stomatal conductance to daily weather variability and seasonal drought stress was studied on Cabernet-Sauvignon, Merlot, Tempranillo, Ugni blanc, and Semillon vines in a non-irrigated vineyard in Bordeaux France. Whole vine sap flow, temperature and humidity in the vine canopy, and net radiation absorbed by the vine canopy were measured on 15-minute intervals from early July through mid-September 2020, together with periodic measurement of leaf area, canopy porosity, and predawn leaf water potential. From this data, bulk stomatal conductance was calculated on 15-minute intervals, and multiple regression analysis was performed to identify key variables and their relative effect on conductance. Attention was focused on addressing multicollinearity and time-dependency in the explanatory variables and developing regression models that were readily interpretable. Variability of vapor pressure deficit over the day, and predawn water potential over the season explained much of the variability in conductance, with relative differences in response coefficients observed across the five varieties. By characterizing this conductance response, the dynamics of vine transpiration can be better parameterized in vineyard water use modeling of current and future climate scenarios.

Clones of 10 Vitis vinifera varieties: degree of inter- and intra-varietal variation and putative mechanisms underlying clonal variability

Context and purpose of the study. Intra-varietal variability for key physiological and oenologically important traits can be exploit in viticulture following the consistently higher environmental pressure driven by climate change.

The drought, the temperature, and the time: drivers of osmotic adjustment?

Context and purpose of the study. Leaf osmotic adjustment (i.e., active accumulation of osmolytes in the cells) has been reported in grapevines in response to drought and as a natural process throughout the growing season (seasonal osmotic adjustment).

Différenciation mésoclimatique des terroirs alsaciens et relation avec les paramètres du milieu naturel

The influence of climatic conditions on the development of the vine and on the quality of the wines no longer needs to be demonstrated at the scale of the vineyard, by the regional climatic characteristics, determining on this scale the viticultural potentialities (Huglin, 1978; Branas, 1946; Riou et al ., 1994); but also on a local scale, at the level of the basic terroir unit (Morlat, 1989), by the landscape differentiation of the natural environment inducing climatic variability within the same vineyard, and partly explaining differences in functioning of the vine, in connection with the processes of maturation and the quality of the wine (Becker, 1977 and 1984; Morlat, 1989 and Lebon, 1993a). According to these authors, the climatic diversity in a wine region constitutes in addition to the edaphic component, an important component of characterization of the Basic Terroir Units (UTB).