Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Résistance stomatique et caractérisation hydrique des terroirs viticoles

Résistance stomatique et caractérisation hydrique des terroirs viticoles

Abstract

La caractérisation des terroirs viticoles se fonde sur divers types de démarches :
– démarche phytoécologique
L’analyse de la répartition des populations végétales naturelles permet une caractérisation écologique des milieux cultivés aux plans thermique, hydrique et trophique; elle oriente le choix ou la sélection des plantes (ou des cépages) à cultiver (Astruc et coll., 1984, 1987; Delpoux, 1971; Jacquinet et Astruc, 1979). Cette démarche a donné de bons résultats dans les zones où la topographie est l’élément déterminant d’une différenciation écologique des terroirs.
– démarche écogéopédologique
La mise en oeuvre de ce concept analytique fait appel aux méthodes et aux techniques de la géologie, de la pédologie et de l’agronomie, pour l’étude des sols, et des systèmes racinaires. Pour les Pays de Loire et avec le Cabemet franc, Morlat (1989, 1992) a pu hiérarchiser les potentialités agroviticoles des terroirs et distinguer :
1 – des terroirs à forte potentialité viticole qui permettent d’obtenir des vins de qualité, quelles que soient les conditions climatiques du millésime
2 – des terroirs à faible potentialité viticole pour lesquels les vins obtenus présentent toujours une ou plusieurs déficiences
3 – des terroirs à potentialité variable (forte ou faible) selon la climatologie de l’année

Ces deux démarches de caractérisation des terroirs intègrent de façon indirecte le fonctionnement de la vigne,
– soit d’une manière globale pour la méthode phytoécologique,
– soit par l’intermédiaire d’un certain nombre de variables telles que le système racinaire, la précocité, la maturation des baies, pour la méthode écogéopédologique.
En fait, comme le note Morlat (1992), « un bon diagnostic de la valeur viticole d’un terroir ne peut être réalisé que si le système sol-cépage-atmosphère est considéré dans son ensemble. » Tous les aspects du fonctionnement du système doivent être considérés simultanément, ce qui n’est pas aisé.

Toutefois, parmi les fonctions physiologiques essentielles, l’alimentation hydrique constitue un élément déterminant de la qualité d’une récolte (Mériaux et coll., 1990). C’est pourquoi, nous avons effectué un suivi de la nutrition hydrique de quelques parcelles de vigne du Frontonnais pendant les phases de véraison et de maturation.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

D. VIGNES (1), P. GALLEGO (2), M. GARCIA (2), C. TOSCA (1)

(1) CESBIO, 18, Av. Edouard Belin, 31055 Toulouse Cédex 
(2) ENSAT, 145 Av. de Muret, 31076 Toulouse Cédex 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Optimizing stomatal traits for future climates

Stomatal traits determine grapevine water use, carbon supply, and water stress, which directly impact yield and berry chemistry. Breeding for stomatal traits has the strong potential to improve grapevine performance under future, drier conditions, but the trait values that breeders should target are unknown. We used a functional-structural plant model developed for grapevine (HydroShoot) to determine how stomatal traits impact canopy gas exchange, water potential, and temperature under historical and future conditions in high-quality and hot-climate California wine regions (Napa and the Central Valley). Historical climate (1990-2010) was collected from weather stations and future climate (2079-99) was projected from 4 representative climate models for California, assuming medium- and high-emissions (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). Five trait parameterizations, representing mean and extreme values for the maximum stomatal conductance (gmax) and leaf water potential threshold for stomatal closure (Ψsc), were defined from meta-analyses. Compared to mean trait values, the water-spending extremes (highest gmax or most negative Ysc) had negligible benefits for carbon gain and canopy cooling, but exacerbated vine water use and stress, for both sites and climate scenarios. These traits increased cumulative transpiration by 8 – 17%, changed cumulative carbon gain by -4 – 3%, and reduced minimum water potentials by 10 – 18%. Conversely, the water-saving extremes (lowest gmax or least negative Ψsc) strongly reduced water use and stress, but potentially compromised the carbon supply for ripening. Under RCP 8.5 conditions, these traits reduced transpiration by 22 – 35% and carbon gain by 9 – 16% and increased minimum water potentials by 20 – 28%, compared to mean values. Overall, selecting for more water-saving stomatal traits could improve water-use efficiency and avoid the detrimental effects of highly negative canopy water potentials on yield and quality, but more work is needed to evaluate whether these benefits outweigh the consequences of minor declines in carbon gain for fruit production.

The modification of cultural practices in grapevine cv. Syrah, does it modify the characteristics of the musts?

The work shows the results of a year of experimentation (2020) in a Syrah variety vineyard in La Roda (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). The trial approach was on a randomized block design with two factors: Irrigation (I) and Pruning (P).
Irrigation schedules were adjusted to apply amounts close to 1,500 m3/ha. With this provision, 2 different irrigation treatments were proposed: I1) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to post-harvest (providing at least 20 % of the total amount of irrigation water to be provided post-harvest); I2) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to harvest (usual irrigation practice in the study area). Pruning was proposed with two treatments, one at the end of January (P1), which is pruning on a conventional date; and P2) pruning carried out at the beginning of budding. In total, 4 repetitions were designed with 4 elementary plots, each one of them representing one of the proposed treatments (I1P1; I1P2; I2P1; I2P2). In total, 16 plots were worked on and each elementary plot consisted of 30 strains, distributed in 3 lines.
The productive response was evaluated with the yield results of the harvest harvested at 23 ºBrix. The qualitative response was measured in the musts through the indices of technological (acidity, pH and potassium) and phenolic maturity and aromatic compounds in free and glycosylated fractions. The treatments tested had, in general, an effect on the different variables analyzed.

Co-design and evaluation of spatially explicit strategies of adaptation to climate change in a Mediterranean watershed

Climate change challenges differently wine growing systems, depending on their biophysical, sociological and economic features. Therefore, there is a need to locally design and evaluate adaptation strategies combining several technical options, and considering the local opportunities and constraints (e.g. water access, wine typicity). The case study took place in a typical and heterogeneous Mediterranean vineyard of 1,500 ha in the South of France. We developed a participatory modeling approach to (1) conceptualize local climate change issues and design spatially explicit adaptation strategies with stakeholders, (2) numerically evaluate their effects on phenology, yield and irrigation needs under the high-emissions climate change scenario RCP 8.5, and (3) collectively discuss simulation results. We organized five sets of workshops, with in-between modeling phases. A process-based model was developed that allowed to evaluate the effects of six technical options (late varieties, irrigation, water saving by reducing canopy size, adjusting cover cropping, reducing density, and shading) with various distributions in the watershed, as well as vineyard relocation. Overall, we co-designed three adaptation strategies. Delay harvest strategy with late varieties showed little effects on decreasing air temperature during ripening. Water constraint limitation strategy would compensate for production losses if disruptive adaptations (e.g. reduced density) were adopted, and more land got access to irrigation. Relocation strategy would foster high premium wine production in the constrained mountainous areas where grapevine is less impacted by climate change. This research shows that a spatial distribution of technical changes gives room for adaptation to climate change, and that the collaboration with local stakeholders is a key to the identification of relevant adaptation. Further research should explore the potential of adaptation strategies based on soil quality improvement and on water stress tolerant varieties.

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Climate, Viticulture, and Wine … my how things have changed!

The planet is warmer than at any time in our recorded past and increasing greenhouse emissions and persistence in the climate system means that continued warming is highly likely. Climate change has already altered the basic framework of growing grapes for wine production worldwide and will likely continue to do so for years to come. The wine sector can continue to play an important role in leading the agricultural sector in addressing climate change. From developing on…