Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Parcours de découverte des terroirs viticoles

Parcours de découverte des terroirs viticoles

Abstract

A partir des recherches conduites sur la caractérisation des terroirs viticoles par des chercheurs de l’Unité de Recherches Vigne et Vin (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) du Centre INRA d’Angers, Terre des Sciences, le Centre de Culture Scientifique et Technique d’Angers (CCSTA) a mis au point un parcours de découverte d’une journée dans le vignoble angevin avec une approche pluridisciplinaire. Différents aspects des disciplines suivantes sont abordées au cours de cette journée : géologie, pédologie, climatologie, lecture du paysage, biologie, écologie, viticulture, oenologie, biochimie, analyse sensorielle. L’histoire des sciences et des techniques, la méthodologie développée par les chercheurs (1), l’histoire des idées au travers des écrits scientifiques, et l’éducation du goût seront intégrés ainsi que, bien sûr, les dimensions commerciale et économique.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Issue: Terroir 1996

Type : Poster

Authors

J.L GAIGNARD (1), D. POUIT (2)

(1) INRA Centre d’Angers
42, rue Georges Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé cedex
(2) CCST Angers – France

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Accumulation of polyphenols in Barbera and Nebbiolo leaves during the vegetative season

Grapevine berries produce thousands of secondary metabolites of diverse chemical nature that have been largely detailed in the past due to their importance for defining wine quality. The wide Vitis vinifera diversity, resulting in thousands of different varieties well detailed in many studies regarding berries, is still not investigated in vegetative organs, leaves in particular. Deepening knowledge related to this aspect could be of great interest for many reasons (for example the possibility of using leaf extract for pharmaceutical, cosmetic and nutrition purposes) but, above all, for understanding the susceptibility of different grapevine varieties to pathogens.

Do natural wines differ from conventionally-produced wines?

In recent years, consumer awareness for consuming healthy and environmental sustainability products has considerably increased [1]. In an ever-changing and highly competitive environment such as the wine sector, production of wines without sulfites, or biodynamic, organic or vegan wines, has experienced an important increase to meet the new needs of consumers [2,3]. Beyond these categories of regulated products, a new concept has emerged: natural wines (NW), for which there is not an established definition or legal regulation. Rather, producers have a personal idea of naturalness under the premise of applying minimal intervention from grape to wine production [4]. In this context, it is hypothesized that self-defined natural wines are different from conventional wines (CW) in their sensory and chemical profile. The predicament of natural wine is based on anecdotic declarations and assumes that minimal intervention guarantees the production of wines with organoleptic properties able to express the “terroir” and thus promote wine diversity, plurality and sensory typicity against the risk of standardization of CW.

Discrimination of South Tyrol’s wines by their cultivation practices: A detailed mass spectrometric approach

Climate change is having a profound effect on viticulture by altering the conditions under which vines grow, leading to increased water stress and earlier harvests, which in turn affect the quality and character of wines [1].

ECA&D: A high-resolution dataset for monitoring climate change and effects on viticulture in Europe

Climate change will lead to persistent changes in temperature and precipitation patterns which will affect the characteristics of wine produced in each region.

Vitis vinifera ‘Ráthay’ on the rootstocks ‘Kober 5BB’, ‘Fercal’, and ‘3309 C’: results of a long-term field trial

Context and purpose of the study. Ráthay is an Austrian red quality wine variety with increased resistance to fungi.