GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Cabernet-Sauvignon ripening in Chile: follow-up study from 2012 to 2018

Cabernet-Sauvignon ripening in Chile: follow-up study from 2012 to 2018

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Temperature is a relevant parameter during vineyard development, affecting vine phenology and grape maturity. Moreover, the climate of the different Chilean valleys influences the varieties cultivated, the ripening period and the final quality of the wines. The use of growing degree days (GDD) is known worldwide for the study of climate in viticulture regions. However, little is known about the evolution of maturity and the sugar loading stop, based on this parameter. GDD, as being independent of the date variable, allows incorporating the effect of climate in the analysis. The present study was aimed to understand the variation between seasons and the effect of temperature in grape maturity and in bioclimatic index. We found correlations that allow predict the behavior of next years, based on growing degree days.

Material and methods – Temperatures were collected from national agro climatic network (AGROMET). Four meteorological stations were consulted depending on the location of the company vineyards. Growing degree days (GDD) were calculated with a base temperature of 10°C from September 1 through March 31. Huglin index, a bioclimatic index of the ripening period, was calculated using daily mean temperature, daily maximum temperature and a day length coefficient of 1, because the vineyard is placed in latitude lower 40°00´. Grape maturity was monitored once a week, recording the sugar concentration and the volume of grapes with Dyostem machine. These data was used to calculate the sugar loading dynamics and the date of sugar loading stop. In average, 145 blocks of Cabernet Sauvignon were measured from four different valleys (Maule valley (M), Curicó valley (C), Maipo Valley (Ma) and Rapel valley (R)).

Results – For the three valleys, the sugar loading stop was beginning at lower GDD for 2015 and 2017, influenced by the higher temperatures in January. But the average potential alcohol was lower in these years, reaching 12.1; 12.3; 13.1 and 11.4 %v/v at 2015 and 12.4; 11.3; 13.5 and 11.9 %v/v at 2017 for M, R, Ma y C respectively. The rate of sugar loading was higher in M and C valley than R and Ma valley for 2015 and 2017, indicating that the high temperatures affect greater R and Ma valley than the other valleys studied. Moreover, in 2017, the dynamics of maturity (mg of sugar per berry) were lower compared with 2015, due to the higher temperatures registered in Cabernet sauvignon blocks in January to April. The maximum temperatures in 2017 were 39.4°C including 13 days with temperatures over 35°C in M valley, 36°C including 7 days with temperatures over 35°C in R, 37°C including 5 days with temperatures over 35°C in Ma valley and 35.7°C including 3 days with temperatures over 35°C in C valley. These temperatures generated a blockage of vines. On the other hand, the year 2014 was the best season, with average potential alcohol at the sugar loading stop of 14.5; 13.6; 14 and 13%v/v for M, R, Ma and C valley. In 2014, the maximum quantity of sugar per berry was higher (250-350 mg of sugar per berry), perhaps because the vines have enough time to load sugars, with lower temperatures from January to April compared with the other years. A year to year comparison of the 4 valleys reveals that the maximum quantity of sugar per berry was decreasing the last three years, from 200-300 mg of sugar per berry in 2012, 2013 and 2015 to 170-260 in 2016, 2017 and 2018 approximately. Analyzing the bioclimatic index, M valley has a warm climate from 2014 onwards; C valley has a warm temperate climate from 2014 onwards and R and Ma valley has a warm climate the last two years. The data of bioclimatic index showed a tendency towards a warm climate. The GDD curves have a polynomic tendency respect to the date. These results could be used to predict GDD for 2019 and a probable date of harvest.

DOI:

Publication date: September 28, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

M.Isabel MOENNE1*, Ricardo RODRIGUEZ1, Juan CURY1, Miguel RENCORET1

VSPT Wine Group, Avenida Vitacura 2670 Piso 16, Santiago, Chile

Contact the author

Keywords

grapevine, degree day, Cabernet, Sauvignon, climate, ripening, maturity

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Elucidating vineyard site contributions to key sensory molecules: Identification of correlations between elemental composition and volatile aroma profile of site-specific Pinot noir wines

The reproducibility of elemental profile in wines produced across multiple vintages has been previously reported using grapes from a single scion clone of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir. The grapevines were grown on fourteen different vineyard sites, from Oregon to southern California in the U.S.A., which span distances from approximately hundreds of meters to 1450 km, while elevations range from near sea level to nearly 500 m. In addition, sensorial (i.e. aroma, taste, and mouthfeel) and chemical (i.e. polyphenolic and volatile) differences across the different vineyard sites have also been observed among these wines at two aging time points. While strong evidence exists to support that grapes grown in different regions can produce wines with unique chemical and sensorial profiles, even when a single clone is used, the understanding of growing site characteristics that result in this reproducible differentiation continues to emerge. One hypothesis is that the elemental profile that a vineyard site imparts to the grape berries and the resulting wine is an important contributor to this differentiation in chemistry and sensory of wines. For example, various classes of enzymes that catalyze the formation of key aroma compounds or their precursors require specific metals. In this work, we begin to report correlations between elemental and volatile aroma profiles of site-specific Pinot noir wines, made under standardized winemaking conditions, that have been previously shown to be distinguished separately by these chemical analyses.

Copper contamination in vineyard soils of Bordeaux: spatial risk assessment for the replanting of vines and crops

Copper (Cu) is widely and historically used in viticulture as a fungicide against mildew. Cu has a strong affinity for soil organic matter and accumulates in topsoil horizons. Thus, Cu may negatively affect soil organisms and plants, consequently reducing soil fertility and productivity. The Bordeaux vineyards have the largest vineyard surfaces (26%) within French controlled appellation and a great proportion of French wine production (around 5 million hl per year). Considering the local context of vineyard surfaces decreasing (vine uprooting) and possible new crop plantation, the issue of Cu potential toxicity rises. Therefore, the aims of this work are firstly to evaluate the Cu contamination in vineyard soils of Bordeaux, secondly to produce a risk assessment map for new vine or crop plantation. We used soil analyses from several local studies to build a database with 4496 soil horizon samples. The database was enhanced by means of pedotransfer functions in order to estimate the bioaccessible (EDTA-extractable) Cu in soils of samples without measurements. From this database, 1797 georeferenced samples with CuEDTA concentrations in the topsoil (0-50 cm depth) were used for kriging interpolation in order to produce the spatial distribution map of CuEDTA in vineyard soils. Then, the spatial distribution of Cu was crossed with vine uprooting surfaces and municipality boundaries. CuEDTAconcentrations ranged from 0.52 to 459 mg/kg and showed clear anomalies. Our results from spatial analysis showed that almost 50% of vineyard soil surfaces have CuEDTA concentrations higher than 30 mg/kg (moderate risk for new plantation) and 20% with concentrations higher than 50 mg/kg (high risk for new plantation). A decision-support map based on municipalities was realised to provide a simple tool to stakeholders concerned by land use management.

The concept of terroir: what place for microbiota?

Microbes play key roles on crop nutrient availability via biogeochemical cycles, rhizosphere interactions with roots as well as on plant growth and health. Recent advances in technologies, such as High Throughput Sequencing Techniques, allowed to gain deeper insight on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with soil, rhizosphere and plant phyllosphere. Over the past 10 years, numerous scientific studies have been carried out on the microbial component of the vineyard. Whether the soil or grape compartments have been taken into account, many studies agree on the evidence of regional delineations of microbial communities, that may contribute to regional wine characteristics and typicity. Some authors proposed the term “microbial terroir” including “yeast terroir” for grapes to describe the connection between microbial biogeography and regional wine characteristics. Many factors are involved in terroir including climate, soil, cultivar and human practices as well as their interactions. Studies considering “microbial terroir” greatly contributed to improve our knowledge on factors that shape the vineyard microbial structure and diversity. However, the potential impact of “microbial terroir” on wine composition has yet not received strong scientific evidence and many questions remain to be addressed, related to the functional characterization of the microbial community and its impact on plant physiology and grape composition, the origins and interannual stability of vineyard microbiota, as well as their impact on wine sensorial attributes. The presentation will give an overview on the role of microbiota as a terroir component and will highlight future perspectives and challenges on this key subject for the wine industry.

Impact of long term agroecological and conventional practices on subsurface soil microbiota in Macabeu and Xarel·lo vineyards

There is a growing trend on the transition from conventional to agroecological management of vineyards. However, the impact of practices, such as reduced-tillage, organic fertilization and cover crops, is not well-understood regarding the soil microbial diversity, and its relationship with the soil physicochemical properties in the subsurface depth near the rooting zone. Soil bacterial diversity is an important contributor towards plant health, productivity and response to environmental stresses. A field experiment was conducted by sampling subsurface soil bacterial community (NGS and qPCR) near to the root zone of Macabeu and Xarel·lo vineyards, located at the Penedes. 3 organic (ECO) and 3 conventional (CON) vineyards, with more than 10 years of respective management were sampled (n=5 each plot). ECO practices did not affect bacterial and fungal abundance but increased significantly the ammonium oxidizing bacteria and alpha-diversity (Inv.Simpson). Interestingly beta-diversity was significantly affected by the management strategy. ANOSIM-tests revealed a significative effect of the management (ecological vs conventional) and plot, on the soil microbial structure (ASV abundance). Main phyla depicted were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria, whose relative abundances were not affected by the management. EdgeR assay revealed a significant increase of Cyanobacteria and decrease of Gemmatimonadetes and Firmicutes phyla in ECO. Interestingly, the grapevine variety was not correlated with the soil microbial community structure. Mantel-test revealed an important correlation (Spearman) of some physicochemical parameters with the soil microbiota structure, in order of importance: texture, EC, pH Ca/Mg, Mg/P, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, SO42-, and OM. N-NH4 and NTK, which were higher in the ECO managed soils, did not correlated significantly with the soil microbiome population. The results revealed the importance of combining a deep physicochemical characterization of each replicate with the microbial diversity assessment to gain better insights on the relationship between soil microbiome and vineyard management.

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.