Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Résistance stomatique et caractérisation hydrique des terroirs viticoles

Résistance stomatique et caractérisation hydrique des terroirs viticoles

Abstract

La caractérisation des terroirs viticoles se fonde sur divers types de démarches :
– démarche phytoécologique
L’analyse de la répartition des populations végétales naturelles permet une caractérisation écologique des milieux cultivés aux plans thermique, hydrique et trophique; elle oriente le choix ou la sélection des plantes (ou des cépages) à cultiver (Astruc et coll., 1984, 1987; Delpoux, 1971; Jacquinet et Astruc, 1979). Cette démarche a donné de bons résultats dans les zones où la topographie est l’élément déterminant d’une différenciation écologique des terroirs.
– démarche écogéopédologique
La mise en oeuvre de ce concept analytique fait appel aux méthodes et aux techniques de la géologie, de la pédologie et de l’agronomie, pour l’étude des sols, et des systèmes racinaires. Pour les Pays de Loire et avec le Cabemet franc, Morlat (1989, 1992) a pu hiérarchiser les potentialités agroviticoles des terroirs et distinguer :
1 – des terroirs à forte potentialité viticole qui permettent d’obtenir des vins de qualité, quelles que soient les conditions climatiques du millésime
2 – des terroirs à faible potentialité viticole pour lesquels les vins obtenus présentent toujours une ou plusieurs déficiences
3 – des terroirs à potentialité variable (forte ou faible) selon la climatologie de l’année

Ces deux démarches de caractérisation des terroirs intègrent de façon indirecte le fonctionnement de la vigne,
– soit d’une manière globale pour la méthode phytoécologique,
– soit par l’intermédiaire d’un certain nombre de variables telles que le système racinaire, la précocité, la maturation des baies, pour la méthode écogéopédologique.
En fait, comme le note Morlat (1992), « un bon diagnostic de la valeur viticole d’un terroir ne peut être réalisé que si le système sol-cépage-atmosphère est considéré dans son ensemble. » Tous les aspects du fonctionnement du système doivent être considérés simultanément, ce qui n’est pas aisé.

Toutefois, parmi les fonctions physiologiques essentielles, l’alimentation hydrique constitue un élément déterminant de la qualité d’une récolte (Mériaux et coll., 1990). C’est pourquoi, nous avons effectué un suivi de la nutrition hydrique de quelques parcelles de vigne du Frontonnais pendant les phases de véraison et de maturation.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

D. VIGNES (1), P. GALLEGO (2), M. GARCIA (2), C. TOSCA (1)

(1) CESBIO, 18, Av. Edouard Belin, 31055 Toulouse Cédex 
(2) ENSAT, 145 Av. de Muret, 31076 Toulouse Cédex 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (Vitis vinifera L.) berry skin flavonol and anthocyanin composition is affected by trellis systems and applied water amounts

Trellis systems are selected in wine grape vineyards to mainly maximize vineyard yield and maintain berry quality. This study was conducted in 2020 and 2021 to evaluate six commonly utilized trellis systems including a vertical shoot positioning (VSP), two relaxed VSPs (VSP60 and VSP80), a single high wire (SH), a high quadrilateral (HQ), and a guyot (GY), combined with three levels of irrigation regimes based on different crop evapotranspiration (ETc) replacements, including a 25% ETc, 50% ETc, and 100% ETc. The results indicated SH yielded the most fruits and accumulated the most total soluble solids (TSS) at harvest in 2020, however, it showed the lowest TSS in the second season. In 2020, SH and HQ showed higher concentrations in most of the anthocyanin derivatives compared to the VSPs. Similar comparisons were noticed in 2021 as well. SH and HQ also accumulated more flavonols in both years compared to other trellis systems. Overall, this study provides information on the efficacy of trellis systems on grapevine yield and berry flavonoid accumulation in a currently warming climate.

Towards adaptation to climate change in Rioja: Quality evaluation of wines obtained from Grenache x Tempranillo selections

The wine sector is of great relevance and tradition in Mediterranean countries, however, it may be most susceptible to climate change. In recent years, wine production is facing changes worldwide, both at environmental as well as commercial levels, due to global warming and the shift in consumers’ preferences. Wine growers and wine makers are in search of solutions that allow to face these new challenges. One of the most promising initiatives in the long term is the introduction of new plant materials, specifically intraspecific hybridizations between premium varieties that may improve traditional germplasm in its adaptation to climate change. These inter-varietal crosses have the potential to generate quality wines, whilst maintaining the regional typicity, and constitute an attractive alternative for the consumer due to their sensory attributes. In this study, we have evaluated wines from 29 intraspecific Garnacha x Tempranillo hybrids in two different locations, with the aim to assess their oenological potential and sensory attributes. Thirteen of the selections were white and 16 were red. Microvinifications were conducted with two or three replications depending on grape availability. Conventional oenological parameters were determined for all wines. The sensory evaluation and hedonic scores were given by five experts. Red selections obtained higher quality scores than white ones. Among the white selections with higher quality scores, GT-41 Varea and GT-159 Varea outstand, due to their high total acidity and high malic acid content. Regarding red selections, GT-57 Varea and GT-57 UR were perceived as higher in quality, highlighted for their moderate alcoholic and high anthocyanin content. Our results indicate that intraspecific hybridization may be a powerful tool for adapting traditional cultivars to climate change in Rioja.

Understanding graft union formation by using metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches during the first days after grafting in grapevine

Since the arrival of Phyloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifolia) in Europe at the end of the 19th century, grafting has become essential to cultivate Vitis vinifera. Today, grafting provides not only resistance to this aphid, but it used to adapt the cultivars according to the type of soil, environment, or grape production requirements by using a panel of rootstocks. As part of vineyard decline, it is often mentioned the importance of producing quality grafted grapevine to improve vineyard longevity, but, to our knowledge, no study has been able to demonstrate that grafting has a role in this context. However, some scion/rootstock combinations are considered as incompatible due to poor graft union formation and subsequently high plant mortality soon after grafting. In a context of climate change where the creation of new cultivars and rootstocks is at the centre of research, the ability of new cultivars to be grafted is therefore essential. The early identification of graft incompatibility could allow the selection of non-viable plants before planting and would have a beneficial impact on research and development in the nursery sector. For this reason, our studies have focused on the identification of metabolic and transcriptomic markers of poor grafting success during the first days/week after grafting; we have identified some correlations between some specialized metabolites, especially stilbenes, and grafting success, as well as an accumulation of some amino acids in the incompatible combination. The study of the metabolome and the transcriptome allowed us to understand and characterise the processes involved during graft union formation.

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include:
• New user interface
• User authentication
• Batch analysis of multiple images
• Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features
• Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard.
Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.