IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Discrimination of monovarietal Italian red wines using derivative voltammetry

Discrimination of monovarietal Italian red wines using derivative voltammetry

Abstract

Identification of specific analytical fingerprints associated to grape variety, origin, or vintage is of great interest for wine producers, regulatory agencies, and consumers. However, assessing such varietal fingerprint is complex, time consuming, and requires expensive analytical techniques. Voltammetry is a fast, cheap, and user-friendly analytical tool that has been used to investigate and measure wine phenolics. In this work linear sweep voltammetry with different multivariate analysis tools (PCA, LDA, KNN, Random Forest, SVM) has been exploited to discriminate and classify Italian red wines from 10 different varieties.A total of 131 monovarietal Italian red wines vinified in 2015 or 2016 were collected from wineries across Italy. The varieties are: Aglianico, Cannonau, Corvina, Montepulciano, Nebbiolo, Primitivo, Raboso, Sagrantino, Sangiovese, and Teroldego. The wines of the same variety came from the same region. Linear sweep voltammograms were collected using a PalmSense3 potentiostat and disposable Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. The derivative voltammograms were obtained with a Savitzky Golay smoothing filter.The results obtained indicated a great diversity of voltammetric responses, but with raw data it was not possible to identify electrochemical features that discriminated the varieties. To obtain a higher discriminant ability first and second order derivative voltammogram were built.The second order derivative voltammograms (2DV) show similar trends within the same variety, in particular the varieties appear to be divided by the potential and intensity of the first peak (180-370 mV).From the PCA of 2DV (explained variance 78% with the first two components) 3 regions of the voltammograms that mainly contribute to PC1 and 4 to PC2 can be identified. Five of these regions (3 for PC1 and 2 for PC2) are at potentials lower than 600 mV, the region associated to the more easily oxidizable compounds. PC1 vs PC2 of the second order derivative voltammetry shows 3 groups with a visible separation of Nebbiolo and Teroldego from the other varieties.The best classification result has been obtained with a PCA-LDA of 2DV using the first 5 PC scores as predictors with an overall accuracy in calibration of 77.9% and an overall accuracy in prediction of 66.7%. The best accuracy has been obtained for varieties Nebbiolo, Teroldego and Sangiovese. The classification of two varieties (Cannonau and Primitivo) resulted problematic both in calibration and in prediction. To conclude, linear sweep voltammetry coupled to chemometric can be a suitable analytical tool technique for the classification of monovarietal red wines in a fast, cheap, and easy-to-use way. In addition, second-order derivative deconvolution of the voltammograms has been proven to be a suitable data pre-processing method for the interpretation of voltammograms from complex matrixes that are rich in oxidable compounds such as red wine.

DOI:

Publication date: June 27, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Vanzo Leonardo1, Slaghenaufi Davide1, Nouvelet Lea1, Curioni Andrea2, Giacosa Simone3, Mattivi Fulvio4, Moio Luigi5 and Versari Andrea5

1Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Italy
2Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Italy
3Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
4Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Italy
5Department of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Avellino, Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

Derivative Voltammetry, Varietal Identity, Wine Fingerprinting, Authenticity, Red Wine

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

The concept of terroir: what place for microbiota?

Microbes play key roles on crop nutrient availability via biogeochemical cycles, rhizosphere interactions with roots as well as on plant growth and health. Recent advances in technologies, such as High Throughput Sequencing Techniques, allowed to gain deeper insight on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with soil, rhizosphere and plant phyllosphere. Over the past 10 years, numerous scientific studies have been carried out on the microbial component of the vineyard. Whether the soil or grape compartments have been taken into account, many studies agree on the evidence of regional delineations of microbial communities, that may contribute to regional wine characteristics and typicity. Some authors proposed the term “microbial terroir” including “yeast terroir” for grapes to describe the connection between microbial biogeography and regional wine characteristics. Many factors are involved in terroir including climate, soil, cultivar and human practices as well as their interactions. Studies considering “microbial terroir” greatly contributed to improve our knowledge on factors that shape the vineyard microbial structure and diversity. However, the potential impact of “microbial terroir” on wine composition has yet not received strong scientific evidence and many questions remain to be addressed, related to the functional characterization of the microbial community and its impact on plant physiology and grape composition, the origins and interannual stability of vineyard microbiota, as well as their impact on wine sensorial attributes. The presentation will give an overview on the role of microbiota as a terroir component and will highlight future perspectives and challenges on this key subject for the wine industry.

De novo Vitis champinii whole genome assembly allows rootstock-specific identification of potential candidate genes for drought and salt tolerance

Vitis champinii cultivars Ramsey and Dog-ridge are main choices for rootstocks to adapt viticulture in semi-arid and arid regions thanks to their distinctive tolerance to drought and salinity. However, genetic studies on non-vinifera rootstocks have heavily relied on the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) reference genome, which difficulted the assessment of the genetic variation between rootstock species and grapevines. In the present study, this limitation is addressed by introducing a novo phased genome assembly and annotation of Vitis champinii. This new Vitis champinii genome was employed as reference for mapping RNA-seq reads from the same species under drought and salt stresses, and for comparison the same reads were also mapped to the Vitis vinifera PN40024.V4 reference genome. A significant increase in alignment rate was gained when mapping Vitis champinii RNA-seq reads to its own genome, compared to the Vitis vinifera PN40024.V4 reference genome, thus revealing the expression levels of genes specific to Vitis champinii. Moreover, differences in coding sequences were observed in ortholog genes between Vitis champinii and Vitis vinifera, which therefore challenges previous differential expression analyses performed between contrasting Vitis genotypes on the same gene from the Vitis vinifera genome. Genes with possible implications in drought and salt tolerance have been identified across the genome of Vitis champinii, and the same genomic data can potentially guide the discovery of candidate genes specific from Vitis champinii for other traits of interest, therefore becoming a valuable resource for rootstock breeding designs, specially towards increased drought and salinity due to climate change.

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

The impact of sustainable management regimes on amino acid profiles in grape juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids

One of the biggest challenges of agriculture today is maintaining food safety and food quality while providing ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation, pest and disease control, ensuring water quality and supply, and climate regulation. Organic farming was shown to promote biodiversity and carbon sequestration, and is therefore seen as one possibility of environmentally friendly production. Consumers expect organically grown crops to be free from chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers and often presume that the quality of organically grown crops is different or higher compared to conventionally grown crops. Integrated, organic, and biodynamic viticulture were compared in a replicated field trial in Geisenheim, Germany (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling). Amino acid profiles in juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids were monitored over three consecutive seasons beginning 7 years after conversion to organic and biodynamic viticulture, respectively. In addition, parameters such as soil nutrient status, yield, vigor, canopy temperature, and water stress were monitored to draw conclusions on reasons for the observed changes. Results revealed that the different sustainable management regimes highly differed in their amino acid profiles in juice and also in their skin flavonol content, whereas differences in the flavanol and hydroxycinnamic acid content were less pronounced. It is very likely that differences in nutrient status and yield determined amino acid profiles in juice, although all three systems showed similar amounts of mineralized nitrogen in the soil. Canopy structure and temperature in the bunch zone did not differ among treatments and therefore cannot account for the observed differences in favonols. A different light exposure of the bunches in the respective systems due to differences in vigor together with differences in berry size and a different water status of the vines might rather be responsible for the increase in flavonol content under organic and biodynamic viticulture.