IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Differentiation and characterization of Spanish fortified wines with protected designation of origin based on volatiles using multivariate approaches

Differentiation and characterization of Spanish fortified wines with protected designation of origin based on volatiles using multivariate approaches

Abstract

Spain is one of the main producers of high-quality fortified wines. Particularly some of them elaborated in Andalusia have acquired a great prestige for being unique due to their production in a specific geographical area with traditional methods, the grape variety used, the climate and the soil. Such is their distinguishing feature achieved that they have been protected by the European Union with the indication “Protected Designation of Origin” (PDO). Thus, there are four PDO of fortified wines in Andalucía (‘Condado de Huelva’, ‘Jerez Xérès Sherry’, ‘Manzanilla Sanlúcar de Barrameda’, and ‘Montilla-Moriles’). Furthermore, within each PDO,there are different categories according to their particular characteristics and winemaking conditions such as the aging process. Hence, Finos and Manzanillas wines are produced by biological aging, Oloroso wines by oxidative aging, and wines such as Amontillado and Palo Cortado wines share both types of aging during their production. The great diversity of high-quality wines on the market and the increase in their demand makes it is necessary to characterize them in order to establish quality and authenticity control parameters, thus protecting and assuring consumers that the product they are purchasing on the market has the quality and characteristics declared. The focus on the aroma has been object of study for the characterization of these products since it is considered one of the most relevant quality criteria for wine. Despite the fact that some authors have previously studied the volatile profile of some of these fortified PDO wines, scarce research has been done to assess the volatile composition of the four Spanish PDO fortified wines [1,2,3]. In this context, the aim of this work was to study and compare the characteristic volatile profile of different fortified wines from each Spanish PDO by headspace solid phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME) in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Chemometric techniques such as PARAFAC2 was applied to reduce the problems associated with GC-MS analysis of complex mixtures and to obtain the maximum information of the volatile profile for distinguishing between samples. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were applied to study the differentiation of the samples. Volatile composition of the samples allowed the differentiation and classification of the different fortified wines based on the presence of certain compounds which could be considered markers of quality and authenticity for each PDO and type of wine.

References

[1] García-Moreno et al., (2021). LWT – Food Science and Technology,140,110706.
[2] Hevia, K., Castro, R., Natera, R., González-García, J. A., Barroso, C. G., & Durán-Guerrero, E. (2016). Chromatographia, 79(11–12), 763–771.
[3] Zea, L., Moyano, L., Moreno, J., Cortes, B., & Medina, M. (2001). Food Chemistry, 75(1), 79–84.

DOI:

Publication date: June 27, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Ubeda Cristina¹, Cortejosa David¹, Morales María Lourdes¹, Callejón Raquel María¹ and Ríos-Reina Rocío¹

1Departamento Nutrición y Bromatología, Toxicología y Medicina Legal. Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla. Sevilla, Spain

Contact the author

Keywords

fortified wines; protected designation of origin; ageing; volatile compounds; SPME

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Climate, Viticulture, and Wine … my how things have changed!

The planet is warmer than at any time in our recorded past and increasing greenhouse emissions and persistence in the climate system means that continued warming is highly likely. Climate change has already altered the basic framework of growing grapes for wine production worldwide and will likely continue to do so for years to come. The wine sector can continue to play an important role in leading the agricultural sector in addressing climate change. From developing on…

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Delaying irrigation initiation linearly reduces yield with little impact on maturity in Pinot noir

When to initiate irrigation is a critical annual management decision that has cascading effects on grapevine productivity and wine quality in the context of climate change. A multi-site trial was begun in 2021 to optimize irrigation initiation timing using midday stem water potential (ψstem) thresholds characterized as departures from non-stressed baseline ψstemvalues (Δψstem). Plant material, vine and row spacing, and trellising systems were concomitant among sites, while vine age, soil type, and pruning systems varied. Five target Δψstem thresholds were arranged in an RCBD and replicated eight times at each site: 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 MPa (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively). When thresholds were reached, plots were irrigated weekly at 70% ETc. Yield components and berry composition were quantified at harvest. To better generalize inferences across sites, data were analyzed by ANOVA using a mixed model including site as a random factor. Across sites, irrigation was initiated at Δψstem = 0.24, 0.50, 0.65, 0.93, and 0.98 MPa for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Consistent significant negative linear trends were found for several key yield and berry composition variables. Yield decreased by 12.9, 15.9, 19.5, and 27.4% for T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively, compared to T1 (p < 0.0001) across sites that were driven by similarly linear reductions in berry weight (p < 0.0001). Comparatively, berry composition varied little among treatments. Juice total soluble solids decreased linearly from T1 to T5 – though only ranged 0.9 Brix (p = 0.012). Because producers are paid by the ton, and contracts simply stipulate a target maturity level, first-year results suggest that there is no economic incentive to induce moderate water deficits before irrigation initiation, regardless of vineyard site. Subsequent years will further elucidate the carryover effects of delaying irrigation initiation on productivity over the long term.

Optimizing stomatal traits for future climates

Stomatal traits determine grapevine water use, carbon supply, and water stress, which directly impact yield and berry chemistry. Breeding for stomatal traits has the strong potential to improve grapevine performance under future, drier conditions, but the trait values that breeders should target are unknown. We used a functional-structural plant model developed for grapevine (HydroShoot) to determine how stomatal traits impact canopy gas exchange, water potential, and temperature under historical and future conditions in high-quality and hot-climate California wine regions (Napa and the Central Valley). Historical climate (1990-2010) was collected from weather stations and future climate (2079-99) was projected from 4 representative climate models for California, assuming medium- and high-emissions (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). Five trait parameterizations, representing mean and extreme values for the maximum stomatal conductance (gmax) and leaf water potential threshold for stomatal closure (Ψsc), were defined from meta-analyses. Compared to mean trait values, the water-spending extremes (highest gmax or most negative Ysc) had negligible benefits for carbon gain and canopy cooling, but exacerbated vine water use and stress, for both sites and climate scenarios. These traits increased cumulative transpiration by 8 – 17%, changed cumulative carbon gain by -4 – 3%, and reduced minimum water potentials by 10 – 18%. Conversely, the water-saving extremes (lowest gmax or least negative Ψsc) strongly reduced water use and stress, but potentially compromised the carbon supply for ripening. Under RCP 8.5 conditions, these traits reduced transpiration by 22 – 35% and carbon gain by 9 – 16% and increased minimum water potentials by 20 – 28%, compared to mean values. Overall, selecting for more water-saving stomatal traits could improve water-use efficiency and avoid the detrimental effects of highly negative canopy water potentials on yield and quality, but more work is needed to evaluate whether these benefits outweigh the consequences of minor declines in carbon gain for fruit production.