GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Investigating three proximal remote sensing techniques for vineyard yield monitoring

Investigating three proximal remote sensing techniques for vineyard yield monitoring

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Yield monitoring can provide the winegrowers with information for precise production inputs during the season, thereby, ensuring the best possible harvest. Yield estimation is currently achieved through an intensive process that is destructive and time-consuming. However, remote sensing provides a group of proximal technologies and techniques for a non-destructive and less time-consuming method for yield monitoring.The objective of this study was to analyse three different approaches, for measuring grapevine yield close to harvest. Traditional destructive measurements for yield determination were used as a reference. Each technique was tested in controlled conditions (laboratory) and field conditions (vineyard) at bunch and vine levels.

Material and methods – This study was carried out in a drip-irrigated vineyard cv. Shiraz at the Welgevallen farm (Stellenbosch University, South Africa). The Shiraz block was planted with a North-South orientation in the year 2000 (2.7m x 1.5m spacing). The vines are spur pruned on a seven-wire vertical shoot positioned system (VSP). Three proximal remote sensing techniques: a) RGB imagery (Conventional Red-Green-Blue images), b) infrared depth sensing (Kinect sensor), and c) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) were analysed for yield monitoring. The estimated yield was accomplished using bunch volume estimation in three experiments at harvest. Experiment 1 uses the Kinect and RGB imagery to estimate bunch volume based on a sample of 94 individual bunches under laboratory conditions. Experiment 2 uses Kinect and RGB imagery to estimate the volume of 21 individual bunches in-field. Experiment 3 uses Kinect, RBG imagery, and LiDAR, in-field, to estimate total yield per vine of 31 individual vines. Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 were undertaken using two canopy treatments: i) full canopy (FC), and ii) leaf removal (LR – 100% leaf removal in the bunch zone thereby exposing the bunches).

Results – The results obtained in this study show a strong correlation between the volume calculated by RGB images (2D modelling) and Kinect (3D modelling) versus the control volume of the individual bunches (Experiment 1). Experiments 2 and 3 show promising results for the three proximal remote sensing techniques studied, especially in the case of fully exposed bunches (LR treatment). Therefore, it’s possible to state the feasibility of these techniques as alternative fast and non-destructive methods for yield monitoring.

Download the PDF

DOI:

Publication date: September 28, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Chris HACKING1, Nitesh POONA1, Nicola MANZAN2, Carlos POBLETE-ECHEVERRÍA3*

1 Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
2 Dipartimento di Scienze AgroAlimentari, Ambientali e Animali, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, Udine, Italy
3 Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa

Contact the author

Keywords

grapevine, yield monitoring, non-destructive methods, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), infrared depth sensing, conventional Red Green Blue images

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

The start of Croatian grapevine breeding program

Modern viticulture in Croatia and the world is mainly based on the grapevine varieties susceptible to various diseases and pests, which leads to unsustainable use of large amounts of pesticides. The sustainable development of viticulture in the future will only be possible by increasing the resistance of the grapevine through the development of new resistant varieties. Breeding programs have been launched in the leading wine-growing countries with the aim of developing resistant varieties possessing high quality level. Coratia is rich in in native grapevine varieties that are the basis of wine production, and are not included in the breeding programs of other countries.
Read More

Assessing the benefits of irrigation access: the case of Southern France vineyards

Agriculture worldwide is threatened by climate change. In particular, declining water resource availability combined with increasing water demand is a key challenge in many rainfed areas, where irrigation appears to be a straightforward adaptation option. In this context, assessing the impacts of irrigation adoption on farm yields and incomes is a necessary step to reflect on the impact of both ex-post and ex-ante policies.

Read More

OmicBots – An innovative and intelligent multi-omics platform facing wine sector challenges

To face emerging competition and challenges, wine producers globally rely on precision viticulture (PV) solutions to boost productivity, enhance quality, increase profitability, and reduce the environmental impact of vineyards. Current pv methods predominantly use multispectral sensor data from several platforms (satellites or vineyard installations). However, these applications generally use data analysis strategies lacking physiological grapevine support.

Read More

Cover crops under-vine impact on grapevine performance and vineyard soil microorganisms is highly affected by edaphoclimatic conditions at a regional scale 

Soil management through cover crops can influence the cycle of nutrients, promote water infiltration, decrease erosion, and enhance the soil microbiota biodiversity, improving the grapevine performance. However, the area under the vines tends to be left bare by applying herbicides or tillage to avoid competition with the crop in semi-arid climates. Use of covers under-vine might be an alternative to these practices aiming at grapevine quality and soil health improvement. The aim of this research was to study the implications of soil management under the vines (cultivation and cover crops) on growth, yield, berry composition and soil microbial communities. A cover crop composed by a mixture of legumes was sown and compared with a control (cultivation), which includes frequent tillage to keep the soil bare, in three areas characterized by different edaphoclimatic conditions in the region of Navarra.

Read More

Impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels on the odor threshold of 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtalene (petrol off-flavor) and role of berry size and Riesling clones

1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtelene (TDN) evokes the odor of “petrol” in wine, especially in the variety Riesling. Increasing UV-radiation due to climate change intensifies formation of carotenoids in the berry skins and an increase of TDN-precursors1. Exploring new viticultural and oenological strategies to limit TDN formation in the future requires precise knowledge of TDN thresholds in different matrices. Thresholds reported in the literature vary substantially between 2 µg/L up to 20 µg/L2,3,4 due to the use of different methods. As Riesling grapes are used for very different wine styles such as dry, sweet or sparkling wines, it is essential to study the impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels.

Read More