terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2023 9 Identifying best parameters to characterize genotypes capability of retaining adequate malic acid at harvest and in final wines

Identifying best parameters to characterize genotypes capability of retaining adequate malic acid at harvest and in final wines

Introduction

Under current climate change pressures, obtaining grapes with adequate acidity at harvest is one of the main challenges for growers, especially if the goal is producing sparkling wines. This issue arises from two main occurrences: i) higher temperatures enhance degradation of malic acid; ii) grape maturity may occur under suboptimal climatic conditions due to an advanced phenology (Palliotti et al. 2014). For this reason, the introduction of new varieties or the reconsideration of minor and insofar neglected cultivars or clones are gaining enormous interest and popularity (Palliotti et al. 2014, Poni et al. 2020, Antolìn et al. 2020). However, criteria for the identification of performing genotypes in terms of ‘acidity at harvest’ are complex. Late veraison and ripening can be inappropriate traits, since they do not necessarily mean that grapes maintain adequate acidity in relation to a satisfying sugars concentration (Palliotti et al. 2014, Frioni et al. 2020). Considering the evolution and the destination of organic acids in grapes, pre-veraison malic acid pool could represent a promising trait. In the same framework, an eventual genetic control over malic acid degradation rates could lead to different conclusions. The same can be said for the ratio between minimum acidity and starting malate abundancy, or for sugars/acidity ratio. However, any of the above-mentioned parameters seems to underestimate some of the factors involved, or in any case to provide an incomplete overview of grapes ripening.

DOI:

Publication date: June 20, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Tommaso FRIONI1*, Riccardo COLLIVASONE1, Silvia PAGANI1, Ginevra CANAVERA1, Matteo GATTI1, Mario GABRIELLI2, Stefano PONI1

1Dept. Of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, PC, Italy
2Dept. Of Sustainable Food Processing, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, PC, Italy

Contact the author*

Keywords

acidity, malic acid, phenotyping, germoplasm, wine quality

Tags

GiESCO | GIESCO 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Les préparations biodynamiques 500 et 501 ont elles un effet sur la vigne ?

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Markus Rienth a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8396

Bilan de l’impact des pratiques viticoles sur la qualité biologique des sols

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Laure Gontier a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8481

Vers des systèmes viticoles économes en pesticide. Étude du réseau DEPHY-Vigne

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Esther Fouillet a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8318

Influence du porte-greffe sur le statut minéral du greffon

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Elisa Marguerit a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8387

La balance hydrique explique davantage la diversité intravariétale du titre alcoométrique du Merlot que l’accumulation des sucres

Dans le cadre de TerclimPro 2025, Charles Romieu a présenté un article IVES Technical Reviews. Retrouvez la présentation ci-dessous ainsi que l’article associé : https://ives-technicalreviews.eu/article/view/8506