WAC 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 WAC 9 WAC 2022 9 3 - WAC - Posters 9 Bioprotection and oenological tannins association to protect Rosé wine color

Bioprotection and oenological tannins association to protect Rosé wine color

Abstract

The bioprotection of musts or grapes is a strategy for limiting sulfiting during winemaking and more specifically at pre-fermentative step. The most preconized yeasts in bioprotection mainly belong to Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Torulaspora delbrueckii species. While previous studies have demonstrated that bioprotectant non-Saccharomyces strains were able to protect musts and wines against microbial spoilage as well as sulfites, they cannot protect must against oxidation which appears to be the main limit of this practice.

A combination of antimicrobial activity through bioprotection (inoculation of a Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain on grapes) and the antioxidant properties of low amounts of sulfites or enological tannins have been tested in order to replace or diminish SO2 addition in rosé winemaking (grape variety Pinot Noir) at pre-fermentative steps. This experiment was carried out under cellar condition. Two enological tannins were tested: quebracho tannins belonging to the condensed tannins family and gall nuts tannins belonging to the hydrolysable gallotannins family. Results showed that combination of bioprotection with enological tannins protected rosé wine color similarly as the combination with SO2, which was not the case with bioprotection alone. The color differences observed cannot be explained neither by anthocyanins concentration, nor by phenolic composition of wines. Quebracho tannins seemed more efficient than gall nuts tannins to protect the color of bioprotected rosé wines.

DOI:

Publication date: June 27, 2022

Issue: WAC 2022

Type: Article

Authors

Maelys Puyo, Scott Simonin, Géraldine Klein, Jordi Ballester, Natalia Quijada-Morin, Hervé Alexandre, Raphaëlle Tourdot-Marechal

Presenting author

Maelys Puyo – UMR Procédés Alimentaires et Microbiologiques, Université de Bourgogne Franche- Comté/AgroSup Dijon, Institut Universitaire de la Vigne et du Vin Jules Guyot, rue Claude Ladrey, BP 27877, F-21000 Dijon, France

UMR Procédés Alimentaires et Microbiologiques, Université de Bourgogne Franche- Comté/AgroSup Dijon, Institut Universitaire de la Vigne et du Vin Jules Guyot, rue Claude Ladrey, BP 27877, F-21000 Dijon, France | Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, UMR 6265 CNRS, UMR 1324 INRAUniversité de Bourgogne Franche Comté, 9 E Boulevard Jeanne d’Arc, F-21000 Dijon, France

Contact the author

Keywords

Bioprotection – Color – Rosé wine – Enological tannins

Tags

IVES Conference Series | WAC 2022

Citation

Related articles…

Yeast derivatives: a promising alternative in wine oxidation prevention?

Oxidation processes constitute a main problem in winemaking. Oxidation result in color browning and varietal aroma loss, which are key attributes of wine organoleptic quality

Effects of grapevine mycorrhizal association on fine root dynamics depend on rootstock genotype

Context and Purpose of the study. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) symbiosis with grapevines is a key component of vineyard ecosystems.

The impact of delayed grapevine budbreak on lemberger wine sensory compounds under variable weather conditions

Spring freeze events threaten grape production globally. As grape buds emerge from dormancy in spring, freezing temperatures have the potential to damage green tissues, decreasing yield potential and compromising fruit quality by harvest.

Flavanol glycosides in grapes and wines : the key missing molecular intermediates in condensed tannin biosynthesis ?

Polyphenols are present in a wide variety of plants and foods such as tea, cacao and grape1. An important sub-class of these compounds is the flavanols present in grapes and wines as monomers (e.g (+)-catechin or (-)-epicatechin), or polymers also called condensed tannins or proanthocyanidins. They have important antioxidant properties2 but their biosynthesis remains partly unknown. Some recent studies have focused on the role of glycosylated intermediates that are involved in the transport of the monomers and may serve as precursors in the polymerization mechanism3, 4. The global objective of this work is to identify flavanol glycosides in grapes or wines, describe their structure and determine their abundance during grape development and in wine.

Optimizing stomatal traits for future climates

Stomatal traits determine grapevine water use, carbon supply, and water stress, which directly impact yield and berry chemistry. Breeding for stomatal traits has the strong potential to improve grapevine performance under future, drier conditions, but the trait values that breeders should target are unknown. We used a functional-structural plant model developed for grapevine (HydroShoot) to determine how stomatal traits impact canopy gas exchange, water potential, and temperature under historical and future conditions in high-quality and hot-climate California wine regions (Napa and the Central Valley). Historical climate (1990-2010) was collected from weather stations and future climate (2079-99) was projected from 4 representative climate models for California, assuming medium- and high-emissions (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). Five trait parameterizations, representing mean and extreme values for the maximum stomatal conductance (gmax) and leaf water potential threshold for stomatal closure (Ψsc), were defined from meta-analyses. Compared to mean trait values, the water-spending extremes (highest gmax or most negative Ysc) had negligible benefits for carbon gain and canopy cooling, but exacerbated vine water use and stress, for both sites and climate scenarios. These traits increased cumulative transpiration by 8 – 17%, changed cumulative carbon gain by -4 – 3%, and reduced minimum water potentials by 10 – 18%. Conversely, the water-saving extremes (lowest gmax or least negative Ψsc) strongly reduced water use and stress, but potentially compromised the carbon supply for ripening. Under RCP 8.5 conditions, these traits reduced transpiration by 22 – 35% and carbon gain by 9 – 16% and increased minimum water potentials by 20 – 28%, compared to mean values. Overall, selecting for more water-saving stomatal traits could improve water-use efficiency and avoid the detrimental effects of highly negative canopy water potentials on yield and quality, but more work is needed to evaluate whether these benefits outweigh the consequences of minor declines in carbon gain for fruit production.