GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Investigating three proximal remote sensing techniques for vineyard yield monitoring

Investigating three proximal remote sensing techniques for vineyard yield monitoring

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Yield monitoring can provide the winegrowers with information for precise production inputs during the season, thereby, ensuring the best possible harvest. Yield estimation is currently achieved through an intensive process that is destructive and time-consuming. However, remote sensing provides a group of proximal technologies and techniques for a non-destructive and less time-consuming method for yield monitoring.The objective of this study was to analyse three different approaches, for measuring grapevine yield close to harvest. Traditional destructive measurements for yield determination were used as a reference. Each technique was tested in controlled conditions (laboratory) and field conditions (vineyard) at bunch and vine levels.

Material and methods – This study was carried out in a drip-irrigated vineyard cv. Shiraz at the Welgevallen farm (Stellenbosch University, South Africa). The Shiraz block was planted with a North-South orientation in the year 2000 (2.7m x 1.5m spacing). The vines are spur pruned on a seven-wire vertical shoot positioned system (VSP). Three proximal remote sensing techniques: a) RGB imagery (Conventional Red-Green-Blue images), b) infrared depth sensing (Kinect sensor), and c) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) were analysed for yield monitoring. The estimated yield was accomplished using bunch volume estimation in three experiments at harvest. Experiment 1 uses the Kinect and RGB imagery to estimate bunch volume based on a sample of 94 individual bunches under laboratory conditions. Experiment 2 uses Kinect and RGB imagery to estimate the volume of 21 individual bunches in-field. Experiment 3 uses Kinect, RBG imagery, and LiDAR, in-field, to estimate total yield per vine of 31 individual vines. Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 were undertaken using two canopy treatments: i) full canopy (FC), and ii) leaf removal (LR – 100% leaf removal in the bunch zone thereby exposing the bunches).

Results – The results obtained in this study show a strong correlation between the volume calculated by RGB images (2D modelling) and Kinect (3D modelling) versus the control volume of the individual bunches (Experiment 1). Experiments 2 and 3 show promising results for the three proximal remote sensing techniques studied, especially in the case of fully exposed bunches (LR treatment). Therefore, it’s possible to state the feasibility of these techniques as alternative fast and non-destructive methods for yield monitoring.

Download the PDF

DOI:

Publication date: September 28, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Chris HACKING1, Nitesh POONA1, Nicola MANZAN2, Carlos POBLETE-ECHEVERRÍA3*

1 Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
2 Dipartimento di Scienze AgroAlimentari, Ambientali e Animali, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, Udine, Italy
3 Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa

Contact the author

Keywords

grapevine, yield monitoring, non-destructive methods, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), infrared depth sensing, conventional Red Green Blue images

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Subsurface irrigation: a means to reduce chemical and water inputs in vineyards

Grape growers around the world are seeking to reduce their reliance on herbicides. However, traditional alternatives to chemical weed control do not always integrate seamlessly into established vineyard operations. Employing nonchemical weed management often requires trellis alterations, purchasing or hiring new equipment, and depending on region, may significantly increase tractor passes required to reach desired level of weed control. Critical thinking and thoughtful strategies are necessary to minimize expenditures and maintain quality during the transition away from herbicides. In this trial, irrigation was installed underground in an effort to minimize water loss due to evaporation, better direct the water to the vines, and reduce weed growth in the difficult to control undervine area.
Read More

Implications of grapevine row orientation in South Africa

Row orientation is a critical long-term viticulture practice, which may have a determining effect on grape and wine quality as well as cost efficiency on a specific terroir selected for cultivation.

Read More

Relationship between terroir and acidity for the red wine grape cultivar Malbec N or Cot N (Vitis vinifera L.) in AOC “Cahors” and “Côtes du Frontonnais “

L’étude préliminaire, réalisée sur les principaux cépages de la région Midi-Pyrénées, a montré que le Cot N possédait des teneurs en acide tartrique dans les moûts et les vins plus élevées que celles des cépages Négrette N, Tannat N, Duras N et Fer Servadou N.

Read More

Gamay And Gamaret Winemaking Processes Using Stems: Impact On The Wine Aromatic Composition.

Stems may bring various benefits to the wine such as alcoholic reduction, color protection or improvement of the tannic intensity.

Read More

Photoselective shade films affect grapevine berry secondary metabolism and wine composition

Grapevine physiology and production are challenged by forecasted increases in temperature and water deficits. Within this scenario, photoselective overhead shade films are promising tools in warm viticulture areas to overcome climate change related factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the vulnerability of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape berry to solar radiation overexposure and optimize shade film use for berry integrity. A randomized complete block design field study was conducted across two years (2020-2021) in Oakville, Napa Valley, CA, with four shade films (D1, D3, D4, D5) differing in the percent of radiation spectra transmitted and compared to an uncovered control (C0). Integrals for gas exchange parameters and mid-day stem water potential were unaffected by the shade films in 2020 and 2021. By harvest, berries from uncovered and shaded vines did not differ in their size or primary metabolism in either year. Despite precipitation exclusion during the dormant season in the shaded treatments, yield did not differ between them and the control in either season. In 2020, total skin anthocyanins (mg/g fresh mass) in the shaded treatments was greater than C0 during berry ripening and at harvest. Conversely, flavonol concentrations in 2020 were reduced in shaded vines compared to C0. The 2020 growing season highlighted the impact of heat degradation on flavonoids. Flavonoid concentrations in 2021 increased until harvest while flavonoid degradation was apparent from veraison to harvest in 2020 across shaded and control vines. Wine analyses highlighted the importance of light spectra to modify wine composition. Wine color intensity, tonality and anthocyanin values were enhanced in D4 whereas antioxidant properties were enhanced in C0 and D5 wines. Altogether, our results highlighted the need of new approaches in warm viticulture areas given the impact that composition of light has on berry and wine quality.

Read More