GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Cabernet-Sauvignon ripening in Chile: follow-up study from 2012 to 2018

Cabernet-Sauvignon ripening in Chile: follow-up study from 2012 to 2018

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Temperature is a relevant parameter during vineyard development, affecting vine phenology and grape maturity. Moreover, the climate of the different Chilean valleys influences the varieties cultivated, the ripening period and the final quality of the wines. The use of growing degree days (GDD) is known worldwide for the study of climate in viticulture regions. However, little is known about the evolution of maturity and the sugar loading stop, based on this parameter. GDD, as being independent of the date variable, allows incorporating the effect of climate in the analysis. The present study was aimed to understand the variation between seasons and the effect of temperature in grape maturity and in bioclimatic index. We found correlations that allow predict the behavior of next years, based on growing degree days.

Material and methods – Temperatures were collected from national agro climatic network (AGROMET). Four meteorological stations were consulted depending on the location of the company vineyards. Growing degree days (GDD) were calculated with a base temperature of 10°C from September 1 through March 31. Huglin index, a bioclimatic index of the ripening period, was calculated using daily mean temperature, daily maximum temperature and a day length coefficient of 1, because the vineyard is placed in latitude lower 40°00´. Grape maturity was monitored once a week, recording the sugar concentration and the volume of grapes with Dyostem machine. These data was used to calculate the sugar loading dynamics and the date of sugar loading stop. In average, 145 blocks of Cabernet Sauvignon were measured from four different valleys (Maule valley (M), Curicó valley (C), Maipo Valley (Ma) and Rapel valley (R)).

Results – For the three valleys, the sugar loading stop was beginning at lower GDD for 2015 and 2017, influenced by the higher temperatures in January. But the average potential alcohol was lower in these years, reaching 12.1; 12.3; 13.1 and 11.4 %v/v at 2015 and 12.4; 11.3; 13.5 and 11.9 %v/v at 2017 for M, R, Ma y C respectively. The rate of sugar loading was higher in M and C valley than R and Ma valley for 2015 and 2017, indicating that the high temperatures affect greater R and Ma valley than the other valleys studied. Moreover, in 2017, the dynamics of maturity (mg of sugar per berry) were lower compared with 2015, due to the higher temperatures registered in Cabernet sauvignon blocks in January to April. The maximum temperatures in 2017 were 39.4°C including 13 days with temperatures over 35°C in M valley, 36°C including 7 days with temperatures over 35°C in R, 37°C including 5 days with temperatures over 35°C in Ma valley and 35.7°C including 3 days with temperatures over 35°C in C valley. These temperatures generated a blockage of vines. On the other hand, the year 2014 was the best season, with average potential alcohol at the sugar loading stop of 14.5; 13.6; 14 and 13%v/v for M, R, Ma and C valley. In 2014, the maximum quantity of sugar per berry was higher (250-350 mg of sugar per berry), perhaps because the vines have enough time to load sugars, with lower temperatures from January to April compared with the other years. A year to year comparison of the 4 valleys reveals that the maximum quantity of sugar per berry was decreasing the last three years, from 200-300 mg of sugar per berry in 2012, 2013 and 2015 to 170-260 in 2016, 2017 and 2018 approximately. Analyzing the bioclimatic index, M valley has a warm climate from 2014 onwards; C valley has a warm temperate climate from 2014 onwards and R and Ma valley has a warm climate the last two years. The data of bioclimatic index showed a tendency towards a warm climate. The GDD curves have a polynomic tendency respect to the date. These results could be used to predict GDD for 2019 and a probable date of harvest.

DOI:

Publication date: September 28, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

M.Isabel MOENNE1*, Ricardo RODRIGUEZ1, Juan CURY1, Miguel RENCORET1

VSPT Wine Group, Avenida Vitacura 2670 Piso 16, Santiago, Chile

Contact the author

Keywords

grapevine, degree day, Cabernet, Sauvignon, climate, ripening, maturity

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Impact of climate variability and change on grape yield in Italy

Viticulture is entangled with weather and climate. Therefore, areas currently suitable for grape production can be challenged by climate change. Winegrowers in Italy already experiences the effect of climate change, especially in the form of warmer growing season, more frequent drought periods, and increased frequency of weather extremes. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of climate variability and change on grape yield in Italy to provide winegrowers the information needed to make their business more sustainable and resilient to climate change. We computed a specific range of bioclimatic indices, selected by the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV), and correlated them to grape yield data. We have worked in collaboration with some wine consortiums in northern and central Italy, which provided grape yield data for our analysis. Using climate variables from the E-OBS dataset we investigate how the bioclimatic indices changed in the past, and the impact of this change on grape productivity in the study areas. The climate impact on productivity is also investigated by using high-resolution convection-permitting models (CPMs – 2.2 horizontal resolution), with the purpose of estimating productivity in future emission scenarios. The CPMs are likely the best available option for this kind of impact studies since they allow a better representation of small-scale processes and features, explicitly resolve deep convection, and show an improved representation of extremes. In our study, we also compare CPMs with regional climate models (RCMs – 12 km horizontal resolution) to assess the added value of high-resolution models for impact studies. Further development of our study will lead to assessing the future suitability for vine cultivation and could lead to the construction of a statistical model for future projection of grape yield.

Modeling the suitability of Pinot Noir in Oregon’s Willamette Valley in a changing climate

Air temperature is the key driver of grapevine phenology and a significant environmental factor impacting yield and quality for a winegrape growing region. In this study the optimal downscaled CMIP5 ensemble for computing thegrowing season average temperature (GST) viticulture climate classification index was determined to spatially compute on a decadal basis predictions of the GST climate index and the grapevine sugar ripeness (GSR) model for Pinot Noir throughout the Willamette Valley (WV) American Viticultural Area (AVA). Forecasts for average temperature and a 220 g/L target sugar concentration level were computed using daily Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) downscaled CMIP5 historic and Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) future climate projections of minimum and maximum daily temperature. We explore spatiotemporal trends of the GST climate classification index and Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR phenology model for the WV AVA. Spatiotemporal computations of the GST climate index and Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR model enable the opportunity to explore relationships between their computed values with one intent being to provide updated GST ranges that better align with current temperature-based modeling understanding of Pinot Noir grapevine phenology and the viticultural application of LOCA CMIP5 climate projections for the WV AVA. The Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR model or the GST index with updated bounds indicate that the percent of the WV AVA area suitable for Pinot Noir production is currently at or near its peak value in the upper 80s to lower 90s of this century.

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include:
• New user interface
• User authentication
• Batch analysis of multiple images
• Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features
• Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard.
Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.

Influence of grapevine rootstock/scion combination on rhizosphere and root endophytic microbiomes

Soil is a reservoir of microorganisms playing important roles in biogeochemical cycles and interacting with plants whether in the rhizosphere or in the root endosphere. The composition of the microbial communities thus impacts the plant health. Rhizodeposits (such as sugar, organic and amino acids, secondary metabolites, dead root cells …) are released by the roots and influence the communities of rhizospheric microorganisms, acting as signaling compounds or carbon sources for microbes. The composition of root exudates varies depending on several factors including genotypes. As most of the cultivated grapevines worldwide are grafted plants, the aim of this study was to explore the influence of rootstock and scion genotypes on the microbial communities of the rhizosphere and the root endosphere. The work was conducted in the GreffAdapt plot (55 rootstocks x 5 scions), in which the 275 combinations have been planted into 3 blocks designed according to the soil resistivity. Samples of roots and rhizosphere of 10 scion x rootstock combinations were first collected in May among the blocks 2 and 3. The quantities of bacteria, fungi and archaea have been assessed in the rhizosphere by quantitative PCR, and by cultivable methods for bacteria and fungi. The communities of bacteria, fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was analyzed by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene, ITS and 28S rRNA gene, respectively. The level of mycorrhization was also evaluated using black ink coloration of newly formed roots harvested in October. The level of bacteria, fungi and archaea was dependent on rootstock and scion genotypes. A block effect was observed, suggesting that the soil characteristics strongly influenced the microorganisms from the rhizosphere and root endosphere. High-throughput sequencing of the different target genes showed different communities of bacteria, fungi and AMF associated with the scion x rootstock combinations. Finally, all the combinations were naturally mycorrhized. The root mycorrhization intensity was influenced by the rootstock genotype, but not by the scion one. Altogether, these results suggest that both rootstock and scion genotypes influence the rhizosphere and root endophytic microbiomes. It would be interesting to analyze the biochemical composition of the rhizodeposition of these genotypes for a better understanding of the processes involved in the modulation of these microbiomes. Moreover, crossing our data with the plant agronomic characteristics could provide insights into their roles on plant fitness.

Making sense of available information for climate change adaptation and building resilience into wine production systems across the world

Effects of climate change on viticulture systems and winemaking processes are being felt across the world. The IPCC 6thAssessment Report concluded widespread and rapid changes have occurred, the scale of recent changes being unprecedented over many centuries to many thousands of years. These changes will continue under all emission scenarios considered, including increases in frequency and intensity of hot extremes, heatwaves, heavy precipitation and droughts. Wine companies need tools and models allowing to peer into the future and identify the moment for intervention and measures for mitigation and/or avoidance. Previously, we presented conceptual guidelines for a 5-stage framework for defining adaptation strategies for wine businesses. That framework allows for direct comparison of different solutions to mitigate perceived climate change risks. Recent global climatic evolution and multiple reports of severe events since then (smoke taint, heatwave and droughts, frost, hail and floods, rising sea levels) imply urgency in providing effective tools to tackle the multiple perceived risks. A coordinated drive towards a higher level of resilience is therefore required. Recent publications such as the Australian Wine Future Climate Atlas and results from projects such as H2020 MED-GOLD inform on expected climate change impacts to the wine sector, foreseeing the climate to expect at regional and vineyard scale in coming decades. We present examples of practical application of the Climate Change Adaptation Framework (CCAF) to impacts affecting wine production in two wine regions: Barossa (Australia) and Douro (Portugal). We demonstrate feasibility of the framework for climate adaptation from available data and tools to estimate historical climate-induced profitability loss, to project it in the future and to identify critical moments when disruptions may occur if timely measures are not implemented. Finally, we discuss adaptation measures and respective timeframes for successful mitigation of disruptive risk while enhancing resilience of wine systems.